737 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Structured review process for Remotion video implementations. Analyzes spec compliance, detects common timing/easing issues, validates asset quality, and provides prioritized revision lists. Use when reviewing Remotion code against design specs or performing quality assurance on video compositions. Trigger phrases "review video code", "check spec compliance", "audit Remotion implementation".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert logging guidance based on Boris Tane's loggingsucks.com philosophy. Use when implementing logging, adding observability, debugging production issues, or reviewing code that includes log statements. Covers wide events architecture, structured logging, smart sampling, and high-cardinality field design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide creating and reviewing skills that extend Claude with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations. Covers SKILL.md structure, frontmatter quality, trigger design, eval pipelines, and packaging. Triggers on create a skill, review this skill, new skill, optimize skill, skill quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Independent re-derivation gate for proposed changes during autonomous execution. Evaluates a change (code diff, config edit, engine evolution, schema change) against the work's authority matrix and a 4-check protocol: invariant compliance, scope authorization, detection narrowness, and regression risk. Returns structured JSON with pass/fail per check, an overall verdict (APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES / REJECT), and blockers. Profile-driven thresholds (strict for unattended runs, lenient for desk supervision). Use when an autonomous agent proposes an engine change, when reviewing a Claude Code-authored modification before merge, or when an unattended profile requires independent re-derivation. Trigger on: "review/approve this proposed change," "critic-gate this," "is this change safe," "is this safe to merge," "should I let this land," "run the critic." Do NOT use for handoff-readiness checks (use rootnode-handoff-trigger-check), general code review, or design-time correctness. Authority matrix required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tested output format specifications for Claude prompts. Use when the user wants a specific deliverable structure — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or building output formatting. Trigger on: "give me the Executive Brief format," "show me the output template for," "I need the Decision Matrix structure," "show me available output formats," "build a custom output format for." Provides 10 ready-to-use structures (executive briefs, technical designs, research summaries, implementation plans, decision matrices, competitive analyses, post-mortems, stakeholder updates, strategic memos, process documentation) plus a custom template, with per-section length guidance and format constraints tested against Claude formatting defaults. If unsure which format fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or choosing reasoning/identity approaches (use rootnode-block-selection if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitor, cap, and recover from context accumulation in agentic systems. Covers per-cycle cost tracking, context window auditing, budget caps with enforcement policies, emergency pruning when approaching limits, and progressive disclosure integration to minimize token spend on routing. Use when running long-lived agent loops (heartbeats, polling, autonomous workflows), when context windows are growing unpredictably between cycles, when API costs spike beyond expected baselines, when designing new agentic workflows that need cost guardrails from the start, or when post-mortem analysis reveals a cost incident caused by context accumulation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement circuit breaker logic for agentic tool calls — tracking tool health, transitioning between closed/open/half-open states, reducing task scope when tools fail, routing to alternatives via capability maps, and enforcing failure budgets to prevent error accumulation. Separates orchestration (deciding what to attempt) from execution (calling tools), following the expeditor pattern. Use when building agents that depend on multiple tools with varying reliability, designing fault-tolerant agentic workflows, recovering gracefully from tool outages mid-task, or hardening existing agents against cascading tool failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a new team composition file following the agent-almanac team template and registry conventions. Covers team purpose definition, member selection, coordination pattern choice, task decomposition design, machine-readable configuration block, registry integration, and README automation. Use when defining a multi-agent workflow, composing agents for a complex review process, or creating a coordinated group for recurring collaborative tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a new agent definition file following the agent-almanac agent template and registry conventions. Covers persona design, tool selection, skill assignment, model choice, frontmatter schema, required sections, registry integration, and discovery symlink verification. Use when adding a new specialized agent to the library, defining a persona for a Claude Code subagent, or creating a domain-specific assistant with curated skills and tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Construct well-structured arguments using the hypothesis-argument-example triad. Covers formulating falsifiable hypotheses, building logical arguments (deductive, inductive, analogical, evidential), providing concrete examples, and steelmanning counterarguments. Use when writing or reviewing PR descriptions that propose technical changes, justifying design decisions in ADRs, constructing substantive code review feedback, or building a research argument or technical proposal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TypeScript discipline for any JavaScript/TypeScript project (frontend + backend): strict mode, type design, generics, narrowing, error types, module