「choice」の検索結果

Master cloud storage: provider choice, sync vs. backup, sharing, storage tiers, and cost control. Use when organizing cloud files, cutting storage costs, or designing team storage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure guidance — subscriptions and RBAC, networking, AKS/App Service choices, Entra ID, and cost management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Idiomatic Astro: islands architecture, content collections, SSR/SSG choices, and performance-first builds. Use when writing, reviewing, or structuring Astro sites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and manage Architecture Decision Records using the Michael Nygard format. Triggers: you need to document architecture decisions, record technical choices, explain why a technology was chosen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit game narrative systems for technical quality -- branching dialogue trees, state/flag tracking, quest systems, choice-consequence mapping, localization pipelines, voice-over integration, and cinematic scripting..

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Searches, retrieves, and synthesizes official Google developer documentation across Google Cloud, AI/Gemini, Android, Chrome, Web, Flutter, Go, Firebase, and other Google developer platforms. Integrates with the Developer Knowledge MCP server (search_documents, get_documents, answer_query) or the Developer Knowledge REST API fallback. Use when searching for gcloud CLI commands, API syntax, IAM permissions, official documentation, architectural comparisons, or product choice overviews. Don't use for local filesystem lookups or non-Google documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement a feature phase by phase from a phased JSON master or Markdown plan. Before each phase, confirm whether to create/run unit tests and whether to run ck:quality, unless explicit flags supply those choices. Supports token-budgeted execution, resumable state, and TDD handoff to ck:test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement a feature phase by phase from a phased JSON master or Markdown plan. Before each phase, confirm whether to create/run unit tests and whether to run ck:quality, unless explicit flags supply those choices. Supports token-budgeted execution, resumable state, and TDD handoff to ck:test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when building, reviewing, or refreshing a RACI (Responsible / Accountable / Consulted / Informed) matrix for a Salesforce project so that every Salesforce-specific decision — data model change, automation tier choice, security model, integration boundary, deployment, license/edition — has exactly one accountable owner and a documented escalation path that downstream agents can route to. Trigger keywords: RACI matrix salesforce project, stakeholder authority salesforce, escalation path salesforce decisions, who approves data model change, salesforce decision rights, REFUSAL_NEEDS_HUMAN_REVIEW routing. NOT for the change advisory board operating model itself (use admin/change-management-and-deployment). NOT for end-user training rollout plans (use admin/change-management-and-training). NOT for the technical mechanics of permission set assignment authority (use admin/permission-set-architecture). NOT for pure stakeholder requirements elicitation (use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf). More trigger keywords: who approves a sandbox refresh, who signs off a data load, release update activation owner, delegated admin authority vs RACI, multi-org decision rights, escalation time-box.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tactical guidance for composing Permission Set Groups: layering permission sets, applying Mute Permission Sets to subtract narrow capabilities, sequencing the recalculation lifecycle, deletion order, and assignment-vs-activation lifecycle. Triggers: 'PSG composition', 'mute permission set', 'PSG recalculation', 'cannot delete permission set in PSG', 'PSG explosion', 'expired PSG assignment'. NOT for the strategic profile-vs-PSG choice or migrating off profiles - use admin/permission-set-architecture. NOT for record-sharing design (OWD, role hierarchy, sharing rules) - use admin/sharing-and-visibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when configuring or troubleshooting the Salesforce CPQ Guided Selling wizard: Quote Process records, ProcessInput questions that filter products by field value, mapping answers to Product2 classification fields, and search type choice (Standard, Enhanced, Custom). Trigger keywords: CPQ guided selling, quote process wizard, product selection wizard, SBQQ__QuoteProcess__c, SBQQ__ProcessInput__c, guided product selection, auto select product, product search plugin. NOT for bundles, product options, or product rules — use admin/cpq-product-catalog-setup. NOT for writing a custom ProductSearchPlugin in Apex — use apex/cpq-apex-plugins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Router for the 63 SfSkills `flow` skill packages. Flow Builder: record-triggered, screen, scheduled and orchestration flows, bulkification, fault handling, limits, testing. "My flow" belongs here even when salesforce-apex also names the limit. Nightly scheduling without naming code defaults here; apex takes it when code/class/Apex is named. Flow-vs-Apex choice before anything