「lens」の検索結果

Use when deciding whether Salesforce Reports, CRM Analytics, or Tableau is the right level of analytics tooling, and when reviewing or troubleshooting basic CRM Analytics designs. Triggers: 'CRM Analytics', 'Einstein Analytics', 'Tableau CRM', 'lens', 'dataset', 'dataflow', 'analytics dashboard', 'license requirement'. NOT for a detailed CRM Analytics vs Tableau licensing and platform comparison — use architect/crm-analytics-vs-tableau-decision. NOT for building the app, lenses and datasets — use admin/crm-analytics-app-creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to define, document, and validate KPI metrics for CRM Analytics — covering metric formula design, dimension selection, target-dataset modeling, benchmark setting, and the KPI register that must exist before any dashboard or lens is built. Trigger keywords: KPI definition CRM Analytics, analytics metric design, analytics target attainment, CRM Analytics measures vs dimensions, analytics benchmark. NOT for laying out the dashboard or lens itself — use admin/analytics-dashboard-design. NOT for scoping data sources, audiences, and drill-down paths — use admin/analytics-requirements-gathering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualitative quality review of game design documents — answers "is this design good, and does it follow best practices?" — across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Fans out adversarial lenses (completeness, clarity, pillar alignment, systems-math, fantasy-delivery, feasibility, scope) plus domain lenses that check it against the game-design rules, each prompted to find problems rather than validate; produces a severity-graded verdict and a two-bucket report (apply-ready fixes vs research), handed to /unikit-gd-apply or /unikit-gd-explore in one move. Scope is inferred: a named system, flow, or content type reviews that document; "all" runs a cross-document review. Use when the user wants a critique, quality judgment, or rules check of the design, e.g. "review the combat GDD", "review the onboarding flow". This is the subjective quality pass — for a mechanical consistency check (numbers, terms, IDs, references matching the registry) use /unikit-gd-verify.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run before building anything new — a pre-build gate that decides whether an idea deserves its own tool, judged from both the agent lens (legible, drivable, automatable) and the human lens (will I touch it, do I want to maintain it). Trigger on "should I build X", "starting a new project / app / tool / repo", "is this worth making", "want to spin up", or any new-build intent — even if the word "checklist" never appears. Outputs a backed GATE.md with checkmarks and a one-line verdict note in the project root docs. Do NOT load for small config tweaks, one-off scripts, bug fixes on existing things, or anything that is clearly a feature of something you already run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run on an existing project to decide KEEP / MERGE / ARCHIVE — never limbo. Forces a call on tools that already exist and may have stopped earning their keep. Trigger on "is this still worth keeping", "audit this repo", "tech-debt cleanup", "sweep the folder", "what's dead here", or any signal that something hasn't been touched in months. Judged from both the agent lens (still legible, still drivable, still safe) and the human lens (do I still reach for it, does it nag). Includes a non-negotiable footgun check for stale pipelines that can overwrite live data. Outputs a backed AUDIT.md and a one-line verdict note in the project root docs. Do NOT load for greenfield projects (use new-project-gate), one-off bug fixes, or when the answer is already obvious.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draws an interactive HTML Architecture Viewer for any code flow the user names. Walks through seven research-driven steps (flow, name, repo research, lens colors, evidence flags, lens+mechanism per stop, build) and verifies links, claims, and generated artifacts before delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research and stress-test open-source project names, from collision checks to launch-ready decisions. Use when the user asks to name or rename a project, compare candidate names, screen GitHub or package namespace risk, verify language or mythology claims, or improve SEO/GEO clarity. Perform live web and registry research, separate brand from category descriptor, classify collisions, and return one evidence-backed recommendation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude Code の過去セッション（transcript JSONL）・設定・運用パターンを cclens と同梱スクリプトで収集し、指定された分析観点に沿って傾向分析と改善案を出す。/session-insights で明示起動されたときのみ使用する。キーワードマッチによる自動起動はしない。起動時に分析観点の指定が必須。

Provides guidance for training and analyzing Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) using SAELens to decompose neural network activations into interpretable features. Use when discovering interpretable features, analyzing superposition, or studying monosemantic representations in language models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The live fieldwork layer for psycho-logic — go look at the actual target market NOW instead of reasoning from your training-data stereotype of it. Use when a psycho-logic move needs grounding in a specific place: the user asks 'what do competitors in [region/country] actually do', 'what's the real price band / norm here', 'how do local leaders position themselves', 'research this market before we localise', 'what signals trust to buyers in X', or is about to launch/adapt in a market you haven't studied. Runs structured web research in the local language — local competitors and their signals, price bands, category conventions, review/trust sources, local terminology, taboos and regulations — and synthesises a compact perception profile the four moves consume. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic; pair with cultural-context (the lens that tells you what to look for). 日本語・中文の相談（「現地の実態を調べて」「调研当地市场」）にも使う。

