「criteria」の検索結果

Use this skill when writing test-first, behavior-driven acceptance criteria in Given/When/Then format for a Salesforce user story. Covers happy path, edge cases, negative paths, permission boundaries, and data-state preconditions so the AC block can drive UAT scripts and Apex test design downstream. Trigger keywords: given when then, gherkin, behavior driven AC, test first acceptance criteria, scenario outline, BDD acceptance criteria. NOT for the user-story format itself (use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce). NOT for UAT script writing (use admin/uat-test-case-design). NOT for Apex test method generation (use agents/test-class-generator). NOT for high-level UAT planning (use admin/uat-and-acceptance-criteria). More triggers: acceptance criteria record, ac_id, req_id on a criterion, artefact under test, negative case for a rule-type requirement, no-match fall-through criterion, oracle for a Then clause, test type apex flow manual, criteria linter, check_ac_format.py, --manifest-dir.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

工程ごとの完了判定、品質ゲート、証跡、標準検証コマンド、例外運用を設計するスキル。 実装完了・テスト実施・品質確認完了・出荷可能を分離し、再利用可能な gate matrix を作る。 「全OK」「完了」などの曖昧な完了表現を排除し、証跡に基づく退出条件を定義する。 Use when defining Definition of Done, quality gates, exit criteria, release readiness gates, evidence requirements, exception handling, or standardized verification commands. Covers: definition of done, quality gate, exit criteria, release readiness, 完了判定, 品質ゲート. Distinct from project-completeness-scorer (which scores) -- this skill designs the gates and criteria themselves.

曖昧な機能要望や影響の大きい変更を、作業範囲・前提・リスクとともに整理し、期待する動作と検証方法が明確な受け入れ基準や引き継ぎ資料にまとめるスキル。

• 曖昧な機能要望を整理したいとき
• 認証変更やデータ移行の受け入れ基準作成
• 別のエージェントやチームへの実装引き継ぎ

Write measurable acceptance criteria for requirements or user stories. Use when the user says "write acceptance criteria", "definition of done", "how do we test this", "fit criteria", "given when then", "Gherkin scenarios", "what does done look like", "testable conditions", "how will we know this works" - even if they don't explicitly say "acceptance criteria".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when writing acceptance criteria for Salesforce features, structuring UAT test scripts from user stories, classifying defects found during UAT, or planning regression testing before a Salesforce release. Trigger keywords: UAT, user acceptance testing, test script, acceptance criteria, defect classification, regression testing, test plan, test case. NOT for Given/When/Then AC syntax — use admin/acceptance-criteria-given-when-then. NOT for the per-case field schema and AC-to-case decomposition — use admin/uat-test-case-design. NOT for automated Flow or Apex test coverage — use flow/flow-testing. Also covers: UAT plan record, sandbox selection for UAT, pre-UAT environment checklist, sandbox email deliverability for testers, test-user personas, negative and bulk coverage, defect triage categories, go/no-go sign-off, quick-deploy window.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate the success criteria for a task or question, then review work against them. Given a task, goal, or open-ended question, decompose it into scenarios, evaluation perspectives, and fine-grained weighted YES/NO criteria using the Recursive Expansion Tree (RET) method; if work is supplied, score it criterion-by-criterion and surface what is missing or could be better. Use when asked to self-review or check your own work, judge whether a task is done well or completely, build a definition-of-done or completeness checklist, create an evaluation rubric or grading criteria, score or grade answers to a question, set up an LLM-as-judge rubric, or when the user mentions self-review, completeness check, success criteria, evaluation criteria, scoring rubric, Qworld, or the RET algorithm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent fallback for CBaseEntity_ModifyOrAppendCriteria (auto-generated, category: vfunc). Locate CBaseEntity::ModifyOrAppendCriteria in the CS2 server module via IDA Pro MCP and emit a fresh, minimal-unique artifact. The deterministic preprocessor could not resolve this symbol on the current gamever - your job is the re-sign. Trigger: CBaseEntity_ModifyOrAppendCriteria, CBaseEntity::ModifyOrAppendCriteria

