「valuation」の検索結果

Use when the user wants to test their LLM/agent application for safety and security vulnerabilities — jailbreaks, prompt injection, PII extraction, harmful content generation, or evaluator gaming. Also use when the user mentions security testing, adversarial testing, red teaming, safety evaluation, ASR (Attack Success Rate), or "is my app safe to deploy." Outputs ASR paired with over-refusal rate and an audit document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) system and wants to evaluate its quality — separating retrieval issues from generation issues. Also use when the user mentions RAG evaluation, faithfulness checking, hallucination detection in RAG, retrieval quality, chunking optimization, or "is my RAG pipeline working." Outputs a diagnostic matrix that pinpoints whether problems are in retrieval or generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Risk-based vendor assessment framework for IT service providers, technology vendors, and third-party partners under DORA, NIS2, GDPR. Provides three-phase process (Initial Screening / Detailed Assessment / Final Evaluation), six-dimension risk scoring (Financial/Operational/Compliance/Security/Reputational/Strategic) with weighted matrices, full DORA Art. 28-30 contractual checklist, NIS2 Art. 21(2) security measures enumeration, GDPR Art. 28 documentation checks, red flags per dimension, trigger-based review criteria, and document templates. Use when: (1) Evaluating new vendors or technology providers, (2) Conducting critical ICT third-party due diligence under DORA, (3) Performing supply chain security assessment under NIS2, (4) Creating vendor onboarding documentation, (5) Establishing ongoing vendor monitoring, (6) Assessing concentration risk, or (7) Generating executive vendor risk reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Panel structure design, firm selection criteria, right-sourcing analysis, and coverage gap assessment for in-house legal teams. Build panel frameworks from scratch or formalise existing informal arrangements. Define weighted selection criteria for firm evaluation. Run right-sourcing analysis (ABC tiering) to identify work sent to expensive providers that doesn't require that level of resource. Assess existing panels for practice area, geographic, and capability gaps. Trigger on: 'design our panel', 'how many firms do we need', 'panel structure', 'firm selection criteria', 'which firms should we use', 'right-sourcing', 'are we sending work to the right firms', 'panel gaps', 'too many firms', 'consolidate our panel', 'we need a firm for', 'preferred provider', 'panel tiers', 'do we need BigLaw for this', 'convergence', 'D&I panel targets', 'how do we choose firms'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess whether a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) is required under Article 27 EU AI Act, and structure or draft that assessment for a specific high-risk AI deployment. Covers deployer scope gating (public bodies and private entities providing public services), affected group mapping, Charter rights analysis, proportionality, safeguards evaluation, residual risk, DPIA/FRIA cross-referencing under the amended Article 27(4), the unconditional notification duty under Article 27(3), and DACH-specific considerations. Use when asked about FRIA obligations, Article 27 scope, fundamental rights and AI, or deployer assessment duties.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Use when asked to determine GPAI model provider obligations, assess Code of Practice compliance, evaluate transparency or copyright requirements for GPAI models, check systemic risk obligations, build a GPAI compliance roadmap, or prepare for AI Office requests. Covers all three Code chapters (Transparency, Copyright, Safety & Security), the 12 commitments and their measures, systemic risk classification (Article 51), provider obligations (Articles 53 and 55), open-source exemptions, enforcement timeline, Commission/AI Office supervision, and DACH-specific overlays such as BSI cybersecurity and works council implications. Triggers on phrases like "GPAI compliance", "Code of Practice assessment", "GPAI model obligations", "systemic risk evaluation", "AI Act transparency requirements", "GPAI copyright policy", "general-purpose AI compliance".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a library of metacognitive prompts targeting planning, monitoring, or evaluation for a specific task. Use when developing students' thinking-about-thinking during independent work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate scaffolds supporting student self-regulation across planning, monitoring, and evaluation phases. Use when students struggle to manage their own learning during extended or independent tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a critical thinking task targeting specific skills like evaluating evidence, identifying bias, or analysing arguments. Use when embedding critical analysis into subject lessons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Formal evaluation framework for Claude Code sessions implementing eval-driven development (EDD) principles

