「cost」の検索結果

Design Azure infrastructure using natural language, or analyze existing Azure resources to auto-generate architecture diagrams, refine them through conversation, and deploy with Bicep. When to use this skill: - "Create X on Azure", "Set up a RAG architecture" (new design) - "Analyze my current Azure infrastructure", "Draw a diagram for rg-xxx" (existing analysis) - "Foundry is slow", "I want to reduce costs", "Strengthen security" (natural language modification) - Azure resource deployment, Bicep template generation, IaC code generation - Microsoft Foundry, AI Search, OpenAI, Fabric, ADLS Gen2, Databricks, and all Azure services

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shipyard's governed delivery pipeline — converge the mission, synthesize a durable spec, decompose vertical-slice tickets with blocking edges, run the frontier in parallel via team, close with verification, and report with a full decision log. Two entry gates — the yard gate (drydock audit) and the fog gate (an effort whose destination is unclear is routed to /ask-navigator before this pipeline starts). Humans own the checkpoints where there is no unique answer or the error cost is severe; agents continuously run everything repeatable and acceptable-by-evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure post-acquisition value creation plans with revenue, cost, and operational levers mapped to an EBITDA bridge. Includes 100-day priorities, KPI targets, and accountability frameworks. Use when planning post-close execution, preparing operating partner materials, or building a board-ready value creation roadmap. Triggers on "value creation plan", "100-day plan", "post-close plan", "EBITDA bridge", "operating plan", or "value creation levers".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the existing test tree and CI configuration for improvements, using a catalog of patterns previously applied in this repo. Use when asked to audit tests or CI, shrink CI time or cost, find redundant or misplaced tests, clean up a test group, or review whether a CI change follows established practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trade execution modeling (backtest only) — slippage formulas (linear / square-root impact), VWAP/TWAP execution logic, market-impact cost estimation, and execution-assumption configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hedging strategy design (beta hedge / option protection / tail risk / cross-asset hedging), including hedge-ratio calculation and cost evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Named investor reasoning frameworks packaged as reusable analytical lenses — 12 lenses (deep value, quality franchise, inversion, scuttlebutt growth, GARP, cycle positioning, debt cycle, forensic short, cost drag, right-business, weak-system contrarian, three questions) that stack on top of evidence already gathered, each with ordered priority signals, hard disqualifiers, and documented failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates and selects Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) products based on organizational requirements including feed integration capability, STIX/TAXII support, workflow automation, analyst interface, and total cost of ownership. Use when conducting a TIP procurement, migrating between TIP solutions, or assessing whether the current TIP meets program maturity requirements. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, MISP, OpenCTI, Anomali, EclecticIQ, or TIP procurement decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill teaches security teams how to detect and respond to unauthorized cryptocurrency mining operations in cloud environments. It covers identifying cryptomining indicators through compute usage anomalies, network traffic patterns to mining pools, GuardDuty CryptoCurrency findings, and runtime process monitoring on EC2, ECS, EKS, and Azure Automation workloads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Every product will be AI-powered. The question is whether you'll build it right or ship a demo that falls apart in production. This skill covers LLM integration patterns, RAG architecture, prompt engineering that scales, AI UX that users trust, and cost optimization that doesn't bankrupt you. Use when: keywords, file_patterns, code_patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in building products that wrap AI APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) into focused tools people will pay for. Not just 'ChatGPT but different' - products that solve specific problems with AI. Covers prompt engineering for products, cost management, rate limiting, and building defensible AI businesses. Use when: AI wrapper, GPT product, AI tool, wrap AI, AI SaaS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compress large language models using knowledge distillation from teacher to student models. Use when deploying smaller models with retained performance, transferring GPT-4 capabilities to open-source models, or reducing inference costs. Covers temperature scaling, soft targets, reverse KLD, logit distillation, and MiniLLM training strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tools are how AI agents interact with the world. A well-designed tool is the difference between an agent that works and one that hallucinates, fails silently, or costs 10x more tokens than necessary. This skill covers tool design from schema to error handling. JSON Schema best practices, description writing that actually helps the LLM, validation, and the emerging MCP standard that's becoming the lingua franca for AI tools. Key insight: Tool descriptions are more important than tool implementa

