「issue」の検索結果

Use when a Scenario user wants to report a bug or request a change, on the public tracker at github.com/scenario-labs/skills or by email to support@scenario.com: turning a failed generation, MCP tool error, or unclear skill into a reproducible report, collecting trace ids with diagnostics_run, stripping keys, signed asset URLs, and personal data, asking before sharing a team or project id, or building a prefilled issue URL. Keywords: file an issue, feature request, feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Browse journal issues, view table of contents, and download original TOC PDF from CNKI. Use when user wants to see papers in a specific journal issue or download the original cover/TOC pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kubernetes certificate management with cert-manager. Use when managing TLS certificates, configuring issuers, or troubleshooting certificate issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage technical SEO findings from Ahrefs Site Audit (and similar crawlers) by SEO impact, not just severity. Use this skill when reviewing crawl results, prioritizing technical fixes, scoping a technical SEO sprint, or after running any site-wide crawl. Triggers on site audit results, technical fix list, crawl errors, technical SEO triage, prioritize technical issues, what should we fix first, broken links, redirect chains. Also triggers when a long list of crawler issues is creating decision paralysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a comprehensive WCAG accessibility audit covering perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust principles. Use this skill whenever the user wants to audit accessibility, review WCAG compliance, fix accessibility issues, prepare for accessibility certification, address an accessibility lawsuit risk, or systematically improve a site's accessibility. Triggers on accessibility audit, WCAG audit, a11y audit, accessibility compliance, ADA compliance, screen reader test, keyboard navigation, accessibility report, fix accessibility, axe scan. Also triggers when accessibility issues have been reported and need systematic remediation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help the user turn their Retentioneering ideas, friction reports, bug findings, or feature needs into high-quality upstream contributions: from capturing and validating the idea, through minimal reproductions and issue drafts, to preparing, testing, and submitting a pull request that follows this repository's conventions. Use when the user says they found a bug, wants a feature, wrote a workaround worth upstreaming, or asks how to contribute, open an issue, or make a PR to retentioneering-tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage and categorize new GitHub issues on watched repos

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose performance issues on Amazon SageMaker HyperPod clusters — uneven NCCL bandwidth across nodes and poor filesystem throughput. Read-only. Surfaces host-side signals (Xid, ECC, NVLink, EFA reachability, FSx saturation) and routes to the appropriate sibling skill (hyperpod-node-debugger, hyperpod-nccl, hyperpod-version-checker, hyperpod-issue-report) for any remediation. Triggers on uneven NCCL across nodes, straggler node, FSx slow, checkpoint slow, dataloader slow, filesystem bottleneck, FSx throughput, cross-AZ latency, topology mismatch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when seeing WebSocket errors like "Invalid frame header", "RSV1 must be clear", or "WS_ERR_UNEXPECTED_RSV_1" - covers multiple WebSocketServer conflicts, compression issues, and raw frame debugging techniques

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) system and wants to evaluate its quality — separating retrieval issues from generation issues. Also use when the user mentions RAG evaluation, faithfulness checking, hallucination detection in RAG, retrieval quality, chunking optimization, or "is my RAG pipeline working." Outputs a diagnostic matrix that pinpoints whether problems are in retrieval or generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Arbitrator research tool for investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS). The tool can summarize arbitrators' experience, with deliverables grounded in primary documents; it can also help find arbitrators based on the issues faced in a particular case. Use when the user asks about an arbitrator ("tell me about arbitrator X", "X, Y and Z"), wants help choosing or shortlisting arbitrators for a case, or asks about appointments, dissents, issue track records (e.g. FET, expropriation), challenge risk, double-hatting, or tribunal composition. Profiles are grounded in the UNCTAD ISDS Navigator dataset plus targeted live lookups (ICSID); deep verification retrieves the actual decisions. Sibling of isds-research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end external local counsel lifecycle management for multi-jurisdiction legal matters. LC selection criteria and capability assessment, engagement setup and instruction design, performance monitoring and check-in cadence, scope enforcement, and relationship escalation. Use when selecting local counsel for a jurisdiction, designing LC instructions, managing the LC check-in rhythm, enforcing scope boundaries when LC signals overreach, or escalating a performance or relationship issue beyond the matter team. Trigger on: 'which LC should we use', 'LC instruction', 'brief the local counsel', 'LC hasn't responded', 'LC is going off scope', 'LC scope dispute', 'confirm scope with LC', 'LC check-in', 'LC is slow', 'monitor the LC network', 'LC engagement letter', 'LC selection', 'what should we tell the local counsel', 'LC onboarding', 'LC performance issue', 'LC relationship problem'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure any rough build, research, or legal-drafting request into an IRAC-shaped prompt — Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion — optimized for a frontier model. It's the bar-exam framework, repurposed as prompt engineering. The skill leads with the issue and ends with the conclusion (where models weight attention most), forces you to name your constraints and non-goals, and specifies what "good" looks like before a single token is generated. Use it before any non-trivial build, or whenever a vague ask deserves a precise brief.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarially stress-tests a legal text — a contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — for interpretive ambiguity: it finds the seams where the people governed by it will later disagree about what it means and turns each into a concrete dispute scenario with both sides' arguments, the likely outcome, and a fix. Use it whenever someone wants to pressure-test, red-team, audit, or find weak spots, loopholes, gaps, ambiguities, or drafting problems in a legal document; whenever a drafter wants to tighten a contract, statute, regulation, or opinion before it issues; whenever a litigator wants to mine an opinion or contract for arguments; or whenever someone hands over a legal text and asks where it will be fought over or for issue-spotting. Trigger it for contract review, statutory-ambiguity analysis, judicial-opinion scope analysis, and drafting QA — even if the user never says "stress-test" or "ambiguity."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a client instruction schedule — a plain-English, Scott Schedule-style Word table that gathers a struggling client's evidence and instructions issue by issue, with a one-page covering note. Use whenever the user asks for a "client instruction schedule", "instruction schedule", "client questionnaire", "schedule of questions for the client", "get instructions from the client on the papers", or says the client is overwhelmed and needs the case broken into manageable questions. Also trigger when asked to turn case papers into a structured request for client input. Do NOT use for court-facing Scott Schedules, pleadings, witness statements, or advice letters — this skill produces a client-facing working document only. Output is always a .docx draft for solicitor review, never a final document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Issue reporting is disabled during limited maintenance of comfyui-mcp and the local Agent Panel. When the user hits a defect, explain that no report will be filed and continue helping with the task. Do not call report_issue to file, draft a report, collect reporting information, or submit through another tool. Triggers on "report this", "fix this bug", or errors in our software.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive GitHub project management with swarm-coordinated issue tracking, project board automation, and sprint planning

