「score」の検索結果

OpenClawの機能分類とQAの証拠を照合し、品質・機能の充足度・長期サポートの評価を見直して、成熟度のスコアカード文書を更新するスキルです。

• 機能領域ごとの成熟度を見直したいとき
• 想定した利用手順の充足度を確認したいとき
• QAの証拠から評価文書を更新したいとき

Use this skill to compute ESTIMATE immune-related microenvironment scores from a bulk expression matrix, generate an ESTIMATE score heatmap, and optionally generate group-wise ESTIMATE score boxplots plus significance tables when a sample group file is supplied. Trigger keywords: ESTIMATE, immune score, stromal score, tumor microenvironment score. NOT for: immune cell deconvolution, single-cell analysis, differential expression, clinical diagnosis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads a CARLA Leaderboard results.json — per-route driving score, route completion, infraction penalty and the infraction lists — explains how the score was computed for that leaderboard version, and rescores an existing result under the other version's rules (2.0 multiplicative vs 2.1 additive) without re-running anything. Also diffs two runs and merges sharded result files. Use when the user asks "what did I score", "why is my score low", "did my agent pass", "why don't my scores match the leaderboard", or hands over a results.json.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score work out of 10 against a clear rubric, then improve it round by round until every item reaches the target score the user named (for example "get it to 8 out of 10", "bring everything under 6 up to 6+"). Covers anchored rubrics, measurable criteria, independent or blind judging, before/after scorecards, and honest reporting of anything still short. Use whenever the user asks to score, rate, grade or judge something out of 10, names a target score, or asks "what would make this a 9?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trustpilot company profile lookup on trustpilot.com — input a company domain (e.g. apple.com, shopify.com, shopwagandtail.com) and extract company metadata: official display name, businessUnitId, TrustScore (1-5), star rating, total review count, last-12-months review count, primary category and all categories, verification flags (verifiedByGoogle, verifiedPaymentMethod, verifiedUserIdentity), claimed/closed status, website URL, contact info (email, phone, country, city, address, zip), profile image, and optional reply behavior metrics (averageDaysToReply, replyPercentage, negativeReviewsWithRepliesCount, companyUsesAIResponses). Detects company-not-found and returns isCompanyFound=false with the searched domain. Use when user mentions Trustpilot company info, Trustpilot TrustScore, look up Trustpilot rating, check Trustpilot stars, Trustpilot business profile, Trustpilot review count, Trustpilot company lookup, Trustpilot verification status, Trustpilot reply percentage, Trustpilot AI responses, business unit ID Trustpilot, get company rating from Trustpilot, scrape Trustpilot company, batch enrich domains with Trustpilot, bulk company info Trustpilot, fast domain enrichment with TrustScore, Trustpilot company metadata, Trustpilot brand monitoring, competitor TrustScore comparison, trustpilot.com domain enrichment, trustpilot company profile, trustpilot domain check, trustpilot business listing, check if company is on Trustpilot, Trustpilot category lookup, company contact info from Trustpilot. Also applies to lead-list enrichment with reputation scores, supplier vetting, agency or KOL vetting via review reputation, aggregator sites that need TrustScores for many domains, due-diligence workflows, and pre-outreach reputation checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performance scorecard design, post-matter feedback collection, QBR preparation, and firm comparison for in-house legal ops teams evaluating outside counsel. Design a scorecard framework calibrated to your team's maturity level. Produce post-matter feedback forms for supervising attorneys to complete at matter close. Prepare a QBR pack with agenda, data summary, and talking points for structured business reviews. Produce a side-by-side firm comparison for panel decision-making. Trigger on: 'design a performance scorecard', 'how do we evaluate our firms', 'build us a scorecard', 'post-matter feedback form', 'feedback at matter close', 'collect feedback on the firm', 'QBR', 'quarterly business review', 'prep for the firm review', 'what should I raise with the partner', 'compare the firms', 'which firm is performing better', 'rank our panel', 'firm performance data', 'scorecard framework', 'evaluate outside counsel', 'annual firm review', 'how are our firms performing'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Busabase App-in-Skill review queue that scores candidate SME financing deals (revenue-based/RBF-style credit) with a deterministic, fully auditable rule-based rubric — never an LLM or API call. Use when the user invokes $kelly-deal-scorer or /kelly-deal-scorer, wants to review a deal-underwriting queue, score financing candidates, compute a composite score breakdown, see a suggested revenue-share rate range, or record approve/send-back/reject decisions for a private-credit or RBF-style lending pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads a CARLA Leaderboard results.json — per-route driving score, route completion, infraction penalty and the infraction lists — explains how the score was computed for that leaderboard version, and rescores an existing result under the other version's rules (2.0 multiplicative vs 2.1 additive) without re-running anything. Also diffs two runs and merges sharded result files. Use when the user asks "what did I score", "why is my score low", "did my agent pass", "why don't my scores match the leaderboard", or hands over a results.json.