「estimate」の検索結果

Estimates task effort by analyzing complexity, dependencies, historical velocity, and risk factors. Produces a structured estimate with confidence levels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estimate a Jira/Linear ticket — 'estimate PROJ-123', 'wie groß ist das?', 'should we split this?' — size + risk + split + uncertainty, sibling of /refine-ticket, close-prompt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end vendor procurement workflow orchestrating RFQ creation, email sending, vendor response tracking, and client-facing estimate generation. Use this skill when managing the full quote-request-to-client-estimate pipeline, coordinating between vendor-rfq-creator and vendor-estimate-creator skills with email automation and status tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide (GAO-20-195G). Use for program cost estimating: the four characteristics of a reliable estimate (comprehensive, well documented, accurate, credible) and the 18 best practices; the 12-step cost estimating process (purpose, plan, technical baseline, WBS, ground rules and assumptions, data, point estimate, sensitivity, risk/uncertainty, document, present, update); estimating methods (analogy, parametric, engineering build-up, learning curves); Monte Carlo risk/uncertainty analysis, confidence levels and contingency; auditing and validating an estimate against the characteristics; earned value management (EIA-748, BCWS/BCWP/ACWP, CPI/SPI/TCPI, EAC, PMB, IBR); and specialized techniques (software cost estimating, learning curves, Analysis of Alternatives, WBS templates, the Green Book internal-control framework). This is the cost-estimating companion to the GAO Schedule and Technology Readiness Assessment guides. Does not cover schedule estimating/risk in depth (see the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide), agency-specific cost models, or the full text of referenced standards (EIA-748, MIL-STD-881D, the Green Book) — these are named, not reproduced.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

コスト見積もりエージェント - クラウドインフラ、ScalarDB、その他ライセンスの見積もりを作成。/estimate-cost [対象パス] で呼び出し。

Fetch Airbnb income estimate (ADR, occupancy, monthly revenue) for any area using the official Airbnb GraphQL API — the same data the Airbnb host simulator shows. Input: station/area name. Output: per-night rate, avg nights, monthly estimate for entire_home and private_room.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

