「condition」の検索結果

This skill should be used when the user wants to verify their changes before pushing, or update the project's rule checklists. Phase 1: validate changed files against .hoyeon/rules/ checklists and report PASS/WARN. Phase 2 (conditional): propose rule additions when unmatched patterns are detected. Essential before git push. Trigger phrases: "check", "checklist", "verify changes", "what did I miss", "pre-push check", "cascading changes", "any more changes needed", "update checklist", "update rules", "rules update", "체크", "체크리스트", "변경 확인", "빠뜨린 거 없나", "push 전 확인", "뭐 더 건드려야 해?", "연쇄 변경 확인", "규칙 갱신".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Greenfield project architecture + harness scaffolding for AI Agent productivity. Interview-driven decisions → requirements.md → execute. Produces: Code Structure (vertical slice exemplar), Test Infrastructure, Guard Rails, conditional extensions, AND Harness (CLAUDE.md with domain/team context, rules, skills, hooks). L2: architecture decisions, L3: harness setup, L4: requirements + harness decisions (tasks generated later by /execute into plan.json). Use when: "/scaffold", "scaffold", "new project", "set up project", "프로젝트 세팅", "초기 구조"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when writing stateful logic, or when code branches a lot or repeats a shape assumption across files. Encode the domain in a structure instead of scattered conditionals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and parse Excel spreadsheets with ExcelJS — create workbooks with multiple sheets, styled cells, formulas, charts, images, and conditional formatting. Use when tasks involve exporting application data to .xlsx, building financial reports, parsing uploaded spreadsheets, or creating data import/export pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define component variants with CVA. Use when creating variant-based components with Tailwind, building design system tokens, or managing complex conditional class names in React.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The craft of weaving story into interactive systems where the player is both audience and author. This skill covers the unique challenges of game narrative: branching structures that respect player agency, environmental storytelling that rewards exploration, dialogue systems that feel alive, and the delicate balance between authored experience and emergent narrative. Unlike linear media, games don't tell stories TO players - they create the conditions for stories to emerge WITH players. The narrative designer's job is to build the scaffolding that supports infinite player-authored moments while maintaining coherent themes and emotional arcs. This skill synthesizes lessons from Disco Elysium's internal monologue as gameplay, Hades' death-as-narrative-engine, interactive fiction's branching mastery (Inkle, Twine), and procedural narrative pioneers like Dwarf Fortress. It addresses ludonarrative harmony, bark systems, cinematics that respect agency, and the "and therefore" test that separates plot from story. Use when "narrative design, game story, game writing, dialogue system, branching narrative, player choice, environmental storytelling, bark system, quest design, lore delivery, ludonarrative, interactive fiction, inkle, twine, dialogue tree, player agency, cinematic design, voice direction, localization, procedural narrative, narrative, game-writing, dialogue, branching, player-agency, environmental-storytelling, quest-design, voice-acting, localization, interactive-fiction, procedural-narrative, ludonarrative" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in meme creation and virality - understanding why certain ideas spread while others die. Covers meme formats, timing, adaptation, meta-commentary, and platform-specific optimization. Knows the difference between forcing a meme and engineering conditions for organic spread. Use when "meme, viral content, make it memeable, shareable, internet