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Train Mixture of Experts (MoE) models using DeepSpeed or HuggingFace. Use when training large-scale models with limited compute (5× cost reduction vs dense models), implementing sparse architectures like Mixtral 8x7B or DeepSeek-V3, or scaling model capacity without proportional compute increase. Covers MoE architectures, routing mechanisms, load balancing, expert parallelism, and inference optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when cognee is slow, expensive, or hitting rate limits — speeding up or throttling ingestion (remember/cognify batching, chunk size, LLM and embedding rate limits, per-stage models), cutting read latency, estimating cost before ingesting, running work in the background, or planning how to scale a deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when putting data into cognee memory with remember() — choosing inputs (text, files, folders, URLs, repos, databases), datasets and node_sets, loaders, ontologies, the graph extractor (LLM or GLiNER), chunking, dry-run cost estimates, or when remember() raises on a keyword argument.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route a NanoClaw agent group to a local Ollama model instead of the Anthropic API. Ollama speaks the Anthropic API natively (v1/messages), so no provider code changes are needed — just env var overrides and a model setting. Use when the user wants to run their agent locally, cut API costs, or experiment with open-weight models. See docs/ollama.md for background.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns whatever came out of a discovery conversation — a call transcript, a voice memo, jobsite photos, an RFP document, a set of drawings, or scrappy notes — into a branded, costed proposal, estimate, or statement of work built on the owner's own templates and historical pricing. Routes it for signature and triggers the deposit invoice once it's accepted. Works entirely from uploaded files when no connector is available, producing DOCX and PDF the owner can send themselves. Use this whenever a quote, bid, estimate, proposal, or SOW is the deliverable — including phrasings like "write this up for them," "put together a quote," "I need to bid this job," "turn my notes into a proposal," "respond to this RFP," or "price this out." Reach for it when the owner describes a job they just looked at, even without saying the word quote.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The ads consultant that becomes an ads agent. Reads paid-ad performance natively through the TikTok Ads connector, or via a build-connector Zapier connection for other ad platforms, explains in plain English what is working and what is burning money, recommends budget, targeting, and creative changes with the dollar impact of each, drafts new ad copy in the owner's voice plus Canva creative briefs, and — only after an explicit yes — executes the approved changes in the ad account. Works from exported CSV reports when nothing is connected, the normal starting point. Use this whenever the owner talks about ads or ad spend at all, including "are my ads working," "what's my ROI on ads," "I'm spending money on Facebook and I don't know what I'm getting," "should I turn this campaign off," "my cost per lead is going up," "write me a new ad," "who should I be targeting," or "the ad guy quit."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads AR/AP, historical cash timing, and known fixed costs from the ledger (MYOB, NetSuite, QuickBooks, Xero, or Zoho Books) or from PayPal, Square, or Stripe — or a CSV upload — and produces a 30/60/90-day cash flow forecast with percentage-variance confidence bands and named risk flags. Delivers a chat summary and a downloadable XLSX. Use when the user asks "forecast my cash flow," "will I make payroll," mentions "runway," or says "cash crunch." Falls back to CSV upload when no connector is live.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a vendor — cost analysis, risk assessment, and recommendation. Use when reviewing a new vendor proposal, deciding whether to renew or replace a contract, comparing two vendors side-by-side, or building a TCO breakdown and negotiation points before procurement sign-off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when managing the money for an internal R&D program or portfolio — building a multi-period program budget with the F&A (indirect) split, tracking burn rate and runway against value-inflection milestones, or routing R&D cost items to a capitalize-vs-expense determination. Every budget output surfaces its assumptions block; capitalize-vs-expense is decision-support only and routes to a named finance owner — it never books an entry or decides accounting treatment. Distinct from finance/financial-analysis (corporate DCF, close, valuation) and research/grants (funding discovery — this manages money already won).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior Quality Manager Responsible Person (QMR) for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Provides quality system governance, management review leadership, regulatory compliance oversight, and quality performance monitoring per ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2. Use when leading management reviews, setting quality policy and objectives, monitoring quality KPIs and cost of quality, or exercising QMR governance and regulatory oversight responsibilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan codebases for technical debt, score severity, track trends, and generate prioritized remediation plans. Use when users mention tech debt, code quality, refactoring priority, debt scoring, cleanup sprints, or code health assessment. Also use for legacy code modernization planning and maintenance cost estimation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。