8,048 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Configure Azure API Management as an AI Gateway for AI models, MCP tools, and agents. WHEN: semantic caching, token limit, content safety, load balancing, AI model governance, MCP rate limiting, jailbreak detection, add Azure OpenAI backend, add AI Foundry model, test AI gateway, LLM policies, configure AI backend, token metrics, AI cost control, convert API to MCP, import OpenAPI to gateway.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Foundry IQ knowledge bases. WHEN: make local or Blob documents searchable; create/diagnose KBs; triage unsupported connectors or multi-source KB creation/reconfiguration (even with classic-search terms); connect existing KB to agents (including multi-source KBs); create/reuse a Search service; retrieve from an existing knowledge base with citations; no brand words needed. Read its procedure before query/target questions. NOT: other KB providers, repository-file search, classic Azure AI Search index/query/app work with no Foundry IQ KB or connector request, generic agent creation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform the agent into a Cloud Solution Architect following Azure Architecture Center best practices. Use when designing cloud architectures, reviewing system designs, selecting architecture styles, applying cloud design patterns, making technology choices, or conducting Well-Architected Framework reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SUPERSEDED by /claudex-loop (formerly /crucible; adds a Phase 0 research/recon pass + rebuilt interview) — prefer that skill unless you explicitly want this one. Two-act plan hardening. ACT 1 (you ↔ Claude) — Claude interviews you relentlessly about a plan or design, one question at a time, recommending an answer for each and exploring the codebase when it can answer itself, until every branch of the decision tree is resolved. ACT 2 (Claude ↔ Codex) — Claude writes the locked plan to PLAN.md and OpenAI Codex adversarially reviews it in a read-only sandbox (VERDICT:APPROVED/REVISE), Claude revises and re-submits to the SAME Codex session until APPROVED or a MAX_ROUNDS cap, then you sign off before any code. Use when the user says "/grill-me-codex", "grill me then have codex review", "grill me and stress-test the plan", "interview me about this plan then get a second model on it", or is about to build something high-stakes (auth, schema, concurrency, migrations, payments) and wants both alignment AND a cross-model sanity check before implementation. Builds on Matt Pocock's grill-me (MIT). For the docs-aware variant use /grill-with-docs-codex; if you already have a plan and want only the Codex review use /codex-review. NOT for reviewing already-written code (use /codex:review) and NOT for trivial changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SUPERSEDED by /claudex-loop (formerly /crucible; its docs-aware mode covers this variant) — prefer that skill unless you explicitly want this one. Two-act plan hardening with living documentation. ACT 1 (you ↔ Claude) — Claude interviews you relentlessly about a plan, one question at a time, challenging it against your project's existing domain model and glossary (CONTEXT.md), sharpening fuzzy terms, stress-testing with concrete scenarios, cross-referencing code, and updating CONTEXT.md + ADRs inline as decisions crystallise. ACT 2 (Claude ↔ Codex) — Claude writes the locked plan to PLAN.md and OpenAI Codex adversarially reviews it in a read-only sandbox (VERDICT:APPROVED/REVISE), Claude revises and re-submits to the SAME Codex session until APPROVED or a MAX_ROUNDS cap, then you sign off before any code. Use when the user says "/grill-with-docs-codex", "grill me against the docs then have codex review", "stress-test this against our domain model then get a second model on it", or is about to build something high-stakes in a project with established terminology/ADRs and wants alignment, documentation, AND a cross-model sanity check. Builds on Matt Pocock's grill-with-docs (MIT). NOT for reviewing already-written code (use /codex:review) and NOT for trivial changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track finance investment signal evolution and update logic based on new finance market information. Use when monitoring finance signals and determining if they are strengthened, weakened, or falsified.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track bacterial strains using MASH, sourmash, fastANI, and inStrain. Compare genomes, detect contamination, and monitor strain-level variation. Use when needing sub-species resolution for outbreak tracking, transmission analysis, or within-host strain dynamics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
XCMS3 workflow for LC-MS/MS metabolomics preprocessing. Covers peak detection, retention time alignment, correspondence (grouping), and gap filling. Use when processing raw LC-MS data into a feature table for untargeted metabolomics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
