7,346 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Guides developers through a human-supervised PDCA framework for AI code generation. Applies analysis, TDD, validation, and retrospection. Activates for sessions requiring systematic quality control.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当用户需要理解"为什么人们会这样做"（尤其是看似不合理的行为）、设计管理制度或激励机制、评估专业顾问建议的可信度、试图说服他人改变行为时激活。典型触发信号：用户困惑于"为什么制度改了但行为没变"；用户的顾问/下属/合作方的建议恰好对他们自己特别有利；用户需要设计一个让他人按期望行事的制度。不适用于纯技术方案设计或不需要考虑人的行为的场景。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当用户需要评估某项投资、收购标的、商业机会或重大资源投入是否"值得"时调用。典型触发信号:涉及"内在价值""安全边际""护城河""定价权""买还是不买"等决策。不适用于纯心理学偏差分析(用 misjudgment-checklist)或规模效应判断(用 scale-advantage-analysis)。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当用户在做重要决策时需要同时检查"理性分析是否正确"和"我的判断是否被认知偏差扭曲"时激活。典型触发信号:用户的分析逻辑严密但直觉不安,或者分析过于顺畅似乎"毫无破绽"。不适用于纯技术问题(如代码调试、数学计算)中不存在人类判断偏差的场景,也不适用于纯情感/人际关系问题中理性轨道不相关的场景。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当用户需要分析企业/组织/产品的竞争格局、评估"做大"是否真的更好、判断某公司的护城河来源是否可持续时调用。典型触发信号：涉及"规模经济""市场占有率""大企业的困境""先发优势""网络效应""赢家通吃"等话题。不适用于纯财务分析(用 value-assessment)或纯心理偏差检查(用 misjudgment-checklist)。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesizes exploration findings into unified analysis with deep investigation capabilities and completeness evaluation (converted from agent)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explores codebases to find relevant files, trace execution paths, and map architecture with team communication capabilities for collaborative analysis (converted from agent)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates MkDocs-flavored or standard GitHub-flavored Markdown documentation from codebase analysis findings including API references, architecture guides, standalone markdown files, and change summaries (converted from agent)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Behavioral rules and lifecycle event handlers for the core-tools package. Includes auto-approval of file operations targeting deep-analysis session directories.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reference patterns for mathematical and combinatorial problem-solving. Covers modular arithmetic, prime sieves, GCD/LCM, binomial coefficients, fast exponentiation, counting techniques, inclusion-exclusion, and game theory. Load this skill when a problem involves number theory, combinatorics, modular operations, or strategic game analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate test files from acceptance criteria or existing code. Supports criteria-driven mode (from specs/tasks) and code-analysis mode (from source files). Auto-detects test framework and spawns test-writer agents for parallel generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze live crypto K-line, price-volume, market-structure, and derivatives evidence, then turn it into a conditional trading plan with exact entry, invalidation, targets, position sizing, leverage, and three risk tiers. Use when a user wants both market analysis and an actionable risk-managed plan, asks whether or how to trade a coin, or requests entry/stop/target/size levels. Do not use for placing orders, managing an existing account, or guaranteeing returns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parse HackerOne / Bugcrowd / Intigriti scope into a structured asset list with in-scope, out-of-scope, and excluded-vuln-class breakdowns. Use when the user has chosen a program and needs to understand exactly what's allowed before recon.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process external specifications through transformation, classification, gap analysis, component discovery, and decomposition. Creates workflow items with classified context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when EZ_math_model coder or packaging fails repeatedly with the same error and needs root-cause analysis instead of another blind retry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when EZ_math_model multi or hybrid mode needs several domain-specialist subagents to gather outside knowledge, industry context, model theory, or sensitivity-analysis references in parallel.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract data from subcontractor bid PDFs and produce a comparison spreadsheet. Feeds into /bid-evaluator. Triggers: 'tabulate bids', 'bid comparison', 'compare bids', 'buyout analysis', 'bid tab'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate tabulated subcontractor bids against specs and drawings — scope gap analysis, exclusion risk scoring, award recommendation. Triggers: 'evaluate bids', 'bid evaluation', 'lowest responsible bidder'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Render a dashboard of the current Claude Code session — message counts, token usage, cache read/write, dollar cost, context %, lines changed, cost-per-turn sparkline, and a tool-call histogram — parsed from the session transcript JSONL by a bundled bash script. One bash call, zero analysis, zero confirmation. Optionally pass a session id to inspect a different session. Use when the user asks for session stats, usage, token or cost breakdown, or a session dashboard.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review user experience and interface design using Nielsen's heuristics, WCAG 2.1 accessibility guidelines, keyboard and screen reader audit, user flow analysis, cognitive load assessment, and form usability evaluation. Use when conducting a usability review before release, assessing WCAG 2.1 accessibility compliance, evaluating user flows for efficiency, reviewing form design, or performing a heuristic evaluation of an existing interface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Navigate the Kabbalistic Tree of Life (Etz Chaim) — explore the ten sephirot, twenty-two paths, four worlds, and three pillars. Covers correspondences, contemplative exercises, and structural analysis. Use when exploring a sephira's attributes and divine names, studying structural relationships between sephirot, learning the four worlds (Atzilut through Assiah), tracing a path's Hebrew letter and tarot attributions, or using the Tree as a symbolic map for understanding a concept or system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a pull request end-to-end using GitHub CLI. Covers diff analysis, commit history review, CI/CD check verification, severity-leveled feedback (blocking/suggestion/nit/praise), and gh pr review submission. Use when a pull request is assigned for review, performing a self-review before requesting others' input, conducting a second review after feedback is addressed, or auditing a merged PR for post-merge quality assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare an organisation for regulatory inspection by assessing readiness against agency-specific focus areas (FDA, EMA, MHRA). Covers warning letter and 483 theme analysis, mock inspection protocols, document bundle preparation, inspection logistics, and response template creation. Use when a regulatory inspection has been announced or is anticipated, when a periodic self-assessment is due, when new systems have been implemented since the last inspection, or after a significant audit finding that may attract regulatory attention.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Redact a network/MITM capture directory — JSONL, JSON, logs, HAR-style dumps — in place before it can be referenced publicly, scrubbing credential tokens, API keys, service ids, UUIDs, emails, home paths, usernames, and device or session hashes while preserving token-class prefixes for analysis and leaving public identifiers untouched. Covers class-preserving substitution, an idempotent re-runnable pass, distinguishing a secret from a public id, and verifying the scrubbed capture through the redaction gate. Use when a wire capture from a sanctioned probe must enter notes, a guide, or a public repo without leaking the session that produced it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。