「directory」の検索結果

Performs deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase. Not for investigating specific bugs, runtime errors, or failures — use investigate. Not for test planning — use automated-test-planning. Not for file-level code review — use code-review. Not for researching open-ended options, prior art, or how something works — use research. Not for designing a new interface or contract — use design-an-api. Not for planning the change its findings imply — use plan-a-change. Not for discovering bounded contexts, ubiquitous language, or where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Not for writing documentation or architectural decision records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes an existing codebase using strategic Domain-Driven Design to discover bounded contexts, surface ubiquitous language and semantic collisions, find places where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries, and produce an evidence-backed domain and context map. Use when the goal is DDD-specific: bounded context discovery, ubiquitous language analysis, domain model discovery, or mapping contested ownership and responsibility. The entire repository is a valid scope; no module or directory must be named first. Does not assess architectural coupling, cohesion, or technical debt — use architectural-analysis. Does not design service communication, integration patterns, or deployment topology — use architectural-analysis or plan-a-feature. Does not refactor code, diagnose bugs, or review code quality — use refactor, investigate, or code-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a human-readable, progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes — why it exists (the real problem it solves or goal it serves for the business or a user), and from there what it does, how it flows, and where to start — so you can get up to speed before working on or reviewing it. Use when you want to understand, get oriented in, make sense of, explain, or get up to speed on a chunk of code, a file, a directory, a symbol, or a PR's changes. Writes the overview to a scratch file and changes no code. Does not review code quality or raise findings — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting them. Does not produce durable feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not assess architecture or structural risk — use architectural-analysis. Does not diagnose bugs or root-cause failures — use investigate. Does not pace a person through the code one step at a time in conversation — use code-walkthrough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walks a person through code changes one step at a time in conversation, starting at the entry point and following the flow that changes, showing a small chunk per step and explaining it in plain language. Defaults to the current branch's changes, and walks the code from the perspective of any context provided instead — a file, directory, symbol, pull request, plan, or ticket. Use when someone wants to be walked through, taught, paced through, or shown around code or a branch step by step, or to learn how a change works before reviewing or extending it. Stops after every step and waits, so the learner sets the pace. Paces through code that already exists and builds nothing — to build new work while being paced through it, use pairing. Does not produce a written overview to read alone — use code-overview. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not diagnose bugs — use investigate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or update repository-specific AGENTS.md instruction files from real repo evidence. Use when asked to create, design, scaffold, split, or improve root or scoped AGENTS.md files for Codex/Claude/agent workflows, especially when a repo needs directory-specific rules, validation commands, generated-file boundaries, or a short agent onboarding router.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix Gorse recommendation engine pods crashing with "user: unknown userid 65532" error. Use when: (1) Gorse master/server/worker pods show CrashLoopBackOff or Error status, (2) Logs show "failed to get user directory" with unknown userid, (3) Running gorse containers with runAsNonRoot security context and custom UID. The gorse images call os.UserHomeDir() at startup which requires the UID to exist in /etc/passwd.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert FIRE analysis cards, Chinese knowledge notes, or project-note JSON into validated EPUB books with directory cards, chapter cards, keyword index cards, backlinks, and GitHub-shareable ebook assets. Use when Codex needs to teach or automate the path from `fire-analysis-card` outputs to `project-note-json-to-epub` style EPUB files, including sample JSON manuscripts and attached `.epub` deliverables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render Obsidian-style weighted graph views from book JSON, keyword indexes, TOCs, card data, or node-link data. Use when the user asks for Obsidian graph view, graph view png, weighted graph, keyword graph, directory-keyword graph, spherical graph visualization, or high-weight nodes centered with clear Chinese labels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, maintain, or migrate functional skills; supports creating from a requirement brief and migrating an existing legacy skill directory into a functional skill structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate lane for fskill-creator; analyzes a legacy skill directory into behavior map, function split proposal, and source evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze codebases to identify reusable code patterns, duplications, and implementation patterns for future development. Use when refactoring code, identifying technical debt, finding opportunities for abstraction, or documenting common patterns in a directory or module. Outputs pattern catalogs, refactoring suggestions, and reusable template code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two-tier memory system that makes Claude a true workplace collaborator. Decodes shorthand, acronyms, nicknames, and internal language so Claude understands requests like a colleague would. CLAUDE.md for working memory, memory/ directory for the full knowledge base.