本文へ移動
cccskills

「rop」の検索結果

5,905 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

caveman

無料

Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by dropping filler, articles, and pleasantries while keeping full technical accuracy. Use persistent mode only when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", or invokes /caveman.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

heyAyushh/stacc32026年9月21日 更新

Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model and sharpens terminology. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions; propose documentation updates for approval as decisions crystallise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

heyAyushh/stacc32026年9月21日 更新

Guides Rust error handling strategy. Use when choosing between Result/Option/panic, using anyhow vs thiserror, propagating errors with ?, or designing custom error types.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

heyAyushh/stacc32026年9月21日 更新

Babysit a GitHub pull request during a user-approved monitoring window by polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and report fresh review feedback. Use when the user asks Codex to monitor a PR, watch CI, handle review comments, or keep an eye on failures and feedback on an open PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

heyAyushh/stacc32026年9月21日 更新

Create new agent skills with proper structure, progressive disclosure, and bundled resources. Use when user wants to create, write, or build a new skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

heyAyushh/stacc32026年9月21日 更新

commit

無料

Commit local changes on the current branch following conventional commit message format. Use when you need to create a git commit without pushing, or when you want to stage and commit changes with a properly formatted message.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

heyAyushh/stacc32026年9月21日 更新

caveman

無料

Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by dropping filler, articles, and pleasantries while keeping full technical accuracy. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

heyAyushh/stacc32026年9月21日 更新

Elite website image-to-code skill for Codex. For visually important web tasks, it must first generate the design image(s) itself, deeply analyze them, then implement the website to match them as closely as possible. In Codex, it must prefer large, readable, section-specific images instead of tiny compressed boards, generate fresh standalone images for sections or detail views instead of cropping old ones, avoid lazy under-generation, avoid cards-inside-cards-inside-cards UI, and keep the hero clean, spacious, readable, and visible on a small laptop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

heyAyushh/stacc32026年9月21日 更新

Scan evidence reports and draft governed upgrade proposals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

eaglhuang/3klife32026年10月14日 更新

任務卡的必要調整。Use when ATM task cards contain proposal-style notes or dated additive acceptance sections such as 識別/行為/狀態機提案、不重啟驗收、ATM 演進規劃書 v2、連鎖影響、治理補丁, and those notes must be re-analyzed into the formal task-card sections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

eaglhuang/3klife32026年10月14日 更新

Resolve the current user prompt into an atm.taskIntent.v1 proposal before next-action routing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

eaglhuang/3klife32026年10月14日 更新

Review a Go design spec before implementation begins - dispatch a subagent that checks a design doc for completeness, consistency, and idiomatic Go (simplicity, small consumer-defined interfaces, explicit wrapped errors, context propagation) plus Cobra/Viper conventions where applicable. Use when a user has a Go spec to review, asks "is this spec ready?", or is about to implement from a written design. Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo's conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

inference-gateway/a2a-debugger32026年10月8日 更新

Generate archetype-driven semantic design tokens (colors, typography, spacing, radius, motion, elevation) that don't look vibecoded. Hard-bans Tailwind-default palettes, Inter-only typography, and purple→pink gradients unless the chosen archetype explicitly demands them. Load when the user asks to generate design tokens, create a design system, set up CSS custom properties, build a token scale, design a color system, set up typography scale, or when frontend-design routes here during token generation. Also triggers on "design tokens for", "token system", "CSS variables for design", "set up a theme", "build a design system foundation". Sub-skill of frontend-design. Always reads ARCHETYPE.md first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dvy1987/agent-loom32026年8月8日 更新

Orchestrator for the pre-decision business-idea lifecycle — generate ideas, model them, evaluate them, validate them with customers, and only then hand off to product-soul / brainstorming. Routes through `idea-generation`, `business-modeling`, `idea-evaluation`, and `customer-discovery`. Load when the user asks to explore business ideas, find a startup idea, evaluate a venture, validate an idea, says "what business should I start", "should I build this", "is this a good business", "I have a startup idea", "evaluate this venture", "model this business", "validate this idea", "Mom Test this", "Lean Canvas this", "Business Model Canvas", "Value Proposition Canvas", "go/no-go on this idea". Pre-decision suite — once one idea is committed, hands off to `product-soul`. Does NOT design features (use `brainstorming`) or audit built products (use `reality-check`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dvy1987/agent-loom32026年8月8日 更新

