「behavior」の検索結果

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Provide instant anchor scroll option. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Provide audio descriptions for video. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Ensure dialogs have an accessible name. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use valid ARIA role values. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Ensure ARIA roles are contained by required parent roles. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing scripts, client components, bundles, or runtime behavior related to Never use eval() or unsafe dynamic code execution. Inspect both source code and the browser execution path so fixes target the real bottleneck or bug.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Provide accessible names for tooltips. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing navigation performance, browser lifecycle events, or resume-from-memory behavior. Check the actual browser lifecycle and restore path, not only static code patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Avoid using deprecated ARIA roles. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Avoid focusable descendants in role='text' elements. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Provide accessible names for toggle fields. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Provide accessible names for progress bars. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Include required ARIA attributes for roles. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use valid values for ARIA attributes. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Announce dynamic content with ARIA live regions. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Avoid autoplaying media. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Ensure accesskey values are unique. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Provide accessible names for ARIA command elements. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use only allowed ARIA attributes for each role. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Benchmark CodeGraph retrieval quality on a real codebase by comparing agent behavior with vs without CodeGraph. Use when the user runs /agent-eval or asks to test, benchmark, audit, or validate a codegraph version (the local dev build or a published npm version) against a language's repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about Codex Rules behavior, injected project rules, supported rule file locations, matching, or environment configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a hypothesis-driven debugging loop across any language or binary, escalating to orthogonal oracle angles and locking the fix with a failing test. Use for crashes, silent failures, hangs, wrong responses, memory leaks, async misbehavior, or reverse engineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarify a material user-owned product decision before substantive implementation commitments. Use only when request and named/governing evidence still leave a choice that would materially change scope, platform support, user-facing surface, data/API contract, domain values, project placement, or cross-system architecture; also use when a truncated request omits such a choice. On the initial turn, inspect only named or governing requirements evidence, then ask directly without loading: prefer structured input; ask one blocking outcome question or at most three coupled questions; wait. After the answer, load the body before write or delegation. Do not use for implement/build/fix/debug/refactor work when expected behavior is settled, plan/design deliverables owned by Plan, complexity/greenfield/integration alone, agent-owned technical choices, locally discoverable facts, reversible defaults, permission to begin, or stop/no-tool turns. Never re-ask supplied facts or turn clarification into refusal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify that a code change actually does what it's supposed to by exercising it end-to-end and observing behavior — drive the affected flow, not just tests or typecheck. Run before committing nontrivial changes; bootstraps this repo's project verify skill if none exists yet. Don't invoke it on a diff that only touches tests, docs, or other code with no runtime surface to drive (a change to product source always has one) — there's nothing to observe.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。