2,187 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Draft an offer letter with comp details and terms. Use when a candidate is ready for an offer, assembling a total comp package (base, equity, signing bonus), writing the offer letter text itself, or prepping negotiation guidance for the hiring manager.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft a knowledge base article from a resolved issue or common question. Use when a ticket resolution is worth documenting for self-service, the same question keeps coming up, a workaround needs to be published, or a known issue should be communicated to customers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build an interactive HTML dashboard with charts, filters, and tables. Use when creating an executive overview with KPI cards, turning query results into a shareable self-contained report, building a team monitoring snapshot, or needing multiple charts with filters in one browser-openable file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Save a correction or hard-won rule as a confidence-weighted lesson that resurfaces before similar work. Use when the user corrects your approach, says "learn this", "always" or "never do X", or you notice yourself repeating a past mistake.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a PR the way a seasoned maintainer would — build an independent model before seeing the diff, investigate the implementation and history, verify material claims, and return a concise briefing. Use for any PR review, self-review, or re-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating an approachable, self-contained HTML review aid for a pull request; explaining what changed, why it matters, how it works, and how it fits into the broader system; turning PR diffs, commits, tests, and architecture context into a local `.pr-review/` HTML page for reviewers; or helping reviewers understand complex code changes without dumping the full diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rank fuzzy matches with rankItem, filter with RankingInfo.passed, compare saved ranking metadata with compareItems, and configure rankings, thresholds, accessors, min/max bounds, or diacritics. Load for @tanstack/match-sorter-utils itself or fuzzy Table filterMeta wiring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a loop that runs a prompt now and follows up either on a fixed schedule or through self-paced wakeups. Usage - /loop check the build, /loop 5m check the build, /loop check the PR every 30m. /loop list to show jobs, /loop clear to cancel all.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end workflow for implementing a non-trivial qwen-code feature. Covers requirements investigation, design, E2E test planning, baseline dry-run, implementation, verification, self-audit, code review, and iteration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reference for writing a Workflow tool script (script API and gotchas, agent() options, pipeline() vs parallel(), verification and convergence patterns, resume, worked example). Load before authoring a script for a workflow the user already opted into; it does not itself authorize running one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Directory and router for the marketing skills library. Use when you need to find the right marketing skill for a task, see what marketing capabilities exist, or get oriented in this plugin. 44 specialist skills across 8 pods (content, SEO + AEO, CRO, channels, growth, intelligence, sales enablement, ops), 59 stdlib Python tools. Routes to one skill — it does not execute marketing work itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Honestly evaluate AI work quality using a two-axis scoring system. Use after completing a task, code review, or work session to get an unbiased assessment. Detects score inflation, forces devil's advocate reasoning, and persists scores across sessions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
/cs:caio-review <plan> — Eval-demanding Chief AI Officer interrogation of any plan that involves AI: model selection, risk classification, cost economics, or AI hiring. Use when shipping an AI feature without an eval set, choosing between API, fine-tune, and self-hosted, or classifying a use case under the EU AI Act.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Close out a launched Claude Managed Agent — recap every primitive the founder now owns, regenerate the single-file overview page, and suggest the next 1-2 upgrades. Use when the user says "wrap up", "close this out", "what do I own now", "give me the summary", "recap the agent", or when the orchestrator routes phase=wrap-up. primitives_inventory.py tables everything owned (agent, environment, session, memory, outcome, deployment); overview_page.py regenerates a self-contained ./my-agent/agent-overview.html; upgrade_suggester.py ranks the next moves from recorded deferrals plus standing hardening steps. Companion to run-without-you; the last stop before phase=done.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 4 of building a Claude Managed Agent — make it run without you. Turn a graded agent into a recurring scheduled deployment (POSIX-cron), an event-driven curl trigger, or confirmed on-demand use, then finalize the versioned roadmap. Use when the user says "run it every morning", "put it on a schedule", "nightly", "weekly", "automate this", "make it recurring", or when the orchestrator routes phase=run-without-you. deployment_builder.py builds the POST /v1/deployments payload (initial_events must include user.message; optionally nests a user.define_outcome so each firing self-grades); cron_validator.py validates the 5-field cron + IANA timezone and prints the wall-clock DST note; next_directions_writer.py writes NEXT-DIRECTIONS.md. No tool makes API calls — the deployment is created via BYOK curl. Distinct from grade-iterate (the in-session loop) and wrap-up (closeout).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Daytona CLI setup, sandbox debugging, keep a sandbox alive, secrets volume, snapshot refresh. Use when Daytona itself is the problem, not for running tests (see run-tests).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
test on Windows, enterprise CA, corporate certificate, GPO cert, TLS fetch failed, Windows sandbox, daytona windows, self-hosted cert. Use when validating OpenWork Windows enterprise TLS/OS-trust fixes in a Daytona Windows sandbox.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add a new feature, put work behind a feature flag, roll something out (per organization, for everyone, cloud or self-hosted), revert or kill a feature, or make a big change to existing behavior such as a new engine. Use BEFORE writing the feature code, and when finishing or removing a rollout.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive Archon through its CLI: run AI workflows on a repo, manage those runs (inspect, approve, reject, cancel, resume), set up Archon or change its config, author new workflows, and improve workflow prompts. Use when the user says "use archon", "run archon", "archon workflow", "fix issue #N with archon", "have archon review this PR", "what's running / check run <id>", "approve/reject/cancel/resume that run", "set up archon", "configure archon", "change my archon config", "create a workflow", "author a workflow", or asks how to write a better Archon prompt. NOT for: doing the coding work yourself — Archon delegates it to isolated runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Log genuine, recurring repository friction to .agents/PAPERCUTS.md — confusing setup, a flaky repo command or script, a misleading in-repo error, stale generated files, or a non-obvious gotcha that will cost the next contributor time. Also use to review, deduplicate, and resolve existing entries. Gate hard before logging: only friction the repository itself can fix counts. Never log the agent's own sandbox/permission errors, shell-scripting mistakes, transient flakiness, or third-party tool quirks the repo can't change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and save an OpenSEO report as one self-contained HTML page. Use when a skill has finished its research, and whenever the user asks for a report, check-in, or summary, or names a report template.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Wire n8n error handling so failures are loud, structured, and recoverable. Use when building any webhook/API workflow, a scheduled or unattended workflow, or any path where a silent failure would drop user-visible work — and whenever the user mentions error handling, onError, continueErrorOutput, error branches/outputs, retries, retryOnFail, Respond to Webhook status codes, 4xx/5xx, Error Trigger, or "my workflow fails silently". Covers per-node error outputs and wiring, retry/self-healing, error-trigger workflows, and 4xx/5xx response shapes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and implement a NemoClaw dependency version upgrade, including Hermes and base images. Use when the dependency itself is changing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。