コスト見積もりエージェント - クラウドインフラ、ScalarDB、その他ライセンスの見積もりを作成。/estimate-cost [対象パス] で呼び出し。

Claude Codeの利用ログからトークン使用量と推定費用を集計し、モデル・セッション・日付別に確認します。予算との比較やCSV出力にも使えます。

• 今日と昨日の支出を比較したいとき
• モデル・セッション別の費用確認
• 予算と支出を比較したいとき

将来のキャッシュフローを現在価値に換算し、企業価値と1株当たりの評価額を算出するExcelを作成します。前提を変えた再計算やシナリオ比較、感度分析も扱います。

• 企業評価用のExcelを作りたいとき
• 弱気・基本・強気のシナリオ比較
• 前提変更による評価額の変化確認

Polymarketの予測市場を検索し、出来事の見込みを価格に基づく割合で示すスキル。取引量、売買注文の一覧、価格履歴を取得して、市場の動きを調べられます。

• 出来事の可能性を市場価格で確認したいとき
• テーマに合う予測市場を探したいとき
• 現在価格と売買注文の確認

鍛えたい筋肉や器具に合う運動を探し、食品の栄養成分を調べるスキル。消費カロリーや体脂肪率の推定、減量・増量に向けた栄養配分にも使えます。

• 使える器具に合う運動を探したいとき
• 食品のカロリーやタンパク質の確認
• 減量・増量に向けた栄養配分

Binance Onchain Pay enables users to buy cryptocurrency with fiat (e.g., EUR, USD) or send existing crypto from their Binance account directly to any external on-chain wallet address in a single flow—no manual withdrawal needed. Enables partners to integrate crypto buying services: - payment-method-list: Get available payment methods (Card, P2P, Google Pay, Apple Pay, etc.) with limits for a fiat/crypto pair - trading-pairs: List all supported fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies - estimated-quote: Get real-time price quote including exchange rate, fees, and estimated crypto amount - pre-order: Create a buy order and get redirect URL to Binance payment flow - order: Query order status and details (processing, completed, failed, etc.) - crypto-network: Get supported blockchain networks with withdraw fees and limits - p2p/trading-pairs: List P2P-specific trading pairs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetches real-time Azure retail pricing using the Azure Retail Prices API (prices.azure.com) and estimates Copilot Studio agent credit consumption. Use when the user asks about the cost of any Azure service, wants to compare SKU prices, needs pricing data for a cost estimate, mentions Azure pricing, Azure costs, Azure billing, or asks about Copilot Studio pricing, Copilot Credits, or agent usage estimation. Covers compute, storage, networking, databases, AI, Copilot Studio, and all other Azure service families.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive equity research snapshots combining analyst consensus estimates, company fundamentals, historical prices, and macroeconomic context. Use when researching stocks, comparing estimates to actuals, analyzing company financials, assessing equity valuations, or building investment cases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns whatever came out of a discovery conversation — a call transcript, a voice memo, jobsite photos, an RFP document, a set of drawings, or scrappy notes — into a branded, costed proposal, estimate, or statement of work built on the owner's own templates and historical pricing. Routes it for signature and triggers the deposit invoice once it's accepted. Works entirely from uploaded files when no connector is available, producing DOCX and PDF the owner can send themselves. Use this whenever a quote, bid, estimate, proposal, or SOW is the deliverable — including phrasings like "write this up for them," "put together a quote," "I need to bid this job," "turn my notes into a proposal," "respond to this RFP," or "price this out." Reach for it when the owner describes a job they just looked at, even without saying the word quote.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares tax-season materials for the owner's accountant, not tax advice. US federal tax; a non-US business gets its closed-books packet instead. Two modes: (1) quarterly estimated tax from YTD net income in the ledger (MYOB, NetSuite, QuickBooks, Xero, or Zoho Books); (2) year-end 1099 prep, scanning the ledger, PayPal, and Stripe for contractors paid over USD 600 into a 1099-NEC list with missing W-9 flags. Any tax request routes first to /tax-prep, which confirms the books are closed and reconciled before running this skill. Use this skill directly only when the owner says the period's books are already closed: "books are closed, now do the 1099s," "run the quarterly estimate off the closed numbers," or "just the contractor W-9 list."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares tax materials as a two-link chain — month-end-prep confirms the books are closed and reconciled first, then tax-season-organizer calculates the quarterly estimated payment or builds the year-end 1099-NEC list and accountant packet from those closed numbers. Requires a ledger (MYOB, NetSuite, QuickBooks, Xero, or Zoho Books); uses Gusto, PayPal, and Stripe when connected, else CSV upload. US federal tax math; a non-US business gets the closed-books packet. Prep material for a CPA, never tax advice, nothing filed. Trigger on "quarterly taxes," "estimated tax payment," "how much should I set aside," "1099s," "1099-NEC," "W-9s," "year-end tax prep," "get my books ready for my accountant," any phrasing that suggests a tax deadline is coming, or a question about net profit or YTD income that sounds like worry about a tax bill. An owner who says the period's books are already closed routes to tax-season-organizer directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mentor for embedded and IoT hardware projects. Helps select MCUs, dev boards, and toolchains, decides where sensor readings end up (phone, PC, dashboard, or alert), and gives time/cost estimates and a phased build plan from breadboard MVP to production PCB. Use when the user mentions embedded, IoT, microcontroller, ESP32, STM32, Arduino, Raspberry Pi Pico, firmware, PCB, KiCad, EasyEDA, PlatformIO, MQTT, Home Assistant, ESPHome, Grafana, an IoT dashboard, seeing sensor data on a phone, or asks for hardware tool recommendations, project planning, or cost/time estimates for an electronics project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Causal inference framework for answering "does X cause Y?" beyond correlation. DoWhy (Microsoft Research) provides the identify-estimate-refute loop: define a causal graph (DAG), identify the causal effect using backdoor/frontdoor/instrumental variable criteria, estimate treatment effects with multiple estimators, and validate results with automated refutation tests. Use when: distinguishing causation from correlation, estimating treatment effects (ATE, ATT, CATE), designing and analyzing A/B tests with confounders, using instrumental variables, performing counterfactual reasoning ("what would have happened if..."), validating causal claims with sensitivity analysis, working with observational data where randomization is impossible, or any analysis where the question is "what is the CAUSAL effect of X on Y" rather than just "how do X and Y relate?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze how liquid a stock is using Yahoo Finance data (yfinance): bid-ask spreads, volume and dollar volume (ADTV), top-of-book and options depth, square-root market impact and slippage estimates, turnover ratio, and Amihud illiquidity, rolled into a liquidity grade. Use this skill whenever the user asks about liquidity or trading costs — how easily a position can be entered or exited, what a large order would do to the price, spread or execution-cost estimates, order book depth, volume patterns, or liquidity comparisons — especially for small caps, penny stocks, and thinly traded names.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch financial and market data with the yfinance Python library (Yahoo Finance). Use this skill whenever the user wants stock data: current quotes and price history, financial statements (income statement, balance sheet, cash flow), options chains, dividends and splits, earnings and analyst estimates, price targets and ratings, institutional and insider holdings, news, multi-ticker comparisons, stock screens, or sector and industry data. Use it even when the user gives only a ticker symbol (AAPL, MSFT, TSLA) and the intent has to be inferred. For earnings previews or recaps, estimate revisions, valuation, correlation, liquidity, or ETF premium analysis, prefer the dedicated skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "set up my founder social-selling routine", "build a daily engagement block for target accounts", or "turn funding / hiring signals into selling plays"; produces the founder/seller daily operating block — a time-boxed engagement-block spec (substantive value-add comments on target-account posts, never a pitch), warm-touch-before-ask cadence rules, trigger-response plays consuming the social-pulse-monitor B2B trigger watchlist (funding / hiring / launch signals), and a quarterly diagnostic that reads LinkedIn SSI as an input diagnostic only (Estimated, vendor-defined — never a target metric). All volume norms are Estimated/community-derived; all execution is human — zero mass-DM, zero connection-request automation, zero engagement automation (LinkedIn UA §8.2 red line); 1:1 pitch and DM mechanics route to outreach-manager. Not for cold email sequences — use cold-outbound-sequencer. 社交销售/创始人日常互动块/热身触达节奏/触发信号剧本

