46 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when deciding whether a project is a strong AISTATS fit, comparing AISTATS with NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, UAI, COLT, JMLR, statistics journals, or application venues, identifying the statistical primitive of the contribution, and sharpening the AI-statistics framing before writing begins.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding whether a project is a genuine ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) contribution rather than single-modality work, choosing a thematic area, and routing between ACM MM, CVPR/ICCV, ACL/EMNLP, ICMR, MMSys, NeurIPS/ICLR, and the ACM TOMM journal by finding the cross-modal or media-systems core of the contribution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding whether a project is a strong AAMAS fit, comparing AAMAS with AAAI, IJCAI, NeurIPS, ICML, EC, and the JAAMAS journal, identifying whether the agents are truly the research object, naming the interaction primitive (solution concept, mechanism, coordination, negotiation), and sharpening the multiagent framing before writing begins.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when positioning an AAMAS submission against multiagent, game-theory, and reinforcement-learning literature spread across AAMAS, AAAI, IJCAI, NeurIPS, ICML, EC, and JAAMAS, including arXiv and workshop versions, concurrent submissions, prior conference versions, and the cross-community citation coverage AAMAS reviewers expect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding whether a project is a strong AAAI submission across its broad AI scope, should be reframed or routed to a dedicated track such as AI for Social Impact or AI Alignment, or should instead go to IJCAI, NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AISTATS, UAI, ACL, CVPR, KDD, CHI, ICRA, or another specialist venue.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
机器之心/Synced（国内首家系统性AI科技媒体）的AI内容创作思维——论文级深度+量化驱动+学术与产业双线并跑+产品化媒体运营。 触发词：「机器之心视角」「像机器之心那样写」「Synced Review」「AI论文解读」「SOTA评测」「AI产业分析」「GMIS大会」。 擅长：顶会论文拆解报道（ICLR/NeurIPS/CVPR）、AI模型数据评测（SOTA平台）、产业趋势三层推演（技术→商业→生态）、AI中国年度评选、学术中立+产业判断、PRO会员通讯。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end academic paper writing workflow. Takes a research repository and produces a publication-ready LaTeX manuscript for top ML/AI conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM). Covers repo understanding, structure planning, section drafting, citation management, anti-AI polishing, and conference formatting. Triggers on "write paper", "draft paper", "scholar writing", "paper writing workflow".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help authors learn from exemplary ICLR, ICML, and NeurIPS papers through source-linked manuscript comparisons, concrete writing and experiment suggestions, and guided reflection. Use for research storytelling, contribution framing, paper comparison, figure planning, or research retrospectives. Not an acceptance predictor or a routine grammar/citation formatter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Base template for Stage1 reviewer-comment breakdown. Use when creating or extending conference-specific Stage1 skills (for example ICLR, ICML, NeurIPS, ACL) so shared extraction, splitting, and response-mapping logic stays consistent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Machine Learning Researcher. Use when a task calls for Machine Learning Researcher judgment. Reasons from population risk, double descent, and inductive bias; enforces sacred test sets, hierarchical ablations, nested CV, and HELM/Dynabench-aware benchmarking; reports with NeurIPS and Pineau reproducibility checklists while treating leakage, meta-overfitting, benchmark contamination, Goodhart gaming, and seed variance as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Deep Learning Scientist. Use when a task calls for Deep Learning Scientist judgment. Reasons from CNN/Transformer inductive bias, Li et al. loss landscapes, grokking/mode connectivity, and Kaplan/Chinchilla scaling (~20 tokens/param); designs ResNet/ViT/DiT/MoE/FlashAttention stacks with FLOPs-matched ablations; trains AdamW+cosine/WSD via Megatron-FSDP/DeepSpeed; evaluates FID/MMLU-Pro/MMLU-CF with lm-eval decontamination and Pineau/NeurIPS reproducibility checklists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert AI Researcher. Use when a task calls for AI Researcher judgment. Reasons from data generating processes, inductive biases, and compute-data-algorithm trade-offs through train/val/test discipline, seed sweeps, ablation ladders, and standards like NeurIPS reproducibility checklists, model cards, and lm-eval-harness, while treating data leakage (Kapoor & Narayanan taxonomy), benchmark contamination, spurious correlations, and reward-model overoptimization as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate, critique, and iterate image-generation prompts for high-fidelity academic paper poster reference mockups before implementing HTML/PDF/PPTX. Use when Codex is asked to create a poster concept image, imagegen prompt, visual reference draft, layout mockup, or "生图" design for ACL/EMNLP/NeurIPS-style A0 posters from a paper, figures, metrics, logos, QR codes, or an existing poster screenshot.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simulate rigorous, fair peer review on a paper — in two modes. (A) Red-team YOUR OWN draft before submission to predict the reviews you'll get and get a fix list. (B) Review SOMEONE ELSE'S paper when you're an assigned reviewer or helping your advisor — produce a fair, venue-formatted, submission-ready review. Use whenever the user gives a paper (PDF, .tex, .md, arXiv link, or pasted text) and wants to predict reviews, find weaknesses before reviewers do, stress-test a submission, OR write a real review of another paper. Grounded in official NeurIPS/ICLR/ACL reviewer guidelines; every criticism pinned to a location, and checked against ACL's H1–H17 list of illegitimate critiques. 两种模式:审自己的稿(投稿前红队)/ 审别人的稿(当审稿人或帮导师),按会议官方标准评,绝不脑补、绝不发不正当批评。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when independently reviewing a research-paper draft before submission, running a mock top-conference panel, assessing readiness or accept/reject risk, or predicting reviewer concerns for venues such as CVPR, ICCV, ECCV, ICLR, NeurIPS, and AAAI. Does not draft or audit author responses after official reviews arrive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help authors learn from exemplary ICLR, ICML, and NeurIPS papers through source-linked manuscript comparisons, concrete writing and experiment suggestions, and guided reflection. Use for research storytelling, contribution framing, paper comparison, figure planning, or research retrospectives. Not an acceptance predictor or a routine grammar/citation formatter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine academic writing for computer science research papers targeting top-tier venues (NeurIPS, ICLR, ICML, AAAI, IJCAI, ACL, EMNLP, NAACL, CVPR, WWW, KDD, SIGIR, CIKM, and similar). Use this skill whenever a user asks to improve, polish, refine, edit, or proofread academic or research writing — including paper drafts, abstracts, introductions, related work sections, methodology descriptions, experiment write-ups, or conclusion sections. Also trigger when users paste LaTeX content and ask for writing help, mention "camera-ready", "rebuttal", "paper revision", or reference any academic venue or conference. This skill handles both full paper refinement and section-by-section editing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write ML papers for NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR: design→submit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write ML papers for NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR: design→submit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write ML papers for NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR: design→submit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end pipeline for writing ML/AI research papers — from experiment design through analysis, drafting, revision, and submission. Covers NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Integrates automated experiment monitoring, statistical analysis, iterative writing, and citation verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。