3,388 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Apply product-grounded visual quality constraints during user-visible UI changes. Use for layout, styling, content hierarchy, theming, responsive behavior, or interaction affordances. Stay inactive for logic-only changes that preserve the rendered interface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews code for quality and security issues. Combines code quality review with security vulnerability detection. Use when reviewing code after generation in Construction Phase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews pull requests for overall quality before merging. Combines code quality and security checks at PR level. Use when performing pre-merge review in Operations Phase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks "which SAT should I use for X?", wants the index of Structured Analytic Techniques, or is choosing between quality-of-information-check, ACH, key-assumptions-check, devils-advocacy, indicators of change, etc. Quality of Information Check is the default first step of any diagnostic run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when evidence needs grading before anyone reasons from it — the user asks "how reliable is this?", "grade this source", "check this report", "can I trust this article?", "is this corroborated?", or hands over a URL, a pasted report or a Liberty91 event ahead of an ACH or assessment. The Quality of Information Check from the CIA Tradecraft Primer, adapted for vendor and press CTI reporting. Resolves each document to its originating source, splits it into claims, and grades every claim on two written elements, access level (how the source knows) and claim support (what backs the statement), with a stated rationale, using a fixed rubric with hard caps. The grade is not an Admiralty rating. Five outlets citing one vendor report count as one source; anything that cannot be traced to a primary is capped, not guessed. Returns a graded claim table, gaps, a deception screen and JSON. /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments run it first by default.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive code review checklist and methodology. Use when reviewing PRs, conducting code audits, or assessing code quality. Keywords: review, PR, code review, audit, assess, quality, check
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review Playwright tests for quality. Use when user says "review tests", "check test quality", "audit tests", "improve tests", "test code review", or "playwright best practices check".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate draw.io editable diagrams (.drawio, .drawio.svg) from text, images, or Excel. Orchestrates 3-agent workflow (Analysis → Manifest → SVG generation) with quality gates. Use when creating architecture diagrams, flowcharts, sequence diagrams, or converting existing images to editable format. Supports Azure/AWS cloud icons. Triggers on draw.io, drawio, ダイアグラム, アーキ図, フローチャート, シーケンス図.
Create or review a reusable skill (SKILL.md) that packages a workflow, and decide whether the request should be a skill instead of a prompt, instruction, agent, or hook. Use when creating a new skill, extracting a workflow from a conversation, updating an existing skill, reviewing SKILL.md quality, or fixing weak skill triggering. Triggers on "create skill", "/create-skill", "new skill", "review skill", "fix skill trigger", "SKILL.md", "スキル作成".
Prose quality checker for Quarto (.qmd) files, grounded in William Zinsser's *On Writing Well* (30th Anniversary Edition). Checks for clutter, weak verbs, hollow qualifiers, clichés, inflated academic voice, poor leads and endings, pronoun and tense inconsistency, and unclear explanation. Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to improve prose quality, tighten writing, reduce clutter, or apply Zinsser's writing principles to a draft. For grammar and punctuation, use the proofread skill. For APSA style rules, use the apsa-style skill. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Conduct a systematic literature review following the PRISMA framework with explicit search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality assessment, and transparent synthesis. Use this skill when the user needs to design a reproducible literature search, apply PRISMA flow documentation, develop inclusion and exclusion criteria, assess study quality, or when they ask 'how do I do a systematic review', 'what is PRISMA', or 'how do I make my literature review reproducible'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Profile and explore a dataset to understand its shape, quality, and patterns. Use when encountering a new table or file, checking null rates and column distributions, spotting data quality issues like duplicates or suspicious values, or deciding which dimensions and metrics to analyze.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform comprehensive exploratory data analysis on scientific data files across 200+ file formats. This skill should be used when analyzing any scientific data file to understand its structure, content, quality, and characteristics. Automatically detects file type and generates detailed markdown reports with format-specific analysis, quality metrics, and downstream analysis recommendations. Covers chemistry, bioinformatics, microscopy, spectroscopy, proteomics, metabolomics, and general scientific data formats.