「engineering」の検索結果

Generate time-windowed product pulse reports from configured signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft launch or promotion copy for a shipped feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish, read, comment on, or edit markdown in Proof. Use for Proof links, sharing specs/plans/drafts, or publish handoffs from planning workflows; avoid proofread, math, evidence, or proof-of-concept meanings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain how and why something has its current shape, or what happened over a window of work, grounded in evidence. Use when the user asks for an explanation. Use ce-pov for a judgment or recommendation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a PR for code that can be deleted or simplified. Use when asked to review for simplicity or unnecessary edge-case overengineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for proactive threat hunting in Google SecOps. Use when proactively hunting for threats, retroactively analyzing indicators of compromise (IoCs), performing prevalence searches across enterprise events, hunting for MITRE ATT&CK techniques, or detecting behavioral and statistical outliers using UDM queries. Don't use for incoming alert triage (use secops-triage), active incident response and timeline deep-dives on a known breach (use secops-investigate), or detection rule authoring (use secops-detection-engineering).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for security alert triage in Google SecOps. Use when investigating and triaging security alerts, determining false positives vs. true positives, assessing entity risk, adjusting alert severity or priority, and closing or escalating alerts and cases. Don't use for deep multi-hop incident investigations across host timelines (use secops-investigate), proactive threat hunting or retroactive IoC sweeps (use secops-hunt), or authoring new detection rules (use secops-detection-engineering).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author, validate, test, and deploy YARA-L 2.0 detection rules and evaluate end-to-end detection coverage gaps in Google SecOps. Use when writing new detection rules, tuning existing rules, validating syntax, testing logic against historical telemetry, or evaluating detection coverage against threat intelligence blogs, CVE disclosures, and Threat Detection Opportunities (TDOs) using synthetic UDM events and long-running coverage analysis. Don't use for alert triage (use secops-triage), deep forensic event reconstruction on infected hosts (use secops-investigate), or case management operations (use secops-cases).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for deep security incident and entity investigations in Google SecOps. Use when investigating cases, analyzing entities (hosts, IPs, domains, hashes, users), extracting and searching UDM events, performing asset and user timeline analysis, and detecting lateral movement across enterprise networks. Don't use for detection rule authoring or YARA-L tuning (use secops-detection-engineering), proactive hypothesis-driven hunting (use secops-hunt), initial alert triage (use secops-triage), or basic case status updates (use secops-cases).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Forces the laziest solution that actually works, simplest, shortest, most minimal. Channels a senior dev who has seen everything: question whether the task needs to exist at all (YAGNI), reach for the standard library before custom code, native platform features before dependencies, one line before fifty. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra. Use on ANY coding task: writing, adding, refactoring, fixing, reviewing, or designing code, and choosing libraries or dependencies. Also use whenever the user says "ponytail", "be lazy", "lazy mode", "simplest solution", "minimal solution", "yagni", "do less", or "shortest path", or complains about over-engineering, bloat, boilerplate, or unnecessary dependencies. Do NOT use for non-coding requests (general knowledge, prose, translation, summaries, recipes).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The 15-minute escalation-routing runbook for the Plain support queue — detecting SLA breaches against {{sla_targets}}, VIP accounts in {{vip_accounts}}, and high severity, routing each qualifying ticket to the right team, opening a linked issue in {{linear_team}} when engineering is needed, and posting the alert to {{escalation_channel}}. Never closes a ticket or promises a resolution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design engineering principles for making interfaces feel polished. Use when building UI components, reviewing frontend code, implementing animations, hover states, shadows, borders, typography, micro-interactions, enter/exit animations, or any visual detail work. Triggers on UI polish, design details, "make it feel better", "feels off", stagger animations, border radius, optical alignment, font smoothing, tabular numbers, image outlines, box shadows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, audit, and improve harnesses that make AI coding agents reliable: AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md instruction files, feature/state tracking, verification gates, scope boundaries, session handoff, memory persistence, context budgets, tool-permission safety, and multi-agent coordination. Use this whenever a coding agent is unreliable across sessions — forgets context, drifts out of scope, claims "done" before tests pass, or starts each session inconsistently — or when creating or assessing AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, feature_list.json, init.sh, progress.md, or session-handoff files. Reach for it even if the user never says the word "harness."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta-prompting standard library for generating, optimizing, and composing prompts programmatically via Standards, Handlebars Templates, and Tools; output is always a prompt to use elsewhere, not final content. USE WHEN meta-prompting, template generation, prompt optimization, prompt engineering, write a prompt, create system prompt, Handlebars template, eval prompt, judge prompt. NOT FOR generating final content (use the appropriate domain skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits any AI instruction set for over-prompting using the core test — would a smarter model make this rule unnecessary? Applies Five Questions to every rule (Claude already does this? Contradiction? Redundant? One-off fix? Vague?) then classifies as CUT/RESOLVE/MERGE/EVALUATE/SHARPEN/MOVE/KEEP. Workflows: Audit (full system, token savings), QuickCheck (single file). Principle: less scaffolding = better output. USE WHEN BPE, bitter pill, audit setup, over-prompting, trim instructions, dead weight, simplify setup, clean up CLAUDE.md. NOT FOR attacking logical flaws in ideas (use RedTeam).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prompt engineering expert for chain-of-thought, few-shot learning, evaluation, and LLM optimization

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used for the tool-interface layer of an agent system specifically: writing tool descriptions agents can route on, designing tool schemas and response formats, naming conventions, actionable error recovery messages, MCP server design, tool-set consolidation, and deciding when to add or remove an individual tool. Use this when the unit of work is a single tool or a set of tools. Route project-shape, pipeline architecture, and task-model-fit decisions to project-development; route deciding whether to introduce sub-agents to multi-agent-patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when building agent evaluation systems: deterministic checks, regression suites, multi-dimensional rubrics, quality gates, production monitoring, baseline comparison, and outcome measurement for agent pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug and optimize AI agents by analyzing reasoning traces, context degradation, tool confusion, instruction drift, repeated task failures, and performance regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when a model gets read-write control over its own live context window instead of a harness-scheduled compaction policy: the context exposed as an editable file the model rewrites with code tools, model-driven eviction and in-place updates, the harness invariants that keep self-editing safe (pinned prefix, edit gate, edit receipts, budget readouts, rollback on overflow), the prefix-cache cost of mid-context edits, and steering or training the model's own context-editing strategy. Route note content and fixed-threshold summarization to context-compression, cache-stable layout under harness control to context-optimization, file offloading to filesystem-context, and loop governance to self-improvement-loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "share memory between agents", "KV cache compaction for multi-agent", "orchestrator worker context", "latent briefing", "reduce worker tokens", "cross-agent memory without summarization", or discusses Attention Matching compaction, recursive language models with workers, or token explosion in hierarchical agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure thorough validation, error recovery, and transparent reasoning in research tasks with multiple tool calls

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used for diagnosing and mitigating context degradation: lost-in-middle failures, context poisoning, context clash, context confusion, attention-pattern issues, and agent performance degradation caused by accumulated or conflicting context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used for project-level decisions about LLM-powered systems: whether an LLM is the right primitive for the task at hand, the shape of a multi-stage batch or agent pipeline, token and cost estimation, choosing between single-agent and multi-agent at the project level, structured output design for downstream parsing, and structuring agent-assisted iteration. Use this when the unit of work is a whole project or a multi-stage pipeline. Route individual tool design to tool-design and individual skill-loading or context-budget tactics to context-optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。