677 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Systematic ambiguity resolution through tiered information gathering. Use when facing unclear requirements, unknown context, uncertain implementation choices, or any situation where guessing would be risky.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-phase dialectical stress-test for HIGH-STAKES decisions only (architecture choices, irreversible product calls, strategic bets). Heavy-cost skill — do NOT use for routine questions, brainstorming, or simple tradeoffs. User must explicitly invoke or describe a decision they call "high-stakes", "irreversible", or "needs stress-testing". Triggers: "stress test this decision", "dialectic on", "challenge this thesis", "should I really".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured decision-making framework for technical proposals and trade-off analysis. When the user faces a choice between multiple approaches (architecture decisions, tool selection, refactoring strategies, migration paths), this skill produces a 1-3-1 format: one clear problem statement, three distinct options with pros/cons, and one concrete recommendation with definition of done and implementation plan. Use when the user asks for a "1-3-1", says "give me options", or needs help choosing between competing approaches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following best practices for technical decision documentation. Use when documenting significant technical decisions, reviewing past architectural choices, or establishing decision processes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tell the difference between design decisions that age well and decisions that follow the crowd. Use when evaluating whether a design choice is principled or fashionable, or when a client asks to 'make it look modern.'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Name what was prioritized, what was sacrificed, and whether the tradeoff was right. Every design decision trades something. Use when evaluating design decisions, defending choices, or helping teams understand what they're giving up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choose typefaces based on voice and context, not trends. Use when selecting fonts for a project, evaluating type choices, or understanding what a typeface communicates before anyone reads a word.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Behavioral UX specialist applying choice architecture, friction audits, and commitment design to guide users toward intended actions without coercion. Use when optimizing conversion flows, onboarding, or checkout UX.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Start a new private GitHub project the AOS way: create the private repo, bootstrap AOS (project card, AGENTS.md, wiki, memory, CI choice), push after GO, and confirm the first CI run is green and the repo is still private. Use for "new project", "start a repo", "bootstrap a project".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A route through AOS's skills for work that travels idea to ship, plus a catalogue of the available options for lookup. Use when unsure where to start, or when picking between overlapping choices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improves typography by fixing font choices, hierarchy, sizing, weight, and readability so text feels intentional. Use when the user mentions fonts, type, readability, text hierarchy, sizing looks off, or wants more polished, intentional typography.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Activate for any ticket that builds new UI, reshapes an existing interface, or requires visual direction. Guidance for distinctive, intentional visual design, aesthetic direction, typography, and layout choices. Do not apply when the project has an established design system and the ticket is within its constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Browser automation powers web testing, scraping, and AI agent interactions. The difference between a flaky script and a reliable system comes down to understanding selectors, waiting strategies, and anti-detection patterns. This skill covers Playwright (recommended) and Puppeteer, with patterns for testing, scraping, and agentic browser control. Key insight: Playwright won the framework war. Unless you need Puppeteer's stealth ecosystem or are Chrome-only, Playwright is the better choice in 202
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ALWAYS use this skill whenever you would otherwise ask the user a question in free-form chat -- for clarifications, confirmations (especially destructive actions), missing parameters, multiple-choice decisions, or structured form input. Elicitations are routed through the Unique AI Platform UI via `unique-cli elicit create` + `elicit wait` (the default polling pattern) or a single supervised `unique-cli elicit ask` call (only when your agent instructions say your environment supervises the wait) so the user gets a proper structured prompt and you get a structured answer back. Do NOT ask the user in plain chat when you can use this skill instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ABSOLUTE MUST to debug and inspect LLM/AI agent traces using PostHog's MCP tools. Use when the user pastes a trace or session URL (e.g. /ai-observability/traces/<id> or /ai-observability/sessions/<id>), asks to debug a trace, figure out what went wrong, check if an agent used a tool correctly, verify context/files were surfaced, inspect subagent behavior, investigate LLM decisions, or analyze token usage and costs. Also use when raw SQL/HogQL against `events.properties.