「score」の検索結果

Guided journey from a website with traffic it under-converts to a research-driven growth engine that captures more leads, persuades more buyers, sells a sharper offer, and earns referrals. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - cro-methodology, scorecard-marketing, storybrand-messaging, made-to-stick, influence-psychology, hundred-million-offers, contagious, one-page-marketing - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (WEBSITE.md, OFFER.md, MARKETING.md, GROW-WEBSITE-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to raise conversion on a site that already has traffic, capture more leads, sharpen a weak offer, add referral loops, or says 'my site gets visitors but nobody buys'. If a broken funnel or usability friction is the real blocker, run improve-website first; if there is no site yet, use create-website; for one leaking flow, conversion-optimization. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect keyword cannibalization across blog posts by extracting primary keywords from titles and headings, clustering semantically similar targets, and flagging posts competing for the same search intent. Supports local-only mode (grep-based) and DataForSEO API mode (Page Intersection endpoint at ~$0.01/call). Outputs severity-scored report with merge or differentiate recommendations. Use when user says "cannibalization", "keyword overlap", "competing pages", "duplicate keywords", "cannibalize".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify statistics and claims in blog posts by fetching cited source URLs and checking if the claimed data actually appears on the page. Extracts all load-bearing claims (statistics, product or policy claims, ranking and comparative claims, named sources), validates cited URLs before fetching, and scores match confidence (exact match 1.0, paraphrase 0.7-0.9, not found 0.0). Flags uncited claims as UNVERIFIED. Use when user says "fact check", "verify statistics", "check sources", "validate claims", "factcheck", "source verification".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI citation readiness audit as part of SEO, covering classic Google search and AI search surfaces together. Use whenever the user wants their content to rank or be cited in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Copilot, You.com, Google AI Overviews, or Google AI Mode. AI citation optimization audit scoring blog posts for major answer surfaces. Evaluates passage-level citability, Q&A formatting, entity clarity, structured data, and AI crawler accessibility. Generates citation capsules and a 0-100 AI Citation Readiness score. Use when user says "geo", "ai citation", "ai optimization", "citation audit", "aeo", "perplexity optimization", "chatgpt citation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect keyword cannibalization across blog posts by extracting primary keywords from titles and headings, clustering semantically similar targets, and flagging posts competing for the same search intent. Supports a free local mode (file analysis) and a paid DataForSEO API mode that runs only after the user approves the call count. Outputs a severity-scored report with merge or differentiate recommendations. Use when the user says "cannibalization", "keyword overlap", "competing pages". Not a site audit (blog-audit) or cluster planning (blog-cluster); it changes no files or redirects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit one blog post file for AI-citation readiness (self-contained, sourced passages, entity clarity, structure, crawler access) and score it with an internal 0-100 heuristic plus per-surface notes for AI Overviews, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot. Use when the user says "geo", "aeo", "ai citation", "citation audit", "chatgpt citation". Not for a site-wide audit, live AI-visibility tracking, or schema generation (use claude-seo seo-geo, blog-audit, blog-schema), and not a promise of citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify statistics and claims in blog posts by fetching cited source URLs and checking if the claimed data actually appears on the page. Extracts all load-bearing claims (statistics, product or policy claims, ranking and comparative claims, named sources), validates cited URLs before fetching, and scores match confidence (exact match 1.0, paraphrase 0.7-0.9, not found 0.0). Flags uncited claims as UNVERIFIED and marks a claim verified only when this run fetched the source and found the passage. Checks that a source says what the post says it says; it cannot prove the source is true or verify first-hand experience. Use when the user says "fact check", "verify statistics", "check sources", "factcheck". Report only; not for rewriting posts (blog-rewrite).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants a full ASO health audit, review their App Store listing quality, or diagnose why their app isn't ranking. Also use when the user mentions "ASO audit", "ASO score", "why am I not ranking", "listing review", or "optimize my app store page". For keyword-specific research, see keyword-research. For metadata writing, see metadata-optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strip the machine fingerprint out of any draft - em dashes, AI slop words, invisible watermark characters - and score it against a five-check detection panel before it goes out. Use whenever text needs to sound human, when the user says humanize, "does this sound like AI", "remove the em dashes", "de-slop this", "will this get flagged", or before any LinkedIn post, comment, reply or DM is shown to the user.