is built: admin/process-automation-selection. Use when the request mentions Flow, Flow Builder, record-triggered flow, screen flow, scheduled flow, subflow, fault path, flow element, orchestration, Process Builder migration, Workflow Rule migration, flow limit, flow hitting SOQL limit, too many SOQL queries in a flow, flow bulkification, Get Records performance. Finds and opens the exact skill package to read; it does not contain the guidance itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore and debate options with fresh documentation and research before committing. Use when facing a real decision with multiple plausible approaches — library/framework choice, architecture call, API or schema design, algorithm selection, or any communication / strategy call where being wrong has cost. Enumerates relevant research domains, looks up current docs and evidence-based methods, weighs options on correctness and elegance, resists bloat. Do NOT use for divergent ideation (brainstorm), extracting user intent (elicit), or reviewing already-written code (quality-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Firmware development for the Raspberry Pi Pico (original, RP2040 — dual Cortex-M0+ @ 133 MHz, 264 KB SRAM, 2 MB QSPI flash) — its 26 exposed GPIO, 4-channel 12-bit ADC, 16-channel PWM, 2× UART/I2C/SPI, PIO state machines, USB 1.1 CDC, VSYS/VBUS/SMPS power wiring, and the PlatformIO + arduino-pico (earlephilhower) setup around them. Use when working on this board, any Pico H or Pico clone, or a bare RP2040: project setup, platformio.ini, the earlephilhower-vs-Mbed core choice, pin mapping, USB CDC serial, analogRead/analogWrite behaviour, Wire/SPI defaults, battery power, EEPROM emulation, BOOTSEL/UF2 flashing, or debugging why something on the board does not work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user gives a SaaS product's landing page URL, homepage, or name and asks for a full teardown or deep-dive of how the product works across web, desktop, and mobile — including per-platform feature inventories and user journeys, tech stack, pricing/plan mapping, how the platforms integrate and sync (and the business logic behind those choices), hardware integrations, business-scale/revenue signals, and concrete release artifacts per platform — with a structured Markdown report as the deliverable. Trigger on phrases like "research this SaaS", "do a platform teardown of X", "map every feature of this product across web/mobile/desktop", "reverse-engineer how this app works everywhere", or a bare URL plus a request to understand the whole product.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create stunning, animation-rich HTML presentations from scratch or by converting PowerPoint files. Use when the user wants to build a presentation, convert a PPT/PPTX to web, or create slides for a talk/pitch. Helps non-designers discover their aesthetic through visual exploration rather than abstract choices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates reference documentation structure + smart documents (ADRs/Guides/Manuals) based on TECH_STACK. Only creates justified documents (nontrivial technology choices).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for distinctive, intentional visual design when building new UI or reshaping an existing one. Helps with aesthetic direction, typography, and making choices that don't read as templated defaults.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for distinctive, intentional visual design when building new UI or reshaping an existing one. Helps with aesthetic direction, typography, and making choices that don't read as templated defaults.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define dygo App Pages and metadata-driven Studio experiences for Business Apps. Use when an App needs a Page, navigation entry, renderer choice, or Studio presentation beyond default Entity routes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select and implement the right Azure compute platform for a workload. Decision tree guides choice based on workload characteristics, scaling needs, and operational maturity. Covers serverless, PaaS, containers, Kubernetes, and IaaS patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Re-asks the most recent question through the agent's interactive questionnaire tool instead of plain text, and keeps using that tool for every later question with concrete options. Use when the user invokes `/qs` or `$qs`, or asks for a question to be re-posed as selectable choices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate several distinct UI directions for a screen or flow before committing to one. Produces 2-4 named interface directions with layout logic, component choices, and tradeoffs, optionally with generated mockup images. Use when the user says "ideate the UI", "give me layout options", "design directions for this screen", "explore the interface", or after context/research and before prototyping. Part of the Product Design set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose multi-agent architectures using environment-first analysis, coordination pressure, commitment tuning, and knowledge levels. Use for autonomy design, protocol choice, and coordination failures. NOT for single-agent planning, centralized schedulers, or prompt-only swarms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。