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score a game's combat skills and spells out of 10 with blind judges, then raise the weakest to a bar, for timing and readability (does a skill read as itself, does the blow land when it lands) and for art (detail, light, trails, impact, art direction, judged against a reference such as Diablo IV). Covers filming casts on a stopped, stepped clock, contact strips and close-ups, anonymised two-judge rounds, the levers that moved scores (hero props made from a painted concept with image-to-3D, own schedules and keyed moves, painted additive textures, camera-facing ribbons, light outside the body), the traps that cost points, asset and load budgets, and shipping each skill as its own version. Use when the user asks to score, review, improve, polish or rebuild combat skills, spells or attacks; says a skill "doesn't make sense", "looks bad" or should look like another game; names a target score; or starts a "next skill" thread. Project specifics (review hooks, harness settings, where each skill's code lives, scores so far) go in an optional local references/<project>.md next to this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a full AWS Well-Architected Framework review evaluating every framework question across all pillars discovered from the live AWS documentation by analyzing code, IaC, and configurations to produce evidence-backed findings with Eisenhower-prioritized remediation. Supports full reviews (every framework best practice with BP ID citations), quick reviews (question-level), pillar-scoped reviews, score-mode reviews (a maturity scorecard with per-pillar scores and filtered findings), and lens-specific reviews using lenses discovered from the live AWS documentation. Triggers on mentions of Well-Architected review, WA review, WAR, pillar assessment, architecture review across pillars, workload assessment, cloud readiness evaluation, or a Well-Architected score, grade, or scorecard request. Does not apply to single-pillar deep-dives, learning WA concepts, ADRs, or migration readiness assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits any landing or service page across 48 checks in 10 categories for LLM/AI discoverability, GEO readiness, content clarity, schema markup, internal linking, freshness signals, and technical crawlability. Produces an overall score out of 100, a per-category score out of 100, pass/warn/fail/ manual counts, and a prioritised fix list — all rendered as a standalone HTML report saved to disk. Use when a user provides a URL and asks to audit it, score it, check its GEO readiness, test its AI discoverability, run a landing page audit, or evaluate it for LLM citation potential. Also trigger on phrases like "audit this page", "score this URL", "check GEO for", "is this page AI-ready", "run a GEO audit", "LLM page check", "how would AI read this page", or "landing page score".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score an ecommerce URL for SEO + GEO readiness and AI citation visibility. Triggers on "geo score", "SEO + GEO score", "check ecommerce GEO", "Amazon/Shopify GEO", "GEO readiness audit". Covers product pages, store pages, marketplace listings, category pages, and homepages, scored from crawlable evidence (not live AI polling).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building, migrating, or debugging Agent Evals on Inngest: scoring AI agent or workflow outcomes, deferred scorers, sessions, traces, step experiments, experiment variant attribution, Insights queries, or production eval loops for prompts, models, tools, providers, and agent behavior. Covers TypeScript SDK v4 scoring beta APIs, `scoreMiddleware`, `step.score`, `inngest.score`, `createScorer`, `defer`, `group.experiment`, `experimentRef`, `meta.sessions`, and when to use durable workflow primitives for outcome-based evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a customer health scorecard across usage, engagement, adoption, NPS, support load, and financial risk. Use when user says "health score", "customer health", "build a scorecard", "how healthy is this account", "customer scoring model", "green yellow red", "health dashboard", or "account health framework" - even if they don't say "scorecard" explicitly. Applies to CSMs building account health models or CS leaders standardizing health tracking across the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when configuring MCAE (Account Engagement / Pardot) lead scoring models, grading profiles, score decay rules, or automation rules that fire on score/grade thresholds. Covers: scoring point values per activity, score decay for inactivity, Profiles for fit grading, combined MQL definitions (Score + Grade), and automation rules vs completion actions. NOT