「reviews」の検索結果

Reviews a change before it is merged, from little or no input. With nothing typed it reviews the branch you are on, uncommitted work included, against its base, its PR and its ticket, so a developer can check their own work before asking for review. With PR links, repo#N or a branch it reviews someone else's change the same way, several repos at once. It judges the failed CI checks and every Bugbot and reviewer comment, gets a fresh breaker review, traces every other piece of code that uses what changed, proves each finding or marks it unproven, says what the merge needs (a build, env vars, migrations, deploy order) and how to check the deploy, never posts to GitHub, and offers fixes only after the report. Runs only when the user types it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-platform review analysis — pulls Yelp/Google/TripAdvisor reviews, identifies recurring complaints, sentiment patterns, response rate, and rating trajectory

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Crabboxの一時環境でネイティブアプリやWebアプリを起動し、チャットのサイドパネルに表示します。動作確認や画面操作、終了時の環境整理も扱います。

• ネイティブアプリを起動して見たいとき
• Webアプリのプレビュー
• 画面操作によるアプリのテスト

GitHubのIssueやPRを確認・作成し、コメントやレビュー、CIの実行結果を扱います。失敗ログの調査や再実行、承認されたマージの状態確認にも対応します。

• IssueやPRを作成・更新したいとき
• PRのレビューやチェックを確認したいとき
• CIの失敗ログ調査と再実行

公開前や変更の取り込み後に、アプリの認証・データ・決済・運用を根拠付きで点検します。公開を妨げる問題と優先して直す項目を、本番への準備状況としてまとめるスキル。

• 公開前に本番への準備状況を確認したいとき
• 変更の取り込み後にリスクを確認したいとき
• CI通過後の本番リスクの点検

PubMedで医学・生命科学の文献を探し、統制語や条件を使った検索式の作成、抄録・書誌情報の取得、再現可能な検索記録の整理を支援するスキル。

• 研究テーマの医学論文を探したいとき
• 主題語と期間で検索式を作りたいとき
• PMIDから抄録・書誌情報を取得

発表用のメモやPowerPointから、ブラウザで動くHTMLスライドを作ります。見本でデザインを選び、画面に収まるレイアウトとアニメーションを整えます。

• 登壇や社内報告のスライド作成
• PowerPointをHTML化したいとき
• 見本から資料のデザインを選びたいとき

機械学習・AIの研究論文を、関連文献の調査から実験設計、結果分析、執筆、投稿準備まで支援します。引用の検証や査読への対応も扱います。

• 既存のコードや結果から論文を書きたいとき
• 研究の主張を裏づける実験を計画したいとき
• 関連研究と引用を確認したいとき

When the user wants to create, optimize, or analyze a referral program, affiliate program, or word-of-mouth strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'referral,' 'affiliate,' 'ambassador,' 'word of mouth,' 'viral loop,' 'refer a friend,' 'partner program,' 'referral incentive,' 'how to get referrals,' 'customers referring customers,' 'affiliate payout,' 'get more reviews,' 'G2 reviews,' 'review campaign,' or 'respond to a bad review.' Use this whenever someone wants existing users or partners to bring in new customers. For launch-specific virality, see launch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community research," "forum research," "competitor reviews," "customer sentiment," "PMF survey," "product/market fit survey," "customer interview questions," "interview outreach," "Sales Safari," or "find out why customers churn/convert/buy." Use for analyzing existing research assets, mining online sources, AND running primary research (interviews and surveys). For writing copy informed by research, see copywriting. For acting on research to improve pages, see cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts systematic, scoping, and narrative literature reviews using PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, and other appropriate sources. Use for research synthesis, reproducible literature searches, screening, citation checking, or preparing Markdown and PDF reviews. Tracks search coverage, records versus studies, and evidence limitations; supports meta-analysis planning but does not supply a meta-analysis engine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions with finding deduplication, severity calibration, and consolidated reporting. Use this skill when organizing multi-reviewer code reviews, calibrating finding severity, or consolidating review results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft performance reviews, self-assessments, peer reviews, and upward feedback in your own voice. Analyzes your contributions, emails, and meeting history via WorkIQ, then produces honest, impact-focused drafts using the STAR format. USE FOR: write my performance review, draft self-assessment, peer review, 360 feedback, annual review, mid-year review, upward feedback, write review for colleague, performance appraisal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn vague "what did I do?" into evidence-backed impact statements for performance reviews, self-reviews, promotion packets, and weekly updates. Uniquely mines Copilot CLI session logs to reconstruct forgotten work, plus git commits and GitHub PRs. Enforces a 3-part impact contract (action → result → evidence). Works standalone with zero dependencies. Trigger for: "brag", "log work", "what did I do", "backfill my work history", "performance review", "self-review", "self assessment", "write impact statement", "review prep", "promo packet", "promotion case", "weekly update", "status report", "accomplishments", "what did I ship", "I forgot to log my work", "summarize my work", "track my wins", "what should I highlight", "end of half", "career