「compliance」の検索結果

/cs:ai-act-readiness <system> — EU AI Act 6-question forcing interrogation. Use during AI-system intake, before EU deployment, or during annual compliance refresh as Article 113 obligations phase in (2025-02-02 / 2025-08-02 / 2026-08-02 / 2027-08-02).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

International market expansion strategy. Market selection, entry modes, localization, regulatory compliance, and go-to-market by region. Use when expanding to new countries, evaluating international markets, planning localization, or building regional teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, scoring, or auditing third-party SaaS / vendor relationships — running a vendor scorecard with industry tuning, tracking SLA compliance with credit-claim flags, classifying third-party risk across 4 risk vectors, preparing a tier-1 vendor review, or auditing the SaaS portfolio. Forks context so large vendor catalogs (50-500 line items) and SLA logs don't pollute the parent thread. Triggers on "vendor SLA", "vendor scorecard", "third-party risk", "TPRM", "vendor review", "supplier performance", "vendor health check", "renewal review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brownfield audit — do existing artifacts actually work? Numbered migration plan. Unlike /project-stage-detect, checks compliance not existence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate skill files for structural compliance and behavioral correctness. Four modes: static linter, spec, category rubric, audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists in designing and implementing secure n-tier serverless web applications and microservices on Google Cloud. Use when users need architecture designs, security checklists, Terraform code, or deployment guidance for multi-tier serverless apps, regional data residency / European sovereignty compliance, zero-trust private VPC networking, or Private Service Connect. Don't use for VM, GKE, or non-Google Cloud architectures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits Filestore instances on Google Cloud across projects for disaster recovery readiness (missing or stale backups), security access governance (overly permissive NFS export rules, 0.0.0.0/0 exposure, missing ROOT_SQUASH), and reliability compliance (Physical Zone Isolation PZI and Physical Zone Separation PZS). Use when assessing storage health posture, auditing NFS export permissions, identifying unprotected file shares, or validating zone failure domains. Don't use for Cloud Storage buckets, Persistent Disk, or NetApp Volumes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Apache ShardingSphere's written coding standards when explicitly requested, or when code-implementation routes task-changed production, test, script, build, generated, or Maven POM artifacts through repository standards. Also perform a standalone read-only compliance audit of a user-specified scope. Use CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, applicable AGENTS.md rules, Checkstyle, Spotless, and other repository-defined standards, including naming and evidence-based defensive-code rules. Do not invoke independently for an ordinary implementation already governed by code-implementation, and do not independently audit architecture, runtime ownership, caches, or lifecycle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates production-ready TypeScript CLIs via a 3-tier template system (manual arg parsing, Commander.js, oclif), each shipping full implementation, docs, package.json, strict config, JSON output, and exit-code compliance. USE WHEN create CLI, build CLI, command-line tool, wrap API, add command, upgrade tier, TypeScript CLI. NOT FOR LifeOS skill scaffolding (use CreateSkill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shell scripting expert for Bash, POSIX compliance, error handling, and automation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and manage Software Bill of Materials (SBOMs) for the OpenShell project. Covers SBOM generation with Syft, license resolution via public registries, and CSV export for compliance review. Trigger keywords - SBOM, sbom, bill of materials, license audit, license resolution, generate sbom, sbom csv, dependency license, supply chain, license scan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building, debugging, or extending MCP servers or clients that connect AI systems with external tools and data sources. Invoke to implement tool handlers, configure resource providers, set up stdio/HTTP/SSE transport layers, validate schemas with Zod or Pydantic, debug protocol compliance issues, or scaffold complete MCP server/client projects using TypeScript or Python SDKs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage a subpoena served on the company — classify it, analyze scope/burden/privilege, cross-check the portfolio, and produce an objections framework, compliance plan, and deadline calendar. Use when the user says "we got a subpoena", "served with a subpoena", or shares a subpoena, CID, or third-party document request to evaluate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diff a new or changed regulation against current privacy policy and practice — outputs a gap list and a remediation plan with owners and dates. Use when a new reg drops, the user asks "does [regulation] affect us", "gap analysis for [state privacy law]", "compliance check against [reg]", or pastes regulatory text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open source license compliance check for a dependency list, a single library, or outbound code. Use when reviewing a manifest, SBOM, or repo for copyleft obligations and license compatibility, when asked whether a library can ship, or when preparing code to be open-sourced.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diff a new AI regulation or guidance against your current governance posture — surfaces gaps, priorities, and a remediation plan with owners and deadlines. Use when an AI regulation moves (or you learn about one you missed), or when user says "new reg just dropped", "does [regulation] affect us", "gap analysis for EU AI Act", "compliance check against [AI law or guidance]", or pastes regulatory text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit OpenClaw frontend code and rendered interfaces for Carapace drift, token misuse, primitive reimplementation, accessibility problems, responsive defects, and off-brand copy. Use for design reviews, compliance checks, or scheduled audit-and-fix workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route OpenClaw design work to canonical brand, Carapace product-interface, marketing-page, or design-audit guidance. Use when a task touches OpenClaw visual identity, shared CSS tokens, product UI, public web pages, or Carapace compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensures all new files include proper Apache 2.0 license headers. Use when creating any new file in the Apache Beam repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check code against the documentation that specifies it - which requirements hold, which the code contradicts, which are absent, and what the code does that no document mentions. Use when comparing an implementation against a whitepaper, protocol spec, or design document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible". Do NOT use for SEO (use seo), performance (use core-web-vitals), or comprehensive site audits covering multiple areas (use web-quality-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technology-agnostic guidance for modular systems: bounded contexts, clear boundaries, composability, state isolation, explicit contracts, failure containment, scaffolding workflows, split/merge criteria, sub-units inside a context, and compliance review signals. Use when designing or reviewing module structure, service boundaries, package layout, cross-cutting dependencies, "how should we split this?", modularity assessments, coupling between domains, greenfield context design, or architecture discussions without assuming a specific framework, language, or repository layout. Do NOT use for executing the full Patterns 1–5 repo decomposition pipeline or per-pattern inventories (use modular-decomposition), phased extraction roadmaps as the main deliverable (use decomposition-planning-roadmap), or end-to-end legacy migration strategy (use legacy-migration-planner).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices". Focuses on visual design and interaction patterns. Do NOT use for performance audits (use core-web-vitals), SEO (use seo), or comprehensive site audits (use web-quality-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。