706 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Draft process letters and bid instructions for sell-side M&A processes. Covers initial indication of interest (IOI) instructions, final bid procedures, and management meeting logistics. Triggers on "process letter", "bid instructions", "IOI letter", "bid procedures", "final round letter", or "management meeting invite".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review completed implementation changes before final verification. Use when repository policy requires independent review or the user explicitly requests it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Universal quality bar and final audit rubric for any agent system prompt. Activate this whenever you are unsure which archetype skill applies, or as a final review pass before writing the system prompt. It defines the required run contract, completion criteria, fallback paths, response format, and anti-patterns every produced agent prompt must satisfy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clean and finalize authorized natural-language text intended for readers by auditing suspicious invisible Unicode and rewriting prose while preserving facts, meaning, and the writer's voice. Use when the user asks to clean, humanize, polish, or finalize articles, manuscripts, reports, documentation, emails, product copy, UI text, Markdown, or HTML prose, or when a project rule or instruction file explicitly requires this workflow. Don't use for code-only tasks or undisclosed authorship evasion; leave code, commands, identifiers, paths, APIs, formulas, citations, required disclosures, and verbatim quotations unchanged.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Meta-prompting standard library for generating, optimizing, and composing prompts programmatically via Standards, Handlebars Templates, and Tools; output is always a prompt to use elsewhere, not final content. USE WHEN meta-prompting, template generation, prompt optimization, prompt engineering, write a prompt, create system prompt, Handlebars template, eval prompt, judge prompt. NOT FOR generating final content (use the appropriate domain skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ensure codebase deliverables are properly packaged as ZIP exports in a dedicated final step
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 9-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review completed implementation changes before final verification. Use when repository policy requires independent review or the user explicitly requests it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Surfaces a single, genuinely relevant AWS Activate partner offer as optional context AFTER another AWS Startup Advisor skill has finalized its recommendation, plan, or build — never influencing the technical advice. Consulted by architect-for-startups, start-building-for-startups, agent-advisor, gcp-to-aws, heroku-to-aws, and llm-to-bedrock: once their output is final, this skill checks whether a relevant Activate offer exists for what the founder is building or migrating and, if so, appends one quiet, dismissible line with a tracked redeem link. Merit-first (offers never change the recommendation), relevance-gated to what the founder actually surfaced, at most one per response and often none, muteable. Offer content is read live from the sibling knowledge-base-for-startups skill (references/offers.md). Do NOT use for account-specific lookups (credits balance, Activate membership, application status) — send those to https://aws.amazon.com/startups.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writing a Succession-style ensemble series (继承之战群像剧写法) — distilled from Jesse Armstrong's complete shooting scripts for all four seasons, 39 episodes (Faber 2023), with his introductions and footnotes, plus Frank Rich's and Lucy Prebble's essays on the writers' room. Covers the invisible-act three-test for scripts with no ACT marks, container episodes built on a ceremony's running order, pressure chambers, one core question per episode, finales with fewer and longer scenes, the absent protagonist at the climax, humiliation passed downward, stage directions carrying subtext and "maybe", reversals turned on one word, writing long, alts, the mega-chart, and engineering an ending once the plot engine loses pressure. Use when the user wants a dynastic family drama, a media-power ensemble, a wedding/funeral/summit set piece, a streaming hour with no act breaks, a finale that redraws alliances, or asks how to "Succession-ize" a script or kill a lead mid-season.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI DevKit · Final code review phase guidance for holistic pre-push review. Use when the user wants code review, final lifecycle review, design alignment checks, integration risk review, or dev-lifecycle phase 9.