culture, template, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits tests for concurrency safety — race conditions, shared mock state, cleanup ordering. Use when writing tests that involve goroutines, async operations, or shared mutable state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan 8-type / 3-category leakage taxonomy; the illegitimate-proxy / sampling-bias / pretraining-contamination subtypes hand off as needs_external_check, naming but NEVER running Oren-2023 exchangeability / Shi-2023 Min-K% / Golchin-2023 Time-Travel / BIG-bench canary); a load-bearing LLM judge is conflicted (same model/family as a compared system) or unvalidated (no human-agreement, no bias control) (HP-JUDGE-VALIDITY); a declared condition/metric is dropped or switched to favor the method, or 'best' is chosen with no held-out set (HP-SELECTIVE-REPORTING). Verdict-bearing at L0/L1 from the DESCRIBED protocol — NOT repo-gated like experiment-forensics; L2 only CONFIRMS against split/preprocessing/result files. A fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per pass) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Leakage and under-reporting are usually HONEST methodological errors — every finding describes a discrepancy to CHECK, never an accusation. An LLM generating GROUND-TRUTH labels is HP-FAKE-GT (experiment-forensics) — routed there, not here. Emits eval-design-forensics.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "eval design audit", "evaluation validity", "train/test leakage", "data leakage", "is the score measuring generalization", "LLM judge bias", "is the judge validated", "selective reporting", "cherry-picked results", "评估设计审计", "评测有效性", "数据泄漏", "训练测试集泄漏", "裁判模型有没有验证", "选择性报告".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

临床诊断思维 (临床诊断思维 / 临床推理 (Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning) — 医生『怎么想病』的元学科:从症状/体征/检查到诊断结论的认知操作系统,从业者(临床医生/住院医/规培生,尤其全科/急诊/大内科等以未分化主诉为生的科室)、医学生与医学教育者、诊断安全与质量改进研究者、以及做医疗 AI 辅助诊断产品的人的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **直觉模式识别 (System 1: illness scripts 疾病脚本 / pattern recognition / gestalt, 『资深人一眼认出 aunt Minnie』) ⇄ 分析性推理 (System 2: hypothetico-deductive 假设演绎 / Bayesian 概率更新)** 的 dual-process 双过程理论 (Kahneman→Croskerry/Norman 谱系), 资深≠更会分析而是『脚本库更大+校准更好』; 更深层论战 — **『认知去偏可教 (Croskerry: bias awareness / cognitive forcing strategies / diagnostic timeout) ⇄ 偏倚标签是马后炮、知识结构才是主因 (Norman/Sherbino/Monteiro: debiasing 干预 transfer 证据弱, bias 是 hindsight 标签)』** — 本行最核心学术对垒; 『概率思维 (验前概率 × 似然比 → 验后概率, Pauker-Kassirer test/treatment threshold 阈值模型) ⇄ 穷尽式排查 (rule-out everything / 防御性医疗 / VOMIT)』; 『临床 gestalt ⇄ 结构化临床决策规则 (Wells/PERC/HEART)』; 『诊断简约 Occam's razor ⇄ Hickam's dictum (病人可以同时得 N 个病)』; 『床旁体格检查复兴 (Verghese Stanford 25 / McGee 循证体检) ⇄ 影像检验替代床旁』; (b) 方法论正典 — illness script theory (Schmidt/Boshuizen: enabling conditions/fault/consequences 三段结构), problem representation + semantic qualifiers 问题表征与语义限定词 (Bowen NEJM 2006, 把病人翻成 one-liner), hypothetico-deductive model (Elstein 1978《Medical Problem Solving》: 早期假设生成+定向检验), Bayesian 工具箱 (sensitivity/specificity/LR/Fagan nomogram/SnNout-SpPin), threshold model (Pauker-Kassirer NEJM 1975/1980), 认知偏倚分类学 (anchoring/premature closure/availability/confirmation/base-rate neglect/search satisficing/diagnostic momentum — Croskerry 偏倚清单), 去偏与元认知策略 (diagnostic timeout/cognitive forcing/Ely checklist/calibration), schema-based reasoning (Clinical Problem Solvers schemas: 按 pivot 症状走分支), reflective practice 结构化反思 (Mamede/Schmidt), 诊断错误科学 (NAM 2015 报告定义 / Newman-Toker Big Three / Hardeep Singh e-triggers / SAFER Dx 框架); (c) 行业结构与角色 — 医学生→实习/住院医 (晨会 morning report/查房被 pimping/汇报训练)→主治 attending→master clinician (NEJM CPC discussant/晨会大师如 Dhaliwal); 配套生态: 医学教育者 (clinical reasoning curriculum + 评估: script concordance test/key features exam/OSCE), 诊断安全研究者 (SIDM/AHRQ), 诊断辅助与 CDS 工具开发者 (DDx generator/AI); (d) 核心工作流 — 数据采集 (病史为王 + 循证体检 + 针对性检验影像) → 问题表征 (one-liner + semantic qualifiers) → 鉴别诊断生成 (schema / 解剖定位法 / VINDICATE-M 