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds questions and assessments that measure what they claim — matching item type to the thing being assessed, writing distractors that diagnose, and telling a question that measures learning from one that measures reading speed or test-taking. Use this to write or review assessment items, design a unit check or diagnostic, work out why scores do not match classroom performance, or decide how much evidence a claim about mastery actually needs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and runs hiring — role definition, sourcing, interview loop design, structured evaluation, and the decision itself. Use this to open a role, write a job description or scorecard, design an interview process, prepare interview questions, calibrate a hiring decision, or diagnose why a hiring process produces poor outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when estimating immune infiltration from bulk RNA-seq expression matrices with ssGSEA/GSVA, comparing case versus control groups, and generating downstream immune-score visualizations. NOT for single-cell RNA-seq, absolute cell proportion estimation, or clinical decision making.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when performing time-dependent ROC curve analysis for survival data with follow-up time, event status, and a numeric marker. Supports CSV/TXT/TSV/Excel input, `risk_score` as the default marker unless `--marker_col` is provided, parameter validation, standardized output directories, AUC table export, ROC point export, and PDF figure generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run GSEA on a ranked gene list and produce the enrichment table, running-score table, and enrichment plots.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when validating an existing prognostic risk signature on an external bulk expression cohort with survival outcomes, producing risk scores, Kaplan-Meier curves, risk distribution plots, heatmap, and time-dependent ROC curves. NOT for: model training, feature selection, nomogram construction, calibration analysis, or single-cell data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A comprehensive auditor for any agent skill — including Manus, OpenClaw/ClawHub, Claude, LobeHub, or custom SKILL.md-based skills. Use this skill whenever a user wants to evaluate, audit, review, score, or quality-check an agent skill before publishing, updating, or deploying. Covers two hard veto gates (structural redlines + research integrity redlines), static quality scoring across 25 criteria (ISO 25010 + OpenSSF + Agent), dynamic test input generation, multi-mode execution testing, multi-layer output evaluation with five specialized category rubrics (Evidence Insight / Protocol Design / Data Analysis / Academic Writing / Other), a Research Veto that applies to all four research categories, human eval viewer generation, actionable P0/P1/P2 optimization recommendations, and automatic skill improvement that outputs a polished, production-ready SKILL.md. Also use whenever a user says "audit my skill", "evaluate my skill", "improve my skill", or wants a corrected version after evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when normalizing bulk gene or protein expression matrices with log2 transform, z-score standardization, or min-max scaling before downstream visualization or exploratory analysis. NOT for count-model normalization such as TPM/DESeq2 size factors, batch correction, or single-cell preprocessing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to analyze an existing PostgreSQL database and identify which tables should be converted to Timescale/TimescaleDB hypertables. **Trigger when user asks to:** - Analyze database tables for hypertable conversion potential - Identify time-series or event tables in an existing schema - Evaluate if a table would benefit from Timescale/TimescaleDB - Audit PostgreSQL tables for migration to Timescale/TimescaleDB/TigerData - Score or rank tables for hypertable candidacy **Keywords:** hypertable candidate, table analysis, migration assessment, Timescale, TimescaleDB, time-series detection, insert-heavy tables, event logs, audit tables Provides SQL queries to analyze table statistics, index patterns, and query patterns. Includes scoring criteria (8+ points = good candidate) and pattern recognition for IoT, events, transactions, and sequential data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculating powerlifting scores to determine the performance of lifters across different weight classes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference for the GRPO (Group Relative Policy Optimization) algorithm. Use when implementing, debugging, or verifying a GRPO training pipeline — covers the mathematical formulation (group-relative advantages, clipped surrogate loss, KL penalty), the training loop (generate → score → advantage → loss), log-probability computation, advantage estimation, and relationship to PPO/REINFORCE.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pattern extraction, confidence-scored evaluation, skill creation, organization, versioning, and cross-project export pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes provided content for quality, E-E-A-T signals, and SEO best practices. Scores content and provides improvement recommendations based on established guidelines. Use PROACTIVELY for content review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

郑希观点库——基于易方达基金经理郑希 2012–2026 年全部公开观点原文语料，外加从语料蒸馏、有本人原话佐证的郑希投资方法的可溯源 research skill。能做： (1) 溯源问答——他怎么看 AI算力/光通信/新能源/半导体/ROE 等，引用其原话作答； (2) 讲解他的投资方法/框架/选股逻辑；(3) 前瞻应用——用他的方法分析当下任意主题/行业/个股，语料没谈过也能据框架推演； (4) 风格化点评——用他季报/手记的口吻写市场点评、季度展望； (5) 言行对照——用他全部基金真实数据（季度持仓/净值/业绩/规模/任职回报）核对"说的"与"买的"，或答他的业绩/重仓/规模； (6) 全市场查询对比——内置约 2.7 万只基金列表，按需抓任意基金真实数据做查询或与郑希对比； (7) 郑希框架评分——给一只基金按他的方法打分（多像郑希会买的）。 When the user mentions 郑希/易方达郑希/zhengxi, asks his view on a sector/stock/theme, his 投资方法/框架/选股/风格/持仓/业绩/净值/规模, wants to apply his approach, a commentary 用郑希口吻, to check words vs holdings, or to look up/compare/score ANY China mutual fund (任意基金/某基金经理/同类对比/给基金打分)——use this skill, even if they don't say "skill", even if the topic isn't in his corpus (fall back to his method). 引用忠于原文、不杜撰；推演与原话区分。研究学习辅助，非投资建议。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review or audit a design/UI across 6 weighted dimensions with Nielsen's 10 heuristics and a prioritized findings table. Use when the user wants a design critique, quality score, heuristic evaluation, or audit of an existing screen, page, or product before/after build.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。