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," or "SEO health check." For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema-markup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A robust and outlier-aware method for testing differential tissue composition from single-cell data. This model can infer changes in tissue composition and heterogeneity, and can produce realistic data simulations based on any existing dataset. This model can also transfer knowledge from a large set of integrated datasets to increase accuracy further.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

把模糊诉求收敛成另一个 AI 能自主执行且可验收的 goal contract（scope / non-goals / success criteria / verification / stop conditions）。本 skill 只写目标契约，**绝不替用户执行任务**。触发硬条件：这份 goal 是要交给别人跑的——subagent、Codex、另一个 AI 会话或另一个人。用于写 goal、优化 goal、改 handoff prompt，或把"今天做完、尽量优化、帮我研究并执行"这类请求变成执行方不会乱猜、不会越界的任务契约。不适用于：自己团队的需求管理和版本拆解（用 issue-pool——它产出的是给人开工的 task，不是给 AI 的契约）、整页界面方案（用 page-solution-design）、PRD/验收标准/测试用例文档（用 prd-test-writer）、框架计划和版本路线（用 issue-pool）、以及用户其实是想让你**直接把这件事做了**的情况——那就直接做，不要走本 skill 把活变成一份文档。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

已有功能的需求变更闭环（门禁式七步）。触发硬条件：要改的功能已经实现并跑起来了。当用户说"改需求""需求变更""调整交互""改功能""重构流程"，或改动容易散到多个文件、碰到鉴权/存储/配置/权限、需要可靠验证 + 回滚方案时使用。流程：锁 scope 写 change brief → 从代码确认当前行为（不靠记忆和假设）→ 影响面与风险评估 + 回滚计划 → 提出新设计等用户批准（**未获批准绝不动代码**）→ 小而局部的 diff → 跑固定回归清单 → 更新文档和决策日志。产出：change brief + 代码 diff + 回归记录 + decision log。不适用于：全新功能从零做（走 issue-pool → page-solution-design（有界面时）→ backend-logic-design（有规则需讨论时）→ prd-test-writer）、只改视觉样式不动任何逻辑（按已有界面直接调整）、新想法还没定要不要做（先用 issue-pool 入池）、写 PRD/测试用例（用 prd-test-writer）、提交推送发版（用 git-push）。注意：本 skill 的七步流程通用于任何项目，但 scripts/impact_scan.sh 与 references/chrome-extension-regression-example.md 是 Chrome 扩展示例；通用回归使用 references/regression-checklist.md，按项目实际选择检查。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fleet skill observability with two views - health audits per-skill metrics and files/resolves issues in memory/issues/; analytics ranks the fleet by 7d runs, success rates, and anomaly flags.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Watch your GitHub repos across four views - a combined urgency monitor (stale PRs, new issues, releases), a new-issue triage queue, a release upgrade digest, or your own opened-PR tracker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handle SLEAP GitHub support workflow for issues and discussions. Use when the user says "support", provides a GitHub issue/discussion number like "#2512", or asks to investigate a user report from talmolab/sleap. Scaffolds investigation folders, downloads posts with images, analyzes problems, and drafts friendly responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。