1,379 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Implements an accepted incremental brownfield migration from native iOS or Android to React Native or Expo using @callstack/react-native-brownfield. Use after the brownfield path has been selected, when setting up the integration, packaging XCFramework or AAR artifacts, or adding React Native surfaces to native hosts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Chain-of-Verification (CoVe) on a draft or a block of text with factual claims. Spawns the `claim-verifier` agent in a fresh context (never a conversation fork) so it never sees the draft — then reports which claims are supported, contradicted, or unverifiable. Use when user says "verify these citations", "check the claims in X", "did I hallucinate anything", "fact-check this draft", "run CoVe on this", or after any text generation that asserts facts about papers, datasets, or numerical results. NOT for style/grammar review (use `/proofread`) or substance review (use `/review-paper`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI DevKit · Compact a historical AI coding session with Jev when context is long, work is handed off or resumed, or durable continuation facts and memory candidates need extraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Render, preview, validate, and burn consistent production subtitles from QC-passed real-timestamp caption artifacts. Use for AI-video production, washed-video production, IndexTTS2 explainers, practical long-form videos, talking-head edits, Kimi-style dark rounded captions, warm-white translucent captions, subtitle styling, subtitle overlays, or fixing caption size, position, shadow, drift, and 4K scaling. Always pair with ra-audio-to-subtitles when final word timestamps do not already exist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a polished local talking-head or narrated screen-recording rough cut without a cloud editor. Use when Codex must clean Chinese or mixed Chinese-English speech, correct product terminology before semantic editing, compress pauses without making speech breathless, preserve source resolution and frame rate, normalize dialogue loudness, generate final-audio subtitle artifacts, or benchmark local output against ChatCut/video-use/chengfeng/AI剪口播.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate production subtitle artifacts from the final narration audio or final merged video using Volcengine Doubao ASR word timestamps. Use for local IndexTTS2 videos, Xiaohei page videos, talking-head delivery subtitles, SRT/VTT export, or whenever subtitle timing must match the final audio. Do not use script-length interpolation for final deliverables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a company update into 3-7 structurally distinct, journalist-shaped story angles. Runs the fact through proven newsroom lenses (perspective, abstraction, news values, data, contrarian, news peg) and refuses rephrasings, invented facts, named-journalist guesses, and AI-marketing slop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft crisis holding statements, journalist Q&A posture, and what-not-to-say guidance from confirmed incident facts, with a hard legal-counsel gate. Builds each statement through proven crisis-comms frameworks (holding-statement anatomy, SCCT, CAP order, the legitimate non-answer, bridge/flag/block).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guided, conversational walkthrough that explains code, UI, UX, features, or .copilot-tracking artifacts with navigable evidence links, a deep review before explaining, and a reconciled decisions-and-changes ledger. Use when the user wants to understand how something works or why it was changed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research-only RPI playbook that gathers task evidence, writes dated research artifacts under .copilot-tracking/research/ or a caller's trusted evidence root, and hands off planning-ready findings. Use when the user needs evidence, alternatives, or task framing first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce evidence-labelled UX needs, journey, structure, inclusion, and engineering-handoff assets. Use when a practitioner needs a durable UX artifact rather than coaching.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate customer-card PowerPoint content YAML from Design Thinking canonical artifacts and build using the shared PowerPoint skill pipeline
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
First contact with Crabbox: run your repository's tests inside a disposable Docker or Podman container on your own machine, no account and no cloud spend, then stop the box. Use when someone asks what Crabbox is or how to try it, wants a throwaway sandbox for a repo with no crabbox.yaml yet, or is about to run crabbox init here; hand off to the crabbox skill for config that already exists, leased remote machines, jobs, secrets, or artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Declare bankruptcy on a long-lived AI agent's accumulated memory — audit what it currently believes, separate ground truth from stale and wrong, purge deliberately, restate the truths that survive, and log what was lost. Use when an agent keeps acting on outdated facts, contradicts itself across sessions, 'remembers' things wrong, or after a reorg/pivot makes its worldview obsolete. Produces a belief audit, a keep/correct/purge ledger, a restated ground-truth file, and the bankruptcy record.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a firm, effective complaint letter that gets a resolution. Use when asked to write a complaint letter, complain to a company about a product/service, escalate poor service, or demand a refund/replacement. Produces a structured complaint — the facts, the impact, the specific resolution you want, and a deadline — in a firm, professional tone that's hard to ignore and easy to act on.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract a brand's visual and verbal identity into an applicable guideline kit — tokens, voice rules, and do/don't pairs — then apply it consistently to any artifact. Use when asked to apply brand guidelines to a document/deck/page, to extract a brand kit from existing materials or a website, to keep AI-produced artifacts on-brand, or to write lightweight brand guidelines for a startup. Produces a compact brand kit (visual tokens + voice rules + application examples) and/or an artifact restyled to it. For a creator's personal voice use creator-brand-kit; for building new UI systems use frontend-design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a one-page briefing note that gets a busy principal up to speed fast. Use when asked to brief a minister/executive/official, prepare a briefing note or read-ahead, or summarize an issue for a decision or meeting. Produces a tight, single-page note: purpose, background, key facts/considerations, and a recommendation or the decision sought — scannable in two minutes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a family meeting to make a big care decision together. Use when asked help me run a family meeting about care, we need to decide together about mom's care, my siblings and I disagree about our parent, or facilitate a care decision. Produces an agenda and structure for the meeting, how to prepare (facts, options, everyone's input), ground rules to keep old family dynamics from derailing it, how to include the person being cared for, ways to work through disagreement toward a decision, and clear next steps with owners. Not legal, medical, or financial advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a blameless postmortem for an incident caused by an AI agent or LLM feature — hallucinated facts shipped to users, runaway tool use, prompt injection, cost blowouts, or wrong actions taken autonomously. Use when asked to write up an AI incident, analyse why an agent did something wrong, or produce corrective actions after an LLM failure. Produces a structured postmortem with trace reconstruction, a root-cause layer analysis, and corrective actions including a permanent regression case. For non-AI production incidents use incident-postmortem.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Behavioral guardrails for Codex coding work based on common user complaints. Use when Codex is asked to implement, modify, debug, review, test, or operate on a codebase and should avoid unsafe scope expansion, stale edits, fake completion, brittle edits, shallow debugging, superficial patch-on fixes, one-off special-case code, short-term design choices that hurt maintainability, blindly following incorrect user assumptions, poor dependency choices, generic product or UI output, over-mocked tests, noisy approvals, verbose status reports, or leaking internal reasoning into project artifacts or user-facing UI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running or planning an Apache Struts release on any maintenance line (6.x, 7.x) - cutting the tag, staging artifacts, opening the vote, promoting, updating the site and announcing - or when asked what the next step in a release is.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a vulnerability or security report arrives for triage, when assessing a CVE/RCE/OGNL/injection claim against the code, or when drafting a reply to a security researcher — to research the claim from source without trusting the reporter and without fabricating your own facts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when opening the formal release vote for a Struts release candidate on any maintenance line (6.x, 7.x) - composing and drafting the [VOTE] Apache Struts X.Y.Z mail to dev@ once the Version Notes page, GitHub release and staged artifacts are published.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Work with Zep's temporal memory: create users and threads, append messages, read distilled facts and history. Trigger phrases: zep, knowledge graph memory, conversation memory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。