「score」の検索結果

Build a structured interview scorecard for a role. Use when the user says "create an interview scorecard", "build an interview guide", "what questions should I ask for this role", "help me evaluate candidates consistently", "design the interview process", or wants to assess candidates against defined criteria - even if they don't explicitly say "scorecard". Also use when a recruiter or hiring manager wants to prevent gut-feel hiring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze ad creatives (images and videos) extracted from competitor research. Use when given a directory of ad images, video files, or transcripts to evaluate ad quality, score visual and messaging effectiveness, assign a scale score for viral/engagement potential, and generate a cross-creative pattern summary. Triggered by requests like "analyze these ads", "score these creatives", "what hooks are competitors using", "evaluate the ad library", "give me a scale score", "analyze the ad folder", or "what's working in these ads".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assigns confidence scores to agent outputs based on multiple factors including source quality, consistency, and reasoning depth. Produces calibrated confidence estimates. Activate on 'confidence score', 'how confident', 'certainty level', 'output confidence', 'reliability score'. NOT for validation (use dag-output-validator) or hallucination detection (use dag-hallucination-detector).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

工程ごとの完了判定、品質ゲート、証跡、標準検証コマンド、例外運用を設計するスキル。 実装完了・テスト実施・品質確認完了・出荷可能を分離し、再利用可能な gate matrix を作る。 「全OK」「完了」などの曖昧な完了表現を排除し、証跡に基づく退出条件を定義する。 Use when defining Definition of Done, quality gates, exit criteria, release readiness gates, evidence requirements, exception handling, or standardized verification commands. Covers: definition of done, quality gate, exit criteria, release readiness, 完了判定, 品質ゲート. Distinct from project-completeness-scorer (which scores) -- this skill designs the gates and criteria themselves.

Builds a DRAFT weighted supplier evaluation matrix from supplier responses and the panel's agreed criteria, weights and scale: a provisional score per cell with the quoted evidence and anchor behind it, a register of every missing or partial answer, and calibration and sensitivity flags. Provisional for panel moderation; never recommends, awards or disqualifies. Use when the user asks to score, weight or rank supplier, bid or tender responses against agreed criteria, for example "score these bids", "build the evaluation matrix", "weight the tender responses" or "rank the suppliers against our criteria". Do not use for a side-by-side comparison without scores, use rfp-comparison-pack instead; for writing the criteria, use rfp-requirements-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Marp形式プレゼンテーションの専門レビュー・評価・改善スキル。 10軸スコアリング（100点満点）で品質を定量評価し、具体的な改善コード付きで提案する。 Use when the user asks to: - Review, evaluate, or critique a Marp presentation / プレゼンをレビュー / 評価 / 添削 - Improve, polish, or upgrade existing slides / スライドを改善 / ブラッシュアップ - Check slide quality, score slides, or audit a deck / スライドの品質チェック / 採点 - "このプレゼンどう？" "スライドを見てほしい" "プレゼン資料のフィードバック" Reads .md files with Marp frontmatter, scores across 10 dimensions, and outputs a detailed review report with concrete before/after code improvements. Works as a companion to the marp-slides skill (generation → review → improvement cycle).

AIエージェントの成果物を、正確さ・網羅性・明瞭さ・実行しやすさ・簡潔さの5軸で自己評価し、根拠付きの点数と優先順位を付けた改善案をまとめます。

• 複数ファイルの実装後の自己評価
• 複数工程を終えた成果物の点検
• 設計文書や分析レポートの評価

CodeScene MCPでコード構造の保守しやすさを評価するスキル。編集前後のスコアを比較し、コミットやPRの前にAIによる変更で品質が下がっていないか確認します。

• 見慣れないファイルを編集前に確認したいとき
• AIの変更で保守性が下がっていないか確認
• スコアを比較しながらコードを整理したいとき

Retrieve the composite country resilience score (0-100) and its domain/pillar breakdown for a single country. Use when the user asks how resilient a country is, or wants its numeric resilience score, trend, or per-domain breakdown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