$ai_input` / `$ai_output_choices` returns empty — message content lives only on the dedicated `posthog.ai_events` table.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a PostHog endpoint with the right shape on the first try — covers query kind choice, name conventions, what to expose as variables (HogQL code_name vs insight breakdown), data_freshness_seconds, and whether to materialise on day one. Use when the user says "create an endpoint", "expose this query as an API", "turn this insight into an endpoint", or asks for help structuring a new endpoint. Steers away from common mistakes: materialising a query with cohort breakdowns or compare mode, inline-only variables on a materialised endpoint, unbounded date ranges, ambiguous names.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidance for distinctive, intentional visual design when building new UI or reshaping an existing one. Helps with aesthetic direction, typography, and making choices that don't read as templated defaults.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plot per-group distributions of continuous data using boxplots, violins, beeswarms, quasirandom jitter, and raincloud plots with sample-size honesty (Weissgerber 2015), KDE-bandwidth awareness, and N-aware encoding choices. Use when comparing distributions across a small number of groups — expression per cluster, biomarker per arm, scores per condition — and the bar-of-mean default is misleading.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build clustered heatmaps for expression matrices and other features-by-samples data with rigorous distance/linkage/scaling choices, robust color mapping, optimal leaf ordering, and ComplexHeatmap/pheatmap/seaborn rendering. Covers the ward.D vs ward.D2 trap, the row-vs-column scaling decision, multi-track annotations, oncoPrint, and raster rendering for large matrices. Use when visualizing expression patterns across samples or identifying co-regulated clusters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Controls error rates across thousands of simultaneous tests in genomics discovery using false-discovery-rate methods (Benjamini-Hochberg 1995; Benjamini-Yekutieli 2001 for arbitrary dependence; Storey q-value with pi0 estimation; local FDR; independent filtering Bourgon 2010; covariate-weighted FDR via IHW Ignatiadis 2016), plus family-wise error control (Bonferroni, Holm) and the GWAS genome-wide threshold. Covers the FDR-versus-FWER choice as the discovery-versus-confirmatory distinction, the dependence assumptions behind BH (PRDS) versus BY, pi0 estimation, the independent-filtering and false-coverage-rate traps, and reproducibility ranking via IDR (Li 2011). Use when correcting p-values from genome-wide tests, choosing between BH/BY/q-value/Bonferroni, setting an FDR threshold, applying IHW or independent filtering, or interpreting q-values. For confirmatory trials with few pre-specified endpoints (closed testing, graphical/gatekeeping), see clinical-biostatistics/multiplicity-graphical.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explains ML predictions on omics data with SHAP, LIME, and permutation importance, handling the correlated-feature trap, the conditional-vs-interventional Shapley choice, and the attribution-is-not-causation boundary. Use when interpreting an omics classifier, debugging shortcut/batch learning, or deciding whether an attribution ranking can be trusted as biology. For validated feature selection see machine-learning/biomarker-discovery; explanations are not a selection method.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end 16S/ITS amplicon workflow from demultiplexed FASTQ to a consensus differential-abundance result, orchestrating cutadapt primer removal, per-run DADA2 ASV inference (learnErrors/mergeSequenceTables/removeBimeraDenovo), region-matched taxonomy assignment, a SEPP/Greengenes2 tree, alpha/beta diversity at a declared sampling depth (phyloseq/vegan, adonis2 paired with betadisper), compositional DA as a consensus of >=2 tools (ALDEx2/ANCOM-BC2) on unrarefied counts, and optional PICRUSt2 functional prediction gated on NSTI. Covers the stage-ordering decisions (primers before truncation, per-run error model, rarefy for diversity not DA, predicted potential not activity) and defers each per-step choice to the six microbiome skills. Use when staging an amplicon study end to end or chaining ASV inference, taxonomy, diversity, and differential abundance. For shotgun reads see workflows/metagenomics-pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze metabolomics data end-to-end — metabolite identification, quantification (TIC normalization, batch correction), differential analysis, and pathway interpretation. Use for processing mass-spec metabolomics output, normalization choice, untargeted metabolomics workflows, and integrating with other omics layers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。