7,339 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Assesses whether a patient performs self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) fingerstick calibrations as required for their real-time CGM system. Triggers include: 'Verify patient performs fingerstick calibrations', 'Ensure calibration schedule is followed'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill reassesses the insulin plan when discontinuing continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and transitioning to multiple daily injections (MDI). It is triggered by phrases such as 'Review planned basal-bolus regimen after pump' and 'Confirm MDI dose calculations and schedule'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses whether the patient has emergency supplies such as glucagon, ketone strips, and backup insulin readily available. Triggered when clinicians verify the patient carries a glucagon kit or ensure backup insulin and supplies are accessible.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses that CGM low- and high-glucose alarm thresholds are individualized to optimize patient benefit and minimize alarm fatigue. Triggered by clinician prompts to 'Review low-glucose alarm thresholds' or 'Ensure alarms are individualized and not excessive'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reassesses annually the patient’s ability to use CGM trend information to adjust insulin doses. Triggered by yearly CGM skills check or annual review of trend-based dosing competence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reassesses annually the patient’s use of self-monitoring blood glucose to calibrate the CGM system. Triggered by ‘Yearly calibration practice review’ or ‘Annual check of SMBG calibration adherence’.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses the patient’s ability to troubleshoot insulin pump malfunctions such as occlusion, battery failure, or error messages. Trigger phrases include “Review pump alarm responses” and “Ensure patient knows steps for pump error”.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses patient's ability to identify the receiver, sensor, and transmitter components of a real-time CGM system. Triggered by clinician requests to review CGM parts or verify patient can name sensor, transmitter, and receiver.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reassesses annually the patient’s CGM sensor site health and care practices, including skin integrity, rotation, and hygiene. Triggered by phrases such as 'Yearly sensor site inspection' or 'Annual review of CGM insertion site rotation and hygiene'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide a non-stigmatising pediatric obesity consultation using the 5As framework (Ask, Assess, Advise, Agree, Assist) and 4Ms assessment (Metabolic, Mechanical, Mental Health, Social Milieu), based on the CMAJ 2025 guideline. Trigger when a clinician asks how to approach a weight conversation with a child or family, how to use the 5As for obesity, how to assess a child with obesity, or how to conduct a non-judgmental obesity visit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map Delphi classes to a relational database using TMS Aurelius ORM attributes. Use when the user asks to create entity classes, add Aurelius mapping to existing classes, fix or review mapping attributes, explain how a class is mapped, or work with associations, inheritance, automapping, nullable fields, blobs, or composite identifiers. Triggers on requests like "create Aurelius entities for...", "map this class to Aurelius", "add ORM mapping", "fix the mapping on this class", "how do I map a one-to-many in Aurelius".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add a new Dagster asset to the pipeline. Use when creating a Bronze, Silver, or Gold layer asset.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess bounded Codex software development requests before choosing direct work or TaskBelay, then prepare confirmed TaskBelay Tasks in new local branches by default, current branches, or dedicated Git worktrees. It may be selected implicitly or explicitly with $taskbelay-codex:taskbelay; the selector never skips assessment. Explicit Task resume and receipt-backed confirmed bootstrap bypass duplicate assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate brand assets — banners, social cards, CIP elements — with brand-token injection + provider routing. Use when generating a banner / social image / branded asset.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
VRIO resource analysis combined with Dynamic Capabilities assessment. Use this skill to identify real competitive advantages (Barney VRIO framework), then test whether the organisation can sense new opportunities, seize them, and transform itself to stay ahead (Teece dynamic capabilities). Runs in three modes — full diagnostic for deep first-use sessions, review mode for quick re-assessment, and alert triggers for defining early-warning signals. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about competitive advantage, defensibility, resource assessment, why competitors are gaining ground, organisational agility, or whether advantages will hold. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess and migrate cross-cloud workloads to Azure. Generates assessment reports and converts code from AWS, GCP, or other providers to Azure services. WHEN: migrate Lambda to Azure Functions, migrate AWS to Azure, Lambda migration assessment, convert AWS serverless to Azure, migration readiness r...