797 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Write a feature spec or PRD from a problem statement or feature idea. Use when turning a vague idea or user request into a structured document, scoping a feature with goals and non-goals, defining success metrics and acceptance criteria, or breaking a big ask into a phased spec.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
麦哲伦舵手（彼得·林奇）投资智能体。以 GARP（Growth at a Reasonable Price）视角寻找"十倍股"，关注 PEG 比率、营收增长加速和商业模式理解，输出 [林奇分析信号]。 在 Phase 1 分析阶段由 hedge-fund-lead 主理人并行调用。 擅长：PEG 比率、十倍股特征识别、营收增长加速、品类扩张潜力、分拆/困境反转机会。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
International journal matcher — performs L3 6-dimensional matching for SCI/SSCI/EI/Scopus journals, computes conditional acceptance probability with review cycle estimation, applies 4-layer weighted ranking, and outputs tiered submission strategy including CAS warning screening and Chinese scholar friendliness analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chinese journal matcher — performs L3 6-dimensional matching (keywords, cited direction, trend, solicitation, institution, cross-discipline), calculates conditional acceptance probability with review cycle estimation, and outputs tiered submission strategy (aspiration-stable-safety) using 4-layer weighted ranking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating /goal directives, reusable testable outcome-oriented success standards for agentic workflows. Use whenever the user asks to create a goal, write a /goal directive, define what good looks like, set success criteria for an agent, define a reusable instruction, create a quality standard, write acceptance criteria for an agent workflow, or specify done conditions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when starting a new feature, product, or system design. Eliminates the spec-implementation gap by making specifications the primary artifact that drives code generation. Keywords: SDD, spec-driven, PRD, feature spec, user stories, implementation plan, specification, acceptance criteria, Given-When-Then.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage specification documents in .agent/specs/. Use when user provides requirements, acceptance criteria, or feature descriptions that need to be tracked and validated against implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 4.0 — Acceptance Criteria lock checkpoint before implementation. Consolidates all ACs from PRD, TechSpec, and Tasks, presents to user for confirmation, and saves the locked AC list to accepted-criteria.md. Implementation only starts after explicit user confirmation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
MATLAB R2026a testing, validation, and CI workflow for matlab.unittest, MATLAB Test, Simulink Test, coverage, artifact generation, GitHub Actions, and open-source reproducibility. Use whenever MATLAB work needs verification, regression tests, CI, GitHub publication, or acceptance criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve an existing skill or repository through isolated proposals, reproducible evaluation and evidence-based acceptance. Use for self-evolve or skill improvement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply organizational ecology (Hannan and Freeman) to analyze population-level dynamics of organizational founding, failure, and selection. Use this skill when the user needs to explain industry-level patterns of birth and death rates, analyze structural inertia and liabilities of newness or aging, evaluate why adaptation is rare relative to selection, or when they ask 'why do most startups fail', 'why is this industry dominated by old firms', or 'why do organizations resist change despite environmental pressure'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Optimize multilingual product listings for international e-commerce including SEO localization, machine translation workflows, and cultural adaptation. Use this skill when the user needs to create product listings in multiple languages, optimize for local search, or adapt marketing content for different markets — even if they say 'translate our listings', 'optimize for local SEO', 'adapt for the Japanese market', or 'our translated listings don't convert'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ask the minimum clarifying questions before implementing when scope, constraints, or success criteria are unclear. Use when a request has multiple plausible interpretations, missing acceptance criteria, or ambiguous environment constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-activates when analyzing GitHub issues to extract functional requirements, non-functional requirements, acceptance criteria, and user stories.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Voert de iteratieve desk-review-&-completion-cyclus uit op een regelrecht-corpus — plannen, harvesten/migreren/uitbreiden, multi-agent valideren, bevindingen 4-weg classificeren (modellering-fout / wetgevings-fout / engine-limitatie / acceptabele untranslatable), synthese + heroverweging, documenteren (wetgevings-/stelselfouten-analyse, fixes-plan, engine-limitaties, diagrammen, corpus-status), verifiëren tegen externe bronnen (resolutie-tracker + bronnen-dossier), en een eindrapport per cyclus. Gebruik dit bij corpus-review op correctheid/coverage zonder live expert-sessie, het opstellen van een wetgevings-notitie-bron, schema-migratie, het harvesten van nieuwe wetten, of het aansturen van een autonome completion-loop. Dossier-agnostisch; de regelrecht-methode is de vaste taal. Voor live-validatie met experts: zie regelrecht-audit-products.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft or restructure research-paper sections, refine local prose, and audit manuscript-wide consistency. Use for evidence-grounded academic writing and revision, not independent acceptance-risk review or official rebuttal management.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn ambiguous requests into an executable implementation plan with assumptions, sequence, acceptance checks, and rollback thinking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine Product Backlog Items to meet INVEST criteria. Write User Stories with Acceptance Criteria in Given/When/Then format, estimate with Story Points, and flag dependencies. Use before sprint planning when backlog items need grooming. Do not use to prioritize the backlog — that is the Product Owner's decision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multilingual communication, translation, localization, and language quality skill for translating, rewriting, localizing, summarizing, tone-matching, and reviewing content across languages. Use for multi-language prompts, UI strings, documentation, cultural adaptation, terminology consistency, bilingual output, language detection, and Indonesian/English or other cross-language workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
RSA attack playbook for CTF and real-world cryptanalysis. Use when given RSA parameters (n, e, c) and need to recover plaintext by exploiting weak keys, small exponents, shared factors, or padding oracles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lattice-based cryptanalysis playbook. Use when attacking RSA via Coppersmith small roots, recovering DSA/ECDSA nonces from bias, solving knapsack problems, or applying LLL/BKZ reduction to cryptographic constructions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify and exploit default or weak credentials on web application login forms, admin panels, CMS backends (WordPress wp-admin, Joomla, Drupal), and embedded device management interfaces. Signals include framework fingerprinting (WhatWeb, Wappalyzer, Nikto), exposed admin paths from robots.txt/dirbusting, and weak password policy acceptance of "Password1" or "123456". Tools: Burp Suite Intruder, Hydra, Medusa, OWASP ZAP.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CORS misconfiguration allows attacker-controlled origins to read sensitive cross-origin responses when servers echo the `Origin` header in `Access-Control-Allow-Origin` or set it to `*` with `Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true`. Detect via `Origin: https://attacker.com` reflection in `Access-Control-Allow-Origin` response header, wildcard `*` on credentialed endpoints, and null origin acceptance. Tools: OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite, manual `fetch()` with `credentials: include`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classical cipher analysis playbook. Use when encountering substitution ciphers, Vigenere, transposition, XOR, or encoded text in CTF challenges that requires frequency analysis, Kasiski examination, or known-plaintext cryptanalysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。