MS-DIAL-based metabolomics preprocessing as alternative to XCMS. Covers peak detection, alignment, annotation, and export for downstream analysis. Use when processing MS-DIAL output files for R/Python analysis or when preferring GUI-based preprocessing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design pegRNAs for prime editing using PrimeDesign algorithms. Generate spacer, PBS, and RT template sequences for precise genomic modifications without double-strand breaks. Use when designing prime editing experiments for precise insertions, deletions, or point mutations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform multi-locus sequence typing (MLST), core genome MLST, and SNP-based strain typing for bacterial isolate characterization using mlst and chewBBACA. Use when identifying strain types, tracking outbreak clones, or characterizing bacterial isolates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design guides for cytosine and adenine base editing using editing window optimization and BE-Hive outcome prediction. Select optimal positions for C-to-T or A-to-G conversions without double-strand breaks. Use when designing base editor experiments for precise nucleotide changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality control metrics for ATAC-seq data including fragment size distribution, TSS enrichment, FRiP, and library complexity. Use when assessing ATAC-seq library quality before or after peak calling to identify problematic samples.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Differential binding analysis using DiffBind. Compare ChIP-seq peaks between conditions with statistical rigor. Requires replicate samples. Outputs differentially bound regions with fold changes and p-values. Use when comparing ChIP-seq binding between conditions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ChIP-seq quality control metrics including FRiP (Fraction of Reads in Peaks), cross-correlation analysis (NSC/RSC), library complexity, and IDR (Irreproducibility Discovery Rate) for replicate concordance. Use to assess experiment quality before downstream analysis. Use when assessing ChIP-seq data quality metrics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Separate a strategy return series into declared baseline exposure and residual edge with returns-based OLS attribution, HAC inference, rolling stability, alternate-baseline sensitivity, and regime breakdowns. Use when evaluating whether backtest, out-of-sample, or live returns contain independent alpha beyond market, equal-weight, momentum, sector, or user-supplied factor returns; when explaining whether a drawdown came from baseline exposure or strategy-specific behavior; or when a strategy needs an attribution quality gate after backtesting. Do not use for holdings-based Brinson attribution, feature-level Shapley explanations, or analysis from summary metrics without a dated return series.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Screen US equities for parabolic exhaustion patterns and generate conditional pre-market short plans, then evaluate intraday trigger fires from live 5-min bars. Phase 1 daily 5-factor scorer (MA extension / acceleration / volume climax / range expansion / liquidity), Phase 2 per-candidate plans for ORL break / first-red 5-min / VWAP fail with explicit borrow / SSR / manual-confirmation gating, Phase 3 one-shot intraday FSM that detects trigger fires and resolves concrete share counts. Covers Phase 1 + Phase 2 + Phase 3.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Researches a topic by breaking it into subtopics, gathering factual information with reasoning, and producing a structured summary with key findings and open questions. Use when the user asks to research, investigate, look up, summarize a topic, or says 'what is known about...' or 'learn about...'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build alignment artifacts — responsibility matrices, decision rights, and communication plans. Use when unclear ownership stalls decisions. For persuading in the moment, use `design-negotiation` (designer-toolkit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choose prototype fidelity and method to match the design question and the decision at stake. Use before building a prototype. For what to test once it exists, use `test-scenario`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set line length and measure for comfortable reading across type sizes and breakpoints. Use when tuning body text. Covers measure only — for the full size and weight scale, use `typography-scale`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read financials, map competitive landscapes, and argue design decisions in the language of value. Use when defending design to commercial stakeholders. For the live negotiation itself, use `design-negotiation` (designer-toolkit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define a responsive grid — columns, gutters, margins, and breakpoint behaviour. Use when establishing page structure. For the spacing scale inside components use `spacing-system`; for cross-device behaviour use `responsive-design`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare UX patterns, features, strengths, and gaps across rival products. Use when you need to know what others actually do. For deliberately adopting their conventions, use `jakobs-law` (interaction-design).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。