「pair」の検索結果

Build custom LLM evaluation pipelines using the OpenJudge framework. Covers selecting and configuring graders (LLM-based, function-based, agentic), running batch evaluations with GradingRunner, combining scores with aggregators, applying evaluation strategies (voting, average), auto-generating graders from data, and analyzing results (pairwise win rates, statistics, validation metrics). Use when the user wants to evaluate LLM outputs, compare multiple models, design scoring criteria, or build an automated evaluation system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the right LLM for LEGAL TRANSLATION — translating contracts, statutes, case law, and legal correspondence across languages, including Arabic/MENA. Vendor-neutral routing triangulated from mid-2026 evidence (WMT25 human eval, SwiLTra-Bench legal-MT, multilingual-reasoning proxies, ArabLegalEval). There is NO clean legal-translation leaderboard, so this vertical is directional and treats human legal-linguist review as mandatory. Asks up to 4 quick questions (language pair, cost, speed, privacy/certification), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model to translate this contract/statute", "best AI for legal translation", "translate this legal doc to/from Arabic", or is about to machine-translate legal text without a fixed model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Critically assess and improve a legal scholarly thesis, article idea, student note, seminar-paper claim, or research agenda using Eugene Volokh's novelty, nonobviousness, utility, and soundness framework, connector-aware research, claim-specific tests, and a sustainable adversarial pass. Produces a self-contained green-, yellow-, or red-light report. Use when a law professor or law student asks whether a claim is viable, novel, publishable, preempted, useful, worth pursuing, or better than competing topics; or wants a thesis stress-tested, narrowed, repaired, or compared. No connector is required: use connected legal and scholarly research when available, public sources otherwise, and disclose any no-research fallback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate completed mediation-competition problems consisting of general information and confidential packets for both sides. Use when asked to validate, audit, score, quality-control, or assess competition readiness; identify factual, numerical, chronological, authority, commercial-logic, or confidentiality defects; test mediation usefulness, BATNAs, settlement corridors, information asymmetry, and opportunities for firmness, cooperation, imagination, and clarification; or produce an author-only validation report. Perform a qualified partial review when packets are missing. Diagnose by default; do not generate a new problem or edit source packets unless repairs are expressly requested. Requires access to all supplied files and a host capable of reading their formats; otherwise disclose the unreviewed material and resulting limits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Takes a skill — a .skill or .zip archive, a bare SKILL.md, a folder, or just a raw idea — and produces a package ready for public distribution on lawve.ai, plus the exact entries for the submission form. Runs a gate first: skills with no plausible legal use, unsafe code, or licensing bars are declined with reasons, and general-purpose skills that could serve legal work are offered a legal adaptation instead. Then applies the standard compliance transforms — structure, metadata, attribution, dependency ladders, orphaned-file repair, limitations disclosure — validates the result, and delivers a zip. Raw ideas are gated first, built (via skill-creator where available), then adapted. Use for "make this Lawve-compliant," "prep this skill for Lawve," "package for lawve.ai," "is this suitable for Lawve," "get my skill ready to publish," or any request to ready a skill for the Lawve catalogue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes the formal letter you send before suing someone in a civil case in England & Wales — the Letter Before Claim that starts the pre-action clock. The part it gets right is which pre-action protocol applies — debt, professional negligence, housing disrepair, personal injury, or the default Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct — each of which has its own rules a generic letter misses (the 30-day debt window, the professional-negligence preliminary-notice step). It also flags the limitation deadline for a solicitor to confirm rather than stating it as fact. Built for litigation juniors, in-house counsel, and small firms without a precedent to copy. Use when the user says 'draft an LBC', 'letter before claim', 'pre-action letter', 'pre-action protocol', or needs to start the pre-action clock before issuing a civil claim. Verify the current protocol before sending.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn an interpretive-ambiguity audit of a legal text — contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — into a polished deliverable. Produces a multi-page website (default), a single-page interactive site, a Microsoft Word document, a PowerPoint deck, or a LaTeX/PDF. Use whenever a user has a stress-test result, ambiguity audit, or "where will this be litigated" scenarios and wants to publish, present, or share them. Triggers on "publish the audit," "make a report from this," "turn this into a website / deck / brief / Word doc," "make a Netlify site," "build slides of these ambiguities," "render the scenarios," "package this stress test," "produce a LaTeX version," and similar. Pairs with the ambiguity-stress-test skill (the underlying analysis) but works on any structured or semi-structured ambiguity analysis. Visual design is opinionated but the user can override colors, fonts, and brand label. Most formats need Python and a writable filesystem; single-file HTML works where the host has neither.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a restorative practice protocol for addressing harm, rebuilding trust, and restoring relationships. Use when managing conflict, behavioural incidents, or relationship breakdown between students.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when verifying build/test/lint before commit, PR, or completion claims. Runs verification pipeline in fresh subagent context with auto-repair. Triggers on /handoff-verify, pre-commit check, build verification, test validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the adversarial verification loop — implement, then hand the change to a fresh checker that did not write it, fix what it finds, and re-dispatch until APPROVE. Use before claiming any behavioural change is done, and on requests like "review loop", "adversarial review", "independent review", "get this verified", "is this actually done", "maker checker", "second pair of eyes on this change". Not for prose, docs or typo edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover Civitai models with the BUILT-IN download_model action:"search_civitai" and install/generate them locally. Find a checkpoint/LoRA/embedding on Civitai, download it into ComfyUI, and use its trigger words. Optionally pair the official Civitai MCP for community features (images browsing, posting, collections).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estimates differential gene expression for short read sequence count using methods appropriate for count data. If you have paired data you may also want to consider Tophat/Cufflinks. Input must be raw count data for each sequence arranged i

