本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

result-report-generator

Summarize modeling experiment evidence, compare the approved main method with a usable baseline, surface fallback triggers, and produce a decision-point or final report without creating routine per-round prose.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md2.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Purpose

Turn saved experiment artifacts into compact evidence. Do not treat ordinary successful runs as requiring a long report, and do not choose the winning method.

Inputs

  • run_summary.json
  • method card and probe summary
  • decision ledger
  • saved tables, metrics, and figures
  • session rigor_profile

Stop if the run summary claims outputs that do not exist or if main and baseline are not comparable.

Modes

Ordinary lean round

  • Validate the run summary and referenced artifacts.
  • Return a compact evidence digest in the conversation.
  • Do not save a Markdown report unless:
    • a fallback trigger fired;
    • a material anomaly or contradiction exists;
    • the human must make a proceed/adjust/fallback decision.

Decision-point round

Save:

results/Qx/experiments/roundN/qx_decision_report.md

Include only:

  • main vs baseline metrics;
  • output-degeneracy/concentration evidence;
  • assumption or feasibility warnings;
  • robustness evidence already available;
  • fallback trigger state;
  • unresolved trade-offs.

Then invoke decision-prompt-builder. After the human answers, route the answer to modeler-decision-logger.

Final/submission mode

Save:

results/Qx/reports/qx_final_result_analysis.md

Include:

  • final main/baseline comparison;
  • uncertainty and error;
  • concentration/degeneracy interpretation;
  • robustness links;
  • limitations and applicable scope;
  • exact source paths for numerical claims.

Rejection and Fallback

  • Archive a method only after a human result_verdict or fallback_activation decision.
  • Move rejected code and outputs to workspace/archived/<Qx>/<method>_REJECTED_roundN/.
  • Add one compact history line to qx_method_card.md; do not create a separate iteration log.
  • Do not archive from an AI suggestion alone.

Rules

  • Do not fabricate metrics, comparisons, or interpretations.
  • Separate facts from human verdicts.
  • Do not create result-report-generator_modeler_decision.md.
  • Do not repeat the full run summary; cite it and extract only decision-relevant evidence.
  • Do not call a diagnostic reference a usable baseline.
  • Do not generate paper prose.

Verification

  • Every reported number resolves to a saved artifact.
  • Main/baseline comparison uses the same split, unit, and metric definition.
  • Output concentration and fallback trigger are addressed.
  • Reports are generated only at decision points or final mode.
  • Human verdicts are read from or appended to the canonical JSONL ledger.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Detect whether approved modeling code is Python or MATLAB/Beita Tianyuan and route it to the matching reviewer using the compact named-check review contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0562026年9月24日 更新

Audit whether the semantic evidence required by the active lean or submission profile exists and is current, without requiring one verbose artifact per skill or an arbitrary number of pass bullets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0562026年9月24日 更新

Run scoped or final cross-media consistency checks for mathematical-modeling artifacts, comparing canonical numbers, symbols, parameters, decisions, files, and paper claims without performing full-workspace audits for low-risk changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0562026年9月24日 更新

Map contest attachments to subquestions, audit and clean raw data, and emit one reusable data profile with quality, coverage, imbalance, concentration, and method-readiness evidence for downstream risk screening.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0562026年9月24日 更新

Build one compact choice card at a genuine mathematical-modeling judgment point. Use before method screening, after a meaningful experiment, or before final claim/freeze approval so the human chooses the trade-off while AI handles mechanical consequences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0562026年9月24日 更新

Plan the smallest set of diagnostic, comparison, paper, and appendix figures or tables needed to support verified mathematical-modeling decisions and claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0562026年9月24日 更新

zhnnky329 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する