Create product backlog items in Why-What-Acceptance format — independent, valuable, testable items with strategic context. Use when writing structured backlog items, breaking features into work items, or using the WWA format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
phuryn/pm-skills☆ 2.7万2026年10月10日 更新
Summarize a meeting transcript into structured notes with date, participants, topic, key decisions, summary points, and action items. Use when processing meeting recordings, creating meeting notes, writing meeting minutes, or recapping discussions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
phuryn/pm-skills☆ 2.7万2026年10月10日 更新
Create a structured customer interview script with JTBD probing questions, warm-up, core exploration, and wrap-up sections. Follows The Mom Test principles — no leading questions, no pitching, focus on past behavior. Use when preparing for user interviews, creating interview guides, or planning discovery research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
phuryn/pm-skills☆ 2.7万2026年10月10日 更新
Facilitate a structured sprint retrospective — what went well, what didn't, and prioritized action items with owners and deadlines. Use when running a retrospective, reflecting on a sprint, creating action items from team feedback, or learning how to run effective retros.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
phuryn/pm-skills☆ 2.7万2026年10月10日 更新
Summarizes WeChat group chat highlights into a structured digest using the local wx-cli binary (https://github.com/jackwener/wx-cli). Generates a normal digest by default; a roast (毒舌) version is opt-in. Maintains per-group history (history.json + history-digests.jsonl), per-user profiles, and per-group fact memory (memory.md) across runs, with privacy guardrails baked in. Use when the user asks to "总结群聊", "群聊精华", "群聊摘要", "summarize group chat", "group chat digest", mentions a WeChat group name with a time range, says "帮我看看 XX 群最近聊了什么", "XX 群有什么值得看的", or asks to "回溯画像" / "初始化画像" / "backfill profiles". Adds the roast version when the user says "毒舌版", "roast 版", "再来个毒舌的", or similar.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
JimLiu/baoyu-skills☆ 2.7万2026年9月11日 更新
Estimate task effort from complexity, dependencies, velocity, risk. Structured estimate with confidence levels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios☆ 2.6万2026年10月8日 更新
Structured bug report from a description, or analyze code for potential bugs. Reproduction steps, severity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios☆ 2.6万2026年10月8日 更新
Create structured plans for multi-step work, including software and non-software tasks. Use when asked to plan, break down implementation, plan from requirements, or deepen an existing plan; prefer ce-brainstorm for exploratory framing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin☆ 2.6万2026年10月14日 更新
Wire n8n error handling so failures are loud, structured, and recoverable. Use when building any webhook/API workflow, a scheduled or unattended workflow, or any path where a silent failure would drop user-visible work — and whenever the user mentions error handling, onError, continueErrorOutput, error branches/outputs, retries, retryOnFail, Respond to Webhook status codes, 4xx/5xx, Error Trigger, or "my workflow fails silently". Covers per-node error outputs and wiring, retry/self-healing, error-trigger workflows, and 4xx/5xx response shapes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
czlonkowski/n8n-mcp☆ 2.3万2026年10月13日 更新
Diagnoses, remediates, and manages Identity and Access Management (IAM) access issues on Google Cloud. Supports two distinct operational modes: (1) Requester Flow for developers encountering access denials (capturing error context, self-service PAM JIT activations, elevated developer self-remediation, or logging structured tickets), and (2) Resolver Flow for privileged administrators (authoritative Policy Troubleshooter analysis, deny policy exemptions, least-privilege role discovery, and PAM/IAM provisioning).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
google/skills☆ 2.1万2026年10月14日 更新
Discovers requirements and generates architectural, design, and deployment guidance for dynamic hybrid search systems by combining semantic search and keyword search. Optimized for AlloyDB hybrid search use cases in Google Cloud. Use when users need vector search combined with structured SQL filtering, faceted attributes, semantic reranking, in-database AI validation, or serverless hosting across transactional relational databases, analytical data warehouses, or managed database engines. DON'T use this skill for simple keyword-only search, or when a standalone non-relational vector database is required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
google/skills☆ 2.1万2026年10月14日 更新
Guides the usage of Gemini Interactions API on Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform. Use when the user wants to use the stateful, server-managed Interactions API for multi-turn conversations, background execution, streaming, structured output, and function calling on the Agent Platform.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
google/skills☆ 2.1万2026年10月14日 更新
Periodic sweep that finds incidents marked resolved in {{incident_channel}}, correlates the channel timeline against GitHub deploys/merges and Datadog log spikes over the incident window, and drafts a structured postmortem as a PR under {{postmortem_path}} in {{target_repo}} — root cause and action items proposed, never finalized.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
