「decomposition」の検索結果

Hypertree decomposition approach to planning problems for reduced computational complexity

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply practical DAG decomposition, transitive-edge reduction, and reachability indexing to dense dependency graphs. Use when low width and repeated queries justify preprocessing. NOT for cyclic graphs, one-off graph checks, or exact-minimum-chain requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fundamental patterns for effective agentic behavior. Teaches decomposition, tool orchestration, error recovery, context management, quality self-assessment, and knowing when to stop. Model-agnostic principles that make any agent more effective regardless of domain. Activate on: "how should I structure this agent", "agentic workflow", "agent patterns", "multi-step task", "tool orchestration", "/agentic-patterns", "decompose this", "agent best practices", "chain of actions", "when should the agent stop", "agent loop design". NOT for: creating agent infrastructure (use agent-creator), building DAGs (use windags-architect), specific tool implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Volatility-based decomposition review. Trigger when: - Evaluating module boundaries against axes of change and business volatility. - Prompt contains: /lowy, volatility, axis of change, design decomposition, boundary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create decomposition directory structure, IA shard skeletons, and all required layer indexes from approved decomposition plan

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry point for new work. Determines the best action path or work decomposition (update existing spec, create new spec, mixed decomposition, or no spec needed) and refines ideas through structured dialogue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate process decomposition and architecture design quality before execution begins. Load when the setup-evaluator agent fires (automatic for agent-chain tasks), or when user says "evaluate this setup", "check the decomposition", "validate the architecture", "is this plan sound", "review the agent design". Catches structural errors, missing knowledge, unrealistic step ordering, and topology mismatches. Does NOT modify — only evaluates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply practical DAG decomposition, transitive-edge reduction, and reachability indexing to dense dependency graphs. Use when low width and repeated queries justify preprocessing. NOT for cyclic graphs, one-off graph checks, or exact-minimum-chain requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply practical DAG decomposition, transitive-edge reduction, and reachability indexing to dense dependency graphs. Use when low width and repeated queries justify preprocessing. NOT for cyclic graphs, one-off graph checks, or exact-minimum-chain requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fundamental patterns for effective agentic behavior. Teaches decomposition, tool orchestration, error recovery, context management, quality self-assessment, and knowing when to stop. Model-agnostic principles that make any agent more effective regardless of domain. Activate on: "how should I structure this agent", "agentic workflow", "agent patterns", "multi-step task", "tool orchestration", "/agentic-patterns", "decompose this", "agent best practices", "chain of actions", "when should the agent stop", "agent loop design". NOT for: creating agent infrastructure (use agent-creator), building DAGs (use jury_rig-architect), specific tool implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AIエージェントに任せる開発を、完了条件の定義、作業分割、実装前後の評価で進め、難易度に応じたモデル選択と費用・時間の記録まで整理するスキル。

• AIエージェントに任せる開発の計画
• 大きな変更を検証可能な作業に分けたいとき
• 実装前後の評価を比較したいとき

CLI modernization and hooks system enhancement for claude-flow v3. Implements interactive prompts, command decomposition, enhanced hooks integration, and intelligent workflow automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CLI modernization and hooks system enhancement for claude-flow v3. Implements interactive prompts, command decomposition, enhanced hooks integration, and intelligent workflow automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides a refactor, cleanup, or restructure with the right decomposition. Use when the user asks to refactor, simplify, extract, or modernize code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create branded architecture, architecture delta, IT current-state, flowchart, sequence, state machine, ER/data model, timeline, swimlane, quadrant, radar/spider, polar chart (polar/radial lollipop), loop/flywheel, nested, tree, org chart, layer stack, exploded axonometric, axonometric plan, Venn, pyramid/funnel, treemap and marimekko, heatmap, bar and dumbbell, waterfall, line (slopegraph, ridgeline, streamgraph, bump), Gantt and scatter charts (bubble, beeswarm), high-level, process, medallion, data flow, DP integration, DP security matrix, Sankey, fishbone, Wardley map, kanban, user journey, service blueprint, deployment, dependency graph, UML class, story map, or database schema diagrams as HTML/SVG/PNG, with .drawio, Mermaid, and .excalidraw import, plus lifecycle phase maps, block decomposition trees, and onboarding guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform relative value analysis on bonds by combining pricing, yield curve context, credit spreads, and scenario stress testing. Use when analyzing bond richness/cheapness, computing spread decomposition, comparing bonds, assessing bond value vs curves, or running rate shock scenarios.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performance attribution analysis — Brinson sector/stock-selection attribution, factor alpha/beta decomposition, market-timing evaluation, and benchmark comparison framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous agents are AI systems that can independently decompose goals, plan actions, execute tools, and self-correct without constant human guidance. The challenge isn't making them capable - it's making them reliable. Every extra decision multiplies failure probability. This skill covers agent loops (ReAct, Plan-Execute), goal decomposition, reflection patterns, and production reliability. Key insight: compounding error rates kill autonomous agents. A 95% success rate per step drops to 60% b