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design lightweight CI quality gates—lint, test tiers, security scans, and merge policies. Use when setting up or improving pipelines without tying to one stack only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate Rust code quality with rustfmt, clippy, cargo check, and security analysis. Use for Rust codebases to ensure idiomatic Rust code and best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claude-native review of code for quality, structure, naming, and maintainability (no external AI). Use when reviewing a file or diff for code quality before committing. Trigger on "review this code", "code review", "is this well-written". For security, use /security-verify; for companion-AI review, use /review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects code quality vulnerabilities in mobile apps (Android/iOS). Trigger on: SQL injection in SQLite, JavaScript injection in WebViews, intent injection, unsafe deserialization, NSKeyedUnarchiver, NSCoding, Java serialization, Parcelable, buffer overflow, JNI native code, PIE disabled, NX disabled, stack canary absent, RELRO, ARC disabled, third-party library CVE, vulnerable dependency, outdated SDK, targetSdkVersion, update enforcement missing, implicit Intent, URL loading in WebView, object persistence, memory corruption, OWASP dependency check. Covers MASVS-CODE-1/2/3/4.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
5-level verification pyramid: static→unit→Playwright E2E (homepage-first, 6bp)→AI visual→post-deploy. 8-check quality gate. Multi-agent testing (functional/security/a11y/performance). Playwright v1.56+ AI agents (Planner/Generator/Healer, v1.63 current). WCAG 2.2 AA via axe-core v4.13. Percy+Chromatic visual regression. ADA Title II 2027/2028 deadlines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Intelligently upscale and enhance videos to cinematic quality using a multi-model backend (Topaz, SeedVR2).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Top-level orchestrator for the Gaia Skill Tree evidence verification pipeline. Run this when you want to do a full evidence pass — collecting raw sources, verifying live GitHub star counts, running Phase 2B benchmark-source verification, adversarially auditing for quality/formatting issues, and checking that every URL is reachable — all in one coordinated sequence. Trigger phrases: "run the evidence pipeline", "full evidence pass", "verify evidence", "evidence verification pipeline", "run ev-pipeline", "check all evidence", "audit the data lake", "evidence quality sweep", "refresh evidence", "validate evidence sources". Also aliased as /evidence-verification-pipeline. Use the individual sub-skills (ev-collection, ev-star-verification, ev-adversarial-audit, ev-link-validation) only when you need to re-run one phase in isolation; for end-to-end work, always start here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run this skill for Phase 3 of the evidence verification pipeline — the adversarial audit step. Use when you need to check the evidence data lake for bad data before ingestion: dead links, wrong URL formats (tree/ vs blob/), subjective wording ("elite", "high-quality"), stale migration notes, benchmark catalog misuse/vendor-claim leakage, or skills whose star evidence conflicts with classified evidence level. Triggers on phrases like: "audit the data lake", "adversarial check", "ev-adversarial-audit", "check for noise in evidence", "flag bad evidence", "run the audit phase", "quality check the by-type files", or any reference to Phase 3 of the pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit essays, reports, literature reviews, dissertations, proposals, and source-backed assignments for high-score academic quality. Use when the user asks whether a paper can get a high grade, wants teacher/rubric feedback addressed, needs a pre-submission review, or needs checks for strict rubric compliance, academic standards, prompt/rubric alignment, argument quality, comparative analysis, evidence hierarchy, table/figure integration, citation specificity, conclusion strength, academic language, source-claim integrity, or evidence boundaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent management workflow — task delegation, progress monitoring, quality verification with regression testing, feedback delivery, and cross-review orchestration. Use this skill when coordinating multiple agents on a shared task, monitoring delegated work, ensuring quality across agent outputs, or implementing a multi-phase plan (3+ phases or 10+ file changes).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simplifies and refines code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. Focuses on recently modified code unless instructed otherwise. This skill should be used when code-quality checks pass but the code would benefit from structural cleanup — deduplication, branching simplification, naming improvements, or dead-code removal. Invoked as a subagent from /code-quality or directly via the Task tool.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。