The perception-by-culture lens for psycho-logic — establish HOW a specific region, country, or subculture reads a signal before you send it, because perception is culturally coded and the same move can mean the opposite elsewhere. Use when adapting a product, price, message, or campaign to a new market; when the user asks 'will this work in [country/region]', 'why does this land in X but flop in Y', 'how do people here perceive Z', 'how do we localise/differentiate by region', or is about to copy a US/global playbook into another market. Covers the cultural dimensions that move Sutherland's levers — uncertainty avoidance, individualism/collectivism, status/power distance, high- vs low-context communication, mental-accounting norms, trust locus, and taboo/sacredness — and how each rewires reframing, costly-signaling, and experience-design. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic; pair with market-recon for live local data. 日本語・中文の相談（「この地域で通用する？」「适合本地市场吗？」）にも使う。

Navigate and understand codebases using agentlens hierarchical documentation. Use when exploring new projects, finding modules, locating symbols in large files, finding TODOs/warnings, or understanding code structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

開発前に製品の狙いを検証し、企画の実行判断、利用開始時のつまずき、機能の優先順位を整理します。根拠と次の行動を含む企画書やロードマップにまとめます。

• 曖昧なアイデアを企画書にしたいとき
• 開発する機能の優先順位付け
• 公開前の導入体験の点検

Draw code changes as animated architecture/data-flow SVGs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Static iPhone and MacBook 3D-style showcase with real HTML embedded on screens, glass-lens refraction, and 360-degree turntable composition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs one or more installed review lenses — adversarial critique, edge cases, verification gaps, structure, prose — and reports triaged findings. Use when, and only when, the user asks you to review a diff, a pull request, or an artifact — code or documents, one or many — and actually says "review"; an explicit skill:bmad-review directive from another skill counts as that ask. A request to act on feedback from an earlier review is a change, not a review. Never invoke this uninvited, including on edits you just made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research framework for pre-IPO / private companies (Ant Group, SpaceX, Stripe, ByteDance...). Six analyst lenses — business model, financial forensics, competitive landscape, risk & governance, tech & IP, alternative-data signals — run in parallel via run_swarm, then cross-validated for signal consistency before any verdict. Built around the core challenge of private-company work: information is scarce, so every data point carries a confidence label (high / medium / low), inference is shown separately from fact, and 'I don't know' is a valid output. Outputs a fair-value range, exit-path analysis, and an information-gap map. Use for any unlisted company where you need to judge what the business is actually worth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides guidance for training and analyzing Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) using SAELens to decompose neural network activations into interpretable features. Use when discovering interpretable features, analyzing superposition, or studying monosemantic representations in language models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read a book, article, transcript, or case study through the lens of a specific strategic problem you're facing. Produces an applied playbook that maps the source onto the problem and gives short/medium/long-term recommendations. NOT for general book summaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review through the lens of real engineers' documented philosophies (Torvalds, Thompson, Carmack, Kent Beck, Jobs, Cagan). Complements abstract-role adversarial review with named, sourced perspectives. Use when automated review findings feel generic, when a PR has architectural or UX impact, or when the author wants pre-submit hardening beyond standard checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing or rebalancing direct vs. partner-led channel economics — computing fully-loaded cost-to-serve per channel, channel ROI with cash / LTV / marginal lenses, and optimal channel mix subject to constraints. For Head of Commercial, RevOps, and VP Sales doing quarterly channel review when pipeline is mixed (e.g., 60% direct + 40% partner-led) and nobody actually knows which channel makes money after CAC, support load, partner discount, deal-velocity differences, retention differential, and overhead allocation are all loaded in. Outputs cost to serve, channel ROI verdicts (DOUBLE-DOWN / MAINTAIN / DEFUND / EXIT), a sensitivity-tested channel-mix recommendation, and the diminishing-returns inflection (e.g., 'which channel actually makes money — direct or partner?').

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review requirements, plans, or specs with role-specific lenses. Use when the user wants to improve an existing planning document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing changed or staged code, a branch, or a PR in the Handsontable monorepo across architecture, code quality, performance, accessibility, and tests. Covers SOLID / Law of Demeter / plugin decoupling / breaking-changes policy, custom ESLint rules / JSDoc / naming / cognitive complexity, large-array and render-batching performance, WCAG 2.1 AA + keyboard navigation, and the tests a change ships (a named exercising test per new path, scoped mutation, a ticket on every weakened assertion). Trigger when asked to review changes, check a diff against Handsontable conventions, assess architectural correctness, spot performance regressions, verify accessibility, or judge whether a change's tests prove it, and as the design lens before or while implementing any core change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The scientific method as a universal problem-solving algorithm — goal-first, plural falsifiable hypotheses, designed experiments, and honest measurement, scaling from TDD to feature validation to MVP launch. USE WHEN think about, figure out, experiment, iterate, optimize, hypothesis, science, full cycle, quick diagnosis, structured investigation, how do we test, analyze results. NOT FOR multi-angle lens passes (use IterativeDepth).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。