resolution, tsconfig hygiene. Apply when the project has `tsconfig.json` and `typescript` in devDependencies. Stack-agnostic — referenced by every JS/TS framework plugin in the marketplace. Use this skill to: - Write types that catch bugs at compile time, not runtime. - Use generics, conditional types, and discriminated unions correctly. - Avoid `any`, `unknown`, and unsafe casts. - Match the project's tsconfig strictness level. - Type third-party libraries (with @types/* or declaration files). Do NOT use this skill for: - Plain JavaScript projects (no tsconfig.json). - Framework-specific type idioms (React component props, Vue defineProps, Angular signals — those live in framework plugins' own conventions skills). - tRPC/Zod runtime-validation specifics — handled by validation libs at the boundary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design small interfering RNA and antisense oligonucleotide sequences against a transcript, and screen them for the failure modes specific to nucleic-acid drugs. Use this skill to tile a target transcript, apply positional and thermodynamic selection rules including duplex asymmetry and nearest-neighbour melting temperature, scan candidates for seed-region complementarity to off-target transcripts, and lay out a chemical modification pattern — gapmer architecture, 2'-O-methyl and 2'-MOE wings, locked nucleic acid, and phosphorothioate placement. Also trigger on siRNA, antisense oligonucleotide, ASO, gapmer, RNase H, seed region, duplex asymmetry, 2'-MOE, locked nucleic acid, phosphorothioate, or GalNAc conjugate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure Cosmos DB performance optimization and best practices guidelines for NoSQL, partitioning, queries, SDK usage, and vector search. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code that interacts with Azure Cosmos DB, designing data models, optimizing queries, or implementing high-performance database operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit, finish, or port PCB placement and routing using circuit intent, mechanical constraints, sourcing evidence, native DRC/connectivity, rendered views, and manufacturing feedback. Use before routing, after autorouting, before fabrication release, when adapting a proven board to another connector, enclosure, platform, or regional variant, or when reviewing layers, GND references, power distribution, decoupling, buses, controlled interfaces, RF keepouts, vias, cost-driving features, opens, or DRC findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews integration completeness including design-implementation consistency, review/test coverage, and completion criteria. Use when performing integration review in Construction Phase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Take one new feature slice from idea to reviewed, committed code in a single guided pass — scope it into the smallest shippable slice, build it test-first with strict TDD, review and fix the diff, then commit it. Chains slice → test-driven-development → the built-in /code-review → git-commit. Not for reviewing an existing PR, upgrades, or open-ended design questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Conduct a systematic literature review following the PRISMA framework with explicit search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality assessment, and transparent synthesis. Use this skill when the user needs to design a reproducible literature search, apply PRISMA flow documentation, develop inclusion and exclusion criteria, assess study quality, or when they ask 'how do I do a systematic review', 'what is PRISMA', or 'how do I make my literature review reproducible'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build accessible UI—semantic HTML, keyboard support, ARIA when needed, WCAG-oriented checks. Use when implementing or reviewing web UI, forms, modals, and design systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement features with code, tests, and documentation. Use when building features from approved designs following TDD and project coding standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Idiomatic Go - package and interface design, error wrapping, table-driven tests, generics, the modern standard library (slices/maps/cmp/errors.Join), current syntax, and logging discipline. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring any Go code, especially code drifting toward Java/Spring shapes (deep layer trees, generic repositories, heavy frameworks) - even if the user never says "idiomatic". Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing, redrawing, or validating research-paper figures and tables, including Matplotlib plots, LaTeX tables, benchmarks, captions, legends, annotations, color, and typography. Preserves exact evidence and checks rendered PDFs for clipping, overlap, and readability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing or reviewing tests, designing test data, naming a test, choosing what to assert, or writing test helpers/mocks/fixtures
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prove a UI or generation feature actually works before asking a human to look at it. Covers A/B-ing an imported design against its source render, driving controls headlessly so a dead button cannot ship, proving the generator really spawns, and launching the real host (VCV Rack, a DAW). Use before any "take a look" on imported UI, plugin shells, or prompt-to-artifact pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Production-grade TypeScript reference for React & Next.js frontend development. Covers type narrowing, component Props, generic hooks, discriminated unions, as const, satisfies, Zod validation, TanStack Query, server/client boundaries, forms, state management, performance, accessibility, debugging, and code review. Use when the user works with TypeScript in React or Next.js: type errors, Props design, generics, API typing, SSR/CSR boundaries, hydration issues, form validation, state management, performance, or code review. Also use for "how should I type this?", "why does this type error happen?", or any architectural decision involving TypeScript in a frontend context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。