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query decomposition and multi-source search orchestration. Breaks natural language questions into targeted searches per source, translates queries into source-specific syntax, ranks results by relevance, and handles ambiguity and fallback strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chief Customer Officer advisory for startups: retention decomposition (gross retention vs NRR honesty, churn root-cause taxonomy), customer segmentation strategy (differential investment across tiers + ICP fit scoring), CS team coverage model (pooled vs named CSM thresholds + ratio math), and CS team org evolution (CS vs Support vs AM distinctions). Use when designing retention strategy, segmenting customers for differential investment, sizing CS team, or sequencing CS hires. Strategic only — does not duplicate engineering/business-growth tactical skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spec-driven feature work that freezes obligations instead of the plan: one human-reviewed plan with EARS criteria, path, entities, interface and one-way doors, then proof-backed checks, then build, then an independent Verifier. Use when the user says "tlc-spec-lean", "plan feature", "specify feature", "write the checks", "build this plan", or "verify work". Do NOT use for standalone design documents unattached to a feature, architecture decomposition analysis, or work that already has a task list or checklist to execute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects anemic domain models, validates and refactors them into rich domain models, and enforces tactical DDD patterns (Entities, Value Objects, Aggregates, Domain Services, Domain Events). Use when the user asks to validate, review, or check domain models or DDD code; detect anemia; refactor domain objects; improve encapsulation; or mentions terms like "anemic model", "rich domain", "aggregate", "value object", "domain event", "ubiquitous language", "is this good DDD", "does this follow DDD", or "check my domain". Do NOT use for module or service boundary design, architectural decomposition, strategic DDD context mapping, or code outside the domain layer (DTOs, controllers, infrastructure adapters).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Feature planning and implementation with 4 adaptive phases (Specify, Design, Tasks, Execute). Auto-sizes depth by complexity. Writes testable requirements in EARS notation, atomic tasks, atomic Conventional Commits, and requirement traceability. Ships deterministic Python validation scripts so structural gates are enforced by code, not memory. Features an independent Verifier (author != verifier, evidence-or-zero), a discrimination sensor, a decision log (STATE.md), a test-coverage matrix, and a self-improving lessons layer. Stack-agnostic and tool-agnostic. Use when (1) planning features, (2) implementing with verification and atomic commits, (3) validating an implementation against a spec. Triggers on "specify feature", "discuss feature", "design", "tasks", "implement", "validate", "verify work", "UAT", "record decision", "pause work", "resume work". Do NOT use for pure architecture decomposition analysis or standalone technical design documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan complex Blazor UI features by decomposing them into focused components. USE FOR: building a complex Blazor page with multiple sections, planning component decomposition, designing a multi-section dashboard or layout, breaking down a large UI feature into composable components, pages with sidebars and content panels, any page with 3+ distinct visual sections or multiple interacting sub-features, identifying parent-child relationships and data flow. DO NOT USE FOR: creating new Blazor projects or apps from scratch (use create-blazor-project), implementing a single individual component (use author-component), writing component code with parameters and EventCallback (use author-component), or simple single-component pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。