5-dimension harness readiness scorecard from `metaharness score {path}`. Returns harnessFit / compileConfidence / taskCoverage / toolSafety / memoryUsefulness + estCostPerRunUsd + scaffoldReady. Pure-read; subprocess invocation; degrades gracefully when MetaHarness is absent (ADR-150 architectural constraint).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run `@metaharness/darwin evolve {repo}` to mutate a harness's seven policy surfaces (planner/contextBuilder/reviewer/retryPolicy/toolPolicy/memoryPolicy/scorePolicy), sandbox-score each variant, and promote only measured wins. The model is frozen; the harness evolves. Closes the loop ADR-150 opens (score+genome describe; evolve changes). Degrades gracefully when @metaharness/darwin is absent (ADR-150 + ADR-153 architectural constraints).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Looks up precomputed AlphaGenome Atlas effects for any GRCh38 single-nucleotide variant (AVI score with Phred and 18 SHAP feature attributions, plus raw and quantile scores for RNA-seq, DNase, ATAC, ChIP-TF, ChIP-histone, CAGE, PRO-cap, splicing, polyadenylation and contact-map tracks), scores variants or scans windows on demand with the AlphaGenome model for human and mouse (variant scoring, in silico mutagenesis, REF-versus-ALT track prediction), and builds Atlas website deep links. Use when the user mentions AlphaGenome, AlphaGenome Atlas, AVI or AlphaGenome Variant Impact, DeepMind variant effect prediction, or wants to prioritise or mechanistically interpret non-coding, regulatory, splicing, enhancer, promoter, or chromatin-accessibility effects of SNVs from a VCF, credible set, or region. Research use only; not a clinical tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts comprehensive wholesale product data from 1688.com product detail pages: title, tiered pricing, SKU variants with dimensions/weight, product images, seller info, shop scores, buyer protection, cross-border flags, product attributes, coupon/promotion data, and review stats. Use when user mentions 1688, 1688.com, wholesale China, alibaba wholesale, B2B China sourcing, Chinese wholesale scraper, 1688 product scrape, 1688 offer, 1688 detail, extract 1688 data, pull 1688 listings, get wholesale price, 1688 supplier info, factory stats 1688, 1688 SKU variants, 1688 product attributes, 1688 shop score, DSR score 1688, 1688 buyer protection, 1688 cross-border, 1688 dropship. Also applies to: scraping bulk product data from 1688 by offer ID list, monitoring 1688 supplier metrics, extracting 1688 pricing tiers for resale analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score and diagnose Google Ads landing pages. Use when asked to audit a landing page, check landing page quality, diagnose high-CTR but low-conversion-rate ad groups, improve Quality Score's Landing Page Experience component, or compare an ad group's messaging against its landing page. Trigger on "landing page audit", "landing page score", "landing page quality", "why is my conversion rate low", "LPX", "landing page experience", "ad to page match", or when `/google-ads-audit` surfaces a high-CTR / low-CVR ad group.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score, annotate, and analyze the functional impact of genetic variants using AlphaGenome Variant Impact (AVI) scores. Query variants in chr:pos:ref>alt format, annotate VCF/tabular callsets, perform saturation mutagenesis window scans (1-based closed chr:start-end), and extract GENCODE v46 GTF gene/exon/junction coordinates all via the AlphaGenome Atlas API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build quiz and assessment funnels that generate qualified leads at 30-50% conversion. Use when the user mentions "quiz funnel", "scorecard", "lead magnet", "score-based segmentation", or "lead qualification". Also trigger when designing self-assessment tools, building calculators or graders for marketing, or creating personalized result pages that drive conversions. Covers concept hooks, question design, dynamic results by tier, and automated follow-up sequences. For landing page conversion, see cro-methodology. For full marketing plans, see one-page-marketing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn interview notes into a structured candidate scorecard and hire recommendation. Use when asked to write an interview scorecard, a candidate evaluation, an interview debrief, or to summarize feedback into a hire/no-hire call. Produces a per-competency assessment with evidence and ratings, an overall recommendation with confidence, and the open questions for the next round — evidence-based, bias-aware, and decision-ready.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects TAD boundaries from balanced Hi-C contact matrices via the diamond-window insulation score (cooltools insulation) and HiCExplorer hicFindTADs, returning a continuous log2 insulation track, valley-prominence boundary_strength, and Li/Otsu-thresholded is_boundary flags across a list of window sizes. Covers the multi-scale window sweep (sub-TAD to compartment-domain), why the boundary is reproducible but the domain partition is not, cross-condition comparison via differential SCORE not differential partition, and the insulation-vs-compartment orthogonality. Use when calling TADs or domain boundaries, computing insulation scores, choosing a window size, ranking boundary strength, comparing boundaries across conditions, or annotating CTCF-backed boundaries; route domain rendering to hic-visualization and boundary-feature overlap to genome-intervals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rank and prioritize neoantigen/epitope candidates by likely T-cell response using NeoFox feature annotation, PRIME2.0, BigMHC-IM, the Łuksza/Balachandran fitness model (agretopicity + foreignness), and pVACtools tiering. Encodes the field's hard truths that immunogenicity is the least-solved layer (dedicated scores ~AUROC 0.6-0.7, modest PPV), that scores are valid only for RANKING within one patient (never absolute go/no-go or cross-patient), that DAI has anchor-inflation and WT-denominator traps, and that stacking weak correlated scores into one number is a red flag. Use when ordering a candidate list for a vaccine. Binding lives in mhc-binding-prediction; calling in neoantigen-prediction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculate a productivity score using actual Agent Monitor metrics — session completion rates, cache efficiency (cache_read vs input), compaction pressure (baseline tokens), turn velocity (turn_count / total_turn_duration_ms), tool success ratio (PreToolUse vs PostToolUse), and the workflow intelligence API's complexity and effectiveness scores.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits existing table permissions on a Power Pages site by analyzing them against site code and Dataverse metadata, then GRADES the configuration with deterministic 1–5 scores across 3 security/usability/correctness categories (9 dimensions). Detection is anchored by a recurring-issue catalog so findings and severities stay consistent run-to-run. Generates an HTML report with an at-a-glance verdict and per-category scores in the Overview plus a single list of **major/minor** issues (each major issue labelled permissions-only or upstream-caused with a short justification), and suggested fixes. Use when the user wants to review, verify, check, score, or grade table permissions for security issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

