「fact」の検索結果

Role profile — a reviewer who is fact-seeking, bedrock-seeking, honest, and rejecting. Demands that arguments rest on small facts that cannot be wrong (not on stacked assumptions dressed up as foundation), and that deliberately-unclear concepts be quarantined — never leaked into solid layers, never mixed with each other. Catches the failure mode where designs ship after partial grounding: most of the spec researched, the design feels finished, and the unresearched remainder holds the deal-breaker. Invoke with `/pedantic <target>` (e.g. `/pedantic review this design doc`, `/pedantic review the SDK design`, `/pedantic review this PR`). Probes cover logical structure (definitions, assumptions, boundaries, contradictions, unfalsifiability, vague quantifiers, counterexamples), epistemic honesty (researchable vs. discoverable-only-by-doing), bedrock integrity (assumed-bedrock, leaked uncertainty, mixed unclarity), and design pathology (YAGNI, wrong-layer abstraction, unclear responsibility, fragmentation, over-engineering). Use when you want a hard critique of a plan, design doc, technical doc, code change, or PR description — not a copy edit, not a vibe check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor bloated AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or similar agent instruction files to follow progressive disclosure principles. Splits monolithic files into organized, linked documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safely change and test untested codebases using Feathers' "Working Effectively with Legacy Code". Use when the user mentions "legacy code", "no tests", "untested codebase", "how do I test this", "seams", "characterization tests", "golden master", "sprout method", "afraid to change this code", "monster method", "dependency breaking", or "inherited a messy codebase". Also trigger when changing code without tests safely, getting a class under test when constructors, statics, or singletons block it, adding features to tangled modules, or planning incremental test coverage for an old codebase. Covers the legacy-code change algorithm, seams, characterization tests, sprout/wrap, and dependency-breaking techniques. For refactoring code that already has tests, see refactoring-patterns. For day-to-day code quality, see clean-code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write readable, maintainable code through disciplined naming, small functions, and clean error handling. Use when the user mentions "clean up this code", "this function is too long", "code smells", "naming conventions", "boy scout rule", "single responsibility", or "unit test quality". Also trigger when reviewing a pull request for readability, untangling a messy function, debating comment styles, or improving error-handling patterns. Covers SRP, comment discipline, formatting, and unit testing. For refactoring techniques, see refactoring-patterns. For architecture and dependency rules, see clean-architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply meta-principles of software craftsmanship: DRY, orthogonality, tracer bullets, and design by contract. Use when the user mentions "best practices", "pragmatic approach", "broken windows", "tracer bullet", "software craftsmanship", "avoid technical debt", "code ownership", or "how do I become a better developer". Also trigger when evaluating build-vs-buy decisions, designing estimation approaches, or choosing between reversible and irreversible architectural decisions. Covers estimation, domain languages, and reversibility. For code-level quality, see clean-code. For refactoring techniques, see refactoring-patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from a working-but-untested vibe-coded prototype to a production-ready product with tests, clean structure, a business-rules boundary, and resilience at scale. Orchestrates nine skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, clean-code, refactoring-patterns, software-design-philosophy, clean-architecture, pragmatic-programmer, release-it, system-design, ddia-systems - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (TESTING.md, TECH-DEBT.md, IMPROVE-CODE-QUALITY-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to harden an AI-generated prototype, add tests before refactoring, make code safe to change, or says 'this works on my machine but I am scared to touch it'. For an aged codebase, remove-technical-debt; for greenfield structure, design-code-architecture; for a product and UX pass, improve-app; to optimize speed and structure, architecture-optimization. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deliver artifacts (files/images/voice) to current IM chat via gateway, returning a receipt. Use this as the only delivery proof for attachments. Text replies are sent automatically - only use this for file/image/voice attachments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when refactoring research code for publication, adding documentation to existing analysis scripts, creating reproducible computational workflows, or preparing code for sharing with collaborators. Transforms research code into publication-ready, reproducible workflows. Adds documentation, implements error handling, creates environment specifications, and ensures computational reproducibility for scientific publications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculate the relative contribution of different factors to a response variable using R² decomposition. Use when you need to quantify how much each factor explains the variance of an outcome.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-hop evidence search + structured extraction over enterprise artifact datasets (docs/chats/meetings/PRs/URLs). Strong disambiguation to prevent cross-product leakage; returns JSON-ready entities plus evidence pointers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan structure validation, phase completeness checks, reference integrity verification, and artifact existence confirmation. Provides the structured verification layer ensuring GSD artifacts are well-formed and complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Red-Green-Refactor TDD methodology with mandatory failing tests, minimal implementation, quality refactoring, and 80% coverage gating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with tdd workflows tdd refactor

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with code refactoring context restore

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Für Factoring AGB: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub Actions workflow patterns for React Native iOS simulator and Android emulator cloud builds with downloadable artifacts. Use when setting up CI build pipelines or downloading GitHub Actions artifacts via gh CLI and GitHub API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a company update into 3-7 structurally distinct, journalist-shaped story angles. Runs the fact through proven newsroom lenses (perspective, abstraction, news values, data, contrarian, news peg) and refuses rephrasings, invented facts, named-journalist guesses, and AI-marketing slop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract factual claims from PR copy, verify each claim independently, attach concrete citations, and warn when certainty is low. Runs each claim through proven newsroom verification methods (lateral reading, source-tier climbing, provenance pillars, triangulation, calibrated rating) and puts the burden of proof on the speaker. Use before a pitch, press release, reactive comment, DM, or other journalist-facing draft is trusted or sent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate headline candidates from a story's raw facts: news-style headlines, press-release headlines, and pitch subject lines. A pure generation skill — it finds the charge in the facts, then runs ten proven moves (consequence, picture, number-as-hero, two-beat turn, naming, reader's-own-story, open question, voice, sound, sized claim), each calibrated by real, verified headlines that made history.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract facts from meetings and update your knowledge base — person profiles, chronological log, and index. Use when the user asks "ingest my meetings", "update my knowledge base", "extract facts from meetings", "sync meetings to wiki", "backfill knowledge", or wants their PARA/Obsidian/wiki profiles updated from conversation data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Export Design Thinking artifacts to a FigJam board or Figma Design file through the Figma MCP server. Use when a team wants collaborative visual review of Method 1, 3, 4, 5, or 6 artifacts, or accepts a DT Coach board-export offer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce evidence-labelled UX needs, journey, structure, inclusion, and engineering-handoff assets. Use when a practitioner needs a durable UX artifact rather than coaching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and validate HVE Core agents, prompts, instructions, and skills with current frontmatter, package membership, delegation, tracking, documentation, and validation conventions. Use when authoring a GitHub Copilot customization artifact in this repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a matched Chinese and English CV (中英文简历) from one set of facts: each version follows its own conventions rather than a literal translation, with names, titles, dates, education and company names rendered correctly in both. Use when asked for a Chinese and English resume, translate my CV into Chinese, 中英文简历, 英文简历, or apply to a foreign company in China or a Chinese company abroad. Produces the Chinese CV, the English CV, a consistency table proving the facts match, and a glossary of the terms chosen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。