950 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
How to query a Well workspace correctly — discover the schema first, then query the right root. Use whenever the user asks about their invoices, companies, contacts, bank transactions, accounts, or accounting ledger in Well, or before writing any well_query_records call.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-mortem analysis when a client churns. Takes client history, engagement data, support tickets, usage logs, and exit feedback to produce a comprehensive churn autopsy with root cause classification, timeline of decline, and preventive measures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you have a spec, design doc, structured plan, or prompt_plan and need to generate a pipeline Graphviz DOT file for headless autonomous building. The agent reads the spec, extracts build pipeline phases, determines tech stack, asks about human gates and model preferences, generates a validated DOT digraph with rich self-contained prompts, and saves it to the project root. Handles any language or framework.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
macOS attack hunting - foothold to root/persistence on a macOS host. TCC/Gatekeeper/SIP bypass, keychain + credential loot, code-signing/entitlements abuse, XPC/dylib/library injection, launch-constraint evasion, MDM/installer abuse. Wiki-first, FIND schema output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous sub-agent hand-off for a fiddly, fully-specified exploit-compile / escalation RUN - the main agent stays on strategy and the board while a cheap sub-agent runs an exact copy-paste checklist behind a false-root/hostname guardrail. Use for "delegate", "offload", "hand this to a sub-agent", "spin a haiku", or the moment a foothold plus a working escalation vector is identified. Main agent dispatches, waits (no parallel duplicate), integrates the result.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate/create/scaffold Terragrunt HCL files — root.hcl, terragrunt.hcl, child modules, stacks, multi-env layouts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides privacy audit report writing including executive summary drafting, findings classification (critical, high, medium, low), evidence referencing, root cause analysis documentation, recommendation formulation, management response tracking, and report distribution protocols. Covers report structure from scope definition through appendices and sign-off. Keywords: audit report, findings documentation, executive summary, recommendations, report structure, privacy audit deliverables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PL (Project Lead) role sub-skill for incident analysis and process evaluation. Loaded through the pl core routing table, or when the owner explicitly asks for a retrospective or root-cause write-up; NEVER auto-load from ambient context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and recommend improvements for a repository's agent-readable context, including AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, WARP.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, .agents/skills, and specs/ PRODUCT.md and TECH.md contracts. Use when asked to review, score, assess, or standardize repo instructions, agent onboarding, spec workflows, or cross-repo agent-context conventions. Use agentsmd-scaffold instead when the user wants to generate or apply root/scoped AGENTS.md files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate or update repository-specific AGENTS.md instruction files from real repo evidence. Use when asked to create, design, scaffold, split, or improve root or scoped AGENTS.md files for Codex/Claude/agent workflows, especially when a repo needs directory-specific rules, validation commands, generated-file boundaries, or a short agent onboarding router.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when analyzing failures, outages, incidents, or negative outcomes, conducting blameless postmortems, documenting root causes with 5 Whys or fishbone diagrams, identifying corrective actions with owners and timelines, learning from near-misses, establishing prevention strategies, or when user mentions postmortem, incident review, failure analysis, RCA, lessons learned, or after-action review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces a human-readable, progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes — why it exists (the real problem it solves or goal it serves for the business or a user), and from there what it does, how it flows, and where to start — so you can get up to speed before working on or reviewing it. Use when you want to understand, get oriented in, make sense of, explain, or get up to speed on a chunk of code, a file, a directory, a symbol, or a PR's changes. Writes the overview to a scratch file and changes no code. Does not review code quality or raise findings — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting them. Does not produce durable feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not assess architecture or structural risk — use architectural-analysis. Does not diagnose bugs or root-cause failures — use investigate. Does not pace a person through the code one step at a time in conversation — use code-walkthrough.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write code through a disciplined, BDD-framed Test-Driven Development loop: build a behavior test list, then drive each behavior through red-green-refactor with an enforced observed-failure gate. Use when the user wants to implement, build, or write code test-first, "do TDD", follow "red-green-refactor", drive code from tests, choose the next test by the Transformation Priority Premise (TPP) or ZOMBIES ordering, or grow a feature behavior-by-behavior with tests leading. This skill writes and changes code; it does not produce a test plan document (use automated-test-planning, or manual-test-planning for a plan a person runs by hand), review or audit existing code (use code-review), restructure existing code outside a TDD loop (use refactor, or plan-a-change to plan a multi-module restructure), specify what a feature should do (use plan-a-feature), or find the root cause of a bug (use investigate). Runs its loop to completion without pausing for review; to review each behavior as it lands, use pairing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs an evidence-based investigation of a bug, failure, or unexpected behavior with investigate and publishes the resulting investigation report to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants something debugged, diagnosed, or root-caused AND the findings posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not investigate to a local file only — use investigate. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not document an already-understood feature to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces a progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes with code-overview and publishes the resulting overview to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants code or a PR explained, oriented, or made sense of AND the overview posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not produce the overview to a local file only — use code-overview. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not document an already-understood feature to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence. Does not root-cause a bug to Confluence — use investigate-to-confluence. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill channels the strategic and scientific reasoning of Demis Hassabis, CEO and co-founder of Google DeepMind, AlphaGo and AlphaFold, and 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Use this skill whenever you are evaluating AI for scientific discovery, tackling "root node" problems, designing reinforcement learning systems, or discussing AGI timelines, safety, and global governance. Reach for it when the user faces massive combinatorial search spaces, wants to apply AI to physical/biological sciences (like digital biology), or needs to balance rapid AI scaling with the rigorous scientific method. Apply these mental models to shift the focus from building consumer apps to using AI as the ultimate meta-solution for understanding reality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix rsky-pds createRecord/putRecord hanging indefinitely with no error logs. Use when: (1) createSession succeeds but createRecord never returns, (2) No error appears in PDS logs despite request hanging for 60+ seconds, (3) PDS health endpoint works but write operations hang, (4) readiness probes intermittently fail on rsky-pds pod. Root cause: PDS_CRAWLERS env var configures crawler notification URLs that are called via reqwest HTTP client WITHOUT any timeout in crawlers.rs. If the crawler URL is unreachable from the cluster, every write hangs forever. Also: setting PDS_CRAWLERS="" produces [""] (one empty string element) which causes a "builder error" instead — must fully unset the env var.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix "Failed to load video" errors when network requests succeed (200/206 status). Use when: (1) Video element shows error but DevTools shows successful requests, (2) Videos download correctly via curl but fail in browser, (3) Range requests work but video won't play, (4) Building CDN/media server for video streaming. The root cause is often missing Accept-Ranges header which browsers need for video seeking and streaming.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix silent data loss when mutating Nostr replaceable events (Kind 0 profile, Kind 3 contact/follow list, Kind 10002 relay list, etc.) in client apps. Use when: (1) Following someone wipes the user's entire follow list, (2) Updating profile metadata loses existing fields, (3) Fresh browser session or mobile login causes data loss on first action, (4) Replaceable event mutation uses stale or null cached state. Root cause: Nostr replaceable events are full-replace (no partial update), so publishing based on stale/unloaded cache overwrites the canonical version. Applies to any Nostr client using React, Flutter, or similar reactive frameworks where query state may not be loaded when a mutation fires.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix JavaScript regex failures when matching CJK (Chinese/Japanese/Korean) text using \b word boundaries. Use when: (1) Regex pattern with \b silently fails to match Japanese, Chinese, or Korean text, (2) Pattern works for Latin/ASCII text but not CJK, (3) hasDriverLicenceCue or similar text-detection function returns false for CJK input despite correct characters, (4) inferIssuerFromTitleText or pattern-matching functions fail on non-Latin scripts. Root cause: JavaScript \b only recognizes [a-zA-Z0-9_] as "word characters" — CJK characters are classified as \W (non-word), so \b before/after CJK always sees a non-word/non-word boundary and fails to match.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix git pre-commit hook failures in Flutter projects when using git worktrees. Use when: (1) Pre-commit hook with `flutter analyze` fails during `git commit` but passes when run manually, (2) Hook output shows "Resolving dependencies..." then immediately fails with no actual analysis errors, (3) Working in a git worktree (created via `git worktree add`). Root cause: git sets GIT_DIR to a worktree-style path during hook execution, which breaks `flutter pub get` (called internally by `flutter analyze`). Fix: unset GIT_DIR, GIT_INDEX_FILE, and GIT_WORK_TREE before flutter/dart commands in the hook.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug "API returns data that doesn't exist in database" when multiple Kubernetes clusters exist (production, staging, POC). Use when: (1) REST API returns records that direct database queries can't find, (2) Data counts match approximately but specific records don't overlap, (3) kubectl context points to a different cluster than the one serving the public domain, (4) ClickHouse/Postgres queries return stale or different data than the API, (5) "completely different datasets" despite same table names and schemas. Root cause: querying the wrong cluster's database.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix misleading Flutter/Dart test failures where expected data is empty ([]) or default values instead of the mocked response, caused by stale Mockito generated mocks or missing stubs being silently swallowed by try/catch in provider/repository code. Use when: (1) Test expects non-empty data but gets [], (2) Mock stubs for a method are set up but the code under test returns fallback/empty results, (3) A PR added new methods to a service class and tests that previously passed now fail with misleading "expected X, actual: empty" assertions, (4) "Generated files are out of date" CI error alongside test failures. The root cause is MissingStubError thrown by unstubbed mock methods, caught by production try/catch blocks, causing silent fallback to empty state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。