4,652 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use Lodestone (lodestone.studiocorsair.com) as one MCP connector for Meta Ads, Instagram insights, Google Analytics 4, email, Telegram, Typefully, and image/video generation. Trigger phrases: lodestone, meta ads, ad campaign insights, instagram insights, ga4 report, google analytics report, send email, telegram message, typefully post, generate image, generate video.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use only after explicit Codex `$superloopy:superloopy-research` or Claude Code `/superloopy:superloopy-research` invocation, a research task started with a leading `loopy` or `루피` (such as `loopy research`), or an active Superloopy loop explicitly routing a research deliverable here. Evidence-backed Superloopy research orchestration with automatic advisory usage targets, parallel read-only lanes, per-retrieval verdicts, graded and dated sources, empirical verification, a priced claim ledger, cited synthesis, and optional reports. Do not activate from research, investigate, look-up, summarize, deep-dive, report, or similar vocabulary alone, in any language; ordinary questions, debugging, and implementation context-gathering stay with their primary workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run automatic SPICE simulations on subcircuits detected from KiCad schematic analysis — validates filter frequencies, divider ratios, opamp gains, LC resonance, and crystal load capacitance. Supports ngspice, LTspice, and Xyce (auto-detected). Generates testbenches, runs batch mode, produces structured pass/warn/fail report. Use when the user asks to simulate, verify, or validate any analog subcircuit — RC filters, LC filters, voltage dividers, opamp circuits, crystal oscillators. Also for "simulate my circuit", "run spice", "verify with simulation", "check my filter cutoff", "does this divider give the right voltage", "what's the bandwidth of this opamp stage". Consider suggesting simulation during design reviews when the schematic analyzer reports simulatable subcircuits and a SPICE simulator is available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The pre-merge review of a branch in a project that records its specs, decisions, and rules in .archcore/. Run this first for 'review my branch', 'review the changes before merge', or 'review before merge': it checks the changed code against the project's recorded canon and the changed documents against the code, and reports which side is wrong — spec-wrong or code-wrong; with no diff, it reports project health. A bug-hunting code review complements this review and does not replace it. Also use for 'show status', 'documentation gaps', 'check if docs match code', 'close out the feature', 'ship the feature and close it out', or after a staleness warning. Modes, named as the first word: drift for staleness detection, deep for a full documentation audit, closeout to close a finished feature, experience to capture a repeated pattern. Not for creating docs — use /archcore:document; not for planning — use /archcore:plan; not for a single-file edit with no branch review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ALWAYS invoke this skill when the user asks where the project as a whole stands - "where are we", "what's the big picture", "what have we built", "what is in this project", "map the project", "what does this thing even do", "what is stale", "what can we delete", "update the roadmap" - in any language, and whenever a session report has just been written. It keeps one file, BIG-PICTURE.md: what the product is, every feature with how far it got, which parts nobody has touched, and what is queued next. Age and wiring are measured from git; how far a feature got comes from the reports or says "not checked". Where a tracker is connected it offers to open the queue as tickets, after a yes and never before. Never invents work, never deletes code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running and reporting the statistical analysis for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — measurement validity, common-method bias, the right estimator (HLM, SEM, panel, experiments), endogeneity, and robustness. Executes and reports the analysis; it does not design the study (amj-methods) or frame the contribution (amj-contribution-framing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages Power BI semantic models, including tables, columns, measures, relationships, field parameters, DAX, Import, DirectQuery and Direct Lake designs, sources, connections, permissions, refresh, and deployment. Load this skill before acting on a semantic model, unless it is part of publishing a PBIP project, which powerbi-report-cli owns. For natural-language data questions use fabriciq; for visuals use powerbi-report-cli.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Collect and assess quality metrics for Simulink models using the metric.Engine API. Use when evaluating model design quality (maintainability, complexity, architecture) or testing completeness (unit testing, SIL, PIL, coverage, pass rates) after edits or test runs. Covers metric discovery, collection, report generation, and diagnostics. Triggers on: "collect metrics", "quality metrics", "metric.Engine", "testing metrics", "maintainability metrics", "SIL metrics", "PIL metrics", "what metrics are available", "assess quality", "coverage metrics", "generate metric report", "diagnose metric errors".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares statistical reports for clinical trials following CONSORT 2025, SPIRIT 2025, ICH E9(R1) estimands, and FDA 2023 covariate adjustment guidance. Covers Table 1 generation, analysis populations (ITT/FAS/PP/Safety), the 5 ICH E9(R1) intercurrent-event strategies, MMRM under MAR (mmrm), reference-based MI (rbmi J2R/CR/CIR), Permutt tipping-point sensitivity, and Rubin's-rules vs frequentist variance debate. Use when preparing regulatory submissions, defining estimands, or implementing missing-data sensitivity analyses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Computes and interprets treatment effect measures (OR, RR, RD, HR, NNT) with calibrated confidence intervals (Wilson, Newcombe, Miettinen-Nurminen, MOVER, profile likelihood, Bender NNT) and reports marginal vs conditional estimands per FDA 2023 covariate adjustment guidance. Use when reporting treatment effects in confirmatory trials, comparing effect sizes across studies, or constructing forest plots.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user needs multi-source research with citation tracking, evidence persistence, and structured report generation. Triggers on "deep research", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "compare X vs Y", "analyze trends", or "state of the art". Not for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidelines for writing well-structured, cited research reports