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AIエージェントが実装の多くを担う開発チーム向けに、計画、責任分担、レビュー基準、テスト要件を整理し、生成コードを扱う開発プロセスを設計するスキル。

• AI生成コードを扱う開発ルールの整備
• コードレビュー基準と承認条件の設定
• エージェントが作業しやすい設計の検討

Guides SOC 2 Type II Privacy Trust Services Criteria preparation and audit execution. Covers AICPA TSP Section 100 Privacy criteria P1-P8 including notice, choice/consent, collection, use/retention/disposal, access, disclosure, security, and quality. Includes evidence collection, control testing, and report review. Keywords: SOC 2, privacy criteria, TSP, AICPA, Type II, trust services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define release criteria, deployment environments, and rollback strategies during PRD v0.8 Deployment & Ops. Triggers on requests to plan releases, define deployment criteria, or when user asks "how do we deploy?", "release criteria", "deployment plan", "rollback strategy", "go-live checklist". Outputs DEP- entries with deployment steps and release criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eliciting and documenting a sales process before it is built in Salesforce: stage sequencing, entry/exit criteria per stage, win/loss analysis requirements, and stage transition rules. Trigger keywords: sales process design, stage discovery, entry criteria, exit criteria, stage gate, win/loss categorisation, sales methodology, pipeline stages, opportunity stage mapping, stage ladder, probability ladder, forecast category mapping, required fields per stage, stage swim lane, discovery workshop, handoff brief. NOT for configuring OpportunityStage, Sales Processes or Path in Setup — use admin/opportunity-management. NOT for cross-functional swim-lane maps — use admin/process-flow-as-is-to-be.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT weighted supplier evaluation matrix from supplier responses and the panel's agreed criteria, weights and scale: a provisional score per cell with the quoted evidence and anchor behind it, a register of every missing or partial answer, and calibration and sensitivity flags. Provisional for panel moderation; never recommends, awards or disqualifies. Use when the user asks to score, weight or rank supplier, bid or tender responses against agreed criteria, for example "score these bids", "build the evaluation matrix", "weight the tender responses" or "rank the suppliers against our criteria". Do not use for a side-by-side comparison without scores, use rfp-comparison-pack instead; for writing the criteria, use rfp-requirements-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ISTQB/JSTQB のテスト計画（test planning）活動を支援するスキル。テスト対象のプロダクトリスク（product risk）を発生可能性×影響度で識別・評価し、それを根拠にテストアプローチ（どこを厚くテストするか）・開始基準（entry criteria）・完了基準（exit criteria）を定めた test-plan.md を作る。「テスト計画を立てて」「テスト戦略を決めたい」「何をどこまでテストすべきか整理して」「リスクベースでテスト範囲を決めたい」と依頼されたときに使う。単発のテスト作成依頼（単にユニットテストを書きたいだけ）は対象外。/test-plan <テスト対象名> で明示的に呼び出されたときのみ使用する。

AIによる開発の成功条件を実装前に定義し、コード・ルール・モデル・人の評価で新機能と既存機能を確認しながら、複数回の試行から信頼性を記録するスキル。

• AI実装前に成功条件を決めたいとき
• プロンプトやエージェント変更後の回帰確認
• 複数回の試行で信頼性を測りたいとき

Create user stories following the 3 C's (Card, Conversation, Confirmation) and INVEST criteria with descriptions, design links, and acceptance criteria. Use when writing user stories, breaking down features into backlog items, or defining acceptance criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screening Assistant - AI-PRISMA 6-dimension screening with Groq LLM (100x cheaper) Supports two project types with different confidence thresholds Use when: screening papers, PRISMA screening, inclusion/exclusion criteria Triggers: screen papers, PRISMA screening, inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria, AI screening

