「the」の検索結果

Win a chargeback dispute — read the reason code, assemble the evidence packet, and write the rebuttal that actually persuades the bank. Use when asked to fight a chargeback, respond to a payment dispute, write a chargeback rebuttal, or contest a customer chargeback. Produces the reason-code decode, the required-evidence checklist for that code, the structured rebuttal letter, and an honest read on whether this one is winnable — so you fight the right disputes and concede the rest. For merchants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pressure-test a business or side-hustle idea before you sink money and months into it — find the real demand, the risky assumptions, and the cheapest way to test them. Use when asked to validate my business idea, is this a good business idea, test my side hustle, or should I start this. Produces a read on the core assumptions the idea depends on, who the customer really is and whether the pain is real, the cheapest experiments to test demand before building, a rough viability check (market, competition, economics), and a go/refine/rethink call — honest, not a cheerleader.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a client's wishes into an architectural brief that can actually be designed against — the accommodation schedule, the adjacencies, the budget reality, and the constraints named before they become change orders. Use when asked to write an architectural brief, prepare a project brief for a building, run a client briefing, or capture requirements for a new build or refurbishment. Produces the accommodation schedule with areas, the adjacency and circulation requirements, the site and statutory constraints, the budget and programme reality check, and the explicit exclusions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think clearly about whether bankruptcy is the right move, or whether another path fits better — without shame and without a sales pitch. Use when asked should I file for bankruptcy, is bankruptcy my best option, alternatives to bankruptcy, or what happens if I file. Produces an honest read on whether your situation is the kind bankruptcy actually helps, the main types and what each does (and doesn't) discharge, the real trade-offs (what you keep, the credit impact and its recovery, what's not dischargeable), the alternatives to weigh first (negotiation, debt management, doing nothing on time-barred debt), and a strong push to consult a bankruptcy attorney. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the beneficiary designations that quietly override wills — the account-by-account sweep, the life-event triggers that make them stale, and the coordination check against actual intentions. Use when asked check my beneficiaries, does my 401k go to my ex, do beneficiary forms beat a will, or what should I update after marriage/divorce/a birth. Produces the account sweep list, the stale-designation red flags, the intent-vs-paperwork comparison table, and the update checklist with the verify-in-writing step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the worst-case drill before an agent goes autonomous — the 'if this agent were fully hijacked right now, what's the damage' walk-through, the containment controls (caps, kill-switch, reversibility, isolation), and the recovery plan. Use when asked what's the worst my agent could do, run a blast-radius assessment, prepare for an agent going rogue, or am I ready to let this run unattended. Produces the worst-case walk-through, the containment controls, the reversibility audit, and the incident-recovery runbook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to check whether a figure is audited, which headline numbers sit outside the audited accounts, what 'adjusted' or 'underlying' means in this report, or who is vouching for the numbers in the highlights. For every headline figure in the highlights, chairman's statement and CEO review of an uploaded annual report, states whether it sits inside or outside the audited statements and what was added or removed versus the nearest audited number. Produces a boundary table, the list of figures outside the boundary, and a plain-English summary of who is vouching for what. Educational, not financial advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare the conversations with aging parents that everyone postpones — the driving talk, the money talk, the care-options talk, the moving talk — each with an opener that doesn't ambush, a dignity-first script, rehearsal against realistic resistance, and the fallback when it goes badly. Use when someone says 'I need to talk to my dad about driving', 'my mum won't discuss her finances', 'we need to talk about care', or is dreading a visit for exactly this reason. Produces the conversation plan, a rehearsal, and the small-steps fallback. A preparation tool, not family therapy — and it says so when the situation needs more.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work through the first hours and days after a disaster — a fire, flood, storm, or evacuation — in the right order: safety and people first, then documenting for insurance and aid, then the immediate recovery steps, without missing the things that cost money or health later. Use when someone says 'my house flooded/burned', 'what do I do after the disaster', 'we just evacuated, now what', or 'the storm damaged everything'. Produces a triaged action plan (safety → document → claim → recover), the do-not-miss list, and where to get help. Not legal advice; routes to emergency services and official aid.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Puts a built website live on a free HTTPS link, or your own .com with no DNS. Use when the user says "put it online", "go live", "make it live", "put this live", "publish my site", "share it with friends", "send my friends a link", "get a link", "make it public", "it only works on localhost" or "get a .com", or asks to deploy or host a site built with an AI tool (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Windsurf, Lovable, Bolt, v0, ChatGPT), or mentions DropTheHassle, and has not picked another host. Covers building first, CLI or MCP setup, deploying, the claim link, the live check, linking a server part the user hosts on AWS, Google Cloud, DigitalOcean or their own server with set_backend, and domain search. The agent never spends money. The human pays.