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when publishing, open-sourcing, exporting, sanitizing, or moving code, agent skills, prompts, templates, fixtures, datasets, workshop assets, or other artifacts from a private repository, vendor/runtime environment, or mixed working directory into a public repository or registry. Builds a provenance inventory, license/security review, explicit allowlist, clean staging package, approval dry run, and fresh public clone/install smoke. Triggers on "open source this", "publish these skills", "make this repo public", "export and sanitize", "подготовь публичный релиз", "выложи скиллы", "опенсорсни", "санитизируй и опубликуй". NOT for ordinary upstream bugfix PRs, vulnerability disclosure, or creating a corp-* department.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The telemetry each Active Directory technique generates and what alerts a defender: Kerberoasting produces Event 4769 with RC4 encryption (0x17) and an MDI alert, DCSync produces Event 4662 with the DS-Replication-Get-Changes GUID, AS-REP roasting produces Event 4768 with no pre-auth, LSASS dumping is blocked by EDR, plus a lateral-movement telemetry table by protocol (SMB/WMI/WinRM/RDP/DCOM). Use this whenever you run or plan an offensive AD technique and need to know what noise it makes, when writing the engagement's detection notes, or when a defender wants to know what to monitor. Teaches red teamers what is loud and blue teamers what to watch. Standard-tooling knowledge, no vendor engine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS) escalation techniques ESC1 through ESC17, driven by hand with Certipy (ly4k). Use when the target runs a Certificate Authority and you want to find vulnerable certificate templates or CA misconfigurations, request a certificate that impersonates a privileged user, and know the exact certipy command, what each ESC actually checks, the Windows Event IDs that fire, and the remediation. ESC1 and ESC8 are the two you hit most in the field.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The order of operations for an Active Directory penetration test: setup, collection, exploitation, post-processing. Use this whenever you are planning or driving an AD assessment and need to know what to run before what and why (map before you exploit; harvest easy credentials before spraying to avoid lockouts; collect the graph before you reason about paths). Covers phase sequencing with standard tooling: netexec/nxc, impacket, certipy, bloodyAD, kerbrute, BloodHound CE. Invoke it at the start of an engagement, when deciding the next phase, or when a step feels out of order.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Abusing Active Directory object ACLs (DACL/ownership) for privilege escalation and lateral movement (GenericAll, GenericWrite, WriteDACL, WriteOwner, AddMember, ForceChangePassword, and replication rights via DS-Replication-Get-Changes-All). Use when BloodHound CE shows an outbound control edge from a principal you own toward a higher-value object, and you want the exact bloodyAD/impacket command to weaponize that ACE, plus detection and remediation. DCSync is covered here strictly as a post-compromise technique, not a user entry path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Real-world Active Directory environment constraints that silently break attacks when ignored: NTLM disabled (Kerberos fallback), AES-only KDCs (RC4 blocked by GPO), LDAP signing and channel binding requiring LDAPS on 636, Kerberos clock skew (KRB_AP_ERR_SKEW), SPNs that must be FQDNs never short names or IPs (the misleading invalidCredentials), Protected Users / LAPS / gMSA / MachineAccountQuota, LDAP 1000-object paging, and VPN latency. Use this whenever a bind, TGT request, LDAP query, or SMB negotiation fails in a way that looks like bad credentials but is really hardening, or before running any AD tooling against a domain you have not fingerprinted. Standard-tooling knowledge (netexec, impacket, certipy, bloodyAD, kerbrute), no vendor-specific engine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A high-level conceptual mapping from Active Directory attack techniques to the compliance controls they touch. Kerberoasting relates to authentication and logging, so it brushes ENS op.acc.5 / op.exp.8, NIS2 Art.21(2)(h), DORA RTS Art.9 / Art.21. Use this when a reader wants to understand which regulatory control an AD finding relates to, or to add an orientation note to a technical finding. This is a conceptual, orientative mapping only; it is NOT an auditor-defensible, curated, ID-by-ID control matrix. Covers ENS (op.acc.*, op.exp.*), NIS2 (Directive 2022/2555 Art.21), and DORA (RTS 2024/1774).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kerberos-based Active Directory attacks driven by hand with standard tooling (Kerberoasting, AS-REP roasting, and delegation abuse: unconstrained, constrained/S4U, RBCD). Use when the target has SPN-bearing service accounts, accounts without pre-authentication, or delegation configured on computer/user objects, and you want the exact impacket/Rubeus/bloodyAD command, the hash format and hashcat mode, the Windows Event IDs that fire, and the remediation to write up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically organizes files in a directory into a clean structure based on configurable rules — by file type, date, project, or priority — with support for duplicate detection, naming conventions, and archival strategies. Use when the user requests file organization or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute research tasks — checklist soft gate, phase dispatch with explicit thesis_dir, budget enforcement (halt + approval card on overrun), skill_pin recording (version_hash content-hashed per skill directory), [x] written on completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create SEO-driven pages at scale using templates and data. Also use when the user mentions "programmatic SEO," "template pages," "pages at scale," "directory pages," "location pages," "[keyword] + [city] pages," "comparison pages," "integration pages," "building many pages for SEO," "pSEO," "generate 100 pages," "data-driven pages," or "templated landing pages." Use this whenever someone wants to create many similar pages targeting different keywords or locations. For auditing existing SEO issues, use an available SEO audit capability. For content strategy planning, use an available content strategy capability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

First-time setup for protein design tools. Use this skill when: (1) User is new and hasn't run any tools yet, (2) Commands fail with "file not found" or "modal: command not found", (3) Modal authentication errors occur, (4) User asks how to get started or set up the environment, (5) biomodals directory is missing or tools aren't working.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。