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When we combine gene-editing technology and sequencing technology, we need to reconstruct a lineage tree from alleles generated and calculate the similarity between each pair of groups. FindIndel() and IndelForm() function will help you align each read to reference sequence and generate scar form strings respectively. IndelIdents() function will help you to define a scar form for each cell or read. IndelPlot() function will help you to visualize the distribution of deletion and insertion. TagPro

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert knowledge for Azure Reliability development including best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, and deployment. Use when choosing Azure regions, availability zones, geo-paired deployments, Queue Storage limits, or Web PubSub apps, and other Azure Reliability related development tasks. Not for Azure Monitor (use azure-monitor), Azure Resiliency (use azure-resiliency), Azure Service Health (use azure-service-health), Azure Sre Agent (use azure-sre-agent).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix failing or degraded skills automatically - systemic-first triage, per-category playbooks, and a verification plan

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage playbook for when cold email deliverability breaks. Decision-tree guidance for "I landed in spam", "bounce rate spiked", "domain blacklisted", "inbox blocked in warmup", "reply rate dropped". Tells you what to check first, what to fix, and how long the fix takes. Pair with /email-deliverability-audit for diagnosis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Export your entire Prospeo people search to CSV. Build filters in Prospeo's UI, then use this skill to extract every result via the API — even searches over 25K. Handles pagination, rate limiting, deduplication, and state-by-state splitting automatically. Pair with /icp-prompt-builder on a 50-person sample to tune a qualification prompt BEFORE exporting 25K.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal tariff calculator for Amazon sellers. Calculate import duties, landed costs, and VAT/GST for any trade route. Supports CN→US, CN→EU, US→EU, EU→US, US→CN and custom origin/destination pairs. Includes Section 301 tariffs, trade agreement rates (USMCA, EVFTA), and HS code lookup. No API key required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Controls facial expressions in Seedance 2.0 with FACS (Facial Action Coding System) Action Unit codes — muscle-level direction (AU12 = lip-corner puller, AU6 = cheek raiser) instead of emotion labels. Use whenever the user wants precise facial acting, a forced/uncanny/mixed expression, micro-performance in a close-up, monologue or dialogue facial beats, a 'which AU code for anger/fear/disgust' answer, or to generate a FACS reference sheet for a character. Pairs with higgsfield-soul Micro-Expressions (named expressions), higgsfield-audio (dialogue + lip-sync), and higgsfield-gpt-image-2 (the reference-sheet image).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes the character-performance layer of a video prompt as behavior under pressure, not displayed emotion — objective, obstacle, tactics, beats, subtext, listening, body/status/proxemics, and mandatory eye life. Produces a reusable 150–220-word acting master profile per character plus a per-scene rewrite of it, and a locked voice prompt. Use whenever a prompt needs acting, performance, or emotion direction; whenever characters read wooden, dead-eyed, or 'AI'; whenever a character must stay themselves across many shots; or when the user asks for character behavior, mannerisms, tics, a gait, or how someone reacts. Pairs with higgsfield-facs (muscle-level AU codes) and higgsfield-seedance (the prompt the paragraph goes into).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests whether a scene is structurally worth generating before any shot is prompted — a five-element engine of Goal, Obstacle, Tactic, Reversal, and Value Shift. Use when the user has a scene, sequence, beat outline, or script and wants it audited or strengthened; when a sequence generates cleanly but lands flat and nobody can say why; when shots look good individually but the run of them does not build; or when the user asks 'is this scene working', 'what's weak here', or 'why doesn't this land'. Upstream of prompting — it decides WHICH shots deserve the credits, not how to write them. Pairs with higgsfield-character-design (who the characters are) and higgsfield-shotlist-director (turning the settled scene into shots).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

结对编程搭档。当用户要求"边写边审"、"结对编程"、"写完自己 review 一遍"、"高可靠地实现"，或明确希望代码交付时附带自我审查意见时使用。交付代码的同时输出结构化审查（正确性/安全/性能/可读性/健壮性五维度），重点捕捉 AI 生成代码的特有缺陷。不用于：对已有 PR 的正式评审（用 code review 流程）、安全专项扫描（用 security-audit）、10 行以内的简单片段。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read one conversation window and return every independently mutable claim it states, one record each, with who or what it is about, whether it happened or stands, and the words that carry its time. Used by the memory extraction model on every conversation window; the engine resolves dates, validates keys, and repairs format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Minimizes test count while preserving coverage. Detects byte-identical pairs, parametrize-inflation, language-guarantee tests, AST-shape tests, stale migration nets. Approval gate before any change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。