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze images, video, speech, motion, products, and websites; route local vision, audio, depth, tracking, matting, identity, and restoration models; auto-edit, replicate, enhance, caption, voice, assemble, annotate, validate, and export editable Timeline Studio projects and videos. Use for reference-video remakes, filter and repeated-shot reconstruction, subject-aware reframing, clip splitting, source-time speed curves, Color Wheels grading, ramps and holds, person or product cutout, person or object outline, authorized face swap, shot and timing reconstruction, timeline markers, chapters, beat cues, review notes and ranges, supplied or web-sourced footage, AI video platform selection, cleanup, highlights, product promotion, website walkthroughs, image-to-video assisted edits, optical-flow editing, depth-assisted relighting, grayscale depth-video conversion, depth/2.5D/transition finishing, AI voiceover, subtitles, short-form production, .timeline automation, or editor evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DCF valuation model for A-share stocks using Chinese financial data. Uses AkShare MCP for financial statements, WACC inputs (risk-free rate from China government bond yields), and growth projections. Use instead of the original dcf-model skill for Chinese equities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation model for A-share equities. This alias skill redirects to china-dcf, which provides comprehensive DCF modeling adapted for Chinese market conventions. Triggers on "A股DCF模型", "DCF估值", "DCF model China", "现金流折现", "discounted cash flow A-share", or "DCF [company]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update A-share financial models with new quarterly data, management guidance, or macro changes. Reflects actuals, rolls estimates forward, flags material changes, and updates valuation. Adapted from the original model-update skill for Chinese market conventions and AkShare data. Triggers on "A股模型更新", "模型更新", "plug earnings into model", "update model for [company]", "刷新预测", or "更新财务模型".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Institutional-quality equity research initiation reports for A-share companies. Covers company analysis, financial modeling, valuation, chart preparation, and final report assembly. Adapted from the original initiating-coverage skill for Chinese market conventions, CAS accounting, and AkShare data sources. Triggers on "A股首次覆盖", "首次评级", "initiate coverage China", "initiate on [company]", "A股研究报告", or "start research on [company]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comparable company analysis for A-share stocks. Uses AkShare MCP to build peer groups, pull financial data, compute valuation multiples (PE, PB, PS), and assess relative value within a Chinese industry sector.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Net asset value (NAV) reconciliation and tie-out for Chinese funds and investment portfolios. Adapts the original nav-tieout skill for A-share holdings, Chinese fund accounting standards, and domestic custody arrangements. Triggers on "A股净值核对", "NAV计算", "NAV tie-out China", "基金净值", "net asset value [fund]", or "portfolio valuation [date]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to optimize configurable system parameters against a measurable scalar objective, especially for model training, inference, quantitative strategies, reinforcement learning, scientific workflows, or other expensive black-box evaluations where reading the project can improve trial selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose SwiftUI performance issues including unnecessary re-renders, view identity problems, and slow body evaluations. Use when SwiftUI views are slow, janky, or re-rendering too often.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structured accessibility audit on an iOS/macOS app — automated XCUITest audits, Accessibility Inspector, manual VoiceOver/Dynamic Type passes, and App Store Accessibility Nutrition Label evaluation. Use before release, when preparing Nutrition Label declarations, or for EU Accessibility Act compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

standR is an user-friendly R package providing functions to assist conducting good-practice analysis of Nanostring's GeoMX DSP data. All functions in the package are built based on the SpatialExperiment object, allowing integration into various spatial transcriptomics-related packages from Bioconductor. standR allows data inspection, quality control, normalization, batch correction and evaluation with informative visualizations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze website traffic, global rank, engagement metrics, and traffic sources for any domain. Use this skill to evaluate affiliate program websites, compare competitor traffic, assess advertiser strength, or understand where an audience comes from. Triggers on: "analyze traffic for [domain]", "how much traffic does [site] get", "compare traffic between [site A] and [site B]", "is [program] worth promoting based on traffic", "traffic analysis", "website analytics for [domain]", "where does [site] get traffic", "check if [advertiser] is legit", "evaluate [program] website health", "SimilarWeb analysis", "traffic sources for [domain]", "how popular is [site]", "website rank", "domain authority check", "compare affiliate program websites".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score product remarkability 1-10 to decide if it's worth promoting. Seth Godin's Purple Cow test. Triggers on: "is this product worth promoting", "should I promote", "product audit", "purple cow", "remarkable product", "is it remarkable", "rate this product", "product quality check", "worth my reputation", "product evaluation", "would I recommend without commission", "product remarkability score", "evaluate this affiliate product", "quality gate for promotion".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。