「dora」の検索結果

Triage and resolve Fedora issues with dnf, systemd, and SELinux-aware guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy. Includes tech debt analyzer, team scaling calculator, engineering metrics frameworks, technology evaluation tools, and ADR templates. Use when assessing technical debt, scaling engineering teams, evaluating technologies, making architecture decisions, establishing engineering metrics, or when user mentions CTO, tech debt, technical debt, team scaling, architecture decisions, technology evaluation, engineering metrics, DORA metrics, or technology strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VP of Engineering advisory for startups: delivery throughput (DORA 4 metrics + bottleneck identification), engineering hiring funnel (sourcing → screen → onsite → offer conversion + time-to-fill + pipeline gap), engineering team structure (squad/tribe/chapter design + tech-lead manager-trigger thresholds), and production discipline (on-call, deployment cadence, postmortem culture). Use when sprint velocity is dropping, eng hiring is broken, team structure is unclear, or deciding when to add a tech-lead manager. NOT a CTO skill (which owns architecture) — VPE owns delivery operations and how the team ships.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:vpe-review <plan> — Throughput-first VP of Engineering interrogation of any plan that touches delivery, eng hiring, team structure, or production discipline. Use when cycle time balloons, DORA metrics slide, or before committing to an eng hiring wave or a reorg.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an ops leader (Director of CX, Head of Support, VP Ops, Head of BizOps, Head of IT ops, Head of Finance ops) is sizing ops capacity, building a headcount plan, modeling utilization risk, planning Q3 capacity or annual support capacity, or designing CS coverage — and needs Erlang-C queueing math, P90 demand sizing, shrinkage-adjusted FTE, manager-trigger thresholds, and a quarterly hiring sequence with ramp + attrition. Apply when sustained team utilization is above 80% or when the team is growing >50% in 12 months. Run before committing the headcount budget. This is NOT engineering capacity (see vpe-advisor for DORA + cycle time) and NOT strategic 3-year workforce planning (see chro-advisor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy. Use when assessing technical debt, scaling engineering teams, evaluating technologies, making architecture decisions, establishing engineering metrics, or when user mentions CTO, tech debt, technical debt, team scaling, architecture decisions, technology evaluation, engineering metrics, DORA metrics, or technology strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manually dispatch and iterate on the Release Canary workflow that smoke-tests published OpenShell artifacts (install.sh on macOS/Ubuntu/Fedora, Helm chart on kind) after each Release Dev publish. Use when changing `.github/workflows/release-canary.yml`, validating a release before tagging, debugging a canary failure, or reproducing a canary job locally. Trigger keywords - release canary, release-canary, canary failed, canary dispatch, test release canary, post-release smoke, install.sh canary, helm chart canary, kind canary, dispatch canary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MiCA compliance evidence and stablecoin risk scoring. Use when the user asks about stablecoin compliance, MiCA status, peg stability, or needs verifiable evidence for audit workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix .NET HTTPS dev certificate trust issues on Linux. Covers the full certificate lifecycle from generation to system CA bundle inclusion, with distro-specific guidance for Ubuntu, Fedora, Arch, and WSL2.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assembles genomes de novo from noisy long reads (Oxford Nanopore R9/R10/Dorado, PacBio CLR) with Flye (repeat graph), Canu (correct-trim-assemble OLC), NextDenovo, Shasta, Raven, wtdbg2, or miniasm, and reconciles bacterial assemblies into a consensus with Trycycler/Autocycler. Covers matching the input flag to the basecaller era (--nano-hq vs --nano-raw), why a raw long-read assembly is contiguous but low-QV and not finished until polished, haplotig false-duplication and purge_dups, coverage and read-N50 as non-substitutable inputs, and mid-read adapter de-chimerization. Use when assembling a bacterial or eukaryotic genome from ONT or PacBio noisy reads, choosing a long-read assembler, or diagnosing an over-collapsed or duplicated assembly. For PacBio HiFi use hifi-assembly instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decides whether and how to polish a draft genome assembly to raise consensus accuracy (QV) with read-type-matched tools - Racon and medaka (ONT consensus), dorado polish, Polypolish and pypolca (Illumina, repeat-aware), Pilon (legacy short-read), NextPolish/NextPolish2, Hapo-G (haplotype-aware), ntEdit, and DeepPolisher/PEPPER-Margin-DeepVariant for human. Covers the do-not-polish-HiFi rule, the medaka basecaller-model footgun, held-out Merqury QV as the only honest stop signal, and the haplotype-collapse trap. Use when correcting homopolymer indels or residual SNPs in a long-read assembly, deciding if a HiFi assembly needs polishing, or choosing an ONT vs hybrid vs short-read polishing chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert delivery management for release planning, deployment strategy, incident response, change management, SLA/error-budget tracking, and DORA metrics across continuous delivery pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VP of Engineering advisor on org design, productivity, quality, delivery, and capacity planning. Use when scoring engineering org health, designing the eng org, planning capacity, or building the productivity dashboard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates standalone interactive HTML "deal cards" that translate complex regulations into negotiation-ready reference tools, systematically distinguishing mandatory obligations from negotiable implementation choices. Use when the user needs an interactive regulatory guide for (1) contract negotiation support, (2) client education or internal training, (3) regulatory briefings for commercial stakeholders, or (4) structured comparison between required and flexible compliance paths. Primary focus on EU digital regulation (Data Act, AI Act, CRA, DORA, NIS2, GDPR) but the structural pattern transfers to any regulation where separating hard obligations from implementation choice is the point. Supports bilingual output where the jurisdiction calls for it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic contract negotiation strategies for technology services agreements with German/EU law specificity. Provides three-position framework (provider-favorable, balanced, client-favorable), deal-size calibration (€100K to €10M+), five-tier objection handling with regulatory leverage (GDPR, DORA, NIS2, BGB), concession packaging, and position matrices for liability, IP, payment, SLA, data protection, and termination. Use when: (1) Developing negotiation strategies for SaaS, cloud, or managed services agreements, (2) Preparing position papers and fallback positions, (3) Responding to counterparty objections, (4) Structuring concession packages that protect core economics, (5) Calibrating tactics to deal size and leverage, or (6) Applying German contract law constraints (BGB §§ 305-310 AGB, § 309 Nr. 7 liability limits, § 288 statutory interest).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a security incident, data breach, or actively exploited vulnerability raises the question "who must we notify, where, and by when?" Screens one incident across the EU reporting regimes — NIS2, GDPR, DORA, and the Cyber Resilience Act — determines which duties fire for each involved entity's roles, resolves the receiving authority per regime and member state from served national law, and produces a deadline table in which every duty, authority, and deadline is cited from official publisher text fetched live through the Ansvar Gateway MCP connector. Never answers from model memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes how multiple regulations interact for a specific product, service, or business model. Identifies where obligations overlap, reinforce, complement, duplicate, or conflict; builds a priority matrix; produces an integrated compliance timeline; and estimates the total compliance burden. Use when (1) scoping a new product or service against the full regulatory landscape before launch, (2) conducting M&A due diligence on a target's multi-regulation exposure, (3) building a strategic compliance roadmap where single-regulation analyses miss the interactions, (4) advising on complex situations where regulations touch the same conduct from different angles, or (5) estimating budget and resourcing for multi-regulation compliance. Primary coverage of EU digital regulation (GDPR, Data Act, AI Act, CRA, NIS2, DORA, DMA, DSA, ePrivacy) and national implementations; the framework extends to any jurisdiction where overlapping regulatory regimes apply to the same activity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define the delivery metrics contract for agent-assisted SDLC — DORA four plus per-stage indicators derived from artifact and git history, and the control bands that turn metric drift into a routed intake. Use when reporting cycle time, plan adherence, or defining response thresholds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CTO-level advisory - build vs buy decisions, tech debt quantification, team scaling, ADRs, technology evaluation (RICE), budget planning, TCO, vendor management, DORA/SPACE metrics

