264 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Fill a Stage5 final remarks template using condensed discussion markdown from all reviewers and optional rating changes. Use when generating final remarks after Stage3/Stage4 discussion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search discussions, track communities, analyze posts, and discover trends on Reddit through SandBase. Use when asked for Reddit research, community analysis, trending topics, discussion monitoring, content discovery, or audience insight beyond customer-focused research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hoyeon Socratic discussion workflow for Codex. Use when the user invokes "$hoyeon-discuss", "/discuss", asks to think through an idea, challenge assumptions, clarify requirements before planning, run a deep/scored discussion, or says Korean phrases like "같이 생각해보자", "문제 정의", "이거 어떻게 생각해?", "요구사항이 불명확", or "아이디어 구체화".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured meeting summaries with action items, decisions, and key discussion points. Use when: taking meeting notes, summarizing discussions, tracking action items, or when user mentions meeting notes, minutes, action items, or needs structured meeting documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Web search, online retrieval, real-time information query, search engine search, Reddit and other community platform discussions, external site posts and trending topics. Trigger when users need to search for the latest information online, look up recent news or trends, query real-time data, research topics via search engines, browse Reddit or community discussions, discover external site posts and trending topics, obtain any online content, web search, online lookup, real-time information, news search, Reddit, trending topics, search engine. Even if the user does not explicitly say "search", trigger this skill whenever their intent involves obtaining real-time web information or verifying current facts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and revise rigorous research narratives, literature reviews, manuscript sections, citations, and figure discussions. Use for technical introductions, methods, results, discussions, review articles, abstracts, or related-work sections.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fetch the latest AI/ML news, trending open-source projects, social media discussions, and KOL (Key Opinion Leader) perspectives from 370+ curated sources. Use when the user asks about recent AI news, AI trends, what's happening in machine learning, open-source AI projects, AI Twitter/Reddit discussions, or wants a daily AI briefing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured approach to workplace conflicts, performance discussions, and challenging feedback using preparation-delivery-followup framework. Use when preparing for tough conversations, addressing conflicts, giving critical feedback, or navigating sensitive workplace discussions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitor social platforms for security threats, vulnerability discussions, and breach intelligence using Xpoz. Use when asked to "find CVE discussions", "security threat monitoring", "OSINT social media", "vulnerability intelligence", "breach mentions", or "threat intel from Twitter/Reddit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Checks the canonical upstream issue tracker, discussion forums, and open pull requests, merge requests, or equivalent change queues for existing reports, discussion, or work on a problem just discussed. Use before diagnosing, fixing, or reporting an apparent open-source problem to avoid duplicate effort and missed context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent collaboration session. Brings 2-4 agent perspectives into one discussion for architecture decisions and trade-off analysis. Use when asked "should we X or Y?", "let's discuss", or "design review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Address GitHub PR review feedback at line, file, and PR level — fetch, evaluate, fix, commit, and resolve. Use when given a PR URL, a review-comment URL, or a PR-level comment URL. Triggers: GitHub discussion URLs, "fix this review comment", "address PR feedback", "resolve PR comments", PR URLs with #discussion_, #issuecomment-, or #pullrequestreview- fragments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate strategic-consultant-grade meeting minutes from transcripts or notes in Japanese OR English (matching the source language), then run a self-review loop (max 3 iterations) that checks for internal contradictions, action-item omissions, speaker-name errors, and date/day-of-week mistakes before reporting completion. Use this skill whenever the user asks to draft meeting minutes, summarize a transcript, or document a meeting discussion — including Japanese-language transcripts (議事録 / 会議メモ / 文字起こし) and English-language transcripts.
Turns one decision discussion (meeting transcript, chat thread, email chain or notes) into a DRAFT one-page decision memo: the decision as stated, status, options considered, evidence cited, dissent recorded verbatim, owner, effective date and review date, with UNKNOWN for anything the discussion did not settle. Use when the user asks to "write up the decision", "record what we decided", "capture the decision from this thread", "draft the decision memo" or "add this to the decision log". Do not use for full minutes or action items, use transcript-to-actions instead; for a technical design decision, use architecture-decision-record; for a paper seeking a decision not yet taken, use board-paper-skeleton. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive English conversation practice partner for Japanese learners. Use this skill whenever the user wants to practice speaking English, role-play a real-life situation (hotel check-in, restaurant, airport, business meeting, technical discussion, code review, job interview, daily small talk, etc.), discuss a technical article in English, or asks how to phrase something naturally in English. Trigger on requests like 'let's practice English', 'I want to talk in English', 'role play', 'pretend you are a ___', 'discuss this article in English', 'how do I say X in English'. 英会話練習・ロールプレイ・英語表現の質問のためのスキル。「英会話したい」「英語で話そう」「ロールプレイ」「ホテルのチェックイン練習」「この記事について英語で話したい」「xxって英語でどう言う？」などのリクエストで起動する。ユーザーは音声入力で会話する想定。会話前に想定問答・頻出表現・単語を提示し、会話を開始、最後に添削まで行う。
倫理的かつ効率的な英語論文執筆を支援するスキル（水本 2025; langtech.jp/ai-writing/ に基づく）。 論文の英語化，校正，構成相談，査読対応，AI利用申告の作成を，学術的誠実性のガードレール付きで行う。 以下のような場面で必ず使用すること： 「論文の英語を直して」「英語論文を書きたい」「この段落を校正して」「査読コメントに返事を書きたい」 「AI利用の申告文を作りたい」「Introduction/Methods/Results/Discussionを書きたい」 「カバーレターを書きたい」「論文の構成を相談したい」「英文を洗練したい」 「日本語を英語にしたい」「表現の候補を出して」「時制をチェックして」 英語論文に関するあらゆる執筆支援タスクで使用する。
Monitor social platforms for security threats, vulnerability discussions, and breach intelligence using Xpoz. Use when asked to "find CVE discussions", "security threat monitoring", "OSINT social media", "vulnerability intelligence", "breach mentions", or "threat intel from Twitter/Reddit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrates group discussions between installed BMAD agents, enabling natural multi-agent conversations where each agent is a real subagent with independent thinking. Use when user requests party mode, wants multiple agent perspectives, group discussion, roundtable, or multi-agent conversation about their project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenClawのGitHub Secret Scanningアラートを調べ、IssueやPRなどに残る秘密情報の伏せ字化、コメントの削除・再作成、通知とアラート処理を進めるスキル。
DiscordのローカルアーカイブからメッセージやDMを検索し、期間を絞った確認や要約に役立てるスキル。保存データの鮮度と取得範囲も確認します。
GitHubのローカル保存データからIssueやPR、重複候補を調べ、同期状況や情報の不足を確認しながら、判断前に最新の状態を照合するスキル。
GitHubのIssueやPRを確認・作成し、コメントやレビュー、CIの実行結果を扱います。失敗ログの調査や再実行、承認されたマージの状態確認にも対応します。
メモや文字起こしなどの素材を、読者が理解しやすい順序の記事に組み立てます。導入案や段落の役割を対話で確かめ、合意した文章を別ファイルに保存するスキル。