「structures」の検索結果

Create exercise directory structures with sections, problems, solutions, and explainers that pass linting. Use when user wants to scaffold exercises, create exercise stubs, or set up a new course section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures git workflow practices. Use when making any code change. Use when committing, branching, resolving conflicts, or when you need to organize work across multiple parallel streams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level hydraulics covering open channel flow, pipe systems, hydraulic structures, pumps and turbines, flood routing, and stormwater management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level geotechnical engineering covering soil classification, shear strength, consolidation, foundation design, slope stability, and retaining structures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level abstract algebra knowledge. Use when working with groups, rings, fields, modules, Galois theory, representation theory, or algebraic structures. Also use when the user mentions 'group', 'ring', 'field', 'homomorphism', 'isomorphism', 'normal subgroup', 'quotient group', 'Sylow theorem', 'Galois theory', 'polynomial ring', 'ideal', 'module', 'vector space', or 'representation theory'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load this skill whenever the project involves writing, editing, or reviewing content for a general audience, including UI copy, help text, error messages, documentation, and instructions. Under no circumstances use jargon, complex sentence structures, or unexplained acronyms without providing plain alternatives. Absolutely always target a reading level accessible to the broadest possible audience. Load alongside content-design/SKILL.md for all content work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, audit, and modify EMULATORS runtime `.fmt` formatter files and keep them synchronized with C++ `getInfoStructure()` producers and their `.hpp` field documentation. Use when adding, renaming, or removing `InfoStructure` attributes or nested structures; diagnosing missing console fields; reviewing formatter includes, formatter names, placeholders, arrays, nested invocations, or table parameters; or changing namespace-specific `.fmt` files under `projects`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SOP for structured documentation lifecycle. Trigger when: - Designing, writing, reviewing, or auditing large-scale documentation structures. - Navigating phases: Audit, Plan, Draft, Review, Verify. - Prompt contains: /doc, doc workflow, audit, draft, review, verify, documentation debt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured Domain Modeling Architecture (SDMA) principles. Trigger when: - Designing domain models, building ologs (ontological graphs), verifying protocol equivalence, selecting schemas, or measuring architectural entropy. - Modeling structures using Category Theory, Coalgebra, or Information Theory. - Prompt contains keywords: sdma, olog, Category Theory, Coalgebra, Information Theory, entropy, schema, pullback, functor, monad.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mathematical foundations, logical structures, and formal verification guidance. Trigger when: - Designing protocol contracts, formal specifications, verifying state spaces, or using proof assistants. - Tasks involve: TLA+, Alloy, Lean, Coq, model checkers, invariants, temporal logic. - Prompt contains keywords: formal verification, alloy, tla+, lean, coq, invariant, state machine, model checker, liveness, safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teaches the AI to design like a high-end agency. Defines the exact fonts, spacing, shadows, card structures, and animations that make a website feel expensive. Blocks all the common defaults that make AI designs look cheap or generic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects rootkit presence on compromised systems by identifying hidden processes, hooked system calls, modified kernel structures, hidden files, and covert network connections using memory forensics, cross-view detection, and integrity checking techniques. Activates for requests involving rootkit detection, hidden process discovery, kernel integrity checking, or system call hook analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect PowerShell Empire framework artifacts in Windows event logs by identifying Base64 encoded launcher patterns, default user agents, staging URL structures, stager IOCs, and known Empire module signatures in Script Block Logging events.