「feed」の検索結果

Submit feedback on an Expo skill—or Expo itself—and control bundled anonymous usage telemetry (off by default / opt-in). Submit feedback with: npx --yes submit-expo-feedback@latest "ACTIONABLE_FEEDBACK". Optionally add either or both: --category "CATEGORY" and --subject "SUBJECT". Replace the uppercase placeholders before running. Use when a skill was useful, confusing, broken, missing context, or worth improving; when Expo, Expo CLI, EAS CLI, docs, or MCP worked well or fell short; when an AI agent repeatedly failed, got stuck, or needed the user to take over an Expo task (report it as an eval candidate); or when the user explicitly asks to enable or disable telemetry (tracking), check its status, or understand what it collects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design the small details -- triggers, rules, feedback, loops and modes -- that separate good products from great ones. Use when the user mentions "microinteraction", "button feedback", "loading state", "toggle design", "animation detail", "state transitions", "input feedback", "the interface feels dead", "make the UI feel responsive", or "add polish to interactions". Also trigger when designing form-validation responses, progress indicators, confirmation dialogs, or any element where the user expects immediate feedback. Covers trigger design, state rules, feedback mechanisms, and progressive loops. For overall UI polish, see refactoring-ui. For affordance design, see design-everyday-things.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Running closed and open betas that produce real signal. Beta participant selection, structured feedback collection, beta-to-GA decision criteria, and the difference between soft-launch (no structure, no signal), kitchen-sink (everyone in, no actionable feedback), and structured beta (calibrated cohort, intentional feedback loops, clear graduation criteria). Triggers on beta program, alpha test, beta cohort, beta participant, beta feedback, beta to GA decision, design partner, early access program, closed beta, open beta, RC release. Also triggers when a feature is approaching launch and the team needs structured pre-GA validation, when prior betas produced noise rather than signal, or when the team has soft-launched before but wants more structured feedback this time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performance scorecard design, post-matter feedback collection, QBR preparation, and firm comparison for in-house legal ops teams evaluating outside counsel. Design a scorecard framework calibrated to your team's maturity level. Produce post-matter feedback forms for supervising attorneys to complete at matter close. Prepare a QBR pack with agenda, data summary, and talking points for structured business reviews. Produce a side-by-side firm comparison for panel decision-making. Trigger on: 'design a performance scorecard', 'how do we evaluate our firms', 'build us a scorecard', 'post-matter feedback form', 'feedback at matter close', 'collect feedback on the firm', 'QBR', 'quarterly business review', 'prep for the firm review', 'what should I raise with the partner', 'compare the firms', 'which firm is performing better', 'rank our panel', 'firm performance data', 'scorecard framework', 'evaluate outside counsel', 'annual firm review', 'how are our firms performing'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse existing written feedback for quality, specificity, actionability, and impact on student learning. Use when reviewing teacher or peer feedback to improve feedback practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize user feedback from multiple channels and identify patterns to inform product decisions. Use when analyzing feedback, prioritizing feature requests, conducting NPS surveys, or understanding user sentiment. Covers feedback collection, categorization, prioritization frameworks, and closing the feedback loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to add an in-site feedback loop to a website repo — a floating "提个建议" button where allowlisted visitors submit suggestions that become a GitHub Issue, which GitHub Actions turns into an automatic code change via Claude Code, auto-merges and deploys, and records on a /_feedback dashboard with one-click revert. Triggers — "给网站加个反馈对话框", "提一句话就自动改网站", "装上反馈闭环", "feedback loop", "/wjs-looping-feedback".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse existing written feedback for quality, specificity, actionability, and impact on student learning. Use when reviewing teacher or peer feedback to improve feedback practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hand a Prisma Next question or report off to the team — file a GitHub issue (bug or feature request), or route Q&A / design discussion / direct-team-contact to the Prisma Discord at pris.ly/discord. Use for bug, bug report, file an issue, report a bug, feature request, missing feature, this should be a feature, file this, this is a bug, this is broken, surprising behaviour, this doesn't work, file feedback, send feedback, capability gap, file via prisma-next-feedback, ask the team, talk to the team, talk to the Prisma team, talk to Prisma, Discord, Prisma Discord, Q&A, design feedback, is this the intended way, how should I do X, extension author question, extension author needs help.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when configuring the outbound Send Email quick action in Lightning Case Feed — creating the action in Setup on Case (Action Type = Send Email), attaching a default Custom email template, setting predefined To/CC/BCC values, wiring QuickAction.QuickActionDefaultsHandler Apex defaults, respecting the Lightning Experience 10-file / 25 MB attachment limits, and letting agents move an email to a different case. Trigger keywords: Send Email quick action, case email composer, Email action missing from Case Feed, Don't Apply Template Subject, QuickActionDefaultsHandler, SendEmailQuickActionDefaults, move email to another case. NOT for Email-to-Case inbound routing, routing addresses, or thread-ID matching (use admin/email-to-case-configuration), NOT for authoring or migrating the templates themselves (use admin/email-templates-and-alerts and admin/classic-email-template-migration), and NOT for Apex Messaging.SingleEmailMessage sends outside Case Feed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds automated threat intelligence feed integration pipelines connecting STIX/TAXII feeds, open-source threat intel, and commercial TI platforms into SIEM and security tools for real-time IOC matching and alerting. Use when SOC teams need to operationalize threat intelligence by automating feed ingestion, normalization, scoring, and distribution to detection systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes structured and unstructured threat intelligence feeds to extract actionable indicators, adversary tactics, and campaign context. Use when ingesting commercial or open-source CTI feeds, evaluating feed quality, normalizing data into STIX 2.1 format, or enriching existing IOCs with campaign attribution. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, Recorded Future, Mandiant Advantage, MISP, AlienVault OTX, or automated feed aggregation pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds automated threat intelligence feed integration pipelines connecting STIX/TAXII feeds, open-source threat intel, and commercial TI platforms into SIEM and security tools for real-time IOC matching and alerting. Use when SOC teams need to operationalize threat intelligence by automating feed ingestion, normalization, scoring, and distribution to detection systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes structured and unstructured threat intelligence feeds to extract actionable indicators, adversary tactics, and campaign context. Use when ingesting commercial or open-source CTI feeds, evaluating feed quality, normalizing data into STIX 2.1 format, or enriching existing IOCs with campaign attribution. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, Recorded Future, Mandiant Advantage, MISP, AlienVault OTX, or automated feed aggregation pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds automated threat intelligence feed integration pipelines connecting STIX/TAXII feeds, open-source threat intel, and commercial TI platforms into SIEM and security tools for real-time IOC matching and alerting. Use when SOC teams need to operationalize threat intelligence by automating feed ingestion, normalization, scoring, and distribution to detection systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes structured and unstructured threat intelligence feeds to extract actionable indicators, adversary tactics, and campaign context. Use when ingesting commercial or open-source CTI feeds, evaluating feed quality, normalizing data into STIX 2.1 format, or enriching existing IOCs with campaign attribution. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, Recorded Future, Mandiant Advantage, MISP, AlienVault OTX, or automated feed aggregation pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for feedback and feature requests to the Muse team. Whenever your response tells the user you can't do a specific thing they wanted, or accepts them giving up on one, offer once to file feedback in that response. This covers missing integrations you can't do yourself, capabilities you lack, and tasks that keep failing at a specific point. File only on their go-ahead. Also use when asked to send, view, check, or withdraw feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, write, or manage Meta ads and assets: ad copy, campaigns, spend, reports, audiences, catalogs, product feeds, feed refresh schedules, experiments, and policy. Always load for any request to create or write an ad, or to advertise a product or service, even when no platform is named; this includes sensitive or restricted categories. Always load for any question asking what a Meta, Facebook, or Instagram advertising policy means, allows, prohibits, or requires, including a standalone policy-definition question with no account context. Those questions must use ads_policy_tool, never browser search or memory. Load for a specifically named catalog or feed with an upload or refresh-schedule request; use Ads reads to resolve ownership before writing. Generic unnamed feeds need context. Whether an image, claim or piece of copy may be used in an ad is ALWAYS a Meta Ads task — 'can I use this in an ad', 'is it allowed', 'is this against policy', and any rights, likeness, celebrity, logo or trademark question about advertising with an image, including a follow-up about one just generated. Those are ads-policy questions, not general legal ones. An ad request uses the campaign workflow unless explicitly only an image or organic post.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collect and submit feedback about Superset (bug reports, feature requests, or general feedback) privately to the Superset team or as a public GitHub issue. Use when the user wants to report a Superset bug, request a feature, or send feedback about Superset.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Navigate difficult conversations and deliver constructive feedback using structured frameworks. Covers the Preparation-Delivery-Follow-up model and Situation-Behavior-Impact (SBI) feedback technique. Use when preparing for difficult conversations, giving feedback, or managing conflicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds the loop from what customers say to what gets changed — collecting feedback, distinguishing signal from noise, routing it to owners, and closing the loop back to the customer. Use this to set up a feedback program, design or interpret CSAT/NPS, decide what customer feedback deserves action, get product to act on recurring issues, or diagnose why feedback is collected but nothing changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a structured five-stage code review covering requirements compliance, correctness, code quality, testing, and security/performance. Each stage uses targeted checklists and categorized feedback (Blocker/Major/Minor/Nit) with actionable suggestions and rationale. Use when the user asks for code review, PR feedback, pull request review, or wants their code checked for bugs, style issues, or vulnerabilities — triggered by phrases like "review my code", "check this PR", "review my changes", "pull request review", or "code feedback".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interpret third-party feedback by running parallel internal and peer interpretations to surface intent, correctness concerns, and ambiguities. Use when the user asks to "interpret feedback", "interpret comments", "what does this feedback mean", "clarify reviewer intent", "understand this review", or "interpret these suggestions".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a user-reviewed Arch Studio bug report or feature request for GitHub. Use when the user runs /as:studio-feedback, says "report a bug", "this skill broke", "send feedback", or requests a feature. Do not use for Claude Code's native /feedback command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。