Evaluate any project, product, or system's claims against its actual implementation — scoring each claim for truth, identifying architectural gaps, assessing competitive positioning, proposing creative solutions, and producing an actionable roadmap. Load when the user asks to evaluate claims, reality-check a project, assess what this project actually does vs what it says, validate product claims, or score a system's credibility. Also triggers on "is this real", "does this work as claimed", "evaluate this project", "assess the gap between claims and reality", "how credible is this", "investor assessment", "score these claims", or "what's real vs marketing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dvy1987/agent-loom32026年8月8日 更新

Design a self-improvement loop for a shipped product's AI agents — production traces feed evals, evals feed improvement proposals (prompts, playbooks, retrieval configs), and a human approval gate promotes changes with rollback. Technique-agnostic: chooses per project between ACE-style evolving playbooks, GEPA/MIPROv2 offline optimization, or simple eval-driven iteration via references/techniques.md. Load when the user asks to make my product's agents self-improving, learn from production traces, add a learning loop, evolve prompts or playbooks safely, promote agent improvements, or GEPA-style optimization. NOT harness-evolution (that improves the coding agent), NOT experimentation (product A/B tests), NOT agent-run-retro (dev-phase manual retros — this skill is the production-scale continuation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dvy1987/agent-loom32026年8月8日 更新

Orchestrate one or more thinking frameworks to work through any problem, decision, document, or idea rigorously. Diagnoses which frameworks fit — inversion, pre-mortem, assumption-mapping, socratic, adversarial-hat — then guides the user through them in the right sequence. Load when the user asks for deep thinking, says "help me think through this properly", "apply your best thinking frameworks", "I need to think carefully before deciding", or "what thinking tools should I use here". Also the entry point for any complex problem where the right framework is unclear. Covers product decisions, engineering tradeoffs, personal decisions, strategy, creative challenges — any domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dvy1987/agent-loom32026年8月8日 更新

Find the earliest decisive failure in an agent run trace and propose an evidence-backed targeted repair. Load when a run failed, results are wrong, or the user asks what went wrong in an agent session. Also triggers on "localize the fault", "first incorrect step", "debug this run", "trace attribution", "why did the agent fail", or after run-trace captures errors. Pairs with debug-and-fix for code defects and dynamic-routing for plan faults.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dvy1987/agent-loom32026年8月8日 更新

Design stable APIs and module boundaries — contract-first types, consistent errors, boundary validation, additive changes. Load when designing REST or GraphQL endpoints, public module interfaces, component props, or FE/BE contracts. Also triggers on "API design", "interface design", "design the API", "module boundary", "API contract", "define the interface". Complements feature-spec (product layer). Routes breaking retirement to api-deprecation-and-migration when it exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dvy1987/agent-loom32026年8月8日 更新

Delegate coding tasks to Claude Code (Anthropic's CLI agent). Use for building features, refactoring, PR reviews, and iterative coding. Requires the claude CLI installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

q2805187159/Anvil32026年6月24日 更新

Diagnose Sentry issues without copy-pasting stack traces. Uses the Composio CLI to pull issue details, events, breadcrumbs, and suspect commits, then maps the frames to local source so the agent can propose a fix directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

q2805187159/Anvil32026年6月24日 更新

Capture conversations and decisions into structured Notion pages; use when turning chats/notes into wiki entries, how-tos, decisions, or FAQs with proper linking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

q2805187159/Anvil32026年6月24日 更新

To access Anthropic's official brand identity and style resources, use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nimoqup046-collab/agora32026年3月26日 更新

c-pro

無料

Write efficient C code with proper memory management, pointer

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nimoqup046-collab/agora32026年3月26日 更新