「iso」の検索結果

Trigger for: FFP IGCE, firm-fixed-price estimate, FFP cost model, proposed FFP rate validation, wrap-rate analysis, Agency BPA rate comparison, price-reasonableness memo, or fair-and-reasonable analysis. Build auditable Firm-Fixed-Price federal estimates using BLS OEWS wages, layered fringe/overhead/G&A/profit, GSA CALC+ positioning, and GSA Per Diem travel. Use for FFP-by-period, FFP-by-deliverable, SOW/PWS decomposition, implied-multiplier analysis, and fixed-price scenario comparisons. Do NOT use for Labor Hour, T&M, or cost-reimbursement IGCEs (use IGCE Builder LH/T&M or IGCE Builder CR). Do NOT use for grant budgets. Requires the bls-oews, gsa-calc, and gsa-perdiem MCP servers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates, updates, or reviews a project's gen-env command for running multiple isolated instances on localhost. Handles instance identity, port allocation, data isolation, browser state separation, and cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-framework enhancement overlay for choosing a multi-agent topology BEFORE writing any agent. A binary-question rubric — is single-agent + tools enough? do agents need to know about each other? does the output need one voice? — maps the answer to single-agent / supervisor / swarm / sequential / hierarchical. Activates when a coder agent is tempted to "split the work into roles" or reaches for a multi-agent framework. Encodes the *selection rubric* that the per-framework skills assume but never surface. Search keywords: when to use multi-agent, single vs multi agent, do I need multiple agents, supervisor vs swarm, multi-agent vs single agent, agent team design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map your security posture against the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover). Produce a gap analysis, current/target tier assessment, and roadmap in the governance language that boards, auditors, and CISOs actually use. Use when the user mentions 'NIST CSF,' 'CSF 2.0,' 'cybersecurity framework,' 'security posture,' 'governance mapping,' 'CSF gap analysis,' 'CSF tiers,' 'cybersecurity maturity,' 'security roadmap,' 'CISO report,' 'board reporting,' 'security program,' or needs to translate technical findings into governance language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety checks. Use when starting isolated feature work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help authors learn from exemplary ICLR, ICML, and NeurIPS papers through source-linked manuscript comparisons, concrete writing and experiment suggestions, and guided reflection. Use for research storytelling, contribution framing, paper comparison, figure planning, or research retrospectives. Not an acceptance predictor or a routine grammar/citation formatter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure Claude Code sandbox network isolation with trusted domains, custom access policies, and environment variables

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive backend development guide for Langfuse's Next.js 14/tRPC/Express/TypeScript monorepo. Use when creating tRPC routers, public API endpoints, BullMQ queue processors, services, or working with tRPC procedures, Next.js API routes, Prisma database access, ClickHouse analytics queries, Redis queues, OpenTelemetry instrumentation, Zod v4 validation, env.mjs configuration, tenant isolation patterns, or async patterns. Covers layered architecture (tRPC procedures → services, queue processors → services), dual database system (PostgreSQL + ClickHouse), projectId filtering for multi-tenant isolation, traceException error handling, observability patterns, and testing strategies (Jest for web, vitest for worker).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when red-teaming an agentic AI / LLM application — indirect & zero-click prompt injection, MCP tool poisoning, persistent memory poisoning, excessive-agency tool abuse, multi-turn jailbreaks, PyRIT/Garak/Promptfoo harnesses

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze PMCC (Poor Man's Covered Call / diagonal spread) positions from IB portfolio. For each diagonal spread, reports short leg risk (delta, IV, assignment probability), daily P&L projections, top-3 roll candidates, and a side-by-side comparison table. Requires TWS or IB Gateway running locally.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting analysis work that needs isolation, or before executing a pre-registered plan - ensures an isolated, reproducible workspace with pinned environment, fixed seeds, and immutable raw data

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare cost estimates across projects, versions, and scenarios. Identify variances, benchmark against standards, and generate comparison reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Side-by-side stat comparisons with context. Adjust for era, pace of play, league differences. Advanced metrics explained in plain English.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drop a folder of vendor quotes, proposals, and SOWs on Cowork -- normalizes them into one comparison matrix, computes true total cost of ownership, surfaces the terms each vendor buried, and arms you with negotiation leverage points and reference-check questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CI/CD pipeline attack hunting (GitHub Actions focus) - pwn requests (pull_request_target), script injection, self-hosted runner takeover, cache poisoning, OIDC-to-cloud token theft, poisoned pipeline execution. Wiki-first, FIND schema output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Web cache poisoning + cache deception hunting - unkeyed input poisoning, cache-key analysis, path-confusion deception, header/parameter cloaking. Wiki-first, FIND schema output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research and advise on the best way to approach a software project, including architecture, tech stack, implementation strategy, pricing/operating-cost tradeoffs, benchmark research, and comparisons with similar real-world projects. Use before building, mid-build, or after completion when the user asks for project strategy, optimal approach, research comparables, similar projects, stack selection, vendor/service choice, repo analysis, architecture critique, implementation feedback, or a prioritized improvement plan. Avoid for narrow single-bug debugging or isolated file edits unless the user asks for broader project direction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deeply research technical architecture, source code, mechanisms, SDKs, frameworks, project comparisons, and system-design options across repositories, history, official docs, issues, discussions, and high-quality community signals. Use when the user asks for deep research, source-level understanding, architecture comparison, mechanism satisfaction, or evidence for designing a system. Always map the question and obtain confirmation before beginning substantive research; skip for simple factual lookups or straightforward implementation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create "[Competitor] alternative" and comparison pages for developer tools. Build honest, high-converting comparison content that ranks for competitive search terms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides compliance with Singapore's Personal Data Protection Act 2012 (PDPA). Covers PDPC advisory guidelines, Do Not Call Registry, data intermediary obligations, deemed consent, notification requirements, and the 2020-2021 amendments. Keywords: Singapore PDPA, PDPC, Do Not Call Registry, deemed consent, data intermediary, advisory guidelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vendor certification acceptance criteria and equivalence mapping. Covers ISO 27701, SOC 2 Privacy, APEC CBPR, EU Code of Conduct evaluation, certification scope analysis, gap supplementation requirements, and cross-framework equivalence assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits Records of Processing Activities against supervisory authority templates from CNIL, ICO, and BfDI. Provides completeness scoring, gap identification, and remediation tracking. Activate for RoPA audit, completeness check, supervisory authority readiness, CNIL template, ICO template, BfDI template, gap analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Framework for evaluating and selecting Consent Management Platforms (CMPs). Covers TCF v2.2 certification requirements, Global Privacy Control support, multi-regulation compliance (GDPR, CCPA, LGPD), A/B testing capabilities, API integration options, reporting features, and a structured vendor comparison methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement the Kantara Initiative consent receipt specification including machine-readable receipt structure, JWT-based verification mechanisms, receipt lifecycle management, and integration patterns for consent management platforms. Supports ISO/IEC 27560 consent record information structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。