「each」の検索結果

Teach the user a new skill or concept, within this workspace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The kpopper method: a knowledge record (GROUNDING.yaml) for work that gets revisited - what is known, where each piece came from, and what would make each conclusion wrong. Use when asked what kpopper is or how to keep a record, when choosing which kpopper skill fits a moment, or when no narrower one does. The occasions have their own skills: ground (read the record before answering), record (write what the work found), map (map existing materials), annotated-doc (a standalone HTML document with evidence), hub (the record's visual home), consolidate (hypotheses and merges), watch (background checks).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handles public relations, media outreach, press releases, and earned media strategy for SMEs. Creates press releases, media pitches, spokesperson briefings, crisis communication plans, and event communications. Use when user asks about PR, press releases, media relations, journalist outreach, crisis communication, or public-facing communications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "communicate via Discord", "send a message to Discord", "check Discord for instructions", "ask a question on Discord", "notify on Discord", "share a file on Discord", "離席する", "離席モード", "Discord で待機して", "Discord待機", or when Claude Code needs to reach the user who is away from the terminal.

Iteratively improves a PR (GitHub), MR (GitLab), or shelved changelist (Perforce) until it reaches the repository's configured Greptile merge threshold with zero unresolved actionable comments, or until the five-review maximum is reached. Triggers Greptile review, fixes all actionable comments, pushes/re-shelves, re-triggers review only for new head SHAs unless a 5/5 score is already published, and repeats. Use when the user wants to optimize a PR/MR/CL against Greptile's code review standards without creating runaway review loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teach the user a new skill or concept, within this workspace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The map of nuxt-crouton's GitHub workflows and the deploy-pipeline anatomy — what each workflow gates, how a merge reaches Cloudflare, which secrets/tokens exist where, and how the agent-pipeline workflows chain. Use when a CI check fails and you need to know what it is, when asked "which workflow deploys X / why did staging update / what does this check gate / where is that secret / why didn't my label trigger anything", when wiring a new app into CI, or when debugging a deploy that never fired. Trigger phrases: "what runs on merge to main", "map of the workflows", "WORKER_SECRETS_JSON", "why is the daily sweep not running", "deploy-apps vs deploy-app", "which token does this workflow use".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a concept is too abstract for the learner's current level and needs analogy-first teaching before complexity re-injection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when explaining a technical concept and adapting depth, pacing, and examples to the learner's readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plant canarytokens and honey credentials and alert on breach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy cloud-native deception across AWS, Azure, and GCP using decoy (honey) resources whose only purpose is to generate a high-fidelity alert the instant an attacker touches them: canary IAM access keys, permission-less decoy users/roles/service principals, honey object-storage buckets, and decoy secrets in Secrets Manager / Key Vault / Secret Manager. Wires detection through CloudTrail + EventBridge, Azure Sentinel honeytoken watchlists + Defender, and GCP Cloud Audit Logs, so any use of a decoy is routed to the SOC with near-zero false positives. Use when protecting cloud accounts and data stores, when an org has only on-prem honeypots and needs cloud coverage, when seeding fake AWS keys to catch credential theft and code-leak exposure, or when detecting cloud reconnaissance and lateral movement. Keywords: cloud deception, canary token AWS, honey S3 bucket, decoy IAM credentials, CloudTrail alert, GuardDuty, Sentinel honeytoken, decoy secret, honey service account, cloud honeypot, breach detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute an internal network penetration test simulating an insider threat or post-breach attacker to identify lateral movement paths, privilege escalation vectors, and sensitive data exposure within the corporate network.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a live investigation as an operator-driven query loop: the operator runs each query on the live system and pastes the result back, and you guide the investigation one labelled query at a time. Use alongside support-assist (which covers what to investigate) whenever someone is pasting query or command output back from a deployment, especially during an incident. Covers labelling, pacing, making each query decide the next step, version-grounding, and keeping queries cheap and correctly classified.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer whether a specific advisory reaches anything in THIS repository — which manifest declares the package, at what version, whether the version is in range, and whether the vulnerable code is reachable. Use when someone asks "does CVE-… affect us", when triaging an advisory against a real codebase, or before spending effort on a fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review+fix protocol with optional pre-core git diff review and safety guardrails (unsoundness, invariants, footguns, incidental complexity). Use when prompts say "/tw-fix this PR", "fix current branch", "fix this diff", "repair CI red", or "apply a minimal patch", and when crash/corruption/invariant-break issues need correction with a validation signal. Stop only after self-review exhausts actionable changes, each full cycle reaches post-self-review rerun plus terminal diff-review closure, and two consecutive zero-edit full cycles are clean.