「rewrite」の検索結果

Remove signs of AI-generated code from a codebase while preserving behavior. Use when editing or reviewing code to make it read like a human engineer on this team wrote it. Works through a test-guarded detect-modify-verify loop: pin down the functional contract and edge cases first, write or run tests as a safety net, then rewrite AI tells (redundant comments, emoji, verbose names, reflexive try/except, defensive null-guards, over-decomposition, speculative abstraction, dead code, non-idiomatic constructs, hallucinated dependencies) and re-verify after every change. The tests decide whether a defensive block is slop or a real safeguard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "optimize my Shopping feed", "fix product disapprovals", "improve product titles/attributes", or "build feed-driven PMax asset groups"; audits and rewrites the Shopping/Performance Max product feed — title/description patterns, required and recommended attributes, GTIN/availability/price hygiene, disapproval triage, and feed-driven asset-group / listing-group structure — informing the ROAS O (Offer) dimension. Not for text ad copy — use ad-creative-builder; not for scoring the account or the RQS — use ad-account-auditor. 商品Feed优化/购物广告Feed/商品标题优化/商品禁投修复

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write or rewrite high-intent marketing copy grounded in product context, customer language, claims evidence, offer structure and conversion goals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply during planned rewrites and migrations with explicit phase boundaries. Converge on the target architecture; don't preserve smooth intermediate states with throwaway compatibility code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when sequencing an addition, refactor, or rewrite. Remove dead weight, redundant validators, and stub references first, then build on the simpler base.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Control risky structural change by proving a refactor is necessary and that behaviour, contracts, data, security boundaries, and operational properties can be preserved through a staged migration. Use whenever the user wants to refactor, restructure, clean up, modernise, extract, migrate, rewrite, or re-architect existing code, or asks whether they should. Prefer this over starting the refactor. DO NOT REFACTOR is a first-class outcome. Part of the audit suite; inherits the shared constitution while its own job is proving necessity and behavioural preservation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bun runtime, package manager, bundler, and test runner. Use when running scripts with bun, managing packages, serving HTTP with Bun.serve, querying databases with Bun.sql/bun:sqlite/Bun.redis, shell scripting with $, using S3/file I/O, writing tests with bun:test, bundling or compiling to executable, or using any Bun-specific API (spawn, glob, semver, FFI, workers, plugins, HTMLRewriter).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to humanize text, make writing sound less like AI, or rewrite content to feel more natural. Triggers on "humanize", "make it sound natural", "too robotic", "sounds like AI", or similar. Works in Hebrew and English. Always output only the rewritten text — no explanations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and run the owner's self-branding system in a structured way across LinkedIn, Substack, dev.to, X, profile rewrites, recurring series, and comment strategy. Use when the owner asks for positioning, a branding plan, profile updates, content drafts, a publishing sequence, comment ideas, or help maintaining a consistent public voice. Optimize for operator credibility: specific experience, defensible numbers, concrete artifacts, and category ownership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for Self-Rewriting Core: AST analyze, patch, commit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms"). Supports detect-only audits, edit-in-place file cleanup, voice and context profiles, and an iterate-to-convergence pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to optimize their App Store listing for seasonal events, holidays, or trending moments — including keyword opportunities, metadata updates, screenshot theming, and timing strategy. Use when the user mentions "seasonal", "holiday", "Christmas", "New Year", "Valentine's Day", "summer", "back to school", "seasonal keywords", "trending now", "limited time", or wants to capitalize on a calendar event. For general keyword research, see keyword-research. For full metadata rewrites, see metadata-optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and execute large refactor or rewrite efforts efficiently with parallel multi-agent analysis and implementation. Use when a user asks to refactor many files, split workstreams, analyze a target code area, and coordinate sub-agents with clear ownership and dependency-aware execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: a general codebase assessment, pre-migration/pre-rewrite review, or explicit security-focused request needs a structured, repeatable security audit pass covering hardcoded secrets, injection-prone constructs, auth/debug backdoors, and insecure config defaults. Complements (does not replace) the built-in /security-review command. Not a mandatory gate on every ticket.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convergence loop that iteratively improves work until quality thresholds are met. Use when: (1) "refine this", "make this better", "iterate on this", (2) After /analyst gives a REVISE verdict, (3) Output quality is below 8/10, (4) "run the refinery loop on this". Reads analyst reviews from system/reviews/. Generates, scores, diagnoses, rewrites, re-scores. Stops when all dimensions >= 8/10 or diminishing returns detected. Outputs to system/refinery-log.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convergence loop that iteratively improves work until quality thresholds are met. Scores, diagnoses specific weaknesses, rewrites, re-scores, and repeats until all dimensions reach 8/10 or diminishing returns are detected. Use when you want to refine or iterate on work, after the analyst gives a REVISE verdict, or when output quality is below your bar. Part of the architect-system loop. Outputs to system/refinery-log.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A hard-edged writing style contract for timeless, forceful English prose without modern AI tics. Use when users ask for prose or rewrites that must be clean, exact, concrete, and free of AI cadence, filler, or therapeutic tone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and rewrite content to remove 21 categories of AI writing patterns with a 43-entry replacement table

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

テックブログ記事をSEOに最適化してリライトするスキル。タイトル最適化、メタディスクリプション生成、本文のキーワード配置、コンテンツ拡充提案、古い表現の更新、構造化データ提案など、包括的なSEOライティングを実施。「SEOリライトして」「検索順位を上げたい」「記事を最適化」などのリクエストで利用。

SEO + GEO (AI-search) + brand-entity desk (Busabase App-in-Skill) — wired to Google Search Console for a dashboard over search analytics and an agent-prepared SEO opportunities review queue, plus an AI-visibility tracker (are we cited in ChatGPT / Perplexity / Gemini / Claude / Copilot answers), a GEO content-optimization queue gated by geo-qa, and an entity / knowledge-panel readiness checklist. Use when the user invokes $kelly-seo or /kelly-seo, mentions SEO, Google Search Console, GSC, search analytics, search performance, queries, keywords, rankings, positions, impressions, clicks, CTR, striking-distance queries, title/meta rewrites, content briefs, internal links, SEO opportunities review, GEO, generative engine optimization, AI search, AI visibility, being cited by AI answer engines, ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini/Claude/Copilot citations, brand entity, knowledge panel, Wikidata, schema.org, or entity readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrite AI-sounding text so it reads like the writer without changing what it says. Use when editing or reviewing prose for AI tells: not-X-but-Y contrasts, one-line closers, staged openers, forced triads, dashes everywhere, inflated claims, sales language, stock AI words, bold labels, or filler. Based on Wikipedia's "Signs of AI writing."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates, optimizes, and iteratively refines agent prompts, system prompts, developer prompts, and reusable prompt templates. Use when asked to improve a prompt, optimize a system prompt, rewrite an agent prompt, tune prompt wording, make a prompt more reliable, port prompts between OpenAI, Claude, or Gemini, or build prompt evals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, refresh, and rewrite PR titles and descriptions following Sentry conventions. Use when opening a PR, writing or updating a PR title/body/description, refreshing an existing PR after material changes, or preparing branch changes for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose why a PostHog endpoint is slow or expensive and propose a concrete fix — bump the cache TTL, enable materialisation, restructure variables, or rewrite the query. Use when the user says "this endpoint is slow", "my endpoint times out", "we're hitting the cost cap on this one", or asks "should I materialise this?". Focuses on a single named endpoint, not a project-wide audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。