kortix-ai/suna☆ 2万2026年10月14日 更新
The per-meeting runbook for turning a finished call's transcript into structured notes and Linear tickets — the notes format, action-item phrasing, ownership routing from memory, and when to flag instead of guess.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
kortix-ai/suna☆ 2万2026年10月14日 更新
Scores an inbound application against the role's written rubric with supporting quotes as evidence, writes a structured screen back to {{applications_source}}, and proposes interview slots on {{hiring_manager_calendar}} for strong matches. Never advances or rejects a candidate — every decision stays with the hiring manager.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
kortix-ai/suna☆ 2万2026年10月14日 更新
Use for structured review, fact-checking, annotation, and correction of documents such as PDF, DOCX, PPTX, and XLSX files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
kortix-ai/suna☆ 2万2026年10月14日 更新
Put your AI on a Performance Improvement Plan. Forces exhaustive problem-solving with Western big-tech performance culture rhetoric and structured debugging. Trigger when: (1) task failed 2+ times or stuck tweaking same approach; (2) about to say 'I cannot', suggest manual work, or blame environment without verifying; (3) being passive—not searching, not reading source, just waiting; (4) user frustration: 'try harder', 'stop giving up', 'figure it out', 'again???', or similar. Also for complex debugging, env issues, config/deployment failures. All task types: code, config, research, writing, deployment, infra, API. Do NOT trigger on first-attempt failures or when a known fix is executing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
tanweai/pua☆ 2万2026年9月9日 更新
Performance-coaching mode for repeated failures, passive behavior, completion-quality issues, or explicit try-harder requests. Uses structured troubleshooting and evidence-first delivery habits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
tanweai/pua☆ 2万2026年9月9日 更新
The scientific method as a universal problem-solving algorithm — goal-first, plural falsifiable hypotheses, designed experiments, and honest measurement, scaling from TDD to feature validation to MVP launch. USE WHEN think about, figure out, experiment, iterate, optimize, hypothesis, science, full cycle, quick diagnosis, structured investigation, how do we test, analyze results. NOT FOR multi-angle lens passes (use IterativeDepth).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
danielmiessler/LifeOS☆ 1.9万2026年9月4日 更新
Structured incident investigation using Five Whys, Fishbone, blameless Postmortem, Fault Tree, Kepner-Tregoe, and FMEA — traces failures to systemic root causes rather than blaming humans. USE WHEN root cause, RCA, 5 whys, fishbone, postmortem, incident analysis, fault tree, why does this keep failing, blameless, recurring bug. NOT FOR systemic loops (use SystemsThinking).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
danielmiessler/LifeOS☆ 1.9万2026年9月4日 更新
Structured multi-angle exploration running 2-8 sequential passes over the same problem, each through a different scientific lens, to surface hidden requirements and edge cases invisible from one angle; each pass yields new ISC criteria. USE WHEN iterative depth, explore deeper, multi-angle analysis, surface hidden requirements, blind spot check, what am I missing. NOT FOR scope/zoom analysis (use ApertureOscillation).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
danielmiessler/LifeOS☆ 1.9万2026年9月4日 更新
Read, create, and edit tldraw .tldr canvas files deterministically — sketch hand-drawn-register diagrams (boxes, arrows, sticky notes, frames, text) directly into a canvas file the user opens in any tldraw surface, and read a rough canvas back as structured data to organize it. USE WHEN tldraw, .tldr file, whiteboard, canvas, sketch a diagram, hand-drawn diagram, draw this on a canvas, put this on the whiteboard, structure my canvas, organize my whiteboard, read my canvas, cluster my sticky notes. NOT FOR polished static images, infographics, or mermaid diagrams (use Art), web UI design (use Webdesign), programmatic video (use Remotion).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
danielmiessler/LifeOS☆ 1.9万2026年9月4日 更新
Ethical people-finding and identity verification via parallel research agents across people-search sites, social media, public records, and reverse phone/email/image/username lookups, with confidence-scored results requiring 3+ matching identifiers. USE WHEN find person, locate person, reconnect, lost contact, old friend, reverse phone lookup, who owns this email, reverse image search, find by username, verify identity, people search, public-data background check, who is this caller. NOT FOR structured due-diligence or company/entity intelligence investigations, or general web research synthesis (use Research).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
danielmiessler/LifeOS☆ 1.9万2026年9月4日 更新
Assertion-first AI eval framework aligned to Anthropic's 'Demystifying evals for AI agents' — typed deterministic asserts + a forced-structured LLM judge over an input→assert case schema, pass^k/pass@k, capability vs regression suites, subscription-billed. USE WHEN eval, evaluate, benchmark, regression test, assertion, assert, llm-rubric, judge, pass@k, pass^k, grade output, compare prompts/models, test agent. NOT FOR scientific-method framing (use Science), property/mutation testing of code (use Hardening), or live UI verification (use Interceptor).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
danielmiessler/LifeOS☆ 1.9万2026年9月4日 更新