「trade-offs」の検索結果

Use this skill to write the PR description (PR body) for any pull request opened against microsoft/apm. Produces one self-sufficient GitHub-Flavored Markdown artifact: TL;DR, Problem (WHY), Approach (WHAT), Implementation (HOW), 1-3 validated mermaid diagrams, explicit trade-offs, validation evidence, and a How-to-test section -- with every WHY-claim backed by a verbatim quote from PROSE or Agent Skills. Activate when the user asks to "write a PR description", "draft a PR body", "open a PR", "fill in the PR template", or any equivalent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

统筹兼顾：当多个目标、指标或利益方相互制约、优化一项会伤害另一项时，识别全部辩证关系对，检查片面性，为每对关系定出当前阶段的侧重与底线，评估系统性影响，并设失衡预警。触发信号包括 trade-off、目标冲突、速度 vs 质量、短期 vs 长期、"顾此失彼"；只有单一目标、用户已定取舍、或属硬性二选一时不触发。 English: Overall planning. When several goals, metrics, or stakeholders constrain each other and optimizing one harms another, map every dialectical pair, check for one-sidedness, set the current emphasis and floor for each pair, assess system-wide effects, and define imbalance alarms. Triggers include trade-offs, goal conflicts, speed vs quality, short vs long term; skip for single-goal work, decisions the user already made, or hard either/or constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

