「building」の検索結果

Detect Business Email Compromise (BEC) fraud, where attackers impersonate executives or vendors to trick employees into wire transfers or data disclosure without malicious links, using email gateway rules, behavioral analytics, and financial process controls. Use when investigating a suspected executive/vendor impersonation email or building detection rules for social-engineering fund-transfer fraud.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) using Elasticsearch/OpenSearch to build behavioral baselines, calculate anomaly scores, perform peer group analysis, and alert on insider threat indicators such as data exfiltration, privilege abuse, and unauthorized access. Use when building or tuning a UEBA pipeline rather than a one-off manual hunt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect Layer 2 ARP poisoning/spoofing by deploying ARPWatch, Dynamic ARP Inspection (DAI), Wireshark packet analysis, and custom Python monitoring scripts that flag gratuitous ARP floods, IP-to-MAC mapping changes, and duplicate IP addresses. Use when investigating suspected man-in-the-middle interception or session hijacking on a local network segment, or when building layer-2 anomaly detection for a SOC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects fileless malware and in-memory attacks that execute entirely in RAM without writing persistent files to disk, evading traditional antivirus. Use when building detections for PowerShell-based attacks, reflective DLL injection, WMI persistence, and registry-resident malware. Activates for requests involving fileless malware detection, in-memory attacks, PowerShell exploitation, or living-off-the-land techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect data exfiltration via DNS tunneling (tools like iodine, dnscat2, dns2tcp) by analyzing query entropy, subdomain length, query volume to single domains, TXT/CNAME/NULL record abuse, and oversized response payloads using passive DNS monitoring and statistical/ML methods. Use when hunting for covert DNS-based data exfiltration or building a passive DNS anomaly detection capability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect API enumeration attacks (BOLA/IDOR, OWASP API1:2023) by writing SIEM detection rules that flag sequential or UUID identifier iteration, parameter tampering, and mixed 200/401/403 response patterns from API gateway and WAF logs. Use when investigating suspected object-level authorization abuse, building threat-hunting queries for API access-control bypass, or hardening API logging/rate-limiting against enumeration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt AADGraphActivityLogs and MicrosoftGraphActivityLogs in Microsoft Sentinel/Log Analytics using KQL to fingerprint offensive Entra ID enumeration tools such as ROADtools, AADInternals, and AzureHound, including User-Agent signatures, roadrecon endpoint sweeps, and sign-in correlation. Use when investigating suspicious Microsoft Graph API activity, Entra ID reconnaissance, or building Sentinel analytics rules to detect these tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect Azure service principal abuse in Microsoft Entra ID using KQL detection queries (Sentinel/Splunk) against Azure AD Audit and Sign-in Logs, covering added credentials, privileged role assignment, admin consent bypass, and service principal enumeration. Use when investigating suspected privilege escalation or persistence via service principals, or building threat-hunting queries for Entra ID identity abuse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect anomalies in DNP3 communications used in SCADA/ICS systems by monitoring unauthorized control commands, firmware update attempts, protocol violations, and deviations from baseline traffic using deep packet inspection and machine learning approaches. Use when securing energy-sector or other OT/ICS networks, investigating suspicious DNP3 master/outstation activity, or building an anomaly-based IDS for industrial control traffic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects insider data exfiltration by analyzing DLP policy violations, file access patterns, upload volume anomalies, and off-hours activity in endpoint and cloud logs. Uses pandas for behavioral analytics and statistical baselines. Use when investigating insider threats or building user behavior analytics for data loss prevention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects defense evasion techniques used by adversaries in endpoint logs including log tampering, timestomping, process injection, and security tool disabling. Use when investigating suspicious endpoint behavior, building detection rules for evasion tactics, or conducting threat hunting for stealthy adversary activity. Activates for requests involving evasion detection, defense evasion analysis, log tampering detection, or MITRE ATT&CK TA0005.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Azure Blob and ADLS storage accounts for public access exposure, weak or long-lived SAS tokens, missing encryption at rest, disabled HTTPS-only traffic, and outdated TLS versions, using the azure-mgmt-storage Python SDK to generate a risk-scored report. Use when assessing an Azure subscription's storage accounts for misconfiguration, building cloud security posture checks, or investigating a suspected data exposure via public blob access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and test for OWASP API3:2023 Broken Object Property Level Authorization (BOPLA), covering excessive data exposure in API responses and mass assignment via injected request-body properties. Use when reviewing API responses/requests for over-exposed or over-writable object fields, or building detection rules and test cases for property-level authorization gaps that object-level checks miss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, run, and measure an adversary engagement operation using the MITRE Engage framework so that deployed deception is driven by strategy instead