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "plan my launch tier", "how big should this launch be", or "build a launch risk register with kill criteria"; produces a tier decision (Tier 1 flagship all-channel / Tier 2 targeted / Tier 3 changelog-level), a launch-type declaration (new-product / feature / relaunch / partnership with co-marketing split), an effort calibration matrix (tier to channel intensity and asset scope), D0/W1/M1 KPI targets (labeled Estimated), a risk register (likelihood x blast-radius, owners, mitigations, kill criteria / rollback thresholds), and a T-8w to T+4w timeline skeleton. Not for picking the launch date or window — use launch-window-planner; not for creator-channel launch campaigns — use campaign-planner. 发布分级/发布类型/风险登记册/kill criteria

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates scientifically sound inclusion and exclusion criteria for Meta-Analysis based on a given title or keywords. Use when user wants to design eligibility criteria for a systematic review or meta-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a UK Civil Service or NHS application: behaviour statements in the Success Profiles format, a personal statement mapped to the essential criteria, and a CV in the form these schemes expect. Use when asked to write my civil service application, answer Success Profiles behaviours, write a 250-word behaviour example, write my NHS supporting information, or apply on Civil Service Jobs or NHS Jobs. Produces each behaviour statement within the word limit using a situation, task, action, result structure, a criteria-mapped personal statement, and a check against the advert's essential criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The Jobs-to-be-Done framework as applied product methodology. Job statements, struggling moments, hire and fire criteria, the difference between feature-thinking and job-thinking. Honest about where JTBD adds clarity (discovery, prioritization, positioning) and where it becomes performative ritual (job-statement workshops that do not drive decisions, persona-theater disguised as JTBD). Triggers on jobs-to-be-done, JTBD, job statements, struggling moments, hire criteria, fire criteria, switch triggers, functional emotional social jobs, outcome-driven innovation. Also triggers when a team is over-relying on feature-request lists or persona archetypes that do not drive product decisions, when a positioning conversation needs the framing JTBD provides, or when discovery is producing outputs that do not connect to product strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RFP creation, distribution, evaluation, and shortlisting for in-house legal teams selecting outside counsel. Draft a new legal services RFP from scratch, evaluate firm responses against weighted criteria, produce a shortlist recommendation with selection rationale for GC sign-off, or design the end-to-end RFP process from scratch. Trigger on: 'draft an RFP', 'run an RFP process', 'evaluate firm responses', 'score the RFP submissions', 'which firms should we shortlist', 'selection recommendation', 'how do we run a panel RFP', 'RFP for legal services', 'pitch process', 'firm selection process', 'compare the proposals', 'we're reviewing our panel', 'panel refresh RFP', 'we need to go to market', 'request for proposal', 'evaluate the pitches', 'which firm won the RFP', 'write a legal RFP', 'RFP evaluation criteria', 'design the RFP process', 'how do we weight the criteria'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Panel structure design, firm selection criteria, right-sourcing analysis, and coverage gap assessment for in-house legal teams. Build panel frameworks from scratch or formalise existing informal arrangements. Define weighted selection criteria for firm evaluation. Run right-sourcing analysis (ABC tiering) to identify work sent to expensive providers that doesn't require that level of resource. Assess existing panels for practice area, geographic, and capability gaps. Trigger on: 'design our panel', 'how many firms do we need', 'panel structure', 'firm selection criteria', 'which firms should we use', 'right-sourcing', 'are we sending work to the right firms', 'panel gaps', 'too many firms', 'consolidate our panel', 'we need a firm for', 'preferred provider', 'panel tiers', 'do we need BigLaw for this', 'convergence', 'D&I panel targets', 'how do we choose firms'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing whether an OpenSpec change's execution goal, acceptance criteria, and implementation or verification tasks are aligned. This should trigger for requests such as Review this OpenSpec change with ATDD; Check acceptance criteria against tasks; Find acceptance criteria without task coverage; Detect tasks that diverge from the execution goal; Explain what is missing, vague, ambiguous, partial, absent, or divergent in this OpenSpec change. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides audit findings remediation program management including finding prioritization by severity (critical, high, medium, low), owner assignment, remediation planning, deadline tracking, verification testing, closure criteria, escalation protocols, and management reporting. Covers remediation lifecycle from finding issuance to verified closure. Keywords: audit remediation, finding management, prioritization, verification testing, closure criteria, remediation tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。