growth", "work journal", or any request to document, summarize, or organize work accomplishments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security guidance and vulnerability review for codebases, APIs, services, CLI tools, libraries, and daemons. Use for security questions, focused reviews, vulnerability research, security audits, or pen tests. Run the complete workflow only for explicit codebase audit or pen-test requests, full/comprehensive/end-to-end reviews, or requested report artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft and post direct, unhedged GitHub PR reviews and issue comments — every item is a required change with a pointer and reason, PR reviews land as "request changes" or "approve" (never a bare comment), and nothing is marked optional or deferred to a follow-up. Use whenever understand-pr or understand-issue (or any review) is about to draft or post to GitHub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous multi-round research review loop. Repeatedly reviews using a secondary Codex agent, implements fixes, and re-reviews until positive assessment or max rounds reached. Use when user says "auto review loop", "review until it passes", or wants autonomous iterative improvement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous multi-round research review loop. Repeatedly reviews using Gemini via gemini-review MCP, implements fixes, and re-reviews until positive assessment or max rounds reached. Use when user says "auto review loop", "review until it passes", or wants autonomous iterative improvement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous multi-round research review loop. Repeatedly reviews using Claude Code via claude-review MCP, implements fixes, and re-reviews until positive assessment or max rounds reached. Use when user says "auto review loop", "review until it passes", or wants autonomous iterative improvement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow 4: Submission rebuttal pipeline. Parses external reviews, enforces coverage and grounding, drafts a safe text-only rebuttal under venue limits, and manages follow-up rounds. Use when user says "rebuttal", "reply to reviewers", "ICML rebuttal", "OpenReview response", or wants to answer external reviews safely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security guidance and vulnerability review for codebases, APIs, services, CLI tools, libraries, and daemons. Use for security questions, focused reviews, vulnerability research, security audits, or pen tests. Run the complete workflow only for explicit codebase audit or pen-test requests, full/comprehensive/end-to-end reviews, or requested report artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-first pull request judge that reviews a PR and posts one consolidated GitHub review with inline comments via the gh CLI. Runs the repo's own deterministic checks first, researches current official docs before any claim about external libraries or APIs, then reviews correctness, security, structural quality (code judo, spaghetti growth, file-size limits), and AI slop including useless code comments. Every finding must carry evidence, every comment passes a deterministic noise gate before posting, and the verdict (APPROVE, COMMENT, REQUEST_CHANGES) is weighed by findings. Use when asked to review a PR, judge this PR, review this branch or diff before merge, run the-judge, "revise esse PR", "faca o code review", or "julgue esse PR". Do NOT use for reviewing prose or documents, fixing CI failures, resolving merge conflicts, writing the fix itself, or responding to review comments (use gh-address-comments).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find businesses, leads, emails, reviews, ratings, and contact details from Google Maps. Use for requests such as "find dentists in Berlin", "scrape Google Maps", "get local business leads", or "collect Google Maps reviews". Runs the open-source scraper locally with Docker and guides nontechnical users through setup, monitoring, and results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix concrete MSBuild property defects in projects and existing shared-file hierarchies. USE FOR: conditions, defaults, append versus overwrite, last-write-wins values, OS/TFM checks, portable paths, normalization, and reviews centered on those property defects. Property defects in Directory.Build.* remain in scope, including overwritten values across parent/child imports and conditions that run before TargetFramework is set, even when the fix changes import order or moves a property group to .targets. DO NOT USE FOR: placement-only or import-only requests with no concrete property defect, such as discovering shared files or choosing which file owns a target or customization (use directory-build-organization); item operations; target structure; broad reviews without a concrete property defect; non-MSBuild work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。