病因筛, 按『常见可能 × 致命不能漏 can't-miss』双轴排序) → 假设定向检验 (按 LR 选检查 / 阈值决策) → working diagnosis + 安全网 (red flags 交代 / test of time / test of treatment) → 反馈校准 (follow-up / M&M / diagnostic timeout); 教学工作流: 晨会渐进披露汇报 / CPC / SNAPPS / one-minute preceptor / virtual morning report; AI 增强工作流 (2023-2026: LLM 鉴别诊断头脑风暴 / OpenEvidence 检索 / ambient scribe 释放认知带宽 + 自动化偏倚 guardrails); (e) 产出物 — one-liner, problem list, prioritized DDx, assessment & plan (按问题分层), 晨会/CPC 汇报, M&M 复盘, 诊断不确定性沟通 (『最可能是 X, 但出现 Y 红旗立刻回来』); (f) 教育与评估 — script concordance test / key feature exam / EPA / 里程碑; 中国语境: 人卫《诊断学》教材 / 执业医师考试 / 规培结业临床思维考核; (g) 争议/批判 — debiasing 之争 (Croskerry vs Norman-Sherbino『knowledge is the cure』, 去偏 RCT 效果弱 / bias 标签不可证伪), 诊断错误率数字之争 (『10-15%』经典估计 / Newman-Toker 79.5 万美国年严重伤害外推方法被质疑 / 尸检符合率), dual-process 二分被批过度简化 (连续谱 / 难以实证分离), 决策规则 vs gestalt (资深 gestalt 常不输 Wells 类规则 / 算法厌恶), vignette 研究外推性 + context/case specificity (推理高度内容绑定不可通用迁移 [Norman/Eva] — 对『教推理通用课』产业的根本批判), AI 辅助诊断 2023-2026 (GPT-4 在 NEJM CPC/vignette 追平或超医生 [Kanjee 2023 JAMA / Goh 2024 JAMA Netw Open『AI alone > physician+AI』悖论] / Google AMIE / OpenEvidence 爆发 vs 自动化偏倚 / 去技能化 / 真实环境验证缺失), 防御性医疗与过度检查 (incidentaloma 瀑布 / VOMIT), 体检衰亡之争, pimping 教学法争议; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 决策科学/Bayesian 派 (Ledley-Lusted 1959 → Elstein/Kassirer/Sox/Pauker/Eddy → Brush) vs 认知心理/双过程派 (Kahneman-Tversky → Croskerry/Graber) vs 教育认知派 (Schmidt/Boshuizen illness scripts → Norman/Eva/Mamede/Durning 情境认知) vs 诊断安全/系统派 (NAM 2015 / Newman-Toker / Hardeep Singh / Graber-SIDM: 错误=系统×认知共因) vs 床旁临床派 (Osler 传统 → Tierney aphorisms / Verghese / McGee / Dhaliwal / Saint: 病史体检为王 + 刻意练习) vs AI/计算派 (INTERNIST-1/DXplain 专家系统 → Isabel → LLM 世代 Rodman/Topol)。不含: 具体专科治疗方案与手术决策深度 (足踝外科/种植牙等另有 skill), 中医辨证 (另有 skill), EBM 文献批判性评价方法学 (相关但本 skill 聚焦诊断推理本身), 护理诊断体系 (NANDA), 影像/病理知觉型读片训练 (相邻但独立), 精神科 DSM 结构化访谈细节, 医患沟通技巧全集 (只覆盖诊断不确定性沟通), 患者自查/自我诊断指

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

健身私教 — 为客户设计、指导和推进个性化训练方案的专业工艺, 有别于团课教练、物理治疗师或运动队教练: (a) 训练方案设计与周期化 (线性 / 波动 / 板块周期化 Bompa & Haff; NSCA《力量训练与体能训练精要》行业圣经; Schoenfeld 肌肥大机制; Helms/Valdez/Morgan 肌肉与力量金字塔; 共轭训练法 Simmons/Westside; Starting Strength 线性渐进 Rippetoe; Renaissance Periodization 训练量地标 Israetel); (b) 动作评估与筛查 (FMS 功能性动作筛查 Gray Cook; NASM CEx 纠正性训练连续体 抑制-拉伸-激活-整合; 关节逐级方法 Cook/Boyle; 姿势与代偿模式识别; PAR-Q+ 与 ACSM 运动前筛查指南); (c) 教学与指令 (外部 vs 内部注意焦点 Wulf; 差异化学习 Schöllhorn; 约束导向方法 Davids/Renshaw; RIR/RPE 自动调节 Zourdos/Helms; 动机访谈在健身中的应用 Rollnick/Miller); (d) 营养指导的执业边界 (宏量营养素周期化; Precision Nutrition / ISSN 立场声明的循证建议; 边界: 私教提供一般性指导, 医学营养治疗需 RD/RDN 资质; 能量可用性与 RED-S Mountjoy IOC 共识); (e) 商业与客户管理 (客户留存与方案依从; 咨询与销售伦理; 线上教练平台与规模化 Goodman PTDC; 方案交付工具 TrueCoach/Trainerize/TrainHeroic; 课时定价模型; 独立教练 vs 健身房雇员); (f) 专项方向 (运动表现 CSCS; 纠正性训练 CES; 老年健身 SFN; 产前产后; 青少年 YSCA; 适应性 / 无障碍健身; 健美 / 形体; 力量举; 耐力运动 S&C)。诚实处理: 兄弟科学 vs 循证之争, 补剂行业利益冲突, 合成代谢激素使用现状 (诚实但不推广: 匿名调查约 30% 有经验男性健身者使用过 — 业内估, Kanayama/Pope/Hudson 记录健康风险, WADA 禁用清单用于竞技语境), 体型焦虑与进食障碍风险 (男性私教肌肉变形症, 正食症倾向, NEDA 负责任语言指南), 健身房掠夺性销售 (高压推销、误导性对比照、长约锁定), 执业边界违规 (私教诊断伤病或超范围开饮食处方), 线上教练认证造假 (周末速成、未经认可的认证)。不含: 物理治疗 / 康复治疗 (持照医疗职业), 不含: 团课教练 (Les Mills/Zumba/CrossFit 分馆教练 — 相邻但不同), 不含: 精英竞技运动教练 (团队项目周期化, 不同职业路径), 不含: 营养作为主业 (临床营养学需单独资质)。 (Personal Trainer — the craft of designing, coaching, and progressing individualized exercise programs for clients, distinct from group fitness instruction, physiotherapy, or sports coaching: (a) exercise programming and periodization (linear / undulating / block periodization per Bompa & Haff; NSCA Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning as industry bible; Schoenfeld on hypertrophy mechanisms; Helms/Valdez/Morgan Muscle & Strength Pyramids; conjugate method Simmons/Westside; Starting Strength linear progression Rippetoe; Renaissance Periodization volume landmarks Israetel); (b) movement assessment and screening (FMS Gray Cook; NASM CEx corrective exercise continuum inhibit-lengthen-activate-integrate; joint-by-joint approach Cook/Boyle; posture and compensation pattern