「criteria」の検索結果

Inspect an unfamiliar repository, turn a focused Markdown behavior scenario into a deterministic test in the repository's native test stack, run it, and preserve traceability between intent and code. Use when asked to add scenario tests, compile acceptance criteria or Given/When/Then Markdown into executable tests, reproduce a user-visible regression, or convert a narrow workflow specification into stable web, API, CLI, desktop, or mobile interaction coverage. Do not use for broad exploratory journeys or agent-judged smoke tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a structured literature review on a given topic by defining a search strategy, applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracting key findings, and synthesizing results into a coherent academic review. Use when the user requests literature review or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Molecular Geneticist. Use when a task calls for Molecular Geneticist judgment. Reasons from sequence-as-hypothesis, reference context (genome build, MANE/RefSeq transcript, HGVS), and allele-level molecular consequence through ACMG/AMP-ClinGen criteria, IGV/VEP/SpliceAI/gnomAD/ClinVar review, MIQE-compliant qPCR/ddPCR, and Sanger/NGS validation while treating allele dropout, pseudogene/paralog misalignment, FFPE deamination, contamination and barcode bleed, and transcript/build mismatch as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Hepatologist. Use when a task calls for Hepatologist judgment. Reasons from hepatic injury pattern (R-value), synthetic function, and portal hypertension through Child-Pugh/MELD 3.0, FIB-4 and elastography, LI-RADS/BCLC staging, SAAG paracentesis, and Baveno VII criteria while treating DILI misattribution, elastography false positives in cholestasis, hypersplenic thrombocytopenia, and missed acute-on-chronic decompensation as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Genetic Counselor. Use when a task calls for Genetic Counselor judgment. Reasons from probabilistic penetrance, Bayesian pretest probability, and patient autonomy through three-generation pedigrees, ACMG/AMP variant criteria, ClinVar/ClinGen/gnomAD, NCCN and CPIC guidelines, and cascade-testing protocols while treating VUS over-upgraded to pathogenic, screening-versus-diagnostic confusion (NIPT vs amnio/CVS), and unaddressed psychosocial and GINA discrimination risk as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Conservation Scientist. Use when a task calls for Conservation Scientist judgment. Reasons from measurable biodiversity change, counterfactual impact, and effective population size through IUCN Red List/Green Status criteria, occupancy and PVA models (unmarked, Vortex), Marxan/prioritizr planning, and BACI/matching designs while treating detection heterogeneity, spatial pseudoreplication, REDD+ leakage, and Ne sample bias as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Chemical Biologist. Use when a task calls for Chemical Biologist judgment. Reasons from chemical genetics, ABPP/TPP/CETSA chemoproteomics, and SGC/Portal probe criteria; deconvolves phenotypic hits with PAINS/aggregator triage, inactive analogs, and genetic epistasis while treating colloidal aggregation, probe promiscuity, and degrader DC50/Dmax tag artifacts as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Clinical Microbiologist. Use when a task calls for Clinical Microbiologist judgment. Reasons from blood-culture volume and contamination criteria, staged Gram–ID–AST reporting, MALDI-TOF/VITEK/Phoenix and EUCAST RAST, CLSI M100 vs EUCAST breakpoint discipline, WHONET antibiograms, and NHSN MDRO alerts—treating contaminant vs pathogen and VME/ME as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review revenue operations deliverables with traceable assumptions, decision criteria, ownership, and risk controls. Use when the user asks for revenue operations planning or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review team composition analysis deliverables with traceable assumptions, decision criteria, ownership, and risk controls. Use when the user asks for team composition analysis planning or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review meeting briefing deliverables with traceable assumptions, decision criteria, ownership, and risk controls. Use when the user asks for meeting briefing planning or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review legal risk assessment deliverables with traceable assumptions, decision criteria, ownership, and risk controls. Use when the user asks for legal risk assessment planning or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review journal entry prep deliverables with traceable assumptions, decision criteria, ownership, and risk controls. Use when the user asks for journal entry prep planning or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review lean canvas deliverables with traceable assumptions, decision criteria, ownership, and risk controls. Use when the user asks for lean canvas planning or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review daily briefing deliverables with traceable assumptions, decision criteria, ownership, and risk controls. Use when the user asks for daily briefing planning or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review brainstorm experiments new deliverables with traceable assumptions, decision criteria, ownership, and risk controls. Use when the user asks for brainstorm experiments new planning or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review audit support deliverables with traceable assumptions, decision criteria, ownership, and risk controls. Use when the user asks for audit support planning or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review business model deliverables with traceable assumptions, decision criteria, ownership, and risk controls. Use when the user asks for business model planning or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review call prep deliverables with traceable assumptions, decision criteria, ownership, and risk controls. Use when the user asks for call prep planning or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review close management deliverables with traceable assumptions, decision criteria, ownership, and risk controls. Use when the user asks for close management planning or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grounded in first principles, rigorously examine and refine a user's plan, task, decision, goal, strategy, proposal, or idea through structured, progressively deeper questioning, in order to bridge the gap between the User and the Agent. Use when the user explicitly requests grilling, challenge, pressure-testing, cross-examination, red-team review, pre-mortem analysis, or a decision audit. The goal is to uncover unclear objectives, hidden assumptions, contradictions, weak evidence, missing information, overlooked constraints, dependencies, risks, trade-offs, failure modes, and misalignment between intended outcomes and likely real-world results. Begin by establishing a shared understanding of the user's actual intent, goals, constraints, and success criteria. Ask focused, high-leverage questions rather than broad or repetitive ones. Adapt each question based on previous answers, probing deeper where uncertainty, unsupported assumptions, or strategic weaknesses remain. Regularly summarize the current understanding of the user's intent and position to confirm alignment, expose misunderstandings, and refine the problem or goal definition. Distinguish facts, assumptions, hypotheses, and unknowns. Challenge reasoning rigorously while remaining constructive, respectful, and solution-oriented. Continue until the reasoning is internally coherent, evidence-aware, constraint-conscious, risk-assessed, and translated into a clearer, more actionable goal, decision, or plan. Ultimately, achieving the super-alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-independent reference media analysis for generated-media production. Use when an agent must analyze reference images, videos, audio, style boards, product shots, brand assets, mood boards, storyboards, performances, prior cuts, or client examples and translate them into safe, non-copying direction, prompts, QA criteria, provenance records, and handoff notes for image, video, audio, avatar, or post-production agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-independent media quality control and delivery direction for generated images, video, audio, ads, product content, social clips, broadcast and streaming assets, localization packages, and mixed-source edits. Use when an agent must define final export specs, inspect technical and perceptual quality, check captions/audio/color/accessibility/provenance/rights, create delivery sheets, version filenames, checksums, manifests, package deliverables, set acceptance or rejection criteria, and perform final delivery QA before handoff to a platform, broadcaster, streamer, client, or ad trafficker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select restriction enzymes by criteria using Biopython Bio.Restriction. Find enzymes that cut once, don't cut, produce specific overhangs, are commercially available, or have compatible ends for cloning. Use when selecting restriction enzymes for cloning or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。