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing organizational structure (team topologies, Conway's Law alignment), mapping stakeholders by power-interest for change initiatives, defining team interface contracts (APIs, SLAs, decision rights, handoffs), assessing capability maturity (DORA, CMMC, agile maturity models), planning org restructures (functional to product teams, platform teams, shared services), or when user mentions "org design", "team structure", "stakeholder map", "team interfaces", "capability maturity", "Conway's Law", or "RACI".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix .NET HTTPS dev certificate trust issues on Linux. Covers the full certificate lifecycle from generation to system CA bundle inclusion, with distro-specific guidance for Ubuntu, Fedora, Arch, and WSL2.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

上线放行决策 / 阻断不达标交付时使用。适用于版本发布前门禁、CI/CD 自动门禁、阶段性质量评估。融合 SonarQube Quality Gate、DORA Change Failure Rate、Google Beyoncé Rule。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to deploy, operate, secure, or scale running infrastructure — cloud architecture (multi-region, VPC, FinOps), CI/CD and deployment strategies, secrets/IAM/supply-chain security, observability and SLO alerting, SRE and incident response, Kubernetes vs ECS and autoscaling, Terraform/Pulumi/CDK, or platform engineering and DORA metrics. Also for generating runbooks, pipeline configs, Terraform modules, or Kubernetes manifests. For choosing the system's architecture or stack before it runs (monolith vs microservices, which database), use software-architect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating effective skills. Use when creating a new skill or updating an existing skill that extends agent capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。