for defining the MQL model before build — use admin/lead-scoring-requirements. NOT for Engagement Studio nurture programs — use admin/lead-nurture-journey-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scores inbound leads against the qualification rubric the user supplies (criteria, scale, weights, thresholds and disqualifiers as given): one DRAFT scorecard per lead with the evidence quoted per criterion, UNKNOWN wherever the lead's information is missing, totals shown with and without the UNKNOWN criteria, a ranked list and a suggested next step such as a qualification call, a request for missing details, nurture or a courteous decline. Use when the user asks to "score these inbound leads", "qualify this lead against our rubric", "run the web form submissions through our lead criteria", "which of these leads should sales call first" or "build a lead scorecard". Do not use for preparing the first call with a lead, use discovery-call-prep instead; for an existing account's growth plan use account-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Supports multivariate severity assessment and exploratory endpoint-time score forecasting for laboratory animal studies using the RELSA (RELative Severity Assessment) score and ARIMA-based foRcast forecasting. Use when combining welfare readouts — body weight or weight loss, body temperature, clinical or nesting scores, biomarkers, activity, heart rate, burrowing, wheel running — into one severity score per animal per day, when asking which animals are at risk of reaching a humane endpoint at a specified future observation time, when defining attention/danger zones or thresholds on a severity scale by kernel density estimation, or when reporting severity for a 3Rs, refinement, animal-welfare, or EU Directive 2010/63/EU severity-assessment context. Covers directionality ("turned" variables), baseline normalization, reference sets, RELSA weights, ARIMA prediction intervals, and RMSE/PICP/MPIW evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Light carved wood in a dark room in three.js, with procedural grain and pores, one warm key through a window, soft shadows that touch, light shafts, background rays and dust, then score the render out of 10 on an anchored rubric with a runnable headless scorecard and iterate until each item reaches the target. Use for oiled timber, kumiko, joinery and workshop scenes; wood that reads flat, plastic or washed out; volumetrics that lift the blacks; "score this out of 10"; or "get the lighting to 8".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Aiming for design-award quality: score a web surface against published design-award judging axes and name the binding constraint. Use when the user says: award-bar-score, award bar score, award winning, award-winning, award winning website, award-winning website, award winning design, award ready.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) scores from vulnerability data sources with proper fallback handling. This skill covers understanding CVSS v3, handling multiple score sources (NVD, GHSA, RedHat), implementing source priority logic, and dealing with missing scores in security reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a scored heuristic critique of the UI using Nielsen's 10 + 6 design laws + optional persona walkthroughs. Outputs a machine-parseable scorecard plus a 0-100 UsabilityScore (the judged companion to the deterministic UICraftScore). Invoke when the user asks for heuristic on their UI, or mentions 'heuristic' alongside design / UI / frontend work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scores a riso film or reworks its score. Designs the cue list from the film's FILM.md events, builds a deterministic renderAudio() from the sound kit in studies/sound.html, iterates with tools/audio.mjs, gates determinism, length, loudness and sync, and records measured results in FILM.md. Use for "score this film", "add sound/music", "the climax is too loud", "fix the handoff at 16 s", "check the mix", sound effects, foley or a soundtrack on a riso film. Not for drawing or motion (riso-film) or changing tools/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Listen to generated music by measuring it and by reading it as sheet music: render Strudel code or record a Web Audio page through the real engine in headless Chromium, then read spectrograms, pYIN pitch lines, chroma, roughness and semitone-rub meters; engrave notes as a score with beat-by-beat harmony; transcribe a melody from audio; read MusicXML/MIDI/ABC or a score image into notes and into Strudel code. Use to check whether generated music sounds right or better (before/after a change), to match a reference track, spectrogram image or score, or to find discordant chords, a buried melody, clipping or muddy mixes. Triggers on 'does it sound better', 'listen to', 'render and check', 'spectrogram', 'sfft/stft', 'discordant', 'clashing chords', 'sounds off', 'compare to the original', 'reproduce this track in Strudel', 'sheet music', 'score', 'notation', 'MusicXML', 'MIDI', 'ABC', 'transcribe', 'OMR'. Pairs with strudeling (writing Strudel); for format conversion use processing-video.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。