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teach the user a new skill or concept, within this workspace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a schedule extract (milestone list or planning tool export) and the period's status notes into a DRAFT plain-language slip explanation: which milestones and activities slipped and by how many working days, arithmetic shown, why per the notes as verbatim fragments with source and date, what each slip pushes next per the extract, and the decision each slip needs framed as a question with the options the notes propose and the owner the governance documents name, every missing fact marked UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "explain the schedule slip", "what slipped this month and why", "write the schedule commentary for the steering pack", "put the delay in plain language for the sponsor" or "what decisions do these slips need". Do not use for the weekly status report, use project-status-tracker instead; for cost variances, use budget-variance-explainer; for one sprint's carry-over, use sprint-review-summary. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a DRAFT product requirements document from the discovery notes, interview summaries, support themes, analytics notes and stakeholder messages the user provides: problem statement, target users, goals with measures as stated, numbered requirements each with a testable acceptance criterion, non-goals, constraints, dependencies and open questions, with every statement tagged evidenced, assumed or UNKNOWN so each assumption is visible for the product owner to confirm. Use when the user asks to "write a PRD", "draft the product requirements", "turn these discovery notes into requirements", "document what this feature needs to do" or "build the requirements doc for this epic". Do not use for supplier-facing requirements in a tender, use rfp-requirements-pack instead; for a technical design decision, use architecture-decision-record; for the change ticket that ships the work, use change-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a control list and an audit scope into draft evidence requests grouped by control owner, each with the control as stated, the audit period, evidence examples (commonly requested) and a proposed due date derived from the fieldwork dates. Never judges whether evidence is sufficient, never selects the sample and never sends a request; the auditor decides. Use when the user asks to "prepare the evidence requests", "draft the PBC list", "build the evidence request pack for the audit" or "what do we need to ask each control owner for". Do not use for document requests and interview questions built from an audit plan, use audit-prep-pack instead; to check claims in a report against sources, use claims-evidence-map. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT stakeholder map for one project from the charter, organisation chart, RACI, governance terms, steering minutes, meeting notes and messages the user provides: a stakeholder register, interest and influence ratings each with its stated basis, stance as evidenced by a verbatim fragment with source and date, gaps, and a proposed engagement plan per stakeholder, every line traced to a source and every missing fact marked UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "build the stakeholder map", "who are the stakeholders on this project", "map interest and influence", "where does each stakeholder stand", "draft the stakeholder engagement plan" or "refresh the stakeholder register". Do not use for a customer account's stakeholders, use account-plan-builder instead; for a one-page brief before one meeting, use meeting-prep-onepager; for logging decisions and risks against the project, use project-status-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintains four living project files (overview and progress log, decision log, RAID log, links) from the mail, channel posts, documents and meeting notes the user attaches or the agent can reach, returns each touched file complete in the chat for the user to save, and builds a weekly DRAFT status report from those files. Use when the user asks to "set up tracking for project X", "catch the project files up", "log this decision against the project", "add this risk to the RAID log", "save this link to the project" or "write this week's status report". Do not use for reviewing an existing RAID log for stale or ownerless entries, use raid-log-review instead; for an HTML status page, use project-dashboard-builder; for minutes of one meeting, use meeting-minutes-writer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Check and interpret data-breach exposure for an email, username, phone or name using Have I Been Pwned, the Pwned Passwords k-anonymity range API, DeHashed, IntelX and Snusbase. Use when checking breach or leak exposure, finding which services an account was registered with, interpreting a combolist or credential dump, assessing credential compromise, or auditing your own leaked personal data

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work leads in Telegram: find prospects by topic, keep only those who self-mentioned it, resolve their handle including through shared groups, pitch personalized and grounded in real templates, run a two-step scheduling close, triage follow-ups, and capture everyone in the CRM. Triggers: "find leads for <topic>", "pitch this prospect", "run outreach".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an investor-outreach wave end to end: assemble the batch of targets, personalize pitches from real templates, send from the designated account, and log every touch in the CRM. Walks the exact checklist with rate limits and dedup against everyone already contacted. Triggers: "/notpeople-wave", "next outreach batch".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。