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect kernel-level rootkits in Linux memory dumps using Volatility3 linux plugins (check_syscall, lsmod, hidden_modules), rkhunter system scanning, and /proc vs /sys discrepancy analysis to identify hooked syscalls, hidden kernel modules, and tampered system structures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes malware command-and-control (C2) communication protocols to understand beacon patterns, command structures, data encoding, and infrastructure. Covers HTTP, HTTPS, DNS, and custom protocol C2 analysis for detection development and threat intelligence. Activates for requests involving C2 analysis, beacon detection, C2 protocol reverse engineering, or command-and-control infrastructure mapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Schedule Management Handbook (2024 edition, Revision 2). Use for program/project schedule management of aerospace and large engineering efforts: the five sub-functions (Planning, Development, Assessment & Analysis, Maintenance & Control, Documentation & Communication); the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and the WBS/OBS/CBS breakdown structures; the Schedule Management Plan (SMP) and Basis of Estimate (BoE); Critical Path Method, logic, durations, float and margin; tiered schedule assessment (Requirements/Health/Basis checks, the Shock Test) and the Dimensions of Schedule Reliability; Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA), Integrated Cost-Schedule Risk Analysis (ICSRA), Monte Carlo, correlation, merge bias, and the Joint Confidence Level (JCL); baselining, replan vs. rebaseline, EVM schedule metrics (SPI, BEI, CEI, HMI, Earned Schedule, CPLI), and status/progress/forecast reporting. This is NASA's scheduling doctrine grounded in NPR 7120.5 and the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide. Thin on the underlying mechanics of CPM, statistics, and EVM (it points to companion handbooks); aerospace/space-flight-centric; anchored to the 2024 second edition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from MIL-STD-881F (13 May 2022), DoD Standard Practice for Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materiel Items. Use for Program/Contract/Subcontract WBS construction, 100% rule and dictionary discipline, commodity appendices A–J, Common Elements (K), sustainment CES reporting (L), Government ST&E (M), and RFP/post-award implementation. Technical planning & WBS and PM/measurement focus—not a cost manual substitute for CAPE policy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from MIL-HDBK-516C (Airworthiness Certification Criteria). Use for DoD air-system airworthiness planning: tailoring a certification basis, systems engineering criteria, and domain clusters for structures, flight technology, propulsion/installation, avionics/electrical/E3/diagnostics, computer systems/software, and crew systems (including applicable UAS control-station elements). Qualitative guidance handbook — not raw contractual requirements. Does not replace service airworthiness authority policy, civil FAA certification rules as authorities, or detailed JSSG/MIL performance specs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes tag and number structures for the new lines and instruments in a P&ID draft according to the project's numbering procedures, checks every tag extracted from the PFD against the quoted procedure format, and lists cross-section identifier mismatches and the registry checks a human must run. Never invents a numbering convention, never alters a PFD tag and never assigns a sequence number the procedure reserves for the registry. Use when the user asks to "run the tagging and numbering section", "check the tags against the numbering procedure", "propose the tag structure for the new lines and instruments" or "list the registry checks before validation" after the process safety flags. Do not use for validating the four sections, use validation-and-review-package instead; do not use for instrument content, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces complete monthly marketing campaign plans — themes, product selection, weekly content structures, recurring posts, promotions, and presentation decks. Use when the task asks to "plan this month's content", "orchestrate a campaign", "build a marketing plan", "select products for promotion", "create a campaign calendar", or "monthly SOP". Covers the full 7-step campaign lifecycle from theme selection to presentation delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Aws Organizations Deep — aWS Organizations deep management. Covers organizational unit hierarchy, account management, service control policies (SCPs), tag policies, backup policies, delegated administrators, and organizational service integrations. Use when managing multi-account AWS environments, reviewing SCPs, auditing OU structures, or analyzing organizational policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Baserow — baserow open-source database platform management covering workspace organization, database and table inventory, field configuration analysis, view management, webhook monitoring, and user access auditing. Use when reviewing database structures, investigating API integration issues, monitoring webhook deliveries, or auditing workspace permissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieve and analyze AlphaFold predicted structures for a protein. Use when the user provides a specific UniProt Accession ID and wants structural confidence metrics (pLDDT), domain boundary analysis, or disorder assessment. Do not use if the user only has a protein name, gene name, or amino acid sequence — ask for a UniProt ID first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate protein designs using AlphaFold2 structure prediction. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。