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Marc Andreessen-mode decision and productivity skill. A blunt, market-first operator that pressure-tests ideas, ventures, features, and career bets through Andreessen's actual frameworks — market dominates team and product; the only milestone that matters is product/market fit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conducts authorized wireless network penetration tests to assess the security of WiFi infrastructure by testing for weak encryption protocols, captive portal bypasses, evil twin attacks, WPA2/WPA3 handshake capture, rogue access point detection, and client-side attacks. The tester evaluates wireless authentication, network segmentation, and the effectiveness of wireless intrusion detection systems. Activates for requests involving wireless pentest, WiFi security assessment, WPA2/WPA3 testing, or rogue access point detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) to monitor endpoint file integrity, system calls, and configuration changes for security violations. Use when deploying OSSEC, Wazuh, or AIDE for endpoint monitoring, building file integrity monitoring (FIM) policies, or meeting compliance requirements for change detection. Activates for requests involving HIDS configuration, file integrity monitoring, OSSEC/Wazuh deployment, or host-based detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes encryption algorithms, key management, and file encryption routines used by ransomware families to assess decryption feasibility, identify implementation weaknesses, and support recovery efforts. Covers AES, RSA, ChaCha20, and hybrid encryption schemes. Activates for requests involving ransomware cryptanalysis, encryption analysis, key recovery assessment, or ransomware decryption feasibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-160 Vol 1 (Engineering Trustworthy Secure Systems) and Vol 2 (Developing Cyber-Resilient Systems). Use for systems security engineering (SSE): the three SSE framework contexts (problem/solution/trustworthiness), the 30+ design principles for trustworthy secure design, trustworthiness and assurance/assurance cases, security across the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 life-cycle process groups, and the Vol 2 cyber-resiliency engineering framework — 4 goals (anticipate/withstand/recover/adapt), objectives, 14 techniques, implementation approaches, and design principles for the APT/adverse-conditions threat model. Bridges systems engineering and the NIST security cluster (CSF/SSDF/RMF). Does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text, nor cover SP 800-53 control catalogs in depth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the GAO Agile Assessment Guide (GAO-24-105506, 2023). Use for assessing and managing Agile software development in federal programs: the Agile Manifesto and framework family (Scrum, Kanban, XP, SAFe, DA, DSDM, Lean, DevOps); the three adoption perspectives (team dynamics, program operations, organization environment); requirements decomposition (epics, features, user stories, INVEST, MoSCoW, definition of done); Agile-aware federal contracting (FAR, modular contracting, SOO/PWS/SOW, product owner vs. COR); program monitoring and control (WBS, cost, schedule, EVM at the feature level); Agile metrics (velocity, lead/cycle time, CFD, burn charts); and the auditor's key-question bank. Oversight- and acquisition-oriented: it tells you how to *assess and govern* Agile programs, not how to code. Thin on hands-on engineering practice, deep cost/schedule checklists (see gao-cost, gao-schedule), and any non-US-federal context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide (GAO-20-195G). Use for program cost estimating: the four characteristics of a reliable estimate (comprehensive, well documented, accurate, credible) and the 18 best practices; the 12-step cost estimating process (purpose, plan, technical baseline, WBS, ground rules and assumptions, data, point estimate, sensitivity, risk/uncertainty, document, present, update); estimating methods (analogy, parametric, engineering build-up, learning curves); Monte Carlo risk/uncertainty analysis, confidence levels and contingency; auditing and validating an estimate against the characteristics; earned value management (EIA-748, BCWS/BCWP/ACWP, CPI/SPI/TCPI, EAC, PMB, IBR); and specialized techniques (software cost estimating, learning curves, Analysis of Alternatives, WBS templates, the Green Book internal-control framework). This is the cost-estimating companion to the GAO Schedule and Technology Readiness Assessment guides. Does not cover schedule estimating/risk in depth (see the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide), agency-specific cost models, or the full text of referenced standards (EIA-748, MIL-STD-881D, the Green Book) — these are named, not reproduced.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the NASA Schedule Management Handbook (2024 edition, Revision 2). Use for program/project schedule management of aerospace and large engineering efforts: the five sub-functions (Planning, Development, Assessment & Analysis, Maintenance & Control, Documentation & Communication); the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and the WBS/OBS/CBS breakdown structures; the Schedule Management Plan (SMP) and Basis of Estimate (BoE); Critical Path Method, logic, durations, float and margin; tiered schedule assessment (Requirements/Health/Basis checks, the Shock Test) and the Dimensions of Schedule Reliability; Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA), Integrated Cost-Schedule Risk Analysis (ICSRA), Monte Carlo, correlation, merge bias, and the Joint Confidence Level (JCL); baselining, replan vs. rebaseline, EVM schedule metrics (SPI, BEI, CEI, HMI, Earned Schedule, CPLI), and status/progress/forecast reporting. This is NASA's scheduling doctrine grounded in NPR 7120.5 and the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide. Thin on the underlying mechanics of CPM, statistics, and EVM (it points to companion handbooks); aerospace/space-flight-centric; anchored to the 2024 second edition.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。