identification; PAR-Q+ and pre-exercise screening ACSM guidelines); (c) coaching and cueing (external vs internal cueing Wulf attentional focus research; differential learning Schöllhorn; constraints-led approach Davids/Renshaw; RIR/RPE autoregulation Zourdos/Helms; motivational interviewing for adherence Rollnick/Miller adapted to fitness); (d) nutrition guidance within scope of practice (macronutrient periodization; evidence-based recommendations per Precision Nutrition / ISSN position stands; scope boundary: PT gives general guidance NOT medical nutrition therapy which requires RD/RDN credential; energy availability and RED-S awareness Mountjoy IOC consensus); (e) business and client management (client retention and programming adherence; consultation and sales ethics; online coaching platforms and scaling Goodman PTDC; programming delivery tools like TrueCoach/Trainerize/TrainHeroic; session pricing models; independent contractor vs gym employee dynamics); (f) specialization tracks (sports performance CSCS; corrective exercise CES; senior fitness SFN; pre/postnatal; youth YSCA; adaptive/inclusive fitness; bodybuilding/physique coaching; powerlifting/strength sports; endurance athlete S&C). Evidence-based practice as the core ethos: Schoenfeld/Krieger meta-analyses on volume-response, Helms systematic reviews on protein/resistance training, Brad Schoenfeld's MASS journal bridging research to practice, Menno Henselmans and Eric Helms as practitioner-researchers, Greg Nuckols Stronger By Science as translation layer. Chinese fitness industry context: rapid growth of personal training in commercial gyms (Keep/Lefit/Megafit chains), NSCA-CPT and ACE-CPT as dominant certifications alongside local CSFA (China Sport and Fitness Association) credential, '体适能' (physical fitness) as formal term, online coaching boom post-COVID, PT business models in tier 1-3 cities diverge sharply. Honest treatment of: bro science vs evidence-based d

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes, triages, flags and rates a piece of text with a probability for every option: which department or queue a ticket goes to, which intent a message expresses, whether a yes/no condition holds (is this tool call grounded, should the agent ask first, is the customer angry), and how severe or urgent it is on a rubric, each with a calibrated confidence. Runs Claude Haiku in the request and response shapes of OpenAI's Decisions API, for when no purpose-built decision model is at hand. Use for "route this ticket", "triage these", "classify with a confidence", "give me a probability that", "rate the severity", "score against this rubric", guardrail checks before a tool call, or "a Decisions API without OpenAI".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide which model, effort level, and cascade shape each subagent gets, and how to keep improvement loops safe (evaluator-as-selector, stop on regression). Routes on measured cost-per-completed-task rather than per-token price, because a tier's token count varies more by task shape than price varies across tiers. Covers per-model effort semantics, the concision lever, cascade preconditions, context handoff, and watching a subagent fan-out live. Use when choosing a subagent's model or effort, when choosing how to escalate a failed attempt, or when asked which model or effort a task should get. Grounded in a 2026-07 calibration, a 2026-08 coding-cost study, a 2026-09 seeded-bug repair battery, a 2026-10 Haiku 5.5 ladder priced per spawn, and a 2026-10 retry-versus-escalation ladder on 295 SWE-bench Verified tasks; Managed Agents API specifics are operational, not calibrated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or editing Pixi'VN story content — defining labels (scenes) with newLabel, writing dialogue steps, adding player choices with newChoiceOption/newCloseChoiceOption, conditional/branching labels, or wiring up narration.call/jump/continue and Game.start to progress the story.