of deployed ad hoc. Covers the Engage Matrix (Prepare, Expose, Affect, Elicit, Understand), the 10-Step Operational Process, mapping engagement Activities to the ATT&CK techniques they expose, and defining measurable Goals and Operational Objectives. Use when a team has honeypots, honeytokens, or canary tokens but no coordinating strategy, when leadership asks "should we engage attackers and how", when building a deception/denial program, when writing an adversary engagement operation plan, or when deciding which deception Activities to deploy against a specific threat actor. Keywords: MITRE Engage, adversary engagement, cyber deception strategy, denial and deception, Engage Matrix, EAC, EGO, Expose Affect Elicit, deception program, honeypot strategy, engagement operation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploys a Software-Defined Perimeter per the CSA v2.0 specification, configuring Single Packet Authorization, mutual TLS, and SDP controller/gateway components to enforce zero trust network access. Use when building or hardening zero trust network architecture, implementing SPA-based "invisible" infrastructure that cloaks services from unauthenticated scanning, or meeting compliance requirements for zero trust network access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures Hardware Security Modules for cryptographic key storage using the PKCS#11 standard interface, covering key generation, signing, encryption, and key management on physical HSMs and SoftHSM2 for development. Use when protecting cryptographic keys so they never leave a hardened device boundary, or when building and testing PKCS#11-based key management workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Correlates security events in IBM QRadar SIEM using AQL (Ariel Query Language), custom rules, building blocks, and offense management to detect multi-stage attacks across network, endpoint, and application log sources. Use when SOC analysts need to investigate QRadar offenses, build correlation rules, or tune detection logic for reducing false positives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a targeted spearphishing simulation for initial access by developing OSINT-derived pretexts, building payloads (HTML smuggling, macro docs, ISO/LNK, OneNote, QR codes), standing up look-alike-domain email infrastructure with SPF/DKIM/DMARC via GoPhish, and tracking results. Use in authorized engagements to gain initial access via personalized phishing against specific individuals, distinct from broad campaigns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) to monitor endpoint file integrity, system calls, and configuration changes for security violations. Use when deploying OSSEC, Wazuh, or AIDE for endpoint monitoring, building file integrity monitoring (FIM) policies, or meeting compliance requirements for change detection. Activates for requests involving HIDS configuration, file integrity monitoring, OSSEC/Wazuh deployment, or host-based detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploys and configures osquery for real-time endpoint monitoring using SQL-based queries to inspect running processes, open ports, installed software, and system configuration. Use when building visibility into endpoint state, threat hunting across fleet, or implementing compliance monitoring. Activates for requests involving osquery deployment, endpoint visibility, fleet management, or SQL-based endpoint querying.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Correlates disparate security incidents, IOCs, and adversary behaviors across time and organizations to identify unified threat campaigns, attribute them to common threat actors, and extract shared indicators for improved detection. Use when multiple incidents exhibit overlapping indicators, when sector-wide attack campaigns require cross-organizational analysis, or when building campaign-level intelligence products. Activates for requests involving campaign analysis, incident clustering, cross-organizational IOC correlation, or MISP correlation engine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure SAML 2.0 identity federation between on-premises Active Directory (via AD FS or a third-party IdP) and Microsoft Entra ID, covering federation models (AD FS, password hash sync, pass-through auth, third-party IdP) and the SAML authentication flow. Use when extending on-premises authentication authority to cloud resources or designing hybrid identity SSO architecture for Entra ID.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a defensible cybersecurity risk assessment using the NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 methodology: prepare scope and a risk model, identify threat sources and threat events, identify vulnerabilities and predisposing conditions, determine likelihood and impact, compute risk, and communicate results as a prioritized risk register. Use when an organization needs an actual risk *assessment* (not a maturity score), when a control framework (CSF, ISO 27001, RMF, SOC 2, PCI) requires a documented risk analysis as input, when leadership asks "what are our top risks and how bad are they", when assessing risk for a new system or major change, or when building a risk register from scratch. This is the methodology that feeds framework selection, ATO packages, and treatment decisions. Keywords: risk assessment, NIST 800-30, threat modeling, likelihood and impact, risk register, risk analysis, threat sources, vulnerabilities, risk determination, qualitative risk, risk matrix, residual risk, risk treatment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a structured SOC escalation matrix defining severity tiers, response SLAs, tiered escalation paths, and notification procedures for security incidents, using context-driven criteria that combine business risk, asset criticality, and data sensitivity. Use when designing or revising how a SOC triages and escalates incidents across analyst tiers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。