矛盾分析法：把复杂问题拆成若干对立面，找出规定其他矛盾的主要矛盾及其主要方面，判定对抗性 / 非对抗性，并据此选择处理方式。当问题头绪多、多个因素互相牵制、优先级不清、根因不明、反复修不好、trade-off 说不清时触发；直接执行类任务或用户已定方案时不触发。 English: Contradiction analysis. Decompose a tangled problem into opposing forces, isolate the principal contradiction and its dominant side, classify it as antagonistic or non-antagonistic, and choose the response accordingly. Trigger on unclear priorities, unknown root causes, recurring failures, or trade-offs that resist explanation; skip for direct execution or when the user has already chosen the solution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for choosing the right protein binder design tool. Use this skill when: (1) Deciding between BoltzGen, BindCraft, or RFdiffusion, (2) Planning a binder design campaign, (3) Understanding trade-offs between different approaches, (4) Selecting tools for specific target types. For specific tool parameters, use the individual tool skills (boltzgen, bindcraft, rfdiffusion, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define actionable principles that resolve trade-offs when the team disagrees. Use when the same decisions keep getting relitigated. For a single project's framing, use `design-brief`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create uncontested market space using value innovation instead of competing head-to-head. Use when the user mentions "blue ocean", "red ocean", "strategy canvas", "ERRC framework", "value innovation", "non-customers", "buyer utility map", "the market is too crowded", "how do we stand out", or "escape the price war". Also trigger when exploring a new market category, or finding underserved or non-customers. Covers the Four Actions Framework, Six Paths, buyer utility map, and value-cost trade-offs. For real strategy formulation and bad-strategy detection, see good-strategy-bad-strategy. For tech adoption strategy, see crossing-the-chasm. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to choose, change, or evaluate their App Store / Google Play category and subcategory — including primary vs secondary category trade-offs, chart-rank competitive analysis, category-driven discoverability, and how category choice affects featuring eligibility. Use when the user mentions "which category", "App Store category", "primary category", "secondary category", "change my category", "Health & Fitness vs Lifestyle", "Productivity vs Utilities", "rank higher in a smaller category", "category chart", "subcategory", "Play Store category", or "should I switch categories". For full ASO health beyond category, see aso-audit. For competitor analysis within the chosen category, see competitor-analysis. For chart movements within categories, see market-movers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs system structure and makes architectural decisions defensible — boundaries, coupling, trade-offs, and recording why. Use this to design a new system or major component, choose between architectural options, review an existing design, decide where a boundary belongs, or document an architectural decision so it survives the people who made it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research-first development methodology that investigates existing solutions, brainstorms alternatives, and evaluates trade-offs before any implementation begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI DevKit · Design phase guidance for reviewing feature design against requirements. Use when the user wants to validate architecture, review design docs, resolve design trade-offs, or run dev-lifecycle phase 3.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a durable Architecture Review Record from a confirmed System Architecture Reviewer scope, evidence, pillar analysis, trade-offs, and dispositions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gated checklist to choose or review a library, framework, storage, data format, model, build-vs-buy or architecture. Run favorites-search before external research when installed. Compare candidates and trade-offs; select within authorization or return user-owned choices. Use for 用哪个 / 选什么框架 / 要不要自建 / A 还是 B / 这个方案行不行 and before committing to one. Research reports → deep-research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Allocate a finite budget or headcount across competing initiatives by return and strategic fit. Use when asked to allocate budget, decide where to invest, build a funding/portfolio plan, or make trade-offs across initiatives under a cap. Produces a capital-allocation plan — initiatives scored by expected return × strategic fit per dollar, a funded/unfunded split against the cap, the cut line, and the reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think clearly about whether bankruptcy is the right move, or whether another path fits better — without shame and without a sales pitch. Use when asked should I file for bankruptcy, is bankruptcy my best option, alternatives to bankruptcy, or what happens if I file. Produces an honest read on whether your situation is the kind bankruptcy actually helps, the main types and what each does (and doesn't) discharge, the real trade-offs (what you keep, the credit impact and its recovery, what's not dischargeable), the alternatives to weigh first (negotiation, debt management, doing nothing on time-barred debt), and a strong push to consult a bankruptcy attorney. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Figure out which AI tool actually fits the task in front of you — chatbot, coding assistant, image model, agent, or none — instead of forcing one tool onto everything. Use when asked which AI tool should I use for, what's the best AI for, do I even need AI for this, or should I use ChatGPT or something else. Produces a match between your task and the right kind of AI tool (with why), the trade-offs that matter for your case, when the answer is a non-AI tool or plain human effort, and how to try it cheaply before committing — so you pick by fit, not by hype or habit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users navigate complex product decisions by weighing competing priorities and calculating long-term value. This skill covers build-vs-buy logic, technical debt evaluation, and communicating tradeoffs to senior leadership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use as the entry point for any Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript. Routes to the right AgSy sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which article type (research paper, short communication, perspective, comment, review) fits. AgSy is a systems-science journal, so the router's first job is to confirm there is a real systems question — interactions, hierarchical levels, trade-offs — not a single-factor field trial. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building figures and tables for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript so exhibits communicate interactions, dynamics, trade-offs, and model performance clearly. AgSy is a systems journal, so the best exhibits show trade-off frontiers, observed-vs-simulated fit, resource flows, and conceptual system diagrams — not just a bar chart of one treatment. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding whether a project fits Agricultural Systems (AgSy) and which article type to target. AgSy is a systems-science journal, so the test is a genuine systems question — interactions among components, across hierarchical levels (field → farm → landscape → region → food system), trade-offs, and emergent behavior — analyzed with integrated modelling, NOT a single-factor field trial. Helps frame the question; it does not collect data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce and interpret PCA, t-SNE, UMAP, and PHATE plots for high-dimensional omics data with rigor about which method preserves what (variance, local structure, manifold, transitions), hyperparameter sensitivity, and the well-documented limits of 2D embeddings. Covers PCA biplot/scree/loadings, t-SNE PCA initialization (Kobak-Berens 2019), UMAP n_neighbors/min_dist trade-offs, and the Chari-Pachter 2023 critique. Use when visualizing high-dimensional data — bulk PCA, single-cell embeddings, multi-omics integration projections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Align preprocessed CLIP-seq reads (eCLIP, iCLIP, iCLIP2, PAR-CLIP) to genome with STAR or bowtie2 using crosslink-preserving parameters, choosing between unique-mapper-only and multi-mapper-aware alignment for repeat-binding RBPs, deciding STAR vs HISAT2 memory trade-offs, and applying ENCODE-compatible filters. Use when turning preprocessed CLIP FASTQ into a deduplicated, MAPQ-filtered BAM ready for peak calling or crosslink-site detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify each parsed mathematical-modeling subquestion by required output and structure, surface ambiguous framing trade-offs for human choice, and record primary/secondary task types without selecting algorithms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess a new customer request against agreed scope, trade-offs and ownership. Use when an engagement expands or a custom feature needs a commitment decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs high-level system architecture, reviews existing designs, makes architectural decisions, creates architecture diagrams, writes ADRs, evaluates technology trade-offs, and plans for scalability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。