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full website SEO audit with parallel subagent delegation. Crawls up to 500 pages, detects business type, delegates to up to 15 specialists (8 always + 7 conditional), generates health score. Use when user says audit, full SEO check, analyze my site, or website health check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when code needs a security review against the OWASP Top 10:2025 — access control, misconfiguration, supply chain, cryptography, injection, insecure design, authentication, integrity, logging and alerting, and mishandled exceptional conditions. Not for penetration testing a running system, not for infrastructure-only scanning, and not for fixing what it finds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning style of Kaiming He, computer vision pioneer and creator of ResNet. Use this skill whenever you are designing deep learning architectures, debugging neural network optimization, formulating generative AI problems, or bridging AI with other scientific domains. Trigger this skill for discussions on network depth, weight initialization, residual learning, flow matching, or when reframing discriminative tasks as conditional generation. It emphasizes simplicity in complex visual problems, end-to-end optimization, and viewing AI as a universal language for science.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned editorial pipeline for agent-run content: six roles with written contracts, one inspectable record that travels between them, and a distribution stage that gives every asset its own argument instead of a shorter draft. Use when content agents return generic, duplicated, or unsourced work, when one flagship piece has to carry a week of distribution, when someone asks to build an AI content team or one-person media company, or when a founder wants a weekly interview-led content system across personal and company accounts. NOT FOR: choosing which topics, pillars, or clusters to cover (use suede-content-strategy); platform mix, cadence, calendars, or listening (use suede-social); an Instagram-specific program (use suede-instagram-growth); running a stage on a schedule with state and stop conditions (use suede-marketing-loops); lane ownership for agents changing code (use suede-agent-teams); writing the flagship piece itself (use suede-ship-copy).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create structured records of decisions with expected outcomes, probabilities, and quit conditions. Use for important decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing Bevy (Rust ECS) game code - pin and respect the repo's minor version, plugins/systems/queries/resources, schedules with FixedUpdate and Time, states and run conditions, messages vs observers across versions, required components, testing systems with App::update and a manual time strategy, compile-time and allocation hygiene.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding whether a request needs an analiz task before implementation - the conditions that require the architect's analysis versus going straight to implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task names Krea or Krea 2, when choosing between Krea's hosted API and its open weights, when wiring the Krea 2 Image or Krea 2 Style Reference API nodes, when building with FLUX.1 Krea Dev, when someone asks about Krea Realtime or realtime or streaming video generation, or when a Krea 2 job needs ControlNet, instruction editing, identity preservation or per-layer conditioning control that core ComfyUI does not provide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How the desk watches markets and the account between trades using Grok Bot routines and WebSocket or polling watches - the desk brief, book checks, funding and price watches, alert conditions and what a watch may and may not do. Use when the user asks for briefings, alerts, "watch X" or scheduled checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。