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke this skill before asking the user any technical question or offering options, and whenever they ask to be asked in plain words - "ask simple", "ask me simply", "ask me in plain words" - in any language. ALWAYS invoke it too when the user asks for your view on a technical choice: whether it is worth doing, more than the problem needs, or replaceable by something simpler, and which option you would take. Invoke it even when the code makes the answer look obvious: the checks are what make the answer more than a guess. Rewrites the question in plain words and always ends with one marked recommendation. A structural choice first passes six checks, shown as a table: effort now, simpler substitute, extra work later, lock-in, over-engineering, easy to undo. Doing nothing is always weighed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the theoretical argument and hypotheses are the bottleneck for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — building a mechanism and deriving testable hypotheses a priori. Constructs the theory; it does not run the analysis (amj-data-analysis) or write the final contribution paragraph (amj-contribution-framing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render a punchy ~12s vertical (9:16) music-only direct-response OFFER ad as a 4-beat kinetic-typography film — HEADLINE slam → real PRODUCT drop → CLAIM/proof → CTA pill — from one config of copy slots, a real product photo, a brand palette, fonts, bpm, and beat split. DETERMINISTIC + FREE (a bundled Remotion project; springs + interpolate, no AI-gen for visuals). Backgrounds are engine gradient divs off the palette, props are inline SVG, the ONLY composited bitmap is the REAL product photo (objectFit:contain, never stretched), and ALL headline/claim/CTA/URL/wordmark text is typeset in the engine — never AI-rendered (the format's credibility guard). A driver binds the config to Remotion input props, renders the 9:16 master, and derives a 1:1 center-crop with ffmpeg. Two gating checks run before render (claim verbs must match the product's physical format; the claim beat needs an edge-entry mechanism prop). Use for the motion-graphics-offer-ad format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects A/B chromatin compartments from balanced Hi-C contact matrices via eigenvector decomposition of the distance-normalized, Pearson-correlated cis matrix with cooltools (eigs_cis), then orients (phases) the compartment eigenvector against a GC or gene-density track so the active (A) sign is not arbitrary. Covers the eigenvector-is-a-choice problem (per-arm view_df to remove the centromere gradient; picking the eigenvector by max correlation with activity, not by eigenvalue), GC phasing with bioframe.frac_gc, resolution choice (100kb-1Mb), saddle plots and saddle_strength for compartmentalization strength, the cohesin-loss-strengthens-compartments result, subcompartments (SNIPER/Calder/dcHiC), and cross-condition compartment switching. Use when calling A/B compartments, computing E1/eigenvectors, phasing the eigenvector, building saddle plots, choosing a compartment resolution, quantifying compartment strength, or comparing compartmentalization across conditions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find out why something in a running web app does not work, when the console is empty and the code looks correct. Reads the click, the request, the store and the console together and returns the file:line to open. Use when a button does nothing, a form will not submit, data will not load, a page renders blank or stale, a modal will not close, or the user says "it's broken" and the code review says it is fine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, enforce, audit, and validate Power BI report themes through the pbir CLI. Invoke when a report uses a default or minimal theme, visuals have inconsistent formatting or many local overrides, or the user asks to create, copy, apply, standardize, rebrand, audit, or validate a theme; change theme colors or typography; define style presets; promote visual formatting into the theme; clear overrides; or improve theme compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze current trends and challenges in Japanese NLP for a topic. Surveys the existing awesome-japanese-nlp-resources dataset and augments it with up-to-the-minute web research to produce a combined trend + issue report. Use only when the user explicitly wants a trend/landscape report, a challenges/limitations report, or a general research overview of a Japanese NLP topic (this combines the bundled dataset with live web research). Trigger phrases include '日本語LLMの最新トレンド', '〜の動向をまとめて', '最近の日本語NLPの流れ', '日本語LLMの課題', '〜の問題点・限界', '未解決の論点', 'trend report on Japanese embeddings', 'latest Japanese speech models', 'challenges in Japanese NER', 'limitations of Japanese embeddings'. For a simple lookup use the search skill; this one runs web research.

Given a Japanese NLP GitHub repo/model/dataset (URL / owner/repo / tool name) OR a topic, find what's already in awesome-japanese-nlp-resources and discover related resources NOT yet listed (contribution candidates). Mines the bundled dataset, then expands via web research across GitHub and Hugging Face. Use when the user names a SPECIFIC repository, model, or tool and wants alternatives/equivalents, OR wants to discover Japanese NLP resources for a topic that are NOT yet in the list, OR wants to prepare a contribution. Trigger phrases include 'mecabに似たツール', 'fugashiの代替', 'alternatives to fugashi', 'repos like manga-ocr', 'what else is like sudachi', 'リストに無い新しい日本語NLP', 'awesome-japanese-nlpに追加できそうな', '最近公開された日本語NLPツール', 'find unlisted Japanese NLP repos', 'new Japanese models on Hugging Face', 'contribute a new resource'. For a simple lookup of what already exists, use the search skill instead.