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Wrap up a client project the right way — a clean handoff, a strong final impression, and the moves that turn a finished project into referrals and repeat work. Use when asked to wrap up a client project, offboard a client, end a client relationship well, or project handoff. Produces a closeout checklist (deliverables, access, final invoice, documentation), a handoff/wrap-up message, the referral/testimonial/repeat-work asks to make at the peak moment, a graceful process for ending an ongoing relationship, and how to leave the door open — so the ending builds your business instead of just stopping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing accepted AISTATS papers for PMLR camera-ready submission, covering the 9-page final body, two-column layout reflow, author de-anonymization, proceedings forms, metadata, final appendix handling, registration, in-person presentation obligations, and public artifact release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for American Anthropologist (AA) via the Research Exchange platform — section selection, anonymization, word/abstract caps, Chicago author-date (free-format accepted), DOIs, ORCID, ethics statement, and figure permissions/alt text. Final checks; it does not draft content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) via the AEA submission system — single-blind review, the 100-word abstract, JEL classification, the submission fee, format, and the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy. Final checks; it does not draft content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for Agricultural Systems (AgSy) via the current Elsevier submission path / Editorial Manager — article-type selection, abstract <= 250 words, Highlights, graphical abstract, CRediT and declaration-of-interest statements, funding/AI disclosures, reference style, and data/code/model availability. Final checks; it does not draft content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) via the AEA/ScholarOne submission system — the word-count and exhibit-count gates, abstract limit, fees, author metadata, declarations, and the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy. Final checks; it does not draft content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) via the AEA submission system — membership-scaled fee, JEL codes, PDF and length rules, ≤100-word abstract, disclosure statements, and data/code readiness. Final checks; it does not draft content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) manuscript via the AEA ScholarOne system — single-blind review front matter, JEL codes, submission and publication fees, format, disclosures, and AEA data-policy readiness. Final checks; it does not draft content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for AEJ: Economic Policy via the AEA online submission system — single-blind review front matter, JEL codes, submission and publication fees, format, the Data and Code Availability Statement, and disclosure. Final checks; it does not draft content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal or invited full review via the Manuscript Central portal — proposal-vs-invited-review route, deadlines, formatting, CV, and anonymity. Final checks; it does not draft content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs adaptive clinical trials including group-sequential (O'Brien-Fleming, Pocock, Lan-DeMets spending), sample-size re-estimation (blinded Friede-Kieser, unblinded Cui-Hung-Wang, Mehta-Pocock promising zone), seamless Phase 2/3 with treatment-arm selection, population enrichment, and response-adaptive randomisation. Covers FDA 2019 Final Adaptive Designs Guidance, FDA 2022 Master Protocols, and ICH E20 Step 2b/3 draft (June 2025, NOT final). Use when planning interim analyses, sample-size re-estimation, or master/platform-trial designs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates and maintains the scenarios a LiveKit agent simulation runs, and wires the agent to consume them. Use when the user asks "what should I test", "generate simulation scenarios", "write scenarios for my agent", "add a scenario for X", "organize my scenario files", "my simulations are flaky", "the scenario hits my real database", "seed state per scenario", "it passed but booked the wrong thing", "grade the final state", or wants to stress-test a flow before shipping. Covers generating a baseline with the LiveKit scenario generator and refining it, writing the cases generation misses, phrasing simulated-user instructions so they steer reliably, splitting scenarios into sets across files, and the agent-side code that seeds deterministic state from a scenario and fails a run on its final state. To run them use running-livekit-simulations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer a hard question by fanning it out to a PANEL of models running in parallel — each answering independently with web search and bash, none seeing the others' work — then having Opus 4.8 judge every response into a structured analysis (consensus, contradictions, partial coverage, unique insights, blind spots) and write a final answer grounded in it. The panel is two independent Opus 4.8 runs (slug opus4.8-4.8), Opus 4.8 + GPT-5.5 via codex (opus4.8-gpt5.5), Opus 4.8 + Gemini 3.1 Pro via agy (opus4.8-gemini3.1pro), or all three (opus4.8-gpt5.5-gemini3.1pro). Opus always judges and writes the final answer — the pipeline can't be reversed. Runs on local CLI subscriptions (no metered API), and saves a timestamped provenance .md per run. Use this whenever the user asks to "run it through Fusion", says /fusion, wants a multi-model / panel / ensemble answer, wants a question cross-checked across models, or wants a higher-confidence answer with consensus and blind spots surfaced — even if they don't say "fusion". General-purpose: any topic (research, law, strategy, technical, personal). Best for high-stakes research, design calls, and debugging where being confidently wrong is expensive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。