「weight」の検索結果

Lightweight build: explore → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Verifies build + tests, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default for everyday features; reach for /claude-setup:build only when the work needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight build: explore → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Verifies build + tests, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default for everyday features; reach for /build only when the work needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `ArchUnitNET` library for architecture rules in .NET tests. Use when a repo needs richer architecture assertions than lightweight fluent rule libraries usually provide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `NetArchTest.Rules` library for architecture rules in .NET unit tests. Use when a repo wants lightweight, fluent architecture assertions for namespaces, dependencies, or layering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the operating health of a one-person company using lightweight metrics, bottleneck analysis, and stop-loss logic. Use when Codex needs to explain review concepts when needed, verify available outputs, ask one question at a time, present multiple bottleneck hypotheses, and write user-confirmed outputs into `opc-doc/`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chinese journal matcher — performs L3 6-dimensional matching (keywords, cited direction, trend, solicitation, institution, cross-discipline), calculates conditional acceptance probability with review cycle estimation, and outputs tiered submission strategy (aspiration-stable-safety) using 4-layer weighted ranking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

International journal matcher — performs L3 6-dimensional matching for SCI/SSCI/EI/Scopus journals, computes conditional acceptance probability with review cycle estimation, applies 4-layer weighted ranking, and outputs tiered submission strategy including CAS warning screening and Chinese scholar friendliness analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when writing sprint contracts in VCSDD strict mode. Provides grading criteria patterns, dimension weight guidelines, and pass threshold formulation for the 5 review dimensions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analysis of Competing Hypotheses — structured technique for evaluating multiple explanations against evidence. Use when facing ambiguous attribution or multiple plausible scenarios. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Runs on ungraded evidence when asked, labelled as such, unweighted, and capped at Moderate confidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

houtu-dependencies enterprise-grade Spring Cloud microservice foundational framework complete usage guide. GroupId is io.github.lujiafa, covering unified response, exception handling, parameter parsing, session authentication, permission control, signature verification, anti-replay, distributed lock, rate limiting, database field encryption, config decryption, access logging, canary routing, weighted load balancing, Feign enhancement, Sentinel circuit breaking, service discovery, Swagger documentation, crypto utilities, HTTP client, monitoring metrics, and other enterprise-grade capabilities. When the project build file (pom.xml or build.gradle/build.gradle.kts) contains io.github.lujiafa or houtu-related dependencies, or when the user mentions houtu or houtu-dependencies, this Skill must be read and code must be generated strictly following framework conventions. Even if the user is simply doing regular Spring Boot development (e.g., writing Controller, Service, Feign), as long as the project includes houtu, the houtu approach must be used instead of native Spring. When the user explicitly wants to use the houtu framework and the project has not yet included it, proactively add the BOM and required Starters; when the project already includes it, proactively identify and import required module dependencies based on business scenarios during coding, naturally integrating framework capabilities to enhance business services based on business semantics, rather than waiting for the user to specify each one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a weighted sales forecast with best/likely/worst scenarios, commit vs. upside breakdown, and gap analysis. Use when preparing a quarterly forecast call, assessing gap-to-quota from a pipeline CSV, deciding which deals to commit vs. call upside, or checking pipeline coverage against your number.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight design smell review for modules and APIs—coupling, cohesion, naming, boundaries, and unnecessary complexity. Use before large refactors or when code feels hard to change. Complements gstack/review (diff-focused).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design lightweight CI quality gates—lint, test tiers, security scans, and merge policies. Use when setting up or improving pipelines without tying to one stack only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Measure social media influence using engagement-weighted metrics beyond follower count. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate influencer effectiveness, compare influence across accounts, or build an influence scoring system — even if they say 'who is more influential', 'influencer ranking', or 'measure social impact'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a lightweight pre-release readiness review of Atlassian Forge apps across manifest/module wiring, architecture, runtime compatibility, dependency posture, tests, deploy readiness, and obvious security, cost, or reliability smells. Use when the user asks "review my Forge app", "pre-deploy check", "is this app ready to ship", "review manifest", "general app review", "release readiness", or asks for a broad quality pass. Do not use for deep security audits/SAST/exploitability review, cost optimization, or diagnosing a known broken app; route those to forge-security-review, forge-cost-optimizer, or forge-debugger respectively.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build structured vendor/tool evaluation matrices with weighted scoring, TCO analysis, and recommendation memos. Covers criteria definition, deal-breaker identification, and negotiation points. Use when selecting SaaS tools, evaluating technology vendors, or making build-vs-buy decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and tier suppliers using a weighted scorecard per SCOR DS Supplier Management practices. Score Quality, Delivery, Cost, Responsiveness, and Sustainability. Classify suppliers as Strategic, Preferred, Approved, or Conditional. Use during vendor reviews or procurement decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build customer health scores and churn risk models using leading indicators. Define health dimensions (Usage, Engagement, Support, Sentiment, Contract), weight and score customers, segment into Healthy / At-Risk / Red, and generate intervention playbooks. Use during QBR prep, customer success reviews, or when churn spikes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit vulnerabilities in the AI Supply Chain by injecting malicious models, datasets, or dependencies. Use this skill to simulate advanced persistent threats (APTs) compromising Hugging Face repositories, manipulating pre-trained weights (Model Poisoning), and exploiting insecure deserialization during model loading (e.g., Pickle files).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI/ML security playbook. Use when assessing model supply chain attacks (pickle RCE, poisoned weights), adversarial examples, model poisoning, model stealing, data privacy attacks (membership inference, model inversion), and autonomous agent security risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight design spec for small changes — tuning adjustments, minor mechanics, balance tweaks. Skips full GDD authoring when a system GDD already exists or the change is too small to warrant one. Produces a Quick Design Spec that embeds directly into story files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when moving expensive browser work off the main thread with Web Workers, SharedWorker, worker pools, Comlink, transferable objects, Vite/Webpack worker integration, or UI responsiveness fixes. Do not use for lightweight synchronous work or DOM manipulation; Chinese triggers include Web Worker, background thread, main thread blocking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when authoring or reviewing frontend unit, component, or light integration tests close to UI code, including React Testing Library, Vue Test Utils, hooks/composables, props/emits, callbacks, accessible queries, user-event interactions, mocks, loading/error/empty states, and regression coverage. For layer planning, real-browser journeys, or existing validation failures, choose the matching testing or validation workflow first; Chinese triggers include component testing, Component unit testing, unit testing, lightweight integration testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI and LLM red-teaming skill for evaluating prompt injection, jailbreak, data exfiltration, tool abuse, agent hijack, RAG poisoning, model denial of service, and unsafe tool-use chains in Gemini, Claude, GPT, and open-weight models. Use to build evaluation harnesses, attack corpora, defensive guardrails, and red-team reports for AI systems you own or are authorized to test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。