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate workloads from Google Cloud Platform to AWS — plus AI and agentic workloads from any provider. Triggers on: migrate from GCP, GCP to AWS, move off Google Cloud, migrate Terraform to AWS, migrate Cloud SQL to RDS, migrate GKE to EKS, migrate Cloud Run to Fargate, migrate App Engine to Elastic Beanstalk, migrate from OpenAI to Bedrock, move off OpenAI, switch from ChatGPT API to AWS, migrate from Gemini to Bedrock, migrate LangChain to Bedrock, migrate LangGraph to AWS, migrate agentic workloads to AWS, move AI workloads to AWS, migrate my AI app to AWS. Runs a 6-phase process: discover GCP resources from Terraform, app code, or billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify must finish before Design, Estimate, or Generate. Do not use for: Azure migrations (see azure-to-aws), on-premises migrations, AWS-to-GCP reverse migration, general AWS architecture advice without migration intent, or GCP-to-GCP refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FAIR-aligned exposure quantification: turns a pile of recon findings into a defensible 0-100 + A-F org risk score (Likelihood x Impact, three ownership-aware factors: exposure/threat/impact), an ownership + proof demotion cap so unproven or weakly-owned findings can't inflate the number, a $-denominated FAIR loss-magnitude estimate (IBM/Ponemon per-record cost bands, cross-source record dedup, threat-factor annualization), attack-path amplification (curated red-team chain catalog + generic graph-walk engine, with a kill-chain vs shared-fate honesty gate), and a board-ready one-pager deliverable (hero $ + letter grade + top-3 findings + top attack path + the ask). Extends osint-methodology's severity rubric and client deliverable templates with quantification. Passive analysis only -- operates on findings already collected, no target traffic, no API keys. Use when asked to score risk, quantify exposure, estimate breach cost, build a board report, translate technical findings to dollars, or explain why a grade or dollar figure came out the way it did.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。