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Financial tracking, revenue analytics, expense management, and pricing optimization. Integrates with Stripe for revenue data, tracks unit economics, and generates financial reports. Use when the user needs revenue tracking, financial reports, pricing optimization, expense management, or says 'revenue', 'MRR', 'ARR', 'finances', 'pricing', 'expenses', 'profit', 'ROAS', or 'unit economics'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compile a weekly productivity report using Agent Monitor data — daily_sessions and daily_events trends, per-session costs from pricing engine, token volumes (input/output/cache_read/cache_write + baselines), tool usage top 20, session completion rates by status, and workflow intelligence metrics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a scoped CCAM cost and token report by model, provider, source, and session. Use for spend reviews, model-mix analysis, unpriced usage detection, or export-friendly cost summaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a CCAM reliability report from session outcomes, hook events, alerts, tool failures, and data freshness. Use for health reviews, incident follow-up, hook-delivery audits, or reliability trend summaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Report concurrency and parallelism for a session — how many agents ran in parallel, concurrency-lane utilization, peak parallel width, and serialization bottlenecks (sequential chains that could have run as parallel lanes) — using the Agent Monitor workflow intelligence API. Use when checking whether a multi-agent session used parallelism efficiently.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a detailed report on APIError events from Agent Monitor data — counts over time, which sessions and models are affected, and the likely root cause (rate limits, overload/529, or context-window pressure) inferred from each event's summary and data payload. Use when API errors spike or when you need to explain why requests are failing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define and check simple service-level objectives for Claude Code from Agent Monitor data — session completion rate, tool success rate (PostToolUse/PreToolUse), and error rate (APIError/total) — then compare each to its target and report the error budget remaining. Use when reporting reliability or when someone asks "are we meeting our SLOs?".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a comprehensive session report with per-model token usage (input, output, cache_read, cache_write including compaction baselines), cost breakdown via the pricing engine, tool invocations, agent hierarchy, compaction events, API errors, turn durations, and thinking block counts. Use when reviewing a specific session or summarizing activity over a date range.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Summarize modeling experiment evidence, compare the approved main method with a usable baseline, surface fallback triggers, and produce a decision-point or final report without creating routine per-round prose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Organize a Power BI or Analysis Services semantic model end to end so it is ready for report authors, Excel users and Copilot - table groups, display folders, Title Case business names and naming conventions, hierarchies, sort-by columns, hiding, Analyze in Excel (IsAvailableInMDX), descriptions, format strings, data categories, context annotations, DAX formatting and UDFs, calculated-object justification, duplicate removal, perspectives, translations and security roles. Use whenever the user asks to "organize", "tidy", "clean up", "polish", "prepare", "standardize" or "make report-ready" a model or one table in it (for example "organize the date table"), to "fix naming conventions", "rename fields", "make names human readable" or "fix abbreviations", even when they name only one of these aspects, and whenever a model is driven through the Tabular Editor 3 MCP or the te CLI for that purpose. Not for DAX performance tuning (dax skill) or model design and star-schema changes (semantic-model skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, enforce, audit, and validate Power BI report themes through the pbir CLI. Invoke when a report uses a default or minimal theme, visuals have inconsistent formatting or many local overrides, or the user asks to create, copy, apply, standardize, rebrand, audit, or validate a theme; change theme colors or typography; define style presets; promote visual formatting into the theme; clear overrides; or improve theme compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Format reference for Power BI Enhanced Report (PBIR) JSON schemas and patterns. Automatically invoke when the user asks about PBIR JSON structure, visual.json properties, PBIR expressions, objects vs visualContainerObjects, theme inheritance, conditional formatting patterns, extension measures, bookmarks, field references, filter formatting, query roles, PBIR page structure, report wallpaper, or any PBIR metadata format question.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。