「codex review」の検索結果

Judge performance or resource claims on real hardware: benchmark design or review, latency, throughput, memory or headroom numbers, and accept-or-reject decisions on optimizations. Not for refactors with no resource claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize user-scoped CLEC episodes into traceable Traditional Chinese Obsidian pages. Use when Codex must group X, pCloud, Google Drive, Bilibili, Odysee, and RSS or Podcast sources by five-digit episode number; obtain and review transcripts through media-transcript; clean readable transcripts with the confirmed CLEC lexicon; anonymize students; or build the standard three-layer episode page.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality audit of a whole repo: bugs, security holes, what breaks under real load, risky code without tests, slow paths, and what to delete, merge or split. Ranked, each finding explained in plain English. One-shot report, changes nothing. Use for "audit this codebase", "review the whole repo", "find bloat", "what can I delete", /ponytail-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Per-screen design spec generator for AI design tools (Stitch / Figma AI / Codex artifacts). Consumes per-feature PRDs from kta-prd-pipeline. Emits tool-agnostic markdown specs. Triggers — design spec, AI design prompt, screen mockup brief, Figma AI input, Stitch prompt, design system tokens, post-PRD design phase, generate design specs, design brief, mockup spec. DOES NOT generate Compose code, Kotlin code, or @Preview stubs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Secure AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot) with permission boundaries, secret protection, code review gates, and safe sandbox configurations for team environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs a small, throwaway multi-agent fan-out (a couple of parallel workers plus a review pass) in ANY project — trigger phrases "spawn a few parallel agents", "fan out", "quick worker team" — without the full /startcycle-graph contract, no .agents/graph.md bootstrap, no state.json schema, no persistent files. Roles run on the session model unless `.aos/pipeline.json` overrides one (an external CLI can take the worker step) and portable across machines that may not have Antigravity/OpenCode/Codex installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive 9-step prompt crafting and delegation protocol for autonomous multi-agent teams. Enforces objective verification, integrity modes, and acceptance criteria across Antigravity, Claude Code, Cursor, OpenCode, Codex, and Roo Code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Current attested Codex, Claude Code, and Agent Skills extension contracts for skilltap. Use when designing, implementing, reviewing, or documenting harness adapters; plugin or marketplace manifests; native plugin lifecycle; skill directories or SKILL.md frontmatter; AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md bridges; configuration scopes; compatibility transfer; adoption, reconciliation, status, or update behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use every time you push a commit to an active pull request, to verify the PR is truly stable before reporting merge readiness. Covers the post-push wait window, AI review audit (Copilot/Greptile/Codex), and the gh commands to snapshot PR state. Trigger on "I pushed" or "is the PR ready to merge".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate a bounded repository task to an allowlisted external coding CLI through the guarded Flow runner. Use for automatic provider selection or explicit Codex, OpenCode, Kimi, Gemini, or Kiro delegation that requires timeout handling and independent local review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run multiple Reforge-guided section-refactor lanes in parallel, each in its own worktree/branch off origin/main, with a score-blind adversarial review panel gating every commit, one draft PR per section. Use when the user wants to reduce Reforge surface/internal score across several sections at once via architecturally-correct deletions (dead surface, entity-leak removal, cross-section read-splits) — not by relocation, parameter bags, or accessibility-dodging. Wraps the per-lane process in .codex/skills/humans-refactor. Triggers: 'refactor swarm', 'parallel section refactors', 'run reforge refactor on Users/Tickets/...', 'burn down surface score across sections'. Has an intensity dial (light|standard|deep) and a workflow|solo execution mode to trade token burn against autonomy per unit of output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes multiple provided pages to identify keyword overlap and potential cannibalization issues. Suggests differentiation strategies. Use PROACTIVELY when reviewing similar content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes provided content for quality, E-E-A-T signals, and SEO best practices. Scores content and provides improvement recommendations based on established guidelines. Use PROACTIVELY for content review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in secure mobile coding practices specializing in input validation, WebView security, and mobile-specific security patterns. Use PROACTIVELY for mobile security implementations or mobile security code reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in secure frontend coding practices specializing in XSS prevention, output sanitization, and client-side security patterns. Use PROACTIVELY for frontend security implementations or client-side security code reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert .NET backend architect specializing in C#, ASP.NET Core, Entity Framework, Dapper, and enterprise application patterns. Masters async/await, dependency injection, caching strategies, and performance optimization. Use PROACTIVELY for .NET API development, code review, or architecture decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate a comprehensive git workflow from code review through PR creation, leveraging specialized agents for quality assurance, testing, and deployment readiness. This workflow implements modern git best practices including Conventional Commits, automated testing, and structured PR creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in secure backend coding practices specializing in input validation, authentication, and API security. Use PROACTIVELY for backend security implementations or security code reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。