5-dimension scorecard (0-100, grade A/B/C/F) for a scaffolded harness. Dimensions: Repo understanding (25%), Agent usefulness (25%), MCP safety (20%), Test coverage (15%), Publish readiness (15%). Emits a 6-field badges block (score + mcpRisk + 4 booleans) ready for the harness README. Exit 0 A/B, 1 C, 2 F.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

7-section readiness scorecard for a LOCAL repo. Reports repo type + agent topology + MCP risk + test confidence + release readiness + recommended harness plan + scorecard. Exit 0 ready, 1 needs-work, 2 blocked. --json for the 6-field scorecard, --bundle for the ADR-031 schema-1 envelope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an ad account needs a systematic CONFIGURATION audit — 84 checkpoints across account, campaign, ad set, ad, tracking, and optimization, scored into a Health Score out of 100, quick wins ranked by impact, regional benchmarks, and a dropshipping checklist, covering Meta, Google, and TikTok. Trigger on 'ads audit', 'audit my ad account', 'is my Meta setup correct', 'health score for the account', 'review my Google Ads', 'we inherited this account and it is a mess'. Not for — diagnosing why the numbers moved this week, see `03-performance-eval-global`; planning fresh budget, see `54-media-plan-global`; rebuilding the campaign hierarchy, see `52-account-structure-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。