3,600 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Generate follow-up teaching moves that extend student thinking after a specific classroom response. Use when a student says something worth exploring and the teacher wants to deepen the dialogue.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The learner teaches the concept to the AI, which plays a curious novice peer and identifies gaps through authentic questions. Use when the learner wants to test their understanding — teaching forces a different kind of organisation than studying.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates a Check for Understanding (CFU) for a math topic or standard: 1–3 targeted formative items whose distractors come from documented student misconceptions, plus a teacher guide routing each likely response to a specific next instructional step. Load BEFORE asking any clarifying question about grade, standard, or topic. This skill is for math; for other subjects, help as you normally would and don't mention the skill to the user. Triggers on asks to create, write, generate, or design a check for understanding, formative check, quick check, or exit ticket for a math concept or standard, and on implicit signals like "I need to see who got it before I move on." Not a quiz, test, or practice set — a CFU is read for what it reveals, not scored, so a numbered quiz or a bare answer key is a different job. Does not create a lesson (k12-lesson-plan-creation, which brings its own exit ticket), tier one (k12-lesson-differentiation), or prepare a teacher to teach one (k12-lesson-prep).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Vendor breach notification cascade management per GDPR Article 33(2). Covers processor-to-controller notification without undue delay, escalation paths, coordinated multi-party breach response, liability allocation, and regulatory notification coordination.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and executes tabletop breach simulation exercises for testing organizational breach response capabilities. Covers scenario creation with realistic inject timelines, participant role assignment, communication testing across internal and external channels, decision-point evaluation, and after-action report generation. Keywords: tabletop exercise, breach simulation, incident response testing, scenario design, after-action report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Executes breach notification under California Civil Code Section 1798.82 (California data breach notification law). Covers data elements triggering notification, timing requirements (most expedient time possible), AG notification for 500+ California residents, specific content and format requirements, and substitute notice provisions. Keywords: California, breach notification, Cal. Civ. Code 1798.82, attorney general, CCPA, data elements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Executes the GDPR Article 33 mandatory breach notification to the supervisory authority within 72 hours of becoming aware of a personal data breach. Covers required notification content, deadline calculation, risk assessment for notification threshold, and DPO involvement. Keywords: GDPR, Article 33, breach notification, 72 hours, supervisory authority, DPO, EDPB.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements technical breach detection capabilities including SIEM integration, DLP alert configuration, anomaly detection rules, and insider threat monitoring. Provides a breach classification taxonomy across confidentiality, integrity, and availability dimensions. Covers detection tool selection, alert tuning, and integration with privacy incident response workflows. Keywords: breach detection, SIEM, DLP, anomaly detection, insider threat, classification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conducts structured post-breach remediation using a lessons learned framework covering root cause remediation, control gap closure, policy updates, training modifications, monitoring enhancements, and regulatory follow-up. Provides a systematic approach to preventing breach recurrence and demonstrating accountability to supervisory authorities. Keywords: post-breach, remediation, lessons learned, root cause, control gap, policy update, training.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft and review social outreach with Guaardvark's supervised outreach system (Reddit, Discord, Twitter/X, Facebook): grounded, graded drafts that never post without the user's approval in the Studio. Use when the user wants a reply drafted for a thread, wants to see the pending outreach queue, or asks about outreach status or cadence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build Tier 1/2/3 cold outreach sequences differentiated by personalization depth and research signal strength during PRD v0.9 Go-to-Market. Triggers on requests to plan cold outreach, founder-led sales, or when user asks "cold email sequence", "outbound campaign", "founder outreach", "LinkedIn outreach", "Tier 1 personalization", "predictable revenue", "sales cadence", "BDR sequence". Outputs GTM-OUT-* sequence entries and lead-list references.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GitHub 解封 — 账号封禁/限制/恢复的领域操作系统。覆盖：(a) GitHub 官方政策体系 (TOS / 可接受使用政策 / Trust & Safety 执行模式 / 公开申诉路径 / 受制裁地区解读)；(b) 封号原因诊断学 (spam / abuse / 制裁误标 / 2FA 丢失 / ToS 违规 / 账号劫持误判 / ban evasion 等子类型 + 症状→原因映射 + 自我分诊压测)；(c) 申诉实操 craft (写一封能让 T&S 快速判误伤的英文申诉信 + 升级阶梯 + 法务介入边界 + Don'ts)；(d) 制裁与合规硬边界 (OFAC SDN 名单 / 哪些国家或地区真不可达 / VPN 误判路径 / 中国大陆不是美国制裁地区的反复重申)；(e) 中国大陆开发者特别处境 (sanctioned region 误标 + SMS 验证不支持 +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab 备用迁移 + 私有自托管 Gitea/Forgejo)；(f) 真实案例库 (~30+ 公开案例分类拆解：误伤 / 真违规 / 制裁误标三类各自赔率与申诉成功路径)。伦理锚绝不软化：不教 ban evasion / 不教撒谎式申诉 / 真违规承认改进 / 丢 2FA 无恢复因子则诚实告知 / 中国制裁误标靠申诉不靠换 VPN / 申诉 6 个月窗口必算清 / 约 3% (业内估) 真违规恢复 vs 约 79% (业内估) 误伤申诉成功率分层标。 (GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: false-positive / genuine violation / sanctions mis-flag, each with win-rate and appeal success path). Ethical anchors absolutely not softened: do NOT teach ban evasion (creating new accounts turns a temp ban into a permanent one — the single biggest mistake); do NOT teach social engineering or lying in appeals (misuse + actually confirms violation); genuine violations: admit + improve beats denial; lost 2FA + no recovery factor → do not pretend recovery is possible; China sanctioned-region mis-flag → fix via appeal, not repeated VPN switching; appeal form 6-month window must be counted carefully; historical 约 3% (业内估) genuine-violation recovery vs 约 79% (业内估) false-positive appeal success rate stratification must be honestly labeled. Anti-samples (explicitly describe harm, never endorse): developer permabanned for ban evasion / open-source team org-banned for personal attacks in public issues / cases where repeated VPN switching escalated risk-control severity.) Master OS — automated mastery of GitHub Account Reinstatement — the domain operating system for GitHub (and analogous platform) account suspension, restriction, appeal, and recovery. Covers: (a) GitHub official policy architecture (TOS / Acceptable Use Policies / Trust & Safety enforcement patterns / public appeals pathways / sanctioned-region interpretation); (b) suspension-cause diagnostics (spam / abuse / sanctions mis-flag / 2FA loss / ToS violation / account hijack false-positive / ban evasion taxonomy + symptom→cause mapping + self-triage pressure test); (c) appeal craft (writing an English appeal letter that gets T&S to fast-track a false-positive ruling + escalation ladder + legal-engagement boundary + Don'ts); (d) sanctions and compliance hard boundaries (OFAC SDN list / which countries/regions are truly unreachable / VPN false-positive paths / China is NOT a US-sanctioned region — repeated emphasis); (e) mainland China developer special circumstances (sanctioned-region mis-flag + SMS verification does not support +86/+852 + Gitee/GitLab/Codeberg/JihuLab fallback migration + self-hosted Gitea/Forgejo); (f) real-case library (~30+ public cases with categorized analysis: fa
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The learner teaches the concept to the AI, which plays a curious novice peer and identifies gaps through authentic questions. Use when the learner wants to test their understanding — teaching forces a different kind of organisation than studying.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate follow-up teaching moves that extend student thinking after a specific classroom response. Use when a student says something worth exploring and the teacher wants to deepen the dialogue.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ready-to-use KOL cold outreach templates — DM scripts for Twitter, email pitches, and follow-up sequences designed to get replies from busy influencers. Tested across 500+ creator partnerships. By @WeiYipei.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
getterの濫用を防ぐための命名規約スキル。ドメインモデルでgetterが必要な場合（永続化、JSON変換など）に `breachEncapsulationOf` プレフィックスを付与することで、カプセル化を破っていることを明示する。 これにより、Tell Don't Ask原則の違反を未然に防ぎ、getterの意図しない使用を抑制する。 コードレビュー、新規実装、リファクタリング時にgetter設計が必要な場合に使用。 対象言語: Java, Kotlin, Scala, TypeScript, Python, Go, Rust。 トリガー：「getterの命名規約」「カプセル化を破るgetter」「永続化用のgetter」 「breachEncapsulation」「getterを作りたいが濫用を防ぎたい」といったgetter命名関連リクエストで起動。
Use when creating outreach sequences, writing cold email campaigns, building multi-channel cadences, designing follow-up flows, or crafting signal-triggered messages. Triggers: 'build an outreach sequence', 'write a cold email sequence', 'create a cadence', 'outreach for [signal]', 'email sequence', 'follow-up sequence', 'multi-channel outreach'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a complete cold email outreach system — ICP definition, sequence architecture, personalization strategy, and batch-produced email sequences with CAN-SPAM/deliverability compliance. Use when "cold outreach", "cold email sequence", "outbound campaign", "prospecting emails", "sales outreach", "build outreach sequence", or any request to create systematic cold email campaigns for lead generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write cold outreach messages that actually get replies, on LinkedIn, in email, or in X (Twitter) DMs. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reach out cold to someone they don't know or barely know, including phrases like "write a cold DM," "cold email," "LinkedIn message to," "reach out to," "pitch [person]," "how do I get [person] to reply," "DM this investor/recruit/partner/podcast host," "email a founder/company I want to work for," "cold email for a job," "land a job at [company]," "reach out about a role," "follow up with someone who ghosted," or any request to draft a first-touch message to a stranger or near-stranger for fundraising, hiring, partnerships/BD, press/podcasts/speaking, or job-seeking. Trigger this even when the user just pastes a name, a role, and "help me reach out," and even when they don't say the word "cold."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Teacher mode — turn a session recap / article / docs / concept / piece of code / bug into an incremental mini-course with comprehension checks, quizzes, and an auto-saved summary note. Invoke /teach [topic or URL]. Triggers — "explain it like a teacher", "walk me through what we did", "turn this into a lesson", "quiz me", "teach me", "let's learn this together".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates account research briefs, personalized outreach sequences, persona-specific talk tracks, and objection handling frameworks for B2B SaaS BDR teams. Use when preparing BDR outreach for target accounts, building prospecting sequences, creating call scripts, developing objection responses, onboarding new BDRs, or reviewing outreach performance. Also use when asked to "write outreach emails," "build a prospecting sequence," "create a call script," "handle objections," or "research an account for outreach." Designed for BDR teams selling compliance, security, and GRC platforms to mid-market and enterprise buyers with multi-persona buying committees.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
学ぶ目的やこれまでの理解に合わせて、短い対話型レッスンと復習用資料を作るスキル。学習記録を残し、複数回のセッションにわたる学びを支えます。
リポジトリから外部経由で悪用できる脆弱性を探し、入力から危険な処理までの経路、再現手順、影響を確認して報奨金制度向けの報告を支援するスキル。
複数工程の計画書を読み、各工程に合うECCコマンドを貼り付け用に生成します。工程の識別情報や完了条件を含め、対象範囲を渡せないコマンドは保留として示します。