8,980 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Vulnerability-research loop toward a novel CVE. Target triage -> attack-surface map -> ranked hypotheses -> investigate (RE / fuzz / audit) -> a finding deepens the loop, a dead-end pivots to a new approach. Uses the full wiki + hunt skillset. Scaffolds and persists state under raw/research/<project>/. Triggers - "research", "find a cve", "analyze this binary/library", "audit this code for vulns".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Health check for the bb/pt/ctf workflow driver subsystem - verifies everything is in place so every machine runs the same. Checks vault-content consistency (scripts present, JSON valid, routing wired, all 69 tool pages carry phase:, the tool index resolves, the hook edits are in place) AND per-machine wiring (the three workflow skills symlinked, hooks registered, imports work), then runs a live init->board->next smoke test. Use when setting up the workflow on a new machine, after a vault sync, when the driver misbehaves, or on "bb-health", "campaign health", "is the workflow set up", "check hooks and scripts", "why is the board not working".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate, lint, audit, or scan a Dockerfile for security and best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate, lint, audit, or review azure-pipelines.yml — syntax, security, best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discovers the core attributes of the current code repository and its projects — languages, frameworks, tooling, and where things live — and writes a concise reference section directly into the project's AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md for other skills, agents, and hooks to consume. Use when scanning, analyzing, or detecting the project's technology stack, build tools, or repository structure. Does not create or update project documentation — use project-documentation for writing feature or system docs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a standalone test plan by analyzing code for test coverage gaps and edge cases. Use when you need to create, generate, or draft a test plan for a branch, need to analyze test coverage, or need to identify what tests to write for specific files or directories. Does not produce a plain-language plan for a person to run tests by hand — use manual-test-planning for that. Does not write test code — use tdd to implement behavior test-first. Does not refine existing plans — use iterative-plan-review. Does not review code quality, security, or style — use code-review for full code review. Does not evaluate architectural testability or structural coupling — use architectural-analysis for architectural assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs a gap analysis between two artifacts (a current state and a desired state) and produces a plain-language, stakeholder-readable report indexed by stable gap IDs. Use when the user wants to compare, evaluate, audit, or reconcile one artifact against another. Does not investigate runtime bugs — use investigate. Does not assess module-level architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not research open-ended options with no second artifact to compare against — use research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Texas Data Privacy and Security Act (TDPSA) compliance. No revenue threshold applies to all businesses. Covers data broker registration requirements, biometric identifier provisions under CUBI, consumer rights, AG enforcement, and 30-day cure period. Effective July 1, 2024.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements the UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) 15 standards under the Data Protection Act 2018 Section 123. Covers best interests assessment, age-appropriate application, transparency, data minimization, geolocation restrictions, and profiling defaults. Keywords: AADC, Children's Code, ICO, age appropriate design, UK.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements telehealth privacy compliance covering HIPAA requirements for virtual care, state licensing and recording consent laws, platform security with BAA requirements for telehealth vendors, cross-state prescribing rules, and OCR enforcement discretion during public health emergencies. Keywords: telehealth privacy, virtual care, HIPAA, recording consent, platform BAA, cross-state licensing, OCR enforcement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates GDPR Article 30(2) Records of Processing Activities for data processors with all four mandatory fields: processor and controller names and contact details, categories of processing, third country transfers, and security measures description. Activate for processor RoPA, Art. 30(2), processor records, sub-processor documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conducts Privacy Impact Assessment for health data processing under GDPR Article 9, HIPAA, and sector-specific health privacy regulations. Covers special category data safeguards, clinical research data, patient portals, health wearables, genetic data, and cross-border health data transfers. Keywords: health data PIA, DPIA, Article 9, HIPAA, special category data, clinical research, patient privacy, genetic data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assessment of pseudonymization techniques and re-identification risk. Covers tokenization, hashing, encryption-based pseudonymization, and hybrid approaches. Includes re-identification risk scoring using the motivated intruder test, quantitative metrics (marketer, journalist, prosecutor models), and linkage attack resilience evaluation. References ENISA 2019 pseudonymization report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conducts comprehensive inventory of protected health information across the enterprise per HIPAA Security Rule requirements at 45 CFR §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A) and §164.310(d). Covers identification of all ePHI repositories, data flow mapping, classification of PHI by sensitivity, and integration with risk analysis. Keywords: PHI inventory, ePHI, data mapping, information asset, data flow, HIPAA risk analysis, designated record set.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct LINDDUN privacy threat modeling across all seven categories: Linking, Identifying, Non-repudiation, Detecting, Data Disclosure, Unawareness, and Non-compliance. Includes DFD-based analysis, threat trees, privacy-specific mitigation strategies, and integration with STRIDE security threat modeling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures privacy settings for enterprise HR systems including SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, and BambooHR. Covers role-based access controls, automated data retention enforcement, cross-border transfer configurations, audit logging, data subject rights facilitation, and field-level security. Keywords: HR system, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, BambooHR, RBAC, retention automation, cross-border transfer, privacy configuration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements HITECH Act privacy and security requirements including breach notification expansion, four-tier penalty structure, state attorney general enforcement authority, EHR meaningful use privacy conditions, and business associate direct liability. Keywords: HITECH Act, breach notification, penalty tiers, state AG enforcement, meaningful use, EHR privacy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Addresses HIPAA privacy and security requirements for health data interoperability under the 21st Century Cures Act, ONC Health IT Certification Program, and CMS Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule. Covers information blocking prohibitions, FHIR API patient access, TEFCA exchange purposes, and privacy safeguards for health information exchange. Keywords: interoperability, information blocking, FHIR, TEFCA, Cures Act, patient access API, health information exchange.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Addresses healthcare AI privacy at the intersection of HIPAA and the EU AI Act for clinical decision support systems. Covers training data PHI handling, model transparency and explainability, patient rights in algorithmic decisions, FDA/OCR regulatory coordination, and bias monitoring. Keywords: healthcare AI, HIPAA, AI Act, clinical decision support, PHI training data, model transparency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides development of GDPR Article 40-41 codes of conduct for industry sectors including drafting, submission, and monitoring body requirements. Activate when creating industry codes or establishing monitoring bodies. Keywords: codes of conduct, Article 40, Article 41, monitoring body, industry code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements financial records retention requirements across EU directives (5-7 years), SOX Section 802 (7 years), MiFID II (5-7 years), tax records, payment data, and AML obligations under AMLD. Maps financial data categories to statutory retention periods with cross-jurisdictional reconciliation. Activate for financial retention, SOX records, MiFID retention, AML retention, tax record keeping queries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides EU Code of Conduct adherence under GDPR Articles 40-41 including EDPB approval requirements, monitoring body accreditation, code drafting, adherence declaration, compliance verification, and complaint handling. Covers sector-specific codes, transnational codes, and Art. 40(3) approval by supervisory authorities. Keywords: code of conduct, Article 40, Article 41, EDPB, monitoring body, adherence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Executes breach notification under California Civil Code Section 1798.82 (California data breach notification law). Covers data elements triggering notification, timing requirements (most expedient time possible), AG notification for 500+ California residents, specific content and format requirements, and substitute notice provisions. Keywords: California, breach notification, Cal. Civ. Code 1798.82, attorney general, CCPA, data elements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements CPRA Section 1798.135 opt-out preference signal handling, covering Global Privacy Control (GPC) technical detection, automated signal honoring, cross-device consistency, and the relationship between browser signals and explicit consumer choices. Activate for GPC, opt-out preference signal, CPRA 1798.135, browser privacy signal, Do Not Sell queries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。