Run fable-mode execution discipline on Claude Fable 5.1 — the top of the escalation ladder and the strongest staged run available. Routes the task to the @fable-orchestrator agent with its model overridden to Fable (`model: "fable"`), which stages the work, delegates artifact production to @fable-worker-sonnet / @fable-worker-haiku, and cold-checks deliverables with @fable-verifier. Trigger when the user explicitly asks for thorough/systematic/"deep work" handling on the strongest model ("fable on fable", "stage this on fable", "deep work mode, fable", "run this on 5.1"), or when a fable-opus run reports the task exceeds Opus's ceiling. Benchmarked 2026-09-02: zero correctness delta on Fable 5.1 at ~1.1× tokens, ~2× wall — a provenance runner, not an accuracy runner. Do NOT use for ordinary single-pass tasks — prefer fable-opus, fable-sonnet, or fable-haiku when the task doesn't need peak reasoning. Fable is plan-included; bulk work still routes down-tier.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screen a client, counterparty, payer or corporate against the sanctions lists published by the designating authorities themselves — the UK Sanctions List (FCDO), OFSI, the UN Security Council, the EU consolidated list and OFAC's SDN and non-SDN lists. Use when onboarding, before taking a payment, before completing a transaction, or whenever a name must be checked against sanctions. Produces candidates and provenance, never a clearance: the record names every list searched with its publication date and count, states what was NOT searched, and ends at a blank decision block. Fails closed — a cache that is missing, damaged, truncated or stale is reported NOT SEARCHED and the process exits non-zero, so nothing can read an incomplete run as clean. Matches across transliteration, diacritics, homoglyphs and initials, because nobody spells a name the way the publisher does. Standard library only; screening opens no network connection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects prompt injection hidden in documents from the other side (pleadings, skeletons, bundles, served evidence, opponents' emails and attachments) before an AI reads them, so the model is not turned against your client. Checks word by word that the text an extractor hands the model was visibly drawn on the page: white, near-white, covered, clipped, off-page, tiny, transparent and invisible-mode text in PDF (ink test plus OCR); Word formatting resolved as Word does (styles, shading, theme colours, scaling, off-page frames, fallbacks, unused headers); HTML/CSS, RTF, email with attachments and zips, xlsx/pptx and legacy formats. Flags Unicode smuggling, text addressed to an AI and authorities found only in hidden text. Fails closed. Optional Read-tool hook. Use BEFORE any AI summary or analysis of an opposing or third-party document. Triggers: 'scan for injection', 'is this document safe', 'check the other side's skeleton', 'injection guard'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits a legal document against legal design principles. Scores the document on six pillars: language patterns (bureaucratese, archaisms, passive voice, nominalization), readability (Flesch Reading Ease and language-specific equivalents), structure and navigation, hidden conditions (material obligations buried away from their headings), statutory duplication (restating the law instead of citing it), and visual hierarchy where layout is available. Assessment-only; does not rewrite the document. Works on English, French, and German documents, inferring the applicable jurisdiction from the document's language and textual signals: governing-law clause, statute citations, party addresses. Use when a user shares a legal document (contract, NDA, T&C, privacy policy, internal policy) asking how good the drafting is from a legal design perspective, whether it is readable, whether it contains buried clauses or restates the law, or how it scores on Flesch / LIX / Amstad / Kandel-Moles readability metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes the one sentence that makes a generic offer feel written for this one company. Produces the tail of "I think we can help you ___". Triggers on "specificity line", "make it feel specific to them", "the specifically sentence", "why would they think this is for them", "personalize the offer not the intro". Outputs one lead-level merge field, blank when the company does not fit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests whether a scene is structurally worth generating before any shot is prompted — a five-element engine of Goal, Obstacle, Tactic, Reversal, and Value Shift. Use when the user has a scene, sequence, beat outline, or script and wants it audited or strengthened; when a sequence generates cleanly but lands flat and nobody can say why; when shots look good individually but the run of them does not build; or when the user asks 'is this scene working', 'what's weak here', or 'why doesn't this land'. Upstream of prompting — it decides WHICH shots deserve the credits, not how to write them. Pairs with higgsfield-character-design